Have a personal or library account? Click to login
From CSR to ESG – The New Era in Corporate Responsibility Cover
Open Access
|Dec 2025

References

  1. Alqudah, M. Z., Sierra-García, L., & Garcia-Benau, M. A., 2025. ESG and emerging technologies: A cluster-based literature review analysis. Sustainable Futures, 10, 101285.
  2. Bloomberg Intelligence., 2024. European ESG data trends survey 2024. Bloomberg L.P. https://www.bloomberg.com/professional/
  3. Can, O., & Turker, D., 2025. Institutional pressures and greenwashing in social responsibility: Reversing the link with hybridization capability. Management Decision, 63(1), 187–216.
  4. Clément, A., Robinot, É., & Trespeuch, L., 2025. The use of ESG scores in academic literature: A systematic literature review. Journal of Enterprising Communities, 19(1), 92–110. DOI: 10.1108/jec-10-2022-0147/full/html
  5. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) versus environmental social governance (ESG)., 2022. Management for Professionals, F361, 117–141.
  6. Corporate social responsibility: The centerpiece of competing and complementary frameworks., 2015. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-24325-005
  7. Dahlsrud, A., 2008. How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13.
  8. Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T., 2021. Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889.
  9. Global ESG assets predicted to hit $40 trillion by 2030, despite challenging environment, forecasts Bloomberg Intelligence., 2024).
  10. Isac, N., Javed, A., Radulescu, M., Cismasu, I. D. L., Yousaf, Z., & Serbu, R. S., 2025. Is greenwashing impacting on green brand trust and purchase intentions? Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27(9), 21329–21346. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-04352-0
  11. Jansen, L., Cunningham, P., Diehl, S., & Terlutter, R., 2024. Corporate social responsibility in controversial industries: A literature review and research agenda. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(5), 4398–4427.
  12. Karwowski, M., & Raulinajtys-Grzybek, M., 2021. The application of corporate social responsibility (CSR) actions for mitigation of environmental, social, corporate governance (ESG) and reputational risk in integrated reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), 1270–1284.
  13. KPMG International., 2024. Global ESG due diligence study 2024. https://home.kpmg/
  14. Kvasničková Stanislavská, L., Pilař, L., Vogli, X., Hlavsa, T., Kuralová, K., Feenstra, A., Pilařová, L., Hartman, R., & Rosak-Szyrocka, J., 2023. Global analysis of Twitter communication in corporate social responsibility area. PeerJ Computer Science, 9, e1390.
  15. Kuzior, A., Lobanova, A., & Bondar, O. 2025. Sustainable consumption and production systems during wartime: Needs, challenges, and adaptation strategies. Production Engineering Archives, 31(2), 212–221. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2025.31.21
  16. Li, T.-T., Wang, K., Sueyoshi, T., & Wang, D. D., 2021. ESG: Research progress and future prospects. Sustainability, 13(21), 11663. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11663
  17. Norberg, P., 2020. CSR politics of non-recognition: Justification fallacies marginalising criticism, society, and environment. Business Ethics: A European Review, 29(4), 694–705.
  18. Nugroho, D. P. D., Hsu, Y., Hartauer, C., & Hartauer, A., 2024. Investigating the interconnection between ESG and CSR strategies: An examination of the influence on consumer behavior. Sustainability, 16(2), 614. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/614
  19. OECD., 2023. Corporate responsibility outlook 2023: Strengthening business integrity and sustainability. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org
  20. Ongan, S., Gocer, I., & Işık, C., 2025. Introducing the new ESG-based sustainability uncertainty index (ESGUI. Sustainable Development, 33(3), 4457–4467.
  21. Pollach, I., Thomsen, C., & Nielsen, A. E., 2024. In search of change: Organizational role expectancies of CSR professionals. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 33(2), 201–216.
  22. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R., 2019. Creating shared value. In Managing Sustainable Business (pp. 323–346). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-024-1144-7_16
  23. Prencipe, A., 2025. Accountability between compliance and legitimacy: Rethinking governance for corporate sustainability. Sustainability, 17(20), 9305. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9305
  24. PwC., 2024. Purpose-driven business: How companies are creating long-term value through ESG integration. PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited. https://www.pwc.com
  25. Rosak-Szyrocka, J., Żywiołek, J., Shengelia, N., Stverkova, H., Santo, P. E., & Pilař, L., 2022. Employee perception of CSR and its effects on the company’s image. Production Engineering Archives, 28(3), 210–216.
  26. Saivinod, M. S., & Sivakumar, N., 2025. The relationship between ESG and CSR – achieving synergy through the golden triangle framework. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ijoa-10-2024-4935/full/html
  27. Santos, A. C. d., Ravedutti, M. M., Marinello, R. M., Moraes, G. F., Moraes, R. N., & Denes-Santos, D., 2025. Is ESG the new corporate social responsibility? Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 19(3), e011255.
  28. Sarpong, S., 2021. Why have we forgotten ‘government social responsibility’? In Current Global Practices of CSR (pp. 803–820). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-68386-3_37
  29. Sitinjak, C., & Ober, J., 2025. Examining the impact of service quality and product innovation on willingness to buy electric vehicles: The mediating role of customer satisfaction. Production Engineering Archives, 31(2), 163–172. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2025.31.16
  30. Sheta, M., Osman, M. N., & Elamer, A. A., 2025. Sustainability champions: The transformative role of internal auditors in ESG assurance – A systematic review and future directions. Journal of Accounting Literature, 1–41.
  31. Smith, D. C., 2025. The intellectual history of Milton Friedman’s criticism of corporate social responsibility. Modern Intellectual History, 22, 184–210.
  32. Subhani, B. H., Zunhuan, S., & Khan, M. A., 2025. Finance for a greener future: Evolving the financial sector for ESG and sustainable corporate debt management. Borsa Istanbul Review, 25(2), 337–349.
  33. Tripathy, U., Verma, M., & Misra, A. K., 2025. ESG performance and corporate metrics: Mapping research trends and setting future research agenda. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/gkmc-03-2024-0143/full/html
  34. Usman, M., Ali, A., Rosak-Szyrocka, J., Pilař, L., Baig, S. A., Akram, R., & Wudil, A. H., 2023. Climate change and livestock herders’ wellbeing in Pakistan. Heliyon, 9(6), e16983.
  35. Wieland, J., 2017. Shared value – Theoretical implications, practical challenges. In Creating Shared Value – Concepts, Experience, Criticism (Vol. 52, pp. 9–26). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-48802-8_2
  36. Xue, Y., Zhang, C., Mentel, G., Mohammed, K. S., Rosak-Szyrocka, J., & Zhao, X., 2025. Impact of ESG rating divergence on corporate resilience: Insights from China’s A-share market. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–26. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-025-06799-9
  37. Yang, Z., & Zha, X., 2025. How environmental regulation and media pressure influence greenwashing behaviors in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Sustainability, 17(11), 5066. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5066
  38. Zervoudi, E. K., Moschos, N., & Christopoulos, A. G., 2025. From CSR and ESG criteria to the greenwashing phenomenon. Sustainability, 17(5), 2222. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2222
Language: English
Page range: 234 - 246
Submitted on: Nov 5, 2025
|
Accepted on: Dec 4, 2025
|
Published on: Dec 31, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Joanna Rosak-Szyrocka, published by Quality and Production Managers Association
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.