Recalling Ideas: Mnemonic and Attentional Inhibition in Creativity

Jędrusiak, Jakub

doi:10.2478/ctra-2024-0012

Abstract

Executive functions (updating, shifting, and inhibition) play an important role in creativity. Until now, only attentional inhibition (the Stroop effect) but not mnemonic inhibition (Thinking-Induced Forgetting, TIF) have been studied. Additionally, the temporal dynamics of the influence of the executive functions on creativity remains unknown. Using structural equation modelling and multilevel models, the relationships between both types of inhibition with creative thinking, as well as their temporal dynamics, were tested on a sample of 300 individuals. Mnemonic and attentional inhibition were shown to be independently associated with originality of thinking. Mnemonic inhibition was found to be more important in the later phases of generating ideas, while attentional inhibition was equally important throughout the idea-generation process, consistent with the predictions of the controlled attention theory of creativity. An interaction between both types of inhibition was also observed, indicating that attentional inhibition may be a prerequisite for mnemonic inhibition.

References

Anderson, M.C., Bjork, R.A., & Bjork, E.L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1063–1087. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1063
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Beaty, R.E., & Silvia, P.J. (2012). Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029171
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Benedek, M., Beaty, R.E., Schacter, D.L., & Kenett, Y.N. (2023). The role of memory in creative ideation. Nature Reviews Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00158-z
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Benedek, M., & Jauk, E. (2019). Creativity and cognitive control. In J.C. Kaufman & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 200–223). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.012
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Sommer, M., Arendasy, M., & Neubauer, A.C. (2014). Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: The common and differential involvement of executive functions in intelligence and creativity. Intelligence, 46, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.007
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bjork, E.L., Bjork, R.A., & Anderson, M.C. (1998). Varieties of goal-directed forgetting. Intentional Forgetting: Interdisciplinary Approaches, 103.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chen, T., & Li, D. (2007). The Roles of Working Memory Updating and Processing Speed in Mediating Agerelated Differences in Fluid Intelligence. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14(6), 631–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825580600987660
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chen, Z., & Zou, L. (2021). The Stroop Effect Under the Interference of Language. Presented at the International
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Conference on Public Relations and Social Sciences (ICPRSS 2021), Kunming, China. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211020.195
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Christensen, P.R., Guilford, J.P., & Wilson, R.C. (1957). Relations of creative responses to working time and instructions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53(2), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045461
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, A.M., & Loftus, E.F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Denckla, M.B. (1996). A theory and model of executive function: A neuropsychological perspective.In G.R. Lyon, & N.A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Attention, memory, and executive function (pp. 263–278). Paul H Brookes Publishing Co.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive Functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Eriksen, B.A., & Eriksen, C.W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203267
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Forthmann, B., Gerwig, A., Holling, H., Çelik, P., Storme, M., & Lubart, T. (2016). The be-creative effect in divergent thinking: The interplay of instruction and object frequency. Intelligence, 57, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.03.005
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Forthmann, B., Karwowski, M., & Beaty, R.E. (2023). Don’t throw the “bad” ideas away! Multidimensional top scoring increases reliability of divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000571
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2019). An R Companion to Applied Regression. Sage. Retrieved from https://www.johnfox.ca/Companion/
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Friedman, N.P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The Relations Among Inhibition and Interference Control Functions: A Latent-Variable Analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(1), 101–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.101
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Friedman, N.P., Miyake, A., Corley, R.P., Young, S.E., DeFries, J.C., & Hewitt, J. K. (2006). Not All Executive Functions Are Related to Intelligence. Psychological Science, 17(2), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01681.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
George, T., & Wiley, J. (2019). Fixation, flexibility, and forgetting during alternate uses tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(3), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000173
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gilhooly, K.J., Fioratou, E., Anthony, S.H., & Wynn, V. (2007). Divergent thinking: Strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects. British Journal of Psychology, 98(4), 611–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2007.tb00467.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Guilford, J.P. (1957). Creative abilities in the arts. Psychological Review, 64(2), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048280
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jędrusiak, J., Forthmann, B., Beaty, R.E., & Karwowski, M. (2023). mtscr: Multidimentional Top Scoring for Creativity Research [R]. https://github.com/jakub-jedrusiak/mtscr
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kassambara, A. (2021). rstatix: Pipe-Friendly Framework for Basic Statistical Tests. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rstatix
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaufman, J.C., & Sternberg, R.J. (Eds.). (2019). The Cambridge handbook of creativity (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kiefer, M., Ahlegian, M., & Spitzer, M. (2005). Working Memory Capacity, Indirect Semantic Priming, and Stroop Interference: Pattern of Interindividual Prefrontal Performance Differences in Healthy Volunteers. Neuropsychology, 19(3), 332–344. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.19.3.332
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koppel, R.H., & Storm, B.C. (2014). Escaping mental fixation: Incubation and inhibition in creative problem solving. Memory, 22(4), 340–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2013.789914
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koriat, A., & Levy-Sadot, R. (2000). Conscious and Unconscious Metacognition: A Rejoinder. Consciousness and Cognition, 9(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.2000.0436
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
LaRocque, J.J., Eichenbaum, A.S., Starrett, M.J., Rose, N.S., Emrich, S.M., & Postle, B.R. (2015). The short- and long-term fates of memory items retained outside the focus of attention. Memory & Cognition, 43(3), 453–468. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0486-y
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lebuda, I., & Benedek, M. (2023). A systematic framework of creative metacognition. Physics of Life Reviews, 46, 161–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2023.07.002
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lemire-Rodger, S., Lam, J., Viviano, J.D., Stevens, W.D., Spreng, R.N., & Turner, G.R. (2019). Inhibit, switch, and update: A within-subject fMRI investigation of executive control. Neuropsychologia, 132, 107134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107134
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048850
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Miyake, A., Friedman, N.P., Emerson, M.J., Witzki, A.H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T.D. (2000). The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N.P. (2012). The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Four General Conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429458
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Murayama, K., Miyatsu, T., Buchli, D., & Storm, B.C. (2014). Forgetting as a consequence of retrieval: A metaanalytic review of retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1383–1409. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037505
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Organisciak, P., & Dumas, D. (2020). Open Creativity Scoring. University of Denver. https://openscoring.du.edu/
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Palmiero, M., Fusi, G., Crepaldi, M., Borsa, V.M., & Rusconi, M.L. (2022). Divergent thinking and the core executive functions: A state-of-the-art review. Cognitive Processing, 23(3), 341–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-022-01091-4
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
R Core Team. (2022). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Runco, M.A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 66–75.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shilko, R.S., Dormashev, Y.B., & Romanov, V.Y. (2013). Attention During Short-term Remembering: The Memory Stroop Effect and the Memory Facilitation Effect. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 335–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.306
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Silvia, P.J., & Beaty, R.E. (2012). Making creative metaphors: The importance of fluid intelligence for creative thought. Intelligence, 40(4), 343–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.02.005
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Simon, J.R., & Wolf, J.D. (1963). Choice Reaction Time as a Function of Angular Stimulus-Response Correspondence and Age. Ergonomics, 6(1), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140136308930679
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sowden, P.T., Pringle, A., & Gabora, L. (2015). The shifting sands of creative thinking: Connections to dualprocess theory. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(1), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2014.885464
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stins, J.F., Polderman, J.C. (Tinca), Boomsma, D.I., & De Geus, E.J.C. (2005). Response Interference and Working Memory in 12-Year-Old Children. Child Neuropsychology, 11(2), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/092970490911351
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stoet, G. (2010). PsyToolkit: A software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 1096–1104. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.4.1096
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stoet, G. (2017). PsyToolkit: A Novel Web-Based Method for Running Online Questionnaires and Reaction-Time Experiments. Teaching of Psychology, 44(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628316677643
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Storm, B.C., & Angello, G. (2010). Overcoming Fixation: Creative Problem Solving and Retrieval-Induced Forgetting. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1263–1265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610379864
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Storm, B.C., Angello, G., & Bjork, E.L. (2011). Thinking can cause forgetting: Memory dynamics in creative problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1287–1293. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023921
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Storm, B.C., Angello, G., Buchli, D.R., Koppel, R.H., Little, J.L., & Nestojko, J.F. (2015). A Review of Retrieval-Induced Forgetting in the Contexts of Learning, Eyewitness Memory, Social Cognition, Autobiographical Memory, and Creative Cognition. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 62, 141–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2014.09.005
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Storm, B.C., & Patel, T.N. (2014). Forgetting as a consequence and enabler of creative thinking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(6), 1594–1609. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000006
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Storm, B.C., & Stone, S.M. (2015). Saving-Enhanced Memory: The Benefits of Saving on the Learning and Remembering of New Information. Psychological Science, 26(2), 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614559285
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643–662. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054651
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Torrance, E.P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Troche, S.J., Makowski, L.M., Pahud, O., & Rammsayer, T.H. (2024). Working memory updating as a mediator of the relation between temporal resolution power and psychometric intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 220, 112479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112479
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Verde, M.F. (2012). Retrieval-Induced Forgetting and Inhibition. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 56, 47–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394393-4.00002-9
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ward, T.B., & Kolomyts, Y. (2019). Creative Cognition. In J.C. Kaufman & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 175–199). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.012
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L.D., François, R., … Yutani, H. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Recalling Ideas: Mnemonic and Attentional Inhibition in Creativity

Abstract

Paradigm

My account