Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparison of Mouth Level Exposure to ‘Tar’ and Nicotine in Smokers of Normal and Superslim King Size Cigarettes in Romania Cover

Comparison of Mouth Level Exposure to ‘Tar’ and Nicotine in Smokers of Normal and Superslim King Size Cigarettes in Romania

By: M Ashley,  A Sisodiya,  M McEwan,  J McAughey and  K Prasad  
Open Access
|Dec 2014

References

  1. 1. St Charles, F. K., A. A. Kabbani, and M. F. Borgerding: Estimating ‘tar’ and nicotine exposure: Human smoking versus machine generated smoke yields; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 56 (2010) 100–110.
  2. 2. Pauly, J. L., R. J. O'Connor, G. M. Paszkiewicz, K. M. Cummings, M. V. Djordjevic, and P. G. Shields: Cigarette Filter-based Assays as Proxies for Toxicant Exposure and Smoking Behaviour - A Literature Review; J. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 18 (2009) 3321–3333.
  3. 3. St Charles, F. K., M. Ashley, C. J. Shepperd, P. Clayton and G. Errington: A Robust Method for Estimating Human Smoked Cigarette Yields from Filter Analysis Data; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 23 (2009) 232–243.
  4. 4. Mariner, D. C., M. Ashley, C. J. Shepperd, G. Mullard, and M. Dixon: Mouth level smoke exposure using analysis of filters from smoked cigarettes: A study of eight countries; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. In press, 2010.10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.05.00620510323
  5. 5. Ashley, M., P. Saunders, G. Mullard, K. Prasad, D. Mariner, J. Williamson, and A. Richter: Smoking intensity before and after introduction of the public place smoking ban in Scotland; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. In press, 2010.10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.03.00520347910
  6. 6. Côté, F., C. Létourneau, G. Mullard, and R. Voisine: Estimation of nicotine and ‘tar’ yields from human-smoked cigarettes before and after the implementation of the cigarette ignition propensity regulations in Canada; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. In press, 2010.10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.03.00420303374
  7. 7. Shepperd, C. J., A. C. Eldridge, D. C. Mariner, M. McEwan, G. Errington, and M. Dixon: A study to estimate and correlate cigarette smoke exposure in smokers in Germany as determined by filter analysis and biomarkers of exposure; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 55 (2009) 97–109.
  8. 8. CORESTA recommended method No. 9 - Determination of nicotine in cigarette filters by gas chromato-graphic analysis (2009); available at: http://www.coresta. org/Recommended_Methods/CRM_09-update2. pdf (Accessed July 2011).
  9. 9. ISO 3308: Routine analytical cigarette smoking ma-chine - Definition and standard conditions; International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, 2000.
  10. 10. ISO 4387: Cigarettes - Determination of total and nicotine free dry particulate matter using a routine analytical smoking machine; International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, 2000.
  11. 11. ISO 10362-1: Cigarettes - Determination of water in smoke condensates, Part 1: Gas-chromatographic method; International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, 1999.
  12. 12. ISO 10315: Methods for chemical analysis of tobacco and tobacco products. Determination of nicotine in smoke condensate of cigarettes (gas chromatographic method); International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, 1991.
  13. 13. ISO 8454: Cigarettes - Determination of carbon monox-ide in the vapour phase of cigarette smoke – NDIR method; International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, 2007.
  14. 14. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 1997. Tobacco disclosure act. General laws of Massachusetts, Chapter 94, Section 307B, 105 CMR 660. 000. Cigarette and smokeless tobacco products: reports of added constituents and nicotine ratings.
  15. 15. Canada 2000. Tobacco reporting regulations. T-115/SOR/2000–272; available at: http://www.hc-sc. gc. ca/hc-ps/tobac-tabac /legislation /reg/indust/method /_main-principal/nicotine-eng. php (Accessed July 2011).
  16. 16. Branton, P. and R. H. Bradley: Activated Carbons for the Adsorption of Vapours from Cigarette Smoke; Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 28 (2010) 3–21.
  17. 17. Scherer G., J. Engl, M. Urban, G. Gilch, D. Janket, and K. Riedel: Relationship between machine-derived smoke yields and biomarkers in cigarette smokers in Germany; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 47 (2007) 171–183.
  18. 18. Hecht S. S., S. E. Murphy, S. G. Carmella, S. Li, J. Jensen, C. Le, A. M. Joseph, and D. K. Hatsukami: Similar Uptake of Lung Carcinogens by Smokers of Regular, Light and Ultralight Cigarettes; Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 14 (2005) 693–698.
  19. 19. Mendes P., S. Kapur, J. Wang, S. Feng, and H. Roethig: A randomized controlled exposure study in adult smokers of full flavour Marlboro cigarettes switching to Marlboro Lights or Marlboro Ultra Lights cigarettes; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 51 (2008) 295–305.
  20. 20. Federal Trade Commission: Cigarettes: Testing for ‘tar’ and nicotine content; Fed. Regist. 1967, 32, 11178.
Language: English
Page range: 277 - 288
Submitted on: Feb 9, 2011
Accepted on: Jul 15, 2011
Published on: Dec 30, 2014
Published by: Institut für Tabakforschung GmbH
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2014 M Ashley, A Sisodiya, M McEwan, J McAughey, K Prasad, published by Institut für Tabakforschung GmbH
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.