Letter to the Editor: Analysis of the Data Variability in the Australian Benchmark Study 2000-2001

S Purkis

doi:10.2478/cttr-2013-0867

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Letter to the Editor: Analysis of the Data Variability in the Australian Benchmark Study 2000-2001

Contributions to Tobacco & Nicotine Research

Volume 23 (2009): Issue 5 (September 2009)

By: S Purkis

Open Access

|Dec 2014

Preview

Download

References

1. King, B., R. Borland and J. Fowles: Mainstream smoke emissions of Australian and Canadian cigarettes: Nicotine Tob. Res. 9 (2007) 835–844.
Search in Google Scholar
2. Cannar, N. B; Draft voluntary agreement for ingredient disclosure: Imperial Tobacco Australia (2000, May 4). Retrieved February 25, 2005 from www.pmdocs. com/ pdf/2075409863_9879. pdf
Search in Google Scholar
3. Intorp, M., S. W. Purkis, M. W. Whittaker, and W. Wright: Determination of Hoffmann analytes in cigarette mainstream smoke. The CORESTA 2006 collaborative study; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 23 (2009) 161–202.
Search in Google Scholar
4. Hoffmann, D. and I. Hoffmann: The changing cigarette: chemical studies and bioassays; in: Risks associated with smoking cigarettes with low machine-measured yield of tar and nicotine, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, 2001, pp. 159–191.
Search in Google Scholar
5. ISO 3308: Routine analytical smoking machine – Definition and standard conditions; International Organisation for Stan-dardisation, Geneva 2000.
Search in Google Scholar
6. Borgerding, M. F., N. Cohen, S. R. Massey, and D. R. E. Thomas, in consultation with M. J. Kaiserman and W. S. Rickert: The 1999 Canadian Benchmark Study, provided to Health Canada on May 24, 2000.
Search in Google Scholar
7. Health Canada: Official methods for collection of emission data on mainstream smoke; Accessed June 2008, www.hc-sc. gc. ca/hl-vs/tobactabac/legislation/reg/indust/ index_e. html;
Search in Google Scholar
8. Labstat Private Communication: CM7 smoke data was the property of Labstat provided for quality control in dis-cussions on this issue, 2001.
Search in Google Scholar
9. Rickert, W. and W. Wright: Stability of yields of Canadian mandated analytes from the Kentucky reference cigarette 1R4F: a time series analysis; CORESTA Congress 2002, Paper ST26, Cooperation Center for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco, Paris, 2002.
Search in Google Scholar
10. Purkis, S. W., C. A. Hill, and I. A. Bailey: Current measure-ment reliability of selected smoke analytes; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 20 (2003) 314–324.
Search in Google Scholar
11. Hyodo, T., O. Inoue, H. Katagiri, A. Mikita, and M. Fuji-wara: Long term inter-laboratory comparisons of selected smoke analysis in 2R4F mainstream smoke; CORESTA Congress (2006) Paper SS7, Cooperation Center for Scien-tific Research Relative to Tobacco, Paris, 2006.
Search in Google Scholar
12. ISO 8243: Cigarettes Sampling; International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
Search in Google Scholar
13. Borgerding, M. F., J. A. Bodnar, and D. E. Wingate: The 1999 Massachusetts Benchmark Study. Final report; presented to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health 24^th July 2000.
Search in Google Scholar