Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Mainstream Smoke Chemistry and in Vitro and In Vivo Toxicity of the Reference Cigarettes 3R4F and 2R4F Cover

Mainstream Smoke Chemistry and in Vitro and In Vivo Toxicity of the Reference Cigarettes 3R4F and 2R4F

Contributions to Tobacco & Nicotine Research
Volume 25 (2012): Issue 1 (February 2012)
By: E Roemer,  H Schramke,  H Weiler,  A Buettner,  S Kausche,  S Weber,  A Berges,  M Stueber,  M Muench,  E Trelles-Sticken,  J Pype,  K Kohlgrueber,  H Voelkel and  S Wittke  
Open Access
|Dec 2014

References

  1. 1. Chepiga, T.A., M.J. Morton, P.A. Murphy, J.T. Avalos, B.R. Bombick, D.J. Doolittle, M.F. Borgerding, and J.E. Swauger: A comparison of the mainstream smoke chemistry and mutagenicity of a representative sample of the US cigarette market with two Kentucky reference cigarettes (K1R4F and K1R5F); Food Chem. Toxicol. 38 (2000) 949-962.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Werley, M.S., SA. Freelin, S.E. Wrenn, B. Gersten-berg, E. Roemer, H. Schramke, E. Van Miert, P. Vanscheeuwijck, S. Weber, and CR. Coggins: Smoke chemistry, in vitro and in vivo toxicology evaluations of the electrically heated cigarette smoking system series K; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 52 (2008) 122-139.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Chen, P.X. and S.C. Moldoveanu: Mainstream smoke chemical analyses for 2R4F Kentucky reference cigarette; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 20 (2003) 448-458.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Counts, M.E., F.S. Hsu, and F.J. Tewes: Development of a commercial cigarette “market map” comparison methodology for evaluating new or non-conventional cigarettes; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 46 (2006) 225-242.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Adam, T., S. Mitschke, T. Streibel, R.R. Baker, and R. Zimmermann: Puff-by-puff resolved characterisation of cigarette mainstream smoke by single photon ionisation (SPI)-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (TOFMS): comparison of the 2R4F research cigarette and pure Burley, Virginia, Oriental and Maryland tobacco cigarettes; Anal. Chim. Acta 572 (2006) 219-229.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Intorp, M, S. Purkis, M. Whittaker, and W. Wright: Determination of “Hoffmann Analytes” in Cigarette Mainstream Smoke. The Coresta 2006 Joint Experiment; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 23 (2009) 161-202.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Rickert, W.S., A.H. Trivedi, R.A. Momin, W.G. Wright, and J.H. Lauterbach: Effect of smoking conditions and methods of collection on the mutagenicity and cytotoxicity of cigarette mainstream smoke; Toxicol. Sci. 96 (2007) 285-293.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Roemer, E., T.H. Ottmueller, V. Zenzen, S. Wittke, F. Radtke, I. Blanco, and R.A. Carchman: Cytotoxicity, mutagenicity, and tumorigenicity of mainstream smoke from three reference cigarettes machine-smoked to the same yields of total particulate matter per cigarette; Food Chem. Toxicol. 47 (2009) 1810-1818.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Roemer, E., R. Stabbert, K. Rustemeier, D.J. Veltel, T.J. Meisgen, W. Reininghaus, R.A. Carchman, CL. Gaworski, and K.F. Podraza: Chemical composition, cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of smoke from US commercial and reference cigarettes smoked under two sets of machine smoking conditions; Toxicology 195 (2004) 31-52.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Schramke, H., T.J. Meisgen, F.J. Tewes, W. Gomm, and E. Roemer: The mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase assay for the assessment and comparison of the mutagenic activity of cigarette mainstream smoke particulate phase; Toxicology 227 (2006) 193-210.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Chen, J., R. Higby, D. Tian, D. Tan, M.D. Johnson, Y. Xiao, K.J. Kellar, S. Feng, and P.G. Shields: Toxicological analysis of low-nicotine and nicotine-free cigarettes; Toxicology 249 (2008) 194-203.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Gaworski, CL., R. Lemus-Olalde, and E.L. Carmines: Toxicological evaluation of potassium sorbate added to cigarette tobacco; Food Chem. Toxicol. 46 (2008) 339-351.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Newland, N. and A. Richter: Agents associated with lung inflammation induce similar responses in NCI-H292 lung epithelial cells; Toxicol. in vitro 22 (2008) 1782-1728.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Carter, CA. and J.T. Hamm: Multiplexed quantitative high content screening reveals that cigarette smoke condensate induces changes in cell structure and function through alterations in cell signaling pathways in human bronchial cells; Toxicology 261 (2009) 89-102.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Higuchi, M.A., J. Sagartz, W.K. Shreve, and P.H. Ayres: Comparative subchronic inhalation study of smoke from the 1R4F and 2R4F reference cigarettes; Inhal. Toxicol. 16 (2004) 1-20.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. ISO 3308: Routine analytical cigarette smoking machine - Definitions and standard conditions. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Health Canada: Determination of ’tar’, nicotine and carbon monoxide in mainstream smoke. Health Canada - Official Method 1999.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Marian, C, R.J. O'Connor, M.V. Djordjevic, V.W. Rees, D.K. Hatsukami, and P.G. Shields: Reconciling human smoking behavior and machine smoking patterns: implications for understanding smoking behavior and the impact on laboratory studies; Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 18 (2009) 3305-3320.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Hammond, D., G.T. Fong, K.M. Cummings, and A. Hyland: Smoking topography, brand switching, and nicotine delivery: results from an in vivo study; Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 14 (2005) 1370-1375.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Hammond, D., G.T. Fong, K.M. Cummings, R.J. O'Connor, G.A. Giovino, and A. McNeill: Cigarette yields and human exposure: a comparison of alternative testing regimens; Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 15 (2006) 1495-1501.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. ISO 3402: Tobacco and tobacco products - Atmosphere for conditioning and testing. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1999.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Radtke, F., M. Schmickler, W. Ochel, and H. Schaffernicht: Pumpenanordnung. Patent EP1832745 (A1) In Office, E.P. (ed.), Germany, 2007.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. ISO 4387: Determination of total and nicotine-free dry particulate matter using routine analytical smoking machine. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1991.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. 24. ISO 10315: Cigarettes - Determination of nicotine in smoke condensate - Gas chromatographic method (2nd ed.). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. 25. ISO 8454: Cigarettes - Determination of carbon monoxide in the vapour phase of cigarette smoke -NDIR method (3rd ed.). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2007.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. 26. CORESTA: Recommended Method No. 74 -Determination of selected carbonyls in mainstream cigarette smoke by high performance liquid chroma-tography (HPLC). Cooperation Centre for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco, 2011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. 27. CORESTA: Recommended Method No. 70 -Determination of selected volatile organic compounds in the mainstream smoke of cigarettes - gas chroma-tography-mass spectrometry method. Co-operation Centre for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco, 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Diekmann, J., A. Wittig, and R. Stabbert: Gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric analysis of acrylamide and acetamide in cigarette mainstream smoke after on-column injection; J. Chromatogr. Sci. 46 (2008) 659-663.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. 29. Diekmann, J., M. Douda, and K. Rustemeier: Rapid and sensitive method for the determination of propylene oxide in cigarette mainstream smoke by gas chroma-tography-mass spectrometry; J. Chromatogr. Sci. 44 (2006) 32–34.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. 30. Stabbert, R., K.H. Schaefer, C. Biefel, and K. Rustemeier: Analysis of aromatic amines in cigarette smoke; Rapid Commun. Mass. Spectrom. 17 (2003) 2125–2132.10.1002/rcm.1161
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. 31. CORESTA: Recommended Method (3rd Draft): The determination of nitric oxide in mainstream smoke of cigarettes by chemiluminescent analysis; Available at (accessed January 2012): http://legacy.library.ucsf.-edu/tid/vpe43d00/pdf;jsessionid=BEB3E72646 C743124370F7007FA332D8.tobacco03.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. 32. Mottier, N. and F. Jeanneret: Evaluation of two derivatization reagents for the determination by LC-MS/MS of ammonia in cigarette mainstream smoke; J. Agric. Food Chem. 59 (2011) 92–97.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. 33. Wagner, K.A., N.H. Finkel, J.E. Fossett, and I.G. Gillman: Development of a quantitative method for the analysis of tobacco-specific nitrosamines in mainstream cigarette smoke using isotope dilution liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry; Anal. Chem. 77 (2005) 1001–1006.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. 34. Maron, D.M. and B.N. Ames: Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test; Mutat. Res. 113 (1983) 173–215.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. 35. Cole, J., W.J. Muriel, and B.A. Bridges: The mutagenicity of sodium fluoride to L5178Y [wild-type and TK+/- (3.7.2c)] mouse lymphoma cells; Mutagenesis 1 (1986) 157–167.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. 36. Gaworski, C.L., H. Schramke, J. Diekmann, T.J. Meisgen, F.J. Tewes, D.J. Veltel, P.M. Van-scheeuwijck, N. Rajendran, M. Muzzio, and H.J. Haussmann: Effect of filtration by activated charcoal on the toxicological activity of cigarette mainstream smoke from experimental cigarettes; Inhal. Toxicol. 21 (2009) 688–704.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. 37. ISO 3308: Routine analytical cigarette-smoking machine - Definitions and standard conditions; International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. 38. Young, J.T.: Histopathologic examination of the rat nasal cavity; Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 1 (1981) 309–312.10.1016/S0272-0590(81)80037-1
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. 39. Lewis, D.J.: Factors affecting the distribution of tobacco smoke-induced lesions in the rodent larynx; Toxicol. Lett. 9 (1981) 189–194.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. 40. Carmines, E.L., C.L. Gaworski, A.S. Faqi, and N. Rajendran: In utero exposure to 1R4F reference cigarette smoke: evaluation of developmental toxicity; Toxicol. Sci. 75 (2003) 134–147.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. 41. Vanscheeuwijck, P.M., A. Teredesai, P.M. Terpstra, J. Verbeeck, P. Kuhl, B. Gerstenberg, S. Gebel, and E.L. Carmines: Evaluation of the potential effects of ingredients added to cigarettes. Part 4: subchronic inhalation toxicity; Food Chem. Toxicol. 40 (2002) 113–131.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. 42. Counts, M.E., MJ. Morton, S.W. Laffoon, R.H. Cox, and PJ. Lipowicz: Smoke composition and predicting relationships for international commercial cigarettes smoked with three machine-smoking conditions; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 41 (2005) 185-227.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. 43. Okuwa, K., M. Tanaka, Y. Fukano, H. Nara, Y. Nishijima, and T. Nishino: In vitro micronucleus assay for cigarette smoke using a whole smoke exposure system: a comparison of smoking regimens; Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 62 (2009) 433-40.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. 44. Roemer, E. and R.A. Carchman: Limitations of cigarette machine smoking regimens; Toxicol. Lett. 203 (2011) 20-27.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. 45. Terpstra, P.M., A. Teredesai, P.M. Vanscheeuwijck, J. Verbeeck, G. Schepers, F. Radtke, P. Kuhl, W. Gomm, E. Anskeit, and G. Patskan: Toxicological evaluation of an electrically heated cigarette. Part 4: Subchronic inhalation toxicology; J. Appl. Toxicol. 23 (2003) 349-362.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. 46. Baker, R.R., E.D. Massey, and G. Smith: An overview of the effects of tobacco ingredients on smoke chemistry and toxicity; Food Chem. Toxicol. 42 Suppl. (2004) S53-S83.10.1016/j.fct.2004.01.00115072838
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. 47. DiGiovanni, J.: Multistage carcinogenesis in mouse skin; Pharmacol. Ther. 54 (1992) 63-128.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. 48. Berenblum, I.: The cocarcinogenic action of croton resin; Cancer Res. 1 (1941) 44-48.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. 49. Belkebir, E., C. Rousselle, C. Duboudin, L. Bodin, and N. Bonvallot: Haber's rule duration adjustments should not be used systematically for risk assessment in public health decision-making; Toxicol. Lett. 204 (2010) 148-155.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. 50. Tsuji, H., K.M. Lee, K. Yoshino, H. Nakamura, G. Lulham, R. Renne, and H. Yoshimura: Comparison of the physiological and morphological effects of cigarette smoke exposure at comparable weekly doses on Sprague-Dawley rats; Inhal. Toxicol. 23 (2010) 17-32.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. 51. St Charles, F.K., CJ. Cook, and P.M. Clayton: The linear relationship between cigarette ‘tar’ and nicotine yields: Regulatory implications for smoke constituent ratios; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 59 (2011) 143-148.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cttr-2013-0912 | Journal eISSN: 2719-9509
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 316 - 335
Submitted on: Sep 1, 2011
Accepted on: Jan 24, 2012
Published on: Dec 30, 2014
Published by: Institut für Tabakforschung GmbH
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:
General interest,
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other,
Physics,
Physics, other

© 2014 E Roemer, H Schramke, H Weiler, A Buettner, S Kausche, S Weber, A Berges, M Stueber, M Muench, E Trelles-Sticken, J Pype, K Kohlgrueber, H Voelkel, S Wittke, published by Institut für Tabakforschung GmbH
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 25 (2012): Issue 1 (February 2012)Next article