Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparison of Mouth Level Exposure to ‘Tar’ and Nicotine in Smokers of Normal and Superslim King Size Cigarettes in Romania Cover

Comparison of Mouth Level Exposure to ‘Tar’ and Nicotine in Smokers of Normal and Superslim King Size Cigarettes in Romania

Contributions to Tobacco & Nicotine Research
Volume 24 (2011): Issue 6 (November 2011)
By: ,  ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Dec 2014
References

References

  1. 1. St Charles, F. K., A. A. Kabbani, and M. F. Borgerding: Estimating ‘tar’ and nicotine exposure: Human smoking versus machine generated smoke yields; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 56 (2010) 100–110.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Pauly, J. L., R. J. O'Connor, G. M. Paszkiewicz, K. M. Cummings, M. V. Djordjevic, and P. G. Shields: Cigarette Filter-based Assays as Proxies for Toxicant Exposure and Smoking Behaviour - A Literature Review; J. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 18 (2009) 3321–3333.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. St Charles, F. K., M. Ashley, C. J. Shepperd, P. Clayton and G. Errington: A Robust Method for Estimating Human Smoked Cigarette Yields from Filter Analysis Data; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 23 (2009) 232–243.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Mariner, D. C., M. Ashley, C. J. Shepperd, G. Mullard, and M. Dixon: Mouth level smoke exposure using analysis of filters from smoked cigarettes: A study of eight countries; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. In press, 2010.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Ashley, M., P. Saunders, G. Mullard, K. Prasad, D. Mariner, J. Williamson, and A. Richter: Smoking intensity before and after introduction of the public place smoking ban in Scotland; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. In press, 2010.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Côté, F., C. Létourneau, G. Mullard, and R. Voisine: Estimation of nicotine and ‘tar’ yields from human-smoked cigarettes before and after the implementation of the cigarette ignition propensity regulations in Canada; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. In press, 2010.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Shepperd, C. J., A. C. Eldridge, D. C. Mariner, M. McEwan, G. Errington, and M. Dixon: A study to estimate and correlate cigarette smoke exposure in smokers in Germany as determined by filter analysis and biomarkers of exposure; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 55 (2009) 97–109.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. CORESTA recommended method No. 9 - Determination of nicotine in cigarette filters by gas chromato-graphic analysis (2009); available at: http://www.coresta. org/Recommended_Methods/CRM_09-update2. pdf (Accessed July 2011).
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. ISO 3308: Routine analytical cigarette smoking ma-chine - Definition and standard conditions; International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, 2000.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. ISO 4387: Cigarettes - Determination of total and nicotine free dry particulate matter using a routine analytical smoking machine; International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, 2000.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. ISO 10362-1: Cigarettes - Determination of water in smoke condensates, Part 1: Gas-chromatographic method; International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, 1999.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. ISO 10315: Methods for chemical analysis of tobacco and tobacco products. Determination of nicotine in smoke condensate of cigarettes (gas chromatographic method); International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, 1991.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. ISO 8454: Cigarettes - Determination of carbon monox-ide in the vapour phase of cigarette smoke – NDIR method; International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, 2007.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 1997. Tobacco disclosure act. General laws of Massachusetts, Chapter 94, Section 307B, 105 CMR 660. 000. Cigarette and smokeless tobacco products: reports of added constituents and nicotine ratings.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Canada 2000. Tobacco reporting regulations. T-115/SOR/2000–272; available at: http://www.hc-sc. gc. ca/hc-ps/tobac-tabac /legislation /reg/indust/method /_main-principal/nicotine-eng. php (Accessed July 2011).
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Branton, P. and R. H. Bradley: Activated Carbons for the Adsorption of Vapours from Cigarette Smoke; Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 28 (2010) 3–21.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Scherer G., J. Engl, M. Urban, G. Gilch, D. Janket, and K. Riedel: Relationship between machine-derived smoke yields and biomarkers in cigarette smokers in Germany; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 47 (2007) 171–183.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Hecht S. S., S. E. Murphy, S. G. Carmella, S. Li, J. Jensen, C. Le, A. M. Joseph, and D. K. Hatsukami: Similar Uptake of Lung Carcinogens by Smokers of Regular, Light and Ultralight Cigarettes; Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 14 (2005) 693–698.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Mendes P., S. Kapur, J. Wang, S. Feng, and H. Roethig: A randomized controlled exposure study in adult smokers of full flavour Marlboro cigarettes switching to Marlboro Lights or Marlboro Ultra Lights cigarettes; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 51 (2008) 295–305.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Federal Trade Commission: Cigarettes: Testing for ‘tar’ and nicotine content; Fed. Regist. 1967, 32, 11178.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cttr-2013-0908 | Journal eISSN: 2719-9509 (formerly 1612-9237)
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 277 - 288
Submitted on: Feb 9, 2011
Accepted on: Jul 15, 2011
Published on: Dec 30, 2014
Published by: Beiträge zur Tabakforschung GmbH
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2014 M Ashley, A Sisodiya, M McEwan, J McAughey, K Prasad, published by Beiträge zur Tabakforschung GmbH
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 24 (2011): Issue 6 (November 2011)
Previous article
Next article