References
- 1. Shatenstein, S.: Smoke in the machine: industry's nervous puff over Tobacco Control report; Tob. Control 11 (2002) 174–175.
- 2. Baker, R.R.: The development and significance of standards for smoking-machine methodology; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int20 (2002) 23–41.
- 3. Bialous, S.A. and D. Yach: Whose standard is it, anyway? How the tobacco industry determines the International Orga-nization for Standardization (ISO) standards for tobacco and tobacco products; Tob. Control 10 (2001) 96–104.
- 4. Baker, R.R.: Whose standard is it anyway? Letter to the Edi-tor; Tob. Control 10 (2001) 394.
- 5. Jacob, F.: Whose standard is it anyway? Letter to the Editor; Tob. Control 10 (2001) 394–395.
- 6. Bialous, S.A. and D. Yach: Author'sreply; Tob. Control 10 (2001) 395–396.
- 7. Kozlowski, L.T. and R.J. O'Connor: Filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents: Tob. Control 11 Supplement 1 (2002) i40–i50.
- 8. Lewis, L.S.: Filter vent blocking. Letter to the Editor; Tob. Control 11 (2002) 285.
- 9. Kozlowski, L.T. and R.J. O'Connor: Authors’ reply: Tob. Control 11 (2002) 285–286.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cttr-2013-0751 | Journal eISSN: 2719-9509 (formerly 1612-9237)
Language: English
Page range: 360 - 360
Published on: Dec 30, 2014
Published by: Beiträge zur Tabakforschung GmbH
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:
© 2014 RR Baker, published by Beiträge zur Tabakforschung GmbH
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.