Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Validation of Methods for Determining Consumer Smoked Cigarette Yields from Cigarette Filter Analysis Cover

Validation of Methods for Determining Consumer Smoked Cigarette Yields from Cigarette Filter Analysis

By: CJ Shepperd,  FK St Charles,  M Lien and  M Dixon  
Open Access
|Dec 2014

References

  1. 1. Federal Trade Commission. FTC to begin cigarette testing: News Release of the Federal Trade Commission, 1 August 1967, Washington DC.
  2. 2. Independent Scientific Committee on Smoking and Health: Fourth report of the Independent Scientific Committee on Smoking and Health; Her Majesty's Stationary Office, London, 1988.
  3. 3. US Department of Health and Human Services: The Health Consequences of Smoking: Nicotine Addiction; Public Health Services, Washington, DC, 1988.
  4. 4. National Institute of Health: Monograph 7. The FTC cigarette test method for determining tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide yields of US cigarettes; Report of the USDHHS NIH, Bethesda MD, 1996.
  5. 5. Federal Trade Commission: FTC proposes new method for testing amounts of tar, nicotine, and carbon mon-oxide in cigarettes; News Release of the Federal Trade Commission, 9 September 1997, Washington, DC.
  6. 6. Bates, C., A. McNeil, M. Jarvis, and N. Gray: The future of tobacco product regulation and labelling in Europe: implication for the forthcoming European Union Directive; Tobacco Control 8 (1999) 225–235.
  7. 7. Wilkenfeld, J., J. Henningfield, J. Slade, D. Burns, and J. Pinney: It's time for a change: cigarette smokers deserve meaningful information about their cigarettes; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92 (2000) 90–92.
  8. 8. World Health Organisation: Monograph: Advancing knowledge on regulating tobacco products: World Health Organization, Geneva, 2001.
  9. 9. Ashton, H. and D.W. Watson: Puffing frequency and nicotine intake in cigarette smokers; Brit. Med. J. 3 (1970) 679–681.
  10. 10. Forbes, W.F., J.C. Robinson, J.A. Hanley, and H.N. Colburn: Studies on the nicotine exposure of indivi-dual smokers. I. Changes in mouth level exposure to nicotine on switching to lower nicotine cigarettes; Int. J. Addict. 11 (1976) 933–950.
  11. 11. Russell, M.A., S.R. Sutton, R. Iyer, C. Feyerabend, and C.J. Vessey: Long term switching to low-tar, low-nicotine cigarettes; Br. J. Addict. 77 (1982) 145–158.
  12. 12. Rawbone, R.G: Switching to low tar cigarettes: Are the tar league tables relevant; Thorax 39 (1984) 657–662.
  13. 13. Baker, R.R., M. Dixon, and C. Hill: The incidence and consequences of filter vent blocking amongst British smokers; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 18 (1998) 71–83.
  14. 14. Watson, C., J. McCraw, J. G. Polzin, and D. Ashley: Development of a method to assess cigarette smoke intake; Environ. Sci. Technol. 38 (2004) 248–253.
  15. 15. Duke, M.G.:Predicting the efficiency of cigarette filters; Filtration and Separation (1986) 358–366.
  16. 16. Norman, V., A.M. Ihrig, R.A. Shoffner, and M.S. Ireland: The effect of tip dilution on the filtration efficiency of upstream and downstream segments of cigarette filters; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 12 (1984) 178–185.
  17. 17. St. Charles, F.K.: A robust method for determining consumer smoked cigarette yields from filter analytical data; Paper presented at the 55th Tob. Sci. Res. Conf., Greensboro, NC, 2001, Program Booklet and Abstracts No. 92.
  18. 18. Creighton, D.E., M.J. Noble, and R.T. Whewell: Instruments to measure, record and duplicate human smoking patterns; in: Smoking Behaviour, edited by R.E. Thornton, Churchill-Livingstone, Edinburgh, London, New York, 1978, pp. 289–300.
  19. 19. ISO 3308: Routine analytical cigarette smoking machine – Definition and standard conditions: International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2000.
  20. 20. ISO 4387: Cigarettes – Determination of total and nicotine free dry particulate matter using a routine analytical smoking machine; International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2000.
  21. 21. ISO 10362-1: Cigarettes – Determination of water in smoke condensates – Part 1: Gas-chromatographic method; International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1999.
  22. 22. ISO 10315: Methods for chemical analysis of tobacco and tobacco products. Determination of nicotine in smoke condensate of cigarettes (gas-chromatographic method); International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1991.
  23. 23. CORESTA Recommended Method 9, 1989: Deter-mination of nicotine in cigarette filters by gas chroma-tography analysis: Cooperation Centre for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco, Paris, www.coresta.org/ Recommended Methods/CRM_09.pdf
  24. 24. Sloan, C.H. and J.G. Curran: Spectrophotometric determination of filtration of cigarette filters; Tob. Sci. 25 (1981) 57–60.
  25. 25. Bland, J.M. and D.G. Altman: Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method; Brit. Med. J. 310 (1995) 170.
  26. 26. Dwyer, R.W. and S.G. Abel: The Efficiencies of cellulose acetate filters; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 13 (1986) 243–253.
  27. 27. Townsend, D.E.: The effects of tobacco moisture on the removal of cigarette smoke by the tobacco rod; Paper presented at 37th Tob. Chem. Res. Conf., Washington, DC, 1983, Program Booklet and Abstracts No. 31.
  28. 28. Hopkins, R., L.E. Wood, and N.M. Sinclair: Evaluation of methods to estimate cigarette smoke uptake; Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 36 (1984) 788–795.
  29. 29. Sweeney, C.T. and L.T. Kozlowski: Blocking filter vents increases carbon monoxide levels from ultra light but not light cigarettes; Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 59 (1998) 767–773.
  30. 30. Sweeney, C.T., L.T. Kozlowski, and P. Parsa: Effect of filter vent blocking on carbon monoxide exposure from selected lower tar cigarette brands; Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 63 (1999) 167–173.
  31. 31. Zacny, J. P., M.I. Stitzer, and J.E. Yingling: Cigarette filter vent blocking: Effects on smoking topography and carbon monoxide exposure; Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 25 (1986) 1245–1252.
  32. 32. Reeves, N., M. Dixon, N. Ayya, D. Hilton, and F.K St. Charles: Measurement of puffing behaviour in lights and ultra lights smokers with ventilation holes partially and fully blocked; Proceedings of the CORESTA Smoke and Technology Groups Joint Meeting, Hamburg, Germany, September 1997, pp. 62–70.
Language: English
Page range: 176 - 184
Submitted on: Apr 5, 2006
Accepted on: Jun 27, 2006
Published on: Dec 30, 2014
Published by: Institut für Tabakforschung GmbH
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2014 CJ Shepperd, FK St Charles, M Lien, M Dixon, published by Institut für Tabakforschung GmbH
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License.