Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Letter to the Editor: Smoking Machine Review Cover
By: RR Baker  
Open Access
|Dec 2014

References

  1. 1. Shatenstein, S.: Smoke in the machine: industry's nervous puff over Tobacco Control report; Tob. Control 11 (2002) 174–175.
  2. 2. Baker, R.R.: The development and significance of standards for smoking-machine methodology; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 20 (2002) 23–41.
  3. 3. Bialous, S.A. and D. Yach: Whose standard is it, anyway? How the tobacco industry determines the International Orga-nization for Standardization (ISO) standards for tobacco and tobacco products; Tob. Control 10 (2001) 96–104.
  4. 4. Baker, R.R.: Whose standard is it anyway? Letter to the Edi-tor; Tob. Control 10 (2001) 394.
  5. 5. Jacob, F.: Whose standard is it anyway? Letter to the Editor; Tob. Control 10 (2001) 394–395.
  6. 6. Bialous, S.A. and D. Yach: Author's (sic) reply; Tob. Control 10 (2001) 395–396.
  7. 7. Kozlowski, L.T. and R.J. O'Connor: Filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents: Tob. Control 11 Supplement 1 (2002) i40–i50.10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i40176606111893814
  8. 8. Lewis, L.S.: Filter vent blocking. Letter to the Editor; Tob. Control 11 (2002) 285.
  9. 9. Kozlowski, L.T. and R.J. O'Connor: Authors’ reply: Tob. Control 11 (2002) 285–286.
Language: English
Page range: 360 - 360
Published on: Dec 30, 2014
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2014 RR Baker, published by Institut für Tabakforschung GmbH
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.