The Generative Force of the Domain and the Field: Contributions of Highly Creative Women
By:
References
- Academy Museum. (n.d.).
Academy museum Óscar timeline . AcademyMuseum.org. Retrieved January 25, 2022, fromhttps://oscars.academymuseum.org/timelines/oscars-firsts - Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, and bodies: A theory of gendered organizations.
Gender & Society ,4 (2), 139–158.https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002">https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002 - Amabile, T.M. (1996).
Creativity in context . Westview Press. - Ayalon, L. (2014). Perceived age, gender, and racial/ethnic discrimination in Europe: Results from the European Social Survey.
Educational Gerontology ,40 (7), 499–517.https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2013.845490">https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2013.845490 - Baer, J., & Kaufman, J.C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity.
The Journal of Creative Behavior ,42 (2), 75–105.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01289.x">https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01289.x - Bonham, K.S., & Stefan, M.I. (2017). Women are underrepresented in computational biology: An analysis of the scholarly literature in biology, computer science and computational biology.
PLOS Computational Biology ,13 (10), 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005134">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005134 - Caleo, S., & Heilman, M. (2014). Is this a man’s world? Obstacles to women’s success in male-typed domains. In R.J. Burke & D. Major (Eds.),
Gender in organizations: Are men allies or adversaries to women’s career advancement? (pp. 217–233). Edward Elgar Publishing.https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781955703.00019">https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781955703.00019 - Cech, E.A., & Blair-Loy, M. (2010). Perceiving glass ceilings? Meritocratic versus structural explanations of gender inequality among women in science and technology.
Social Problems ,57 (3), 371–397.https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2010.57.3.371">https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2010.57.3.371 - Cidlinská, K. (2019). How not to scare off women: Different needs of female early-stage researchers in STEM and SSH fields and the implications for support measures.
Higher Education ,78 , 365–388.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0347-x">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0347-x - Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2019). Feminist qualitative methods and methodologies in psychology: A review and reflection.
Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review ,2 (1), 13–28.https://uwe-repository.work-tribe.com/output/854611 - Cohen, P.N., & Huffman, M.L. (2007). Working for the woman? Female managers and the gender wage gap.
American Sociological Review ,72 (5), 681–704.https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200502">https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200502 - Crosby, F. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination.
American Behavioral Scientist ,27 (3), 371–386.https://doi.org/10.1177/000276484027003008">https://doi.org/10.1177/000276484027003008 - Crosby, F. (2017). Sex discrimination, personal denial, and collateral damage.
Social Justice Research ,30 (1), 89–105.10.1007/s11211-017-0279-0">http://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-017-0279-0 - Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.),
The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). Cambridge University Press. - Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996).
Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention . Harper Collins. - Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014).
The systems model of creativity. The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi . Springer - Dung, S.K., López, A., Barragan, E.L., Reyes, R.J., Thu, R., Castellanos, E., Catalan, F., Huerta-Sánchez, E., & Rohlfs, R.V. (2019). Illuminating women’s hidden contribution to historical theoretical population genetics.
Genetics ,211 (2), 363–366.https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.118.301277">https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.118.301277 - Eysenck, H.J. (1995).
Genius: The natural history of creativity . Cambridge University Press. - Fiorini, R.A. (2018). Transdisciplinary education for deep learning, creativity and innovation.
Eruditio ,2 (4), 123–146.http://worldacademy.org/eruditio/volume-2/issue-4/article/transdisciplinary-education-deep-learning-creativity-and-innovation - Grönlund, A., & Öun, I. (2018). In search of family-friendly careers? Professional strategies, work conditions and gender differences in work–family conflict.
Community, Work & Family ,21 (1), 87–105.10.1080/13668803.2017.1375460">http://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2017.1375460 - Huang, J., Gates, A., Sinatra, R., & Barabasi, A. (2020). Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ,117 (9) 4609–4616.10.1073/pnas.1914221117">http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1914221117 - Isen, A.M., & Reeve, J. (2005). The influence of positive affect on intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Facilitating enjoyment of play responsible work behavior, and self-control.
Motivation and Emotion ,29 , 295–323.10.1007/s11031-006-9019-8">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9019-8 - Kaufman, J.C., & Beghetto, R.A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity.
Review of General Psychology ,13 (1), 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688">https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688 - Kaufman, J., Glăveanu, V.P., & Baer, J. (2017).
The Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains . Cambridge Press.10.1017/9781316274385">http://doi.org/10.1017/9781316274385 - Kleven, H., Landais, C., Posch, J., Steinhauer, A., & Zweimüller, J. (2019). Child penalties across countries: Evidence and explanations.
AEA Papers and Proceedings ,109 , 122–126.10.1257/pandp.20191078">http://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20191078 - Kronborg, L. (2010). What contributes to talent development in eminent women?
Gifted and Talented International ,25 (2), 11–27.https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2010.11673567">https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2010.11673567 - Kronborg, L. (2021). Eminent women were once gifted girls: How to transform gifted potential into eminent talents. In R.J. Sternberg & D. Ambrose (Eds.),
Conceptions of giftedness and talent (1st ed., pp. 215–233). Palgrave Macmillan.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56869-6_13">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56869-6_13 - Lerner, M.J. (1981). The justice motive in human relations. In M.J. Lerner & S.C. Lerner (Eds.),
The justice motive in social behavior: Critical issues in social justice . Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0429-4_2">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0429-4_2 - Linková, M. (2017). Excellence and its others: Gendered notions of what it takes to succeed in science. In M. Vohlídalová & M. Linková (Eds.),
Gender and neoliberalism in Czech academia (pp. 159–197). Slon. - List, K., Hartford, W., & Renzulli, J. (1991). Creative women’s developmental patterns thorough age thirty-five.
Gifted Education International ,7 (3), 114–122.https://doi.org/10.1177/026142949100700303">https://doi.org/10.1177/026142949100700303 - Nakano, T.C., Oliveira, K.S., & Zaia, P. (2021). Gender differences in creativity: A systematic literature review.
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa ,37 , Article 372116.https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e372116">https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e372116 - Napier, J.L., Suppes, A., & Bettinsoli, M.L. (2020). Denial of gender discrimination is associated with better subjective well-being among women: A system justification account.
Eur J Soc Psychol ,50 (6), 1191–1209.https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2702">https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2702 - Nobel Prize. (n.d.).
Nobel Prize facts . NobelPrize.org. Retrieved January 25, 2022, fromhttps://www.nobel-prize.org/prizes/facts/nobel-prize-facts - Piirto, J. (1991). Why are there so few? Creative women: Visual artists, mathematicians, musicians.
Roeper Review ,13 (3), 142–147.https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199109553340">https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199109553340 - Porto, M.M., & Romo, M.S. (2021). Caracteristicas personales de mujeres altamente creativas: Una revisión sistemática.
Revista Ibero-Americana de Criatividade e Inovação ,2 (4), 241–255.https://recriai.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/59 - Prado, R.M., Alencar, E.M.L.S., & Fleith, D.S. (2016). Diferenças de gênero em criatividade: Análise das pesquisas brasileiras.
Boletim de Psicologia ,66 (144), 113–124.http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0006-59432016000100010&lng=pt&tlng=pt - Prado, R.M., & Fleith, D.S. (2020). Mulheres talentosas no Brasil: Trajetórias e desafios profissionais na sociedade contemporânea.
Psicologia em Estudo ,25 , Article 46906.https://doi.org/10.4025/psicolestud.v25i0.46906">https://doi.org/10.4025/psicolestud.v25i0.46906 - Real Academia Española. (n.d.).
Académicos de número . Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación. Retrieved January 25, 2022, fromhttps://www.rae.es/academicos/academicos-de-numero#main - Reis, S.M. (1995). Talent ignored, talent diverted: The cultural context underlying giftedness in females.
Gifted Child Quarterly ,39 (3), 162–170.https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629503900306">https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629503900306 - Reis, S.M. (2002). Internal barriers, personal issues, and decisions faced by gifted and talented females.
Gifted Child Today ,25 (1), 14–28.https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2002-50">https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2002-50 - Romo, M. (2018). ¿Tiene género la creatividad? Obstáculos a la excelencia en mujeres.
Estudios de Psicología ,35 (3), 247–258.https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-02752018000300003">https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-02752018000300003 - Root-Bernstein, R.S., & Root-Bernstein, M.M. (1999).
Sparks of genius . Houghton Mifflin. - Runco, M.A., Cramond, B., Pagnani, A.R. (2010). Gender and creativity. In J. Chrisler & D. McCreary (Eds.),
Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 343–357). Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1465-1_17">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1465-1_17 - Simonton, D.K. (1994).
Greatness: Who makes history and why . The Guilford Press. - Stainback, K., Kleiner, S., & Skaggs, S. (2016). Women in power: Undoing or redoing the gendered organization?
Gender & Society ,30 (1), 109–135.https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243215602906">https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243215602906 - Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008).
Pesquisa qualitativa: Técnicas e procedimentos para o desenvolvimento de teoria fundamentada . Artmed. - Storage, D., Charlesworth, T.E.S., Banaji, M.R., & Cimpian, A. (2020). Adults and children implicitly associate brilliance with men more than women.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 90, Article 104020.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104020">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104020 - Thompson, T.L., & Pfeiffer, S.I. (2020). The identification and development of creativity with particular attention to gender. In H. David (Ed.),
Understanding gifted children: Perspectives, gender differences and challenges (pp. 69–96). Nova Science Publishers. - Vohlídalová, M. (2017). Academic couples, parenthood and women’s research careers.
European Educational Research Journal ,16 (2–3), 166–182.https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116668883">https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116668883 - Williams, C.L., Muller, C., & Kilanski, K. (2012). Gendered organizations in the new economy.
Gender & Society ,26 (4), 549–573.https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243212445466">https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243212445466
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2022-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2354-0036
Language: English
Page range: 119 - 137
Submitted on: Jun 10, 2022
Accepted on: Dec 27, 2022
Published on: Feb 4, 2023
Published by: University of Bialystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2023 Marina Porto, Manuela Romo, published by University of Bialystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.