Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Relationship Between Cigarette Yields and Smoking Time Under Different Machine Smoking Regimes Cover

Relationship Between Cigarette Yields and Smoking Time Under Different Machine Smoking Regimes

Contributions to Tobacco & Nicotine Research
Volume 26 (2014): Issue 1 (April 2014)
By: Stéphane Colard,  Thomas Verron,  Rémi Julien,  Xavier Cahours and  Stephen W. Purkis  
Open Access
|May 2014

References

  1. 1. European Parliament and Council: Directive 2001/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2001 on the Approximation of the Laws, Regulations and Administrative Provisions of the Member States Concerning the Manufacture, Presentation and Sale of Tobacco Products; Off. J. Eur. Commun. L 194 (2001) 26-34.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. International Organisation for Standardization (ISO): International Standard ISO 3308:2012. Routine Analytical Smoking Machine - Definition and Standard Conditions; ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): International Standard ISO 4387:2000. Cigarettes - Determination of Total and Nicotine Free Dry Particulate Matter Using a Routine Analytical Smoking Machine; ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): International Standard ISO 8454:2009. Cigarettes - Determination of Carbon Monoxide in the Vapour Phase of Cigarette smoke - NDIR Method, Third Edition, Amendment 1; ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): International Standard ISO 10315:2000. Cigarettes - Determination of Nicotine in Smoke Condensates - Gas-Chromatographic Method, Second edition; ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): International Standard ISO 10362-1:1999. Cigarettes - Determination of Water in Smoke Condensates - Part 1: Gas-Chromatographic Method, Second edition; ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1999.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Darrall, K.G.: Smoking Machine Parameters and Cigarette Smoke Yields; Sci. Total Environ. 74 (1988) 263-278.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Tobacco Disclosure Act: Cigarette and Smokeless Tobacco Products: Reports of Added Constituents and Nicotine Ratings; General Laws of Massachusetts, Chapter 94, Section 307B 105 CMR 660.000, 1997.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Health Canada: Tobacco Reporting Regulations (SOR/2000-273), Part 3 Emissions from Designated Tobacco Products, 2000, available at http://lawslois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-2000-273/page-7.html#h-15 (accessed September 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Kozlowski, L.T. and R.J. O’Connor: Official Cigarette Tar Tests are Misleading: Use of a Two-Stage, Compensating Test; Lancet 355 (2000) 2159-2161.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Pickworth, W., P. Houlgate, M. Schorp, M. Dixon, M.F. Borgerding, and G. Zaatari: A Review of Human Smoking Behaviour and Recommendations for a New ISO Standard for Machine Smoking of Cigarettes; Report of the Ad Hoc WG9 Smoking Review Team to ISO TC126 WG9, 2005, available at http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/mqt27a00 (accessed September 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. World Health Organization: The Scientific Basis of Tobacco Product Regulation; Second Report of a WHO Study Group (TobReg), WHO Technical Report Series 951, ISBN 978 92 4 120951 9, 2008, available at http://www.who.int/tobacco/global_interaction/tobreg/publications/tsr_951/en/index.html (accessed September 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Food and Drug Administration: The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act; HR 1256, Section 904 (e), 2009 available at http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/TobaccoProductsScientificAdvisoryCommittee/UCM204339.pdf (accessed September 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Purkis, S.W., V. Troude, and C.A. Hill: Effect of Puffing Intensity on Cigarette Smoke Yields; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 66 (2013) 72-82.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 15. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): International Standard ISO 12863:2010. Standard Test Method for Assessing the Ignition Propensity of Cigarettes; ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): International Standard ISO 9512:2002. Cigarettes - Determination of Ventilation - Definitions and Measurement Principles; ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2002.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Association Française de Normalisation (AFNOR): French Standard NF V37-009, 2004. Tabac et Produits du Tabac - Cigarettes - Détermination de la vitesse de combustion libre; AFNOR, Paris, France, 2004.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): International Standard ISO 2971:1998. Cigarettes and Filter Rods - Determination of Nominal Diameter - Method Using a Laser Beam Measuring Apparatus; ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1998.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. European Standardisation Organisation: European Standard EN 16156, 2010. Cigarettes - Assessment of the Ignition Propensity - Safety Requirement; EN, Brussels, Belgium, 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Baker, R.R.: Variation of the Gas Formation Regions Within a Cigarette Combustion Coal During the Smoking Cycle; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 11 (1981) 1-17.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Dwyer, R.W., P.J. Lipowicz, C.R. Lambert, and M. White: The Effects of Machine Smoking Conditions on the Performance of Cigarettes; PM USA Internal Report, 2002 available at http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/eft92g00 (accessed September 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Dwyer, R.W. and P. Chen: Prediction of Pressure Drop and Ventilation in a Lit Cigarette; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 18 (1999) 205-211.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; ISBN 3-900051-07-0, Vienna, Austria, 2008, available at http://www.R-project.org (accessed September 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. 24. St.Charles, F.K.: Calculation of Cigarette Burn Time from the Puff Count; 54th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Nashville, TN, September 24-27, 2000, Paper 61, available at http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/ tid/prt91g00 (accessed September 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Verron T., X. Cahours, and S. Colard: LIP cigarettes: Effect of Band Positioning; Presentation PT17, CORESTA Congress, Sapporo, Japan, 2012 available at http://www.coresta.org/Meetings/Past_Abstracts/Sapporo2012-SmokeTech.pdf (accessed September 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Hammond, D., G.T. Fong, K.M. Cummings, R.J. O’Connor, G.A. Giovino, and A. McNeill: Cigarette Yields and Human Exposure: A Comparison of Alternative Testing Regimens; Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 15 (2006) 1495-1501.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Liang, Q., H.J. Roethig, J. Lipowicz, Y. Jin, and P.E. Mendes: The Effect of Cigarette Burn Time on Exposure to Nicotine and Carbon Monoxide in Adult Smokers; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 50 (2008) 66-74.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Zielinski, S.L.: Smoking Machine Test Inadequate and Confusing, but no Replacement a Decade Later; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 97 (2005) 10-11.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. 29. European Commission: Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Approximation of the Laws, Regulations and Administrative Provisions of the Member States Concerning the Manufacture, Presentation and Sale of Tobacco and Related Products, 2012, available at http://ec.europa.eu/health/tobacco/docs/com_2012_788_en.pdf (accessed September 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. 30. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): International Standard ISO 8243:2006. Cigarettes - Sampling; ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. 31. Piadé, J.J., S. Wajrock, G. Jaccard, and G. Janeke: Formation of Mainstream Cigarette Smoke Constituents Prioritized by the World Health Organisation - Yield Patterns observed in Market Surveys, Clustering and Inverse Correlations; Food Chem. Toxicol. 55 (2013) 329-347.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. 32. Saint-Jalm, Y., M.F. Borgerding, S.G. Chapman, and W.T. Morgan: Alternative Smoking Regimes. CORESTA Task Force Report, 2006, available at http://www.coresta.org/Reports/Alternative-Smoking-Regimes-TF_FinalReport_July2006.pdf (accessed September 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. 33. Mariner, D.C., W.D. Heller, J. Sarabia, S.W. Purkis, M. Meger, H.J. Eberhardt, and M. Czechowicz: The 2010 ISO TC126 Working Group 10 Collaborative Study on Intense Machine Smoking; Presentation ST05, CORESTA Joint Study Group Meeting, Graz Austria, 2011, available at http://www.coresta.org/Meetings/Past_Abstracts/Graz2011-SmokeTech.pdf (accessed September 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. 34. Verron T., M. Czechowicz, W.D. Heller, X. Cahours, and S.W. Purkis: Aspects of the Design Protocol and the Statistical Methods for Analysis of Tar, Nicotine and Carbon Monoxide Yields in Cigarette Smoke that can Affect the Measurement Variability Within Collaborative Studies; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 67 (2013) 252-265, available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.08.004 (accessed March 2014).10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.08.00423959062
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. 35. Purkis, S.W., V. Troude, G. Duputié, and C. Tessier: Limitations in the Characterization of Cigarette Products Using Different Machine Smoking Regimes; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 58 (2010) 501-15.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. 36. Purkis, S.W., X. Cahours, M. Rey, B. Teillet, V. Troude, and T. Verron: Some Consequences of Using Cigarette Machine Smoking Regimes with Different Intensities on Smoke Yields and Their Variability; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 59 (2011) 293-309.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. 37. Côté, F. and J. Verreault: Overestimation of Tar Yields at Canadian Intense Smoking Regime: Factors Affecting the Accuracy; Paper SSPT38, CORESTA Congress, Edinburgh, 2010, available at http://www.coresta.org/Meetings/Past_Abstracts/Edinburgh2010-SmokeTech.pdf (accessed September 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. 38. Tindall, I.F., L.P. Crumpler, and T.J.P. Mason: Smoking Machine Design and Yield Errors Under Intense Smoke Regimes; Presentations SSPT07 and SSPT08, CORESTA Congress, Sapporo, Japan, 2012, available at http://www.coresta.org/Meetings/Past_Abstracts/Sapporo2012-SmokeTech.pdf (accessed September 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. 39. United States of America: US Public Law 111-31-June 22, 2009: Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control and Federal Retirement Reform; available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ31/pdf/PLAW-111publ31.pdf (accessed March 2014).
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cttr-2014-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2719-9509
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 4 - 18
Submitted on: Nov 11, 2013
Accepted on: Feb 13, 2014
Published on: May 1, 2014
Published by: Institut für Tabakforschung GmbH
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Smoking regime,
Cigarette smoke yields,
Cigarette smoking time
Related subjects:
General interest,
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other,
Physics,
Physics, other

© 2014 Stéphane Colard, Thomas Verron, Rémi Julien, Xavier Cahours, Stephen W. Purkis, published by Institut für Tabakforschung GmbH
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 26 (2014): Issue 1 (April 2014)Next article