References
- Berelis, G. (2004). Reading the judgment, Karogs, 8, 141–142.
- Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic works (1886). Signed in Berne on 9 September 1886.
- Blomqvist, J. (2014). Moral Rights, Primer on International Copyright and Related Rights. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Cofomel (2019). Cofemel v. G-Star Raw. The Court of Justice of The European Union, C-683/17.
- Copeland v. Bieber (2015). U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, (2015, No. 14–1427).
- Copyright Law of the Republic of Latvia (2000). Latvijas Vēstnesis, no 148/150.
- Copyright Law of the United States and Related Laws of the United States Code (2016).
- Criminal Law of the Republic of Latvia (1998). Latvijas Vēstnesis no 199/200.
- Cropley, A. (2010). Creativity in the Classroom: The Dark Side. In D. Cropley, A. Cropley, J. Kaufman, & M. Runco (Eds.), The Dark Side of Creativity (pp. 297–315). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761225.016
- Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, OJ L 167, 22.6.2001, p. 10–19.
- Dutfield, G., & Suthersanen, U. (2008). Copyright, Global Intellectual Property Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Ginsburg, J.C., & Treppoz, E. (2015). International Copyright Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Goldstein, P. (2001). Protection under copyright and neighboring rights. International Copyright. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Greenberg, M.H. (2014). The neuroscience of creativity. Comic art, Creativity and the Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Gruszka, A. & Tang, M. (2017). The 4P’s Creativity Model and its application in different fields. May 2017. Handbook of the management of creativity and innovation: Theory and practice. World Scientific Press (pp. 51–71). https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813141889_0003
- Hare, J., & Choi, K. (2019) Attribution and plagiarism in the creative arts: A flipped information literacy workshop for postgraduate students. Journal of Information Literacy, 13(1), 62–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.11645/13.1.2640
- Imran, N. (2010). Electronic media, creativity and plagiarism. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 40(4), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929609.1929613
- Infopaq (2008). Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening. The Court of Justice of the European Union, C-5/08.
- Kalnāja-Zelča, I. (2014). Insight into the systems of copyright protection tradition. Jurista Vārds, 15.04.2014., 15(817), 8–15. http://www.juristavards.lv/doc/264224-ieskats-autora-tiesibu-aizsardzibas-tradiciju-sistemas/
- Kalnāja-Zelča, I. (2014). What is plagiarism and how to avoid it? Eversheds Bitans. http://www.visc.gov.lv/vispizglitiba/saturs/dokumenti/metmat/skaidrojums_par_autortiesibam.pdf
- Kasof, J. (1995). Explaining Creativity: The Attributional Perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 8(4), 311–366. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0804_1
- Kaufman, J., & Beghetto, R. (2009). Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity. Review of General Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688
- Kozbelt, A. (2020). Introduction. In J. Kaufman, & R. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, (2nd ed.), 761 p. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.26613/esic/4.1.179
- Lacey-Smith, T. (2019). The balance between creative freedom and protecting copyright. World IP Review 10-07-2019. https://www.worldipreview.com/contributed-article/the-balance-between-creative-freedom-and-protecting-copyright
- Law on Copyright and Related Rights, Lithuania (1999).
- Lebuda, I., Karwowski, M., & Galang, A.J.R. et al. (2019). Personality predictors of creative achievement and lawbreaking behavior. Curr Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00306-w
- Naveed, I. (2010). Electronic media, creativity and plagiarism. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 40(4). https://doi.org/10.1145/1929609.1929613
- Painer (2010). Eva-Maria Painer v Standard VerlagsGmbH and Others. The Court of Justice of the European Union, C-145/10.
- Paklone, I. (1997). Copyright. Handbook. AGB.
- Paklone, I. (2014). The concept of authorship of literary work: contextual aspects. Doctoral thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philology. Riga, Latvian University, 88. https://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/bitstream/handle/7/5253/44887-Inese_Paklone_2014.pdf?sequence=1
- Pelham (2019). Pelham v. Hütter, The Court of Justice of The European Union, C-476/17.
- Perkal, P.J. (2018). The Art of Sampling in the Metall auf Metall case: a new form of artistic expression or mere infringement of copyright and related rights? (April 24, 2018). http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2018/04/24/art-sampling-metall-auf-metall-case-new-form-artistic-expression-mere-infringement-copyright-related-rights/
- Rivers, T. (1998). Guide for Broadcasters on Legal Ownership, Acquisition, Payment, Enforcement and Administrative Management. EBU.
- Rosati, E. (2018). The AG Opinion in Metall auf Metall: it’s not a fundamental rights violation to say that sampling requires a licence. The IPKat (14.12.2018). https://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2018/12/the-ag-opinion-in-metall-auf-metall-its.html
- Runco, M.A. (2007). Creativity Theories and Themes: Research, Development, and Practice. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
- Runco, M., & Jaeger, G. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal – CREATIVITY RES J. 24. 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
- Sanoma (2016) GS Media BV v Sanoma Media Netherlands BV. The Court of Justice of The European Union, C-160/15.
- Satija, M.P., & Martínez-Ávila, D. (2019). Plagiarism: An essay in terminology. DESIDOC: Journal of Library & Information Technology, 39(2) (November 2019): 87–93. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.39.2.13937
- Satversme (The Constitution of the Republic of Latvia), (1993). Vēstnesis, 43.
- Stempel, J. (2019). Cyndi Lauper settles copyright lawsuit over ‘Kinky Boots’ finale. Reuters, August 10, 2019. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-music-lauper-kinky-boots/cyndi-lauper-settles-copyright-lawsuit-over-kinky-boots-finale-idUSKCN1UZ2I2
- Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia (2014). State v. J.G., SKK-48/2014.
- Svece, A. (2004). Plagiarism after the author’s death. Karogs, 8.
- Torremans, P. & Holyoak, J. (1998). Intellectual Property Law. London, Edinburg, Dublin: Butterworths.
- Ventspils Court (2014). State v. pers. A, 140017314.
- Wehmeier, S. et al. (2005). Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary. 7th edition. Oxford University Press, 1780 p.
- White, A. (2014). 73 Songs You Can Play With The Same Four Chords. BuzzFeed News (2014, April). https://www.buzzfeed.com/alanwhite/73-songs-you-can-play-with-the-same-four-chords
- WIPR, (2016). “Justin Bieber copyright dispute should be dismissed, says judge” (2016, November). https://www.worldipreview.com/news/justin-bieber-copyright-dispute-should-be-dismissed-says-judge-12605
- Žīgurs, R. (2017). The Concept of Appropriation in the Art Law. Jurista vārds 1.08.2017. NR. 32 (986). https://juristavards.lv/doc/271110-piesavinasanas-jedziens-makslas-tiesibas/