Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The IDEA Design Scaffold: A Developmental Framework for Functional Ideation in Systemic Design Cover

The IDEA Design Scaffold: A Developmental Framework for Functional Ideation in Systemic Design

By:   
Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Allen, J.W.P., & Bickhard, M.H. (2022). Emergent Constructivism: Theoretical and Methodological Considerations. Human Development, 66(4–5), 276–294.
  2. Amabile, T.M., & Pratt, M.G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001
  3. Anton, A.I. (1996). Goal-based requirements analysis. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Requirements Engineering, 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRE.1996.491438
  4. Arnellos, A., Spyrou, T., & Darzentas, J. (2008). Meaning Needs Functional Emergence: Shedding Novel Light onto Difficult Problems. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 15, 50–56.
  5. Banathy, B.H. (1996). Designing Social Systems in a Changing World. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9981-1
  6. Barbrook-Johnson, P., & Penn, A.S. (2022). Systems Mapping: How to build and use causal models of systems. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-01919-7
  7. Bauer, J.M., & Herder, P.M. (2009). Designing Socio-Technical Systems. In A. Meijers (Ed.), Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences (pp. 601–630). North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51667-1.50026-4
  8. Beghetto, R.A., & Kaufman, J.C. (2007). Toward a Broader Conception of Creativity: A Case for mini-c Creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.1.2.73
  9. Bickhard, M.H. (1978). The Nature of Developmental Stages. Human Development, 21(4), 217–233.
  10. Bickhard, M.H. (1988). Piaget on Variation and Selection Models: Structuralism, Logical Necessity, and Inter-activism. Human Development, 31(5), 274–312.
  11. Bickhard, M.H. (1992). Scaffolding and Self-scaffolding: Central aspects of development. In L.T. Winegar & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Children’s Development Within Social Context (Vol. 2, pp. 33–52). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  12. Bickhard, M.H. (1999). On the Cognition in Cognitive Development. Developmental Review, 19(3), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1999.0489
  13. Bickhard, M.H. (2003). An integration of motivation and cognition. In L. Smith, C. Rogers, & P. Tomlinson (Eds.), BJEP Monograph Series II: Part 2 Development and Motivation: Joint Perspectives. British Psychological Society. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsmono.2003.cat529.5
  14. Bickhard, M.H. (2005). Functional scaffolding and self-scaffolding. New Ideas in Psychology, Revisiting Scaffolding: What Do We Think We Know and What Do We Still Need to Figure Out?, 23(3), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.04.001
  15. Bickhard, M.H. (2006). Developmental normativity and normative development. In L. Smith & J. Voneche (Eds.), Norms in human development (pp. 57–76). Cambridge University Press.
  16. Bickhard, M.H. (2007). Learning is Scaffolded Construction. In D.W. Kritt & L.T. Winegar (Eds.), Education and Technology (pp. 73–88). Rowman & Littlefield.
  17. Bickhard, M.H. (2009). Interactivism: A manifesto. New Ideas in Psychology, 27(1), 85–95.
  18. Bickhard, M.H. (2019). Dynamics Is Not Enough: An Interactivist Perspective. Human Development, 63(3–4), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1159/000503826
  19. Bickhard, M.H. (2024). The Whole Person: Toward a Naturalism of Minds and Persons (1st ed.). Academic Press.
  20. Bickhard, M.H., & Campbell, D.T. (2003). Variations in Variation and Selection: The Ubiquity of the Variation-and-Selective-Retention Ratchet in Emergent Organizational Complexity. Foundations of Science, 8(3), 215–282. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025046917589
  21. Bickhard, M.H., & Campbell, R.L. (1996). Topologies of learning and development. New Ideas in Psychology, 14(2), 111–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-118X(96)00015-3
  22. Bickhard, M.H., & Terveen, L. (1995). Foundational Issues in Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science: Impasse and Solution. Elsevier Science Publishers.
  23. Boulton, J.G., Allen, P.M., & Bowman, C. (2015). Embracing Complexity: Strategic Perspectives for an Age of Turbulence. Oxford University Press.
  24. Buchanan, R. (2019). Systems Thinking and Design Thinking: The Search for Principles in the World We Are Making. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 5(2), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.04.001
  25. Campbell, D.T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67(6), 380–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040373
  26. Campbell, R.L., & Bickhard, M.H. (1986). Knowing levels and developmental stages (Vol. 16). Karger.
  27. Campbell, R.L., & Bickhard, M.H. (1992). Types of constraints on development: An interactivist approach. Developmental Review, 12(3), 311–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(92)90012-Q
  28. Caporael, L.R., Griesemer, J.R., & Wimsatt, W.C. (2014). Developing Scaffolds: An Introduction. In J.R. Griesemer, W.C. Wimsatt, & L.R. Caporael (Eds.), Developing scaffolds in evolution, culture, and cognition. The MIT Press.
  29. Capra, F., & Luisi, P.L. (2014). The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision (draft). CUP.
  30. Carver, C.S., & Scheier, M.F. (2012). Cybernetic Control Processes and the Self-Regulation of Behavior. In R.M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation (Illustrated edition, pp. 28–42). Oxford University Press.
  31. Carver, C.S., & Scheier, M.F. (2017). Self-Regulatory Functions Supporting Motivated Action. In A.J. Elliot (Ed.), Advances in Motivation Science (pp. 1–37). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2017.02.002
  32. Charyton, C., Jagacinski, R.J., & Merrill, J.A. (2008). CEDA: A research instrument for creative engineering design assessment. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(3), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.3.147
  33. Checkland, P.B., & Poulter, J. (2020). Soft Systems Methodology. In M. Reynolds & S. Holwell (Eds.), Systems Approaches to Making Change: A Practical Guide (pp. 201–253). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7472-1_5
  34. Christensen, W.D. (2004). Self-directedness, integration and higher cognition. Language Sciences, Distributed Cognition and Integrational Linguistics, 26(6), 661–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2004.09.010
  35. Christensen, W.D., & Hooker, C.A. (1999). The Organization of Knowledge: Beyond Campbell’s Evolutionary Epistemology. Philosophy of Science, 66, S237–S249.
  36. Christensen, W.D., & Hooker, C.A. (2000). An interactivist-constructivist approach to intelligence: Self-directed anticipative learning. Philosophical Psychology, 13(1), 5–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080050002717
  37. Collier, J.D., & Hooker, C.A. (1999). Complexly Organised Dynamical Systems. Open Systems & Information Dynamics, 6(3), 241–302. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009662321079
  38. Cropley, D.H. (2015). Creativity in Engineering: Novel Solutions to Complex Problems (1st ed.). Academic Press.
  39. Cropley, D.H., & Cropley, A. (2005). Engineering Creativity: A Systems Concept of Functional Creativity. In Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 169–185). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611925
  40. Csikszentmihályi, M. (1988). Motivation and creativity: Toward a synthesis of structural and energistic approaches to cognition. New Ideas in Psychology, 6(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-118X(88)90001-3
  41. Csikszentmihályi, M., & Wolfe, R. (2014). New Conceptions and Research Approaches to Creativity: Implications of a Systems Perspective for Creativity in Education. In The Systems Model of Creativity (pp. 161–184). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9085-7_10
  42. Daly, S.R., Mosyjowski, E.A., & Seifert, C.M. (2014). Teaching Creativity in Engineering Courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(3), 417–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20048
  43. Design Council. (2022). The Double Diamond: 15 years on. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-work/news-opinion/double-diamond-15-years/
  44. Farrell, R.P., & Hooker, C.A. (2007a). Applying Self-Directed Anticipative Learning to Science I: Agency, Error, and the Interactive Exploration of Possibility Space in Early Ape-Languagae Research. Perspectives on Science, 15(1), 87–124.
  45. Farrell, R.P., & Hooker, C.A. (2007b). Applying Self-Directed Anticipative Learning to Science II: Learning How to Learn Across a Revolution in Early Ape Language Research. Perspectives on Science, 15(2), 222–255. https://doi.org/10.1162/posc.2007.15.2.222
  46. Farrell, R.P., & Hooker, C.A. (2013). Design, science and wicked problems. Design Studies, 34(6), 681–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.05.001
  47. Feldman, D.H. (1989). Creativity: Proof that development occurs. In W. Damon (Ed.), Child development today and tomorrow (pp. 240–260). Jossey-Bass.
  48. Feldman, D.H. (1999). The Development of Creativity. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 169–186). Cambridge University Press.
  49. Gabora, L., & Steel, M. (2022). From Uncertainty to Insight: An Autocatalytic Framework. In R.A. Beghetto & G.J. Jaeger (Eds.), Uncertainty: A Catalyst for Creativity, Learning and Development (pp. 125–156). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98729-9_8
  50. Ge, X., Chen, C.-H., & Davis, K.A. (2005). Scaffolding Novice Instructional Designers’ Problem-Solving Processes Using Question Prompts in a Web-Based Learning Environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(2), 219–248. https://doi.org/10.2190/5F6J-HHVF-2U2B-8T3G
  51. Goel, V. (1995). Sketches of Thought. MIT Press.
  52. Green, A.E., Beaty, R.E., Kenett, Y.N., & Kaufman, J.C. (2024). The Process Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 36(3), 544–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2254573
  53. Griesemer, J.R., Wimsatt, W.C., & Caporael, L.R. (2014). Developing scaffolds in evolution, culture, and cognition. The MIT Press.
  54. Hathcock, S.J., Dickerson, D.L., Eckhoff, A., & Katsioloudis, P. (2015). Scaffolding for Creative Product Possibilities in a Design-Based STEM Activity. Research in Science Education, 45(5), 727–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9437-7
  55. Head, B.W. (2022). Wicked Problems in Public Policy: Understanding and Responding to Complex Challenges. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94580-0
  56. Hennessey, B.A., & Amabile, T.M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 569–598. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416
  57. Holton, D., & Clarke, D. (2006). Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390500285818
  58. Hooker, C.A. (1994). Regulatory constructivism: On the relation between evolutionary epistemology and Piaget’s genetic epistemology. Biology and Philosophy, 9(2), 197–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00857932
  59. Hooker, C.A. (Ed.). (2011). Philosophy of complex systems. NH.
  60. Hooker, C.A. (2018). A New Problem-Solving Paradigm for Philosophy of Science. Perspectives on Science, 26(2), 266–291. https://doi.org/10.1162/POSC_a_00275
  61. Jackson, M. (2019). Critical Systems Thinking and the Management of Complexity. Wiley.
  62. Jones, P. (2014). Systemic Design Principles for Complex Social Systems. In G.S. Metcalf (Ed.), Social Systems and Design (pp. 91–128). Springer Japan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54478-4_4
  63. Jones, P., & Kijima, K. (Eds.). (2018). Systemic Design: Theory, Methods, and Practice (Vol. 8). Springer Japan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55639-8
  64. Lee, C.-S., & Kolodner, J.L. (2011). Scaffolding Students’ Development of Creative Design Skills: A Curriculum Reference Model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 3–15.
  65. Martindale, C. (1999). Biological Bases of Creativity. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 137–152). Cambridge University Press.
  66. Mate, J.L., & Silva, A. (Eds.). (2004). Requirements Engineering For Sociotechnical Systems. Information Science Pub.
  67. Meadows, D.H. (2008). Thinking in Systems: A Primer. Chelsea Green Publishing.
  68. Mylopoulos, J., Chung, L., Liao, S., Wang, H., & Yu, E. (2001). Exploring alternatives during requirements analysis. IEEE Software, 18(1), 92–96. IEEE Software. https://doi.org/10.1109/52.903174
  69. Navas, H.V.G. (2017). Problem Solving and Increase of Ideality of Complex Systems. In F.-J. Kahlen, S. Flumer-felt, & A. Alves (Eds.), Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems: New Findings and Approaches (pp. 305–327). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_11
  70. Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World (2nd ed.). The MIT Press.
  71. Norman, D.A. (2008). Signifiers, not Affordances. Interactions, 15(6), 18–19.
  72. Norman, D.A., & Stappers, P.J. (2015). DesignX: Complex Sociotechnical Systems. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 1(2), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2016.01.002
  73. Rittel, H.W.J., & Webber, M.M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
  74. Runco, M.A. (2010). Divergent Thinking, Creativity, and Ideation. In J.C. Kaufman & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 413–446). Cambridge University Press.
  75. Runco, M.A. (2022). Uncertainty Makes Creativity Possible. In R.A. Beghetto & G.J. Jaeger (Eds.), Uncertainty: A Catalyst for Creativity, Learning and Development (pp. 23–36). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98729-9_3
  76. Runco, M.A., & Jaeger, G.J. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
  77. Sevaldson, B. (2022). Designing Complexity: The Methodology and Practice of Systems Oriented Design. Common Ground Research Networks.
  78. Simon, H.A. (1977). The Organization of Complex Systems. In H.A. Simon (Ed.), Models of Discovery: And Other Topics in the Methods of Science (pp. 245–261). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9521-1_14
  79. Simonton, D.K. (2011). Creativity and Discovery as Blind Variation: Campbell’s (1960) BVSR Model after the Half-Century Mark. Review of General Psychology, 15(2), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022912
  80. Snell-Rood, E.C., & Steck, M.K. (2019). Behaviour shapes environmental variation and selection on learning and plasticity: Review of mechanisms and implications. Animal Behaviour, 147, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.08.007
  81. Sternberg, R.J. (2003). The Development of Creativity as a Decision-Making Process. In R.K. Sawyer (Ed.), Creativity and Development. Oxford University Press.
  82. Sternberg, R.J., Lubart, T.I., & Wan-chi. (1999). The Concept of Creativity: Prospects and Paradigms. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge University Press.
  83. Waddock, S., Meszoely, G.M., Waddell, S., & Dentoni, D. (2015). The complexity of wicked problems in large scale change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(6), 993–1012. (world). https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-08-2014-0146
  84. Wu, J. (2013). Hierarchy Theory: An Overview. In R. Rozzi, S.T.A. Pickett, C. Palmer, J.J. Armesto, & J.B. Callicott (Eds.), Linking Ecology and Ethics for a Changing World: Values, Philosophy, and Action (pp. 281–301). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7470-4_24
  85. Xenakis, I., & Arnellos, A. (2013). The relation between interaction aesthetics and affordances. Design Studies, 34(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2012.05.004
  86. Xenakis, I., & Arnellos, A. (2014). Aesthetic perception and its minimal content: A naturalistic perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1038). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01038
  87. Xenakis, I., & Arnellos, A. (2025). Relating creativity to aesthetics through learning and development: An Inter-activist-Constructivist framework. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-025-10084-5
  88. Xenakis, I., & Grigoreli, D. (2025). The IDEA Design Scaffold: Empowering Novice Designers with Systemic and Sustainable Design Education. In V. Clemente, G. Gomes, M. Reis, S. Félix, S. Ala, & D. Jones (Eds.), Design Research Society (DRS) Special Interest Group (EdSIG) LearnXDesign 2025. https://doi.org/10.21606/drslxd.2025.019
Language: English
Page range: 23 - 59
Submitted on: Nov 5, 2025
Accepted on: Jul 17, 2026
Published online: Sep 25, 2026
Published in print: Dec 1, 2026
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Ioannis Xenakis, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.