References
- 1. Teillet, B., X. Cahours, T. Verron, S. Colard, and S.W. Purkis: Comparison of Smoke Yield Data Collected from Different Laboratories; Beitr.Tabakforsch. Int. 25 (2013) 662–670. DOI: 10.2478/cttr-2013-094310.2478/cttr-2013-0943
- 2. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): ISO 5725-6:1994/Cor 1:2001 - Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results – Part 6: Use in Practice of Accuracy Values – Technical Corrigendum 1; ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2001.
- 3. Eldridge, A., T.R. Betson, M.V. Gama, and K. McAdam: Variation in Tobacco and Mainstream Smoke Toxicant Yields from Selected Commercial Cigarette Products; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 71 (2015) 409–427. DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.01.00610.1016/j.yrtph.2015.01.00625620723
- 4. Belushkin, M., G. Jaccard, and A. Kondylis: Considerations for Comparative Tobacco Product Assessments Based on Smoke Constituent Yields; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 73 (2015) 105–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.06.01710.1016/j.yrtph.2015.06.01726140819
- 5. Levin, B.: On the Holm, Simes, and Hochberg Multiple Test Procedures; Am. J. Public Health 86 (1996) 628–629. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.86.5.62810.2105/ajph.86.5.62813804678629710
- 6. Bland, J.M. and D.G. Altman: Multiple Significance Tests: The Bonferroni Method; Brit. Med. J. 310 (1995) 170. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.310.6973.170.10.1136/bmj.310.6973.17025485617833759
- 7. Aickin, M. and H. Gensler: Adjusting for Multiple Testing When Reporting Research Results: The Bonferroni vs. Holm Methods; Am. J. Public Health 86 (1996) 726–728. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.86.5.72610.2105/ajph.86.5.72613804848629727
- 8. Verron, T., X. Cahours, and S. Colard: Analysis of the Effect of Multiple Testing in Assessing Tobacco Product Differences; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 27 (2017) 78–85. DOI: 10.1515/cttr-2017-000810.1515/cttr-2017-0008
- 9. Cooperation Center for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco (CORESTA): CORESTA Recommended Method No. 75 - Determination of Tobacco Specific Nitrosamines in Mainstream Cigarette Smoke by LCMS/MS. July 2014 - CRM developed into ISO 19290:2016. Available at: https://www.coresta.org/determination-tobacco-specific-nitrosamines-mainstream-cigarette-smoke-lc-msms-29198.html (accessed November 2019)
- 10. Cooperation Center for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco (CORESTA): CORESTA Recommended Method No. 74 - Determination of Selected Carbonyls in Mainstream Cigarette Smoke by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) (2018). CRM was developed into ISO 21160:2018 / also being developed into ISO 23922. Available at: https://www.coresta.org/determination-selected-carbonyls-mainstream-cigarette-smoke-high-performance-liquid-chromatography (accessed November 2019)
- 11. Cooperation Center for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco (CORESTA): CORESTA Recommended Method No. 70 - Determination of Selected Volatile Organic Compounds in the Mainstream Smoke of Cigarettes - Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Method (2018). CRM was developed into ISO 21330:2018 / also being developed into ISO 23923. Available at: https://www.coresta.org/determination-selected-volatile-organic-compounds-mainstream-smoke-cigarettes-gas-chromatography (accessed November 2019)
- 12. Cooperation Center for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco (CORESTA): CORESTA Method No. 58 -Determination of Benzo[a]pyrene in Cigarette Mainstream Smoke by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (2019). CRM developed into ISO 22634/1:2008. Available at: https://www.coresta.org/determination-benzoapyrene-cigarette-mainstream-smoke-gas-chromatography-mass-spectrometry-32952
- 13. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): International Standard ISO 8454:2007 + Amd 1:2009. Cigarettes - Determination of Carbon Monoxide in the Vapour Phase of Cigarette Smoke - NDIR method; ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
- 14. Cooperation Center for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco (CORESTA): CORESTA Task Force - CVAR - Cigarette Variability (2014). Available at: https://www.coresta.org/groups/cigarette-variability (accessed November 2019)