Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Empathy in Action: How Motivation and Empathic Engagement Shape Creative Processes in Human-Computer Interaction Cover

Empathy in Action: How Motivation and Empathic Engagement Shape Creative Processes in Human-Computer Interaction

By:  and    
Open Access
|May 2026

References

  1. Alzayed, M.A., Miller, S.R., & McComb, C. (2021). Empathic creativity: Can trait empathy predict creative concept generation and selection? AI EDAM, 35(4), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060421000196
  2. Amabile, T.M. (2012). Componential theory of creativity (Working Paper No. 12–096). Harvard Business School.
  3. Amabile, T.M. (2018). Creativity In Context: Update To The Social Psychology Of Creativity. Routledge.
  4. Amabile, T.M., & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the Social Psychology of Creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.001
  5. Amabile, T.M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184. https://doi.org/10.5465/256995
  6. Bary, A. (2021, July 26). Big 5 Tech Stocks Now Account for 23% of the S&P 500. Barron’s. https://www.barrons.com/articles/big-tech-stocks-sp-500-51627312933?tesla=y
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  8. Daly, S.R., Mosyjowski, E.A., & Seifert, C.M. (2014). Teaching creativity in engineering courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(3), 417–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20048
  9. Davis, M.H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
  10. de Jesus, S.N., Rus, C.L., Lens, W., & Imaginário, S. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and creativity related to product: A meta-analysis of the studies published between 1990–2010. Creativity Research Journal, 25(1), 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.752235
  11. De Zoysa, R., Male, S., & Chapman, E. (2024). Motivation and the role of empathy in engineering work. Australa-sian Journal of Engineering Education, 29(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2024.2346410
  12. Drouet, L., Bongard-Blanchy, K., Koenig, V., & Lallemand, C. (2022). Empathy in design scale: Development and initial insights. In Proceedings of Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519848
  13. Du, Y., Zhang, L., & Chen, Y. (2016). From creative process engagement to performance: Bidirectional support. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(7), 966–982. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-03-2015-0046
  14. Forgeard, M. (2022). Prosocial motivation and creativity in the arts and sciences: Qualitative and quantitative evidence. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 18(2), 222–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000435
  15. Forgeard, M.J.C., & Mecklenburg, A.C. (2013). The two dimensions of motivation and a reciprocal model of the creative process. Review of General Psychology, 17(3), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032104
  16. Frich, J., Mose Biskjaer, M., & Dalsgaard, P. (2018). Twenty years of creativity research in human-computer interaction: Current state and future directions. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, DIS ’18, (pp. 1235–1257). https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196732
  17. Friedman, B., & Hendry, D.G. (2019). Value Sensitive Design: Shaping Technology with Moral Imagination. MIT Press.
  18. Gabriel, A., Camargo, M., Monticolo, D., Boly, V., & Bourgault, M. (2016). Improving the idea selection process in creative workshops through contextualisation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 1503–1513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.039
  19. Ganiev, A.G., & Tashev, S.N. (2021). The role of “imagination” in the process of “creative thinking” developing students’ “imagination” and “creative thinking” skills in teaching physics. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 633–642.
  20. Gerber, E.M., & Martin, C.K. (2012). Supporting creativity within web-based self-services. International Journal of Design, 6(1), 85–100.
  21. Gilet, A.-L., Mella, N., Studer, J., Grühn, D., & Labouvie-Vief, G. (2013). Assessing dispositional empathy in adults: A French validation of the interpersonal reactivity index (IRI). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du comportement, 45(1), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030425
  22. Grant, A.M., & Berry, J.W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.59215085
  23. Green, A.E., Beaty, R.E., Kenett, Y.N., & Kaufman, J.C. (2024). The Process Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 36(3), 544–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2254573
  24. Hess, J.L., & Fila, N.D. (2016). The development and growth of empathy among engineering students. In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.26120. The Development and Growth of Empathy Among Engineering Students. Publisher. https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/handle/1805/12192
  25. Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semistructured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
  26. Karakaya, A.F., & Demirkan, H. (2015). Collaborative digital environments to enhance the creativity of designers. Computers in Human Behavior, 42, 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.029
  27. Kim, H.J., Yi, P., & Ko, B.W. (2022). Deepening students’ experiences with problem identification and definition in an empathetic approach: Lessons from a university design-thinking program. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15(3), 852–865. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-03-2022-0083
  28. Kuo, H.-C., Tseng, Y.-C., & Yang, Y.-T. C. (2019). Promoting college student’s learning motivation and creativity through a STEM interdisciplinary PBL human-computer interaction system design and development course. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.09.001
  29. Lee, H.-K., & Park, J.E. (2021). Designing a new empathy-oriented prototyping toolkit for the design thinking process: Creativity and design sensibility. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 40(2), 324–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12345
  30. Leech, N.L., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2011). Beyond constant comparison qualitative data analysis: Using NVivo. School Psychology Quarterly, 26(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022711
  31. Li, X., Chen, J., & Fu, H. (2024). The roles of empathy and motivation in creativity in design thinking. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 34(4), 1305–1324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09869-z
  32. Nazir, C., & Lin, M. (2023). Beyond empathy: how curiosity promotes to greater care. In K. Vaes, & J. Verlinden (Eds.), Connectivity and creativity in times of conflict, Academia Press. https://doi.org/10.26530/978940 1496476-115
  33. Norman, D.A. (2004). Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books.
  34. Oleson, A., Solomon, M., & Ko, A.J. (2020). Computing students’ learning difficulties in HCI Education. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Honolulu, HI. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376149
  35. Oztop, P., Katsikopoulos, K., & Gummerum, M. (2018). Creativity through connectedness: The role of closeness and perspective taking in group creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 30(3), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1488347
  36. Park, H.J., & Lee, J.H. (2025). Nurturing an empathic mindset in human–computer interaction education: An integrative review of empathy enhancement strategies. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 49(3), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2025.2453494
  37. Salminen, M., Hamari, J., & Ravaja, N. (2021). Empathizing with the end user: Effect of empathy and emotional intelligence on ideation. Creativity Research Journal, 33(2), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1864164
  38. Sormani, E., & Uude, K. (2022). Academics’ prosocial motivation for engagement with society: The case of German academics in health science. Science and Public Policy, 49(6), 962–971. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac042
  39. Souto, V.T., Fadel, L.M., & Spinillo, C.G. (2024). Gender differences in design creativity. In proceedings of the Design Society, 4, 1125–1134. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2024.115
  40. Strobel, J., Hess, J., Pan, R., & Morris, C.A.W. (2013). Empathy and care within engineering: Qualitative perspectives from engineering faculty and practicing engineers. Engineering Studies, 5(2), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2013.814136
  41. Tian, X., Peng, X., & Peng, X. (2021). Influence of prosocial motivation on employee creativity: The moderating role of regulatory focus and the mediating role of knowledge sharing. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–17. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.704630
  42. Warr, A., & O’Neill, E. (2005). Understanding design as a social creative process. In proceedings of the 5th Conference on Creativity & Cognition (pp. 118–127). https://doi.org/10.1145/1056224.1056242
  43. Weibel, D., Martarelli, C.S., Häberli, D., & Mast, F.W. (2018). The fantasy questionnaire: A measure to assess creative and imaginative fantasy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(4), 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1331913
  44. Wilcox, L., DiSalvo, B., Henneman, D., & Wang, Q. (2019). Design in the HCI classroom: Setting a research agenda. In proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 871–883). https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322381
  45. Yuan, Y.-H., Wu, M.-H., Hu, M.-L., & Lin, I.-C. (2019). Teacher’s encouragement on creativity, intrinsic motivation, and creativity: The mediating role of creative process engagement. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(3), 312–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.181
  46. Zaki, J. (2014). Empathy: A motivated account. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1608–1647. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037679
  47. Zhang, X., & Bartol, K.M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48037118
  48. Zhang, X., Pi, Z., Li, C., & Hu, W. (2021). Intrinsic motivation enhances online group creativity via promoting members’ effort, not interaction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 606–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13045
  49. Zwoliński, G., Kamińska, D., Haamer, R.E., Pinto-Coelho, L., & Anbarjafari, G. (2023). Enhancing empathy through virtual reality: Developing a universal design training application for students. Medycyna Pracy, 74(3), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.13075/mp.5893.01407
Language: English
Page range: 52 - 73
Submitted on: Jul 7, 2025
Accepted on: Apr 12, 2026
Published on: May 15, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 Hye Jeong Park, Jae Hwa Lee, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.