Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Predictive Power of Social Environment, Grit, and Motivation for Creative Potential of Science Learners Cover

Predictive Power of Social Environment, Grit, and Motivation for Creative Potential of Science Learners

Open Access
|Sep 2022

References

  1. Abuhassàn, A., & Bates, T. (2015). Grit: Distinguishing effortful persistence from conscientiousness. Journal Of Individual Differences, 36(4), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a00017510.1027/1614-0001/a000175
  2. Alexopoulos, A., Paolucci, P., Sotiriou, S., Bogner, F., Dorigo, T., & Fedi, M. et al. (2021). The colours of the Higgs boson: a study in creativity and science motivation among high-school students in Italy. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00169-410.1186/s40561-021-00169-4
  3. Amabile, T.M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-5533-8
  4. Amabile, T.M. (1990). Within you, without you: Towards a social psychology of creativity and beyond. In M.A. Runco & R.S. Albert (Eds.), Theories ofcreativity (pp. 61–91). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  5. Amabile, T.M., & Fisher, C.M. (2009). Stimulate creativity by fueling passion. In E.A. Locke (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of principles of organizational behavior (2nd Ed.) (pp. 481–498). London: Wiley-Blackwell10.1002/9781119206422.ch26
  6. Amabile, T.M., Goldfarb, P., &Brackfield, S.C. (1990). Social influences on creativity: Evaluation, coaction, and surveillance. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 6–21.10.1080/10400419009534330
  7. Bala, T. (2015). A comparative study of creativity of students in relation to their home environment. International Journal Of Advanced Research In Management And Social Sciences, 4(4), 189–197.
  8. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  9. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Choice Reviews Online, 35(03), 239. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-182610.5860/CHOICE.35-1826
  10. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentive perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
  11. Bandura, A. (2006). Going global with social cognitive theory: From prospect to paydirt. In S.I. Donaldson, D.E. Berger & K. Pezdek (Eds.), The rise of applied psychology: New frontiers and rewarding careers (pp. 53–70). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  12. Barai, B., &Saha, R. (2021). Social Environment and Scientific Creative Potential: Understanding the Mediating Variables Within. International Journal of Education and Psychology in the Community, 11(1 & 2), 120–139.
  13. Baer, J., & Kaufman, J.C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27, 158–163.10.1080/02783190509554310
  14. Berry, W., & Feldman, S. (1985). Multiple Regression in Practice (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences). SAGE Publications.10.4135/9781412985208
  15. Chen, J., Wang, M., Grotzer, T., & Dede, C. (2018). Using a three-dimensional thinking graph to support inquiry learning. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching, 55(9), 1239–1263. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.2145010.1002/tea.21450
  16. Cropley, A. (2006). Creativity: A social approach. Roeper Review, 28(3), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/0278319060955435110.1080/02783190609554351
  17. Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.10.4324/9780203357965
  18. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domain of creativity. In M.A. Runco & R.S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 190–212). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  20. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
  21. Csikszentmihalyi, M, (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R.J. Stem-berg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807916.018
  22. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2015). The Systems Model of Creativity. Springer Netherlands.10.1007/978-94-017-9085-7
  23. Davis, C., Kaufman, J., & Mcclure, F. (2011). Non-Cognitive Constructs and Self-Reported Creativity by Domain. The Journal Of Creative Behavior, 45(3), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01426.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01426.x
  24. Day, Ch. (2004). A Passion for Teaching. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203464342
  25. Domino, G. (1979). Creativity and the Home Environment. Gifted Child Quarterly, 23(4), 818–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862790230041410.1177/001698627902300414
  26. Duckworth, A., Peterson, C., Matthews, M., & Kelly, D. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087
  27. Duckworth, A., & Quinn, P. (2009). Development and Validation of the Short Grit Scale (Grit–S). Journal Of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 166–174. doi: 10.1080/00223890802634290
  28. Dunn, L.L.S. (2004). Cognitive playfulness, innovativeness, and belief of essentialness: Characteristics of educators who have the ability to make enduring changes in the integration of technology into the classroom environment. University of North Texas, Texas, unpublisheddoctoral dissertation.
  29. Fredrickson, B.L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
  30. Feist, G.J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
  31. Frijda, N.H., Mesquita, B., Sonnemans, J., & Van Goozen, S. (1991). The duration of affective phenomena or emotions, sentiments and passions. In K.T. Strongman (Ed.), International review of studies on emotion (pp. 187–225). New York: Wiley.
  32. Garriott, P., Flores, L., Prabhakar, B., Mazzotta, E., Liskov, A., & Shapiro, J. (2013). Parental Support and Under-represented Students’ Math/Science Interests. Journal Of Career Assessment, 22(4), 627–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/106907271351493310.1177/1069072713514933
  33. Glynn, S., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2009). Science Motivation Questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching, 46(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.2026710.1002/tea.20267
  34. Glynn, S.M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire ii: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of research in science teaching, 48(10), 1159–1176.10.1002/tea.20442
  35. Grohman, M.G., Ivcevic, Z., Silvia, P., & Kaufman, S.B. (2017). The Role of Passion and Persistence in Creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aca000012110.1037/aca0000121
  36. Guilford, J.P. (1950) Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.10.1037/h0063487
  37. Guilford, J.P. (1968). Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications. San Diego, CA: Knapp.
  38. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  39. Haller, C.S., & Courvoisier, D.S. (2010). Personality and thinking style in different creative domains. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(3), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/a001708410.1037/a0017084
  40. Haase, J., Hoff, E., Hanel, P., & Innes-Ker, Å. (2018). A Meta-Analysis of the Relation between Creative Self-Efficacy and Different Creativity Measurements. Creativity Research Journal, 30(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.141143610.1080/10400419.2018.1411436
  41. Hennessey, B.A. (1989). The effect of extrinsic constraint on children’s creativity when using a computer. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 151–168.10.1080/10400418909534312
  42. Hennessey, B.A., & Amabile, T.M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598.10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416
  43. Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal Of Science Education, 24(4), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069011009891210.1080/09500690110098912
  44. Hu, W., Wu, B., Jia, X., Yi, X., Duan, C., Meyer, W., et al. (2013). Increasing students’ scientific creativity: The “learn to think” intervention program. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.20.10.1002/jocb.20
  45. Karademir, E. (2016). Investigation the scientific creativity of gifted students through project-based activities. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 2(2), 416–427.10.21890/ijres.05662
  46. Kaufman, J.C. (2003). Critical thinking, creativity, and culture: An introduction. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 22(3), 5–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews20032231310.5840/inquiryctnews200322313
  47. Kaufman, J.C., & Baer, J. (2005). The amusement park theory of creativity. In J.C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 321–328). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.10.4324/9781410611925
  48. Kunat, B. (2017). „Dzielenie się czasem wolnym z uczniem” czyli o pracy nauczycieli z pasją. [„Sharing a free time with a pupil” a Word on the work of teachers with passion]. In E. Dubas, A. Gutowska (Eds.), Time and Places in a Biography. Educational Aspects. [Czas i miejsca w biografii. Aspekty edukacyjne]. (pp. 155–165), Łódź: UŁ.
  49. Kunat, B. (2018). Passion and Creativity – Together or Separately?. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 5(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2018-000410.1515/ctra-2018-0004
  50. Lawson, A.E., Banks, D.L., &Logvin, M. (2007). Self-efficacy, reasoning ability, and achievement in college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 706–724.10.1002/tea.20172
  51. Mednick, S.A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.10.1037/h0048850
  52. Meeker, M. (1982). Test of creative thinking. Vida, OR: SOI Systems.
  53. Mehrinejad, S., Rajabimoghadam, S., & Tarsafi, M. (2015). The Relationship between Parenting Styles and Creativity and the Predictability of Creativity by Parenting Styles. Procedia – Social And Behavioral Sciences, 205, 56–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.09.01410.1016/j.sbspro.2015.09.014
  54. Miller, S. (2017). Loneliness, Group Relevance, and Creativity (Masters). University of Wisconsin OshKosh.
  55. Moeller, J. (2014). Passion as concept of the psychology of motivation. Conceptualization, assessment, inter-individual variability and longterm stability (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.dbthueringen.de/servlets/DerivateServlet/Derivate-29036/DissJulia
  56. Montuori, A., & Purser, R. (Eds.). (1999). Social creativity (Vol. 1). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  57. Niu, W. (2007). Individual and Environmental Influences on Chinese Student Creativity. The Journal Of Creative Behavior, 41(3), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01286.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01286.x
  58. O’hara, L.A. & Sternberg, R.J. (2001). It doesn’t hurt to ask: Effects of instructions to be creative, practical, or analytical on essay-writing performance and their interaction with students’ thinking styles. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 197–210.10.1207/S15326934CRJ1302_7
  59. Pajares, F., & Schunk, D.H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self- concept, and school achievement. In R. Riding & S. Rayner (Eds.), BT self-perception (pp. 239–266). London: Ablex Publishing.
  60. Park, S., Park, K., & Choe, H. (2005). The Relationship Between Thinking Styles and Scientific Giftedness in Korea. Journal Of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(2–3), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-47510.4219/jsge-2005-475
  61. Pintrich, P.R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–686.10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
  62. Pretz, J., & Nelson, D. (2017). Creativity Is Influenced by Domain, Creative Self-Efficacy, Mindset, Self-Efficacy, and Self-Esteem. In M. Karwowski & J. Kaufman, The Creative Self Effect of Beliefs, Self-Efficacy, Mindset, and Identity (pp. 155–170). Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-809790-8.00009-1
  63. Pugsley, L., & Acar, S. (2018). Supporting Creativity Or Conformity? Influence of Home Environment and Parental Factors on the Value of Children’s Creativity Characteristics. The Journal Of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 598–609. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.39310.1002/jocb.393
  64. Ratelle, C., Larose, S., Guay, F., & Senécal, C. (2005). Perceptions of Parental Involvement and Support as Predictors of College Students’ Persistence in a Science Curriculum. Journal Of Family Psychology, 19(2), 286–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.28610.1037/0893-3200.19.2.286
  65. Rojas, J. (2015). The Relationships Among Creativity, Grit, Academic Motivation, And Academic Success In College Students (Ph.D.). University of Kentucky.
  66. Rojas, J., & Tyler, K. (2018). Measuring the Creative Process: A Psychometric Examination of Creative Ideation and Grit. Creativity Research Journal, 30(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.141154610.1080/10400419.2018.1411546
  67. Runco, M. (1992). Children’s divergent thinking and creative ideation. Developmental Review, 12(3), 233–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(92)90010-y10.1016/0273-2297(92)90010-Y
  68. Runco, M. (2005). Motivation, Competence, and Creativity. In A.J. Elliot & C.S. Dweck, Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 609–623). Guilford Publishers.
  69. Runco, M.A. (2007). Creativity Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. London, UK: Elsevier Academic Press.
  70. Runco, M.A. (2010). Divergent thinking, creativity, and ideation. In J.C. Kaufman & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 413–446). Cambridge University.10.1017/CBO9780511763205.026
  71. Runco, M., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0221337310.1007/BF02213373
  72. Runco, M., Acar, S., &Cayirdag, N. (2017). A closer look at the creativity gap and why students are less creative at school than outside of school. Thinking Skills And Creativity, 24, 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.04.00310.1016/j.tsc.2017.04.003
  73. Runco, M., Plucker, J., & Lim, W. (2001). Development and Psychometric Integrity of a Measure of Ideational Behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1334_1610.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_16
  74. Shalley, C.E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G.R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.00710.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007
  75. Simonton, D.K. (1984). Genius, creativity, and leadership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univesity Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674424753
  76. Steffin, S.A. (1983). Fighting against convergent thinking. Childhood Education, 59, 355–358.10.1080/00094056.1983.10520595
  77. Sternberg, R.J., & Lubart, T.I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34(1), 1–31.10.1159/000277029
  78. Sternberg, R.J., & Lubart, T.I. (1992). Buy low and sell high: An investment approach to creativity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(1), 1–5.10.1111/j.1467-8721.1992.tb00002.x
  79. Sternberg, R., & Wagner, R. (1991). MSG thinking style inventory (pp. 140). Star mountain project.10.1037/t14063-000
  80. Sternberg, R. (1988). Mental Self-Government: A Theory of Intellectual Styles and Their Development. Human Development, 31(4), 197–224. doi: 10.1159/000275810
  81. Sternberg, R.J. (1997). Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511584152
  82. Sternberg, R.J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–9810.1207/s15326934crj1801_10
  83. Sun, M., Wang, M., & Wegerif, R. (2020). Effects of divergent thinking training on students’ scientific creativity: The impact of individual creative potential and domain knowledge. Thinking Skills And Creativity, 37, 100682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.10068210.1016/j.tsc.2020.100682
  84. Torrance, E.P. (1974). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Lexington, MA: Personnel Press.
  85. Vries, H., & Lubart, T. (2017). Scientific Creativity: Divergent and Convergent Thinking and the Impact of Culture. The Journal Of Creative Behavior, 53(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.18410.1002/jocb.184
  86. Wallach, M.A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York: Holt, Rinehard& Winston.
  87. Yang, K., Lee, L., Hong, Z., & Lin, H. (2016). Investigation of effective strategies for developing creative science thinking. International Journal Of Science Education, 38(13), 2133–2151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.123068510.1080/09500693.2016.1230685
  88. Zhang, L.-F., & Sternberg, R.J. (2006). The nature of intellectual styles. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Language: English
Page range: 51 - 68
Submitted on: Nov 10, 2021
|
Accepted on: May 19, 2022
|
Published on: Sep 2, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2022 Bikash Barai, Rajesh Kumar Saha, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.