Have a personal or library account? Click to login

The Sustainable Impact of the Use of Science Based Targets in Organisations

Open Access
|Dec 2023

References

  1. Bendig, D., Wagner, A., Lau, K. (2022). Does it pay to be science-based green? The impact of science-based emission-reduction targets on corporate financial performance. Journal Of Industrial Ecology, DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13341
  2. Bjorn, A., Lloyd, S., Matthews, D. (2021). From the Paris Agreement to corporate climate commitments: evaluation of seven methods for setting `science-based’ emission targets. Environmental Research Letters, 16(5), DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abe57b
  3. Bjorn, A., Tilsted, J. P., Addas, A., Lloyd, S. M. (2022). Can Science-Based Targets Make the Private Sector Paris-Aligned? A Review of the Emerging Evidence. Current Climate Change Reports, 8(2), 53–69, DOI: 10.1007/s40641-022-00182-w
  4. de Silva, G. C., Regan, E. C., Pollard, E. H. B., Addison, P. F. E. (2019). The evolution of corporate no net loss and net positive impact biodiversity commitments: Understanding appetite and addressing challenges. Business Strategy And The Environment, 28(7), 1481–1495, DOI: 10.1002/bse.2379
  5. Faria, P. C. S., Labutong, N. (2020). A description of four science-based corporate GHG target-setting methods. Sustainability Accounting Management And Policy Journal, 11(3, SI), 591–612, DOI:, 10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2017-0031
  6. Giesekam, J., Norman, J., Garvey, A., Betts-Davies, S. (2021). Science-Based Targets: On Target? SUSTAINABILITY, 13(4), DOI: 10.3390/su13041657
  7. Giesekam, J., Tingley, D. D., Cotton, I. (2018). Aligning carbon targets for construction with (inter)national climate change mitigation commitments. Energy And Buildings, 165, 106–117, DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.01.023
  8. Kuo, L., Chang, B.-G. (2021). Ambitious corporate climate action: Impacts of sciencebased target and internal carbon pricing on carbon management reputation-Evidence from Japan. Sustainable Production And Consumption, 27, 1830–1840, DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.025
  9. Reavis, M., Ahlen, J., Rudek, J., Naithani, K. (2022). Evaluating Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Mitigation Goals of the Global Food and Beverage Sector. Frontiers In Sustainable Food Systems, 5, DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.789499
  10. Sá, J. C., Carvalho, A., Fonseca, L., Santos, G., Dinis-Carvalho, J. (2023). Science Based Targets and the factors contributing to the sustainable development of an organisation from a Literature review to a conceptual model. Production Engineering Archives, 29(3), 241–253, DOI: 10.30657/pea.2023.29.28
  11. SBTi. (2023, February 16). Concepts, Advantages and Company data. https://sciencebasedtargets.org/
  12. Walenta, J. (2020). Climate risk assessments and science-based targets: A review of emerging private sector climate action tools. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Climate Change, 11(2), DOI: 10.1002/wcc.628
Language: English
Page range: 231 - 239
Submitted on: Nov 5, 2023
Accepted on: Dec 6, 2023
Published on: Dec 29, 2023
Published by: Quality and Production Managers Association
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year

© 2023 Afonso Carvalho, José Carlos Sá, Florbela Correia, Olivia McDermott, José Dinis-Carvalho, Luís Fonseca, published by Quality and Production Managers Association
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.