References
- Abdelhameed, W.A. (2013). Virtual Reality Use in Architectural Design Studios: A case of studying structure and construction. Procedia Computer Science, 25, 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.11.027
- Ahmed, N.H., & Ahmed, M.S. (2021). The effective use of holographic technology in enhancing the creative thinking of the advertising designer. International Design Journal, 11(2), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.21608/IDJ.2021.152357
- Ahn, S.J., Le, A.M.T., & Bailenson, J. (2013). The effect of embodied experiences on self-other merging, attitude, and helping behavior. Media Psychology, 16(1), 7–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2012.755877
- Akchelov, E., & Galanina, E. (2016). Virtual World of Video Games. In 2016 8th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-GAMES) (pp. 1–4). IEEE. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/VS-GAMES.2016.7590379
- Aneja, D., McDuff, D., & Shah, S. (2019). A high-fidelity open embodied avatar with lip syncing and expression capabilities. In 2019 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (pp. 69–73). http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3340555.3353744
- Bakr, A.F., El Sayad, Z.T., & Thomas, S.M.S. (2018). Virtual reality as a tool for children’s participation in kindergarten design process. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 57(4), 3851–3861. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2018.10.003
- Banakou, D., Kishore, S., & Slater, M. (2018). Virtually being Einstein results in an improvement in cognitive task performance and a decrease in age bias. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 917. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00917
- Banerjee, D., & Rai, M. (2020). Social isolation in Covid-19: The impact of loneliness. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764020922269
- Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N., & Davis, S.J. (2021). Why working from home will stick (No. w28731). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28731
- Bertrand, P., Guegan, J., Robieux, L., McCall, C.A., & Zenasni, F. (2018). Learning empathy through virtual reality: multiple strategies for training empathy-related abilities using body ownership illusions in embodied virtual reality. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, 26. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00026
- Bhagwatwar, A., Massey, A., & Dennis, A.R. (2013). Creative Virtual Environments: Effect of Supraliminal Priming on Team Brainstorming. 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2013.152
- Bilda, Z., & Demirkan, H. (2003). An insight on designers’ sketching activities in traditional versus digital media. Design studies, 24(1), 27–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00032-7
- Bonnardel, N. (2000). Towards understanding and supporting creativity in design: Analogies in a constrained cognitive environment. Knowledge-Based Systems, 13, 505–513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0950-7051(00)00067-8
- Bonnardel, N. (2012a). Designing future products: What difficulties do designers encounter and how can their creative process be supported? Work, A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0020-5296
- Bonnardel, N. (2012b, reedition). Créativité et Conception: Approches cognitives et ergonomiques [Creativity and Design: Cognitive and Ergonomics Approaches]. De Boeck.
- Bonnardel, N., & Bouchard, C. (2011). Towards supporting creative design: Analysis of the use of the TRENDS system according to designers‘ expertise. Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition – C&C 2011 (pp. 315–316), Atlanta. New York: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2069618.2069674
- Bonnardel, N., & Bouchard, C. (2014). Design, ergonomics and user interfaces: complementary and interdisciplinary studies to enhance creative activities. In Proceedings of the 2014 Ergonomie et Informatique Avancée Conference-Design, Ergonomie et IHM: quelle articulation pour la co-conception de l’interaction (pp. 2–10). https://doi.org/10.1145/2671470.2671471
- Bonnardel, N., & Bouchard, C. (2017). Creativity in design. In J.C. Kaufman, V.P. Glaveanu, & J. Baer (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Creativity Across Different Domains (pp. 403–427). New York: Cambridge University.
- Bonnardel, N., Forens, M., & Lefevre, M. (2016). Enhancing collective creative design: an exploratory study on the influence of static and dynamic personas in a virtual environment. The Design Journal, 19(2), 221–235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2016.1129145
- Bonnardel, N. & Gero, J. (2021). The possible of design. In V.P. Glăveanu (Ed.), The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Bonnardel, N., & Marmèche, E. (2004). Evocation processes by novice and expert designers: Towards stimulating analogical thinking. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(3), 176–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-1690.2004.00307.x
- Bonnardel, N., & Marmèche, E. (2005). Towards supporting evocation processes in creative design: A cognitive approach. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(4–5), 422–435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.006
- Bonnardel, N., & Pichot, N. (2020). Enhancing collaborative creativity with virtual dynamic personas. Applied Ergonomics, 82, 102949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102949
- Bonnardel, N., & Sumner, T. (1996). Supporting evaluation in design. Acta Psychologica, 91(3), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(95)00057-7
- Bonnardel, N., Wojtczuk, A., Gilles, P.-Y, & Mazon, S. (2018). The creative process in design. In T. Lubart (Ed.), The Creative Process: Perspectives from multiple domains (pp. 229–254). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50563-7_9
- Bonnardel, N., & Zenasni, F. (2010). The impact of technology on creativity in design: An enhancement? Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(2), 180–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00560.x
- Bouchard, C., Camous, R., & Aoussat, A. (2005). Nature and role of intermediate representations (IR) in the design process: Case studies in car design. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 38(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.2005.006602
- Bouchard, C., & Omhover, J.F. (2016). Supporting early design through conjoint trends analysis methods and the TRENDS system. In Collaboration in Creative Design (pp. 53–72). Springer, Cham. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29155-0_4
- Boughzala, I., de Vreede, G.J., & Limayem, M. (2012). Team collaboration in virtual worlds: Editorial to the special issue. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(10), 6.10.17705/1jais.00313
- Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Richard, P., Burkhardt, J.M., Frantz, B., & Lubart, T. (2020). The expression of users’ creative potential in virtual and real environments: An exploratory study. Creativity Research Journal, 32(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1712162
- Brangier, E., Bornet, C., Bastien, J.M.C., Michel, G., & Vivian, R. (2011). Mesure de la capacité des personas à générer des idées dans la conception de projets WEB. Le Travail Humain, 75(2), 121–145.
- Buisine, S., & Guegan, J. (2020). Proteus vs. social identity effects on virtual brainstorming. Behaviour & Information Technology, 39(5), 594–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1605408
- Buisine, S., Guegan, J., & Vernier, F. (2017). Technological innovation in group creativity. In Creativity, Design Thinking and Interdisciplinarity (pp. 185–201). Springer, Singapore. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7524-7_12
- Burkhardt, J.-M., & Lubart, T. (2010). Creativity in the age of emerging technology. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19, 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00559.x
- Carillo, K., Cachat-Rosset, G., Marsan, J., Saba, T., & Klarsfeld, A. (2020). Adjusting to epidemic-induced telework: empirical insights from teleworkers in France. European Journal of Information Systems, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1829512
- Chinowsky, P.S., & Rojas, E.M. (2003). Virtual teams: Guide to successful implementation. Journal of Management in Engineering, 19(3), 98–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2003)19:3(98)
- Chrysikou, E.G., & Weisberg, R.W. (2005). Following the wrong footsteps: Fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31, 1134–1148. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1134
- Clifton, J., & Palmisano, S. (2020). Effects of steering locomotion and teleporting on cybersickness and presence in HMD-based virtual reality. Virtual Reality, 24(3), 453–468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00407-8
- Coburn, J.Q., Freeman, I., & Salmon, J.L. (2017). A review of the capabilities of current low-cost virtual reality technology and its potential to enhance the design process. Journal of computing and Information Science in Engineering, 17(3), 031013. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4036921
- Dan, A., & Reiner, M. (2017). EEG-based cognitive load of processing events in 3D virtual worlds is lower than processing events in 2D displays. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 122, 75–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.08.013
- Davis, A., Murphy, J.D., Owens, D., Khazanchi, D., & Zigurs, I. (2009). Avatars, people, and virtual worlds: Foundations for research in metaverses. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(2), 90–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00183
- Dennis, A.R., Minas, R.K., & Williams, M.L (2019). Creativity in computer-mediated virtual groups. In P.B. Paulus., & B.A. Nijstad (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Group Creativity and Innovation (pp. 253–269). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190648077.013.15
- Dennis, A.R., & Wixom, B.H. (2002). Investigating the moderators of the group support systems use with meta-analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 235–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2002.11045696
- Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem solution. Design Studies, 22, 425–437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6
- Dreshaj, E. (2015). Holosuite: an exploration into interactive holographic telepresence (PhD thesis). Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
- Eastman, C.M. (1969). Cognitive processes and ill-defined problems: A case study from design. Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 669–690). Washington, DC.
- Elmorshidy, A. (2010). Holographic Projection Technology: The World is Changing. ArXiv:1006.0846 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.0846
- Fauville, G., Luo, M., Muller Queiroz, A.C., Bailenson, J.N., & Hancock, J. (2021). Zoom Exhaustion & Fatigue Scale. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3786329
- Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E., Eden, H., Sugimoto, M., & Ye, Y. (2005). Beyond binary choices: Integrating individual and social creativity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(4–5), 482–512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.014
- Forens, M., Bonnardel, N., & Barbier, M.L. (2015). How communication modalities can impact group creativity in multi-user virtual environments. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2015 (pp. 1–4). https://doi.org/10.1145/2788412.2788439
- Frank, M.G., & Gilovich, T. (1988). The dark side of self- and social perception: Black uniforms and aggression in professional sports. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.74
- Funke, G.J., & Galster, S.M. (2009). The effects of cognitive processing load and collaboration technology on team performance in a simulated command and control environment. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39(3), 541–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2008.10.007
- Gero, J.S. (2000). Computational models of innovative and creative design processes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 64, 183–196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(99)00105-5
- Gero, J.S. & Bonnardel, N. (Eds.). (2005). Studying Designers. Sydney: University of Sydney.
- Gerry, L.J. (2017). Paint with Me: Stimulating Creativity and Empathy While Painting with a Painter in Virtual Reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 23(4), 1418–1426. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2657239
- Girvan, C. (2018). What is a virtual world? Definition and classification. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(5), 1087–1100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9577-y
- Goh, C.H., Kulathuramaiyer, N., & Zaman, T. (2017). Riding waves of change: a review of personas research landscape based on the three waves of HCI. In International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries (pp. 605–616). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59111-7_49
- Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 123–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400419109534381
- Guan, J.-Q., Wang, L.-H., Chen, Q., Jin, K., & Hwang, G.-J. (2021). Effects of a virtual reality-based pottery making approach on junior high school students’ creativity and learning engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1871631
- Guegan, J., Buisine, S., Mantelet, F., Maranzana, N., & Segonds, F. (2016). Avatar-mediated creativity: When embodying inventors makes engineers more creative. Computers in Human Behavior, 61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.024
- Guegan, J., Segonds, F., Barré, J., Maranzana, N., Mantelet, F., & Buisine, S. (2017). Social identity cues to improve creativity and identification in face-to-face and virtual groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.043
- Gül, L.F., & Maher, M.L. (2009). Co-creating external design representations: Comparing face-to-face sketching to designing in virtual environments. CoDesign, 5(2), 117–138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15710880902921422
- Halo, L., & Matsutoya, M. (2019). Still be here. The Multiplicity of Hatsune Miku. Interface Critique, 2, 143–149. https://doi.org/10.11588/ic.2019.2.66988
- Hayashi, K. (2021). Holograms and Idols: The Image of God and Artificial Transcendence in the Cultural Phenomenon of the Japanese Vocaloid Hatsune Miku. Technology and Theology, 263.
- Jansson, D.G., & Smith, S.M. (1991). Design fixation. Design Studies, 12, 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(91)90003-F
- Jensen, M.M., Thiel, S.K., Hoggan, E., & Bødker, S. (2018). Physical versus digital sticky notes in collaborative ideation. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 27(3), 609–645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-018-9325-1
- Johnson, R.D., & Downing, L.L. (1979). Deindividuation and valence of cues: effects on prosocial and antisocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(9), 1532–1538. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.9.1532
- Karau, S.J., & Hart, J.W. (1998). Group cohesiveness and social loafing: Effects of a social interaction manipulation on individual motivation within groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2(3), 185. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.2.3.185
- Karau, S.J., & Williams, K.D. (1997). The effects of group cohesiveness on social loafing and social compensation. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1(2), 156. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.1.2.156
- Khosravi, P., Rezvani, A., & Wiewiora, A. (2016). The impact of technology on older adults’ social isolation. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 594–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.092
- Kirkman, B.L., & Mathieu, J.E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31(5), 700–718. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279113
- Kohler, T., Matzler, K., & Füller, J. (2009). Avatar-based innovation: Using virtual worlds for real-world innovation. Technovation, 29(6–7), 395–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.11.004
- Koutsabasis, P., Vosinakis, S., Malisova, K., & Paparounas, N. (2012). On the value of virtual worlds for collaborative design. Design Studies, 33(4), 357–390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.11.004
- Lee, H. (2013). 3D holographic technology and its educational potential. TechTrends, 57(4), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0675-8
- Liu, Y., Lather, J., & Messner, J. (2014). Virtual reality to support the integrated design process: A retrofit case study. In Computing in Civil and Building Engineering (2014) (pp. 801–808). http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/9780784413616.100
- Maaravi, Y., Heller, B., Shoham, Y., Mohar, S., & Deutsch, B. (2020). Ideation in the digital age: literature review and integrative model for electronic brainstorming. Review of Managerial Science. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00400-5
- Maciver, F., & Malins, J. (2016). Two Heads Are Better Than One: Principles for Collaborative Design Practice. In P. Markopoulos, J.-B. Martens, J. Malins, K. Coninx, & A. Liapis (Eds.), Collaboration in Creative Design: Methods and Tools (1 ed., Vol. 1, pp. 13–31). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29155-0_2
- Marinussen, M., & de Rooij, A. (2019). Being yourself to be creative: How using self-similar avatars can support the generation of original ideas in virtual environments. 285–293. Paper presented at ACM Creativity and Cognition 2019, San Diego, United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325480.3325482
- McKinlay, A., Procter, R., & Dunnett, A. (1999). An investigation of social loafing and social compensation in computer-supported cooperative work. In Proceedings of the international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work (pp. 249–257). https://doi.org/10.1145/320297.320327
- Merrick, K. E., & Gu, N. (2011). Case studies using multiuser virtual worlds as an innovative platform for collaborative design. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon), 16(12), 165–188.
- Miaskiewicz, T., & Kozar, K.A. (2011). Personas and user-centered design: How can personas benefit product design processes? Design studies, 32(5), 417–430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.03.003
- Michinov, N. (2012). Is electronic brainstorming or brainwriting the best way to improve creative performance in groups? An overlooked comparison of two idea-generation techniques. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, E222–E243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.01024.x
- Michinov, N., & Primois, C. (2005). Improving productivity and creativity in online groups through social comparison process: New evidence for asynchronous electronic brainstorming. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.004
- Moreno, D.P., Yang, M.C., Hernández, A.A., Linsey, J.S., & Wood, K.L. (2015). A step beyond to overcome design fixation: a design-by-analogy approach. In Design Computing and Cognition‘14 (pp. 607–624). Springer, Cham. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14956-1_34
- Müller, F. A., & Wulf, T. (2021). Differences in Learning Effectiveness across Learning Environments: A Cognitive Load Perspective. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2021, No. 1, p. 11426). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
- Nemeth, C.J., & Nemeth-Brown, B. (2003). Better than individuals? The potential benefits of dissent and diversity for group creativity. In P.B. Paulus & B.A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 63–84). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195147308.003.0004
- Nijstad, B.A., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijkx, H.F. (2003). Production blocking and idea generation: Does blocking interfere with cognitive processes? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(6), 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00040-4
- Nunamaker, J.F., Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S., Vogel, D., & George, J.F. (1991). Electronic meeting systems. Communications of the ACM, 34(7), 40–61. https://doi.org/10.1145/105783.105793
- O‘Connor, M.F., Arizmendi, B.J., & Kaszniak, A.W. (2014). Virtually supportive: a feasibility pilot study of an online support group for dementia caregivers in a 3D virtual environment. Journal of Aging Studies, 30, 87–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2014.03.001
- Osborn, A.F., (1963). (2nd). Applied Imagination. New York, Scribner.
- Paulus, P.B., & Brown, V.R. (2007). Toward a more creative and innovative group idea generation: a cognitive-social-motivational perspective of brainstorming. Social Personality and Psychology Compass, 1, 248–165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00006.x
- Paulus, P.B., & Kenworthy, J.B. (2019). Effective brainstorming. In P.B. Paulus., & B.A. Nijstad (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Group Creativity and Innovation (pp. 287–306). Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190648077.013.17
- Paulus, P.B., Kohn, N.W., Arditti, L.E., & Korde, R.M. (2013). Understanding the group size effect in electronic brainstorming. Small Group Research, 44(3), 332–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496413479674
- Paulus, P.B., Larey, T.S., & Ortega, A.H. (1995). Performance and perceptions of brainstormers in an organizational setting. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(1–2), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.1995.9646143
- Paulus, P.B., & Nijstad, B.A. (Eds.). (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195147308.001.0001
- Pissini, J. (2020). Embodied by Design: The Presence of Creativity, Art-making, and Self in Virtual Reality. (Electronic Thesis or Dissertation). Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/
- Pruitt, J., & Grudin, J., (2003). Personas: practice and theory. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Designing for User Experiences. ACM, New York, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/997078.997089
- Ratan, R., Beyea, D., Li, B. J., & Graciano, L. (2020). Avatar characteristics induce users’ behavioral conformity with small-to-medium effect sizes: A meta-analysis of the proteus effect. Media Psychology, 23(5), 651–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1623698
- Raveendhran, R., Fast, N.J., & Carnevale, P.J. (2020). Virtual (freedom from) reality: Evaluation apprehension and leaders’ preference for communicating through avatars. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106415
- Reiter-Palmon, R., Kramer, W., Allen, J.A., Murugavel, V.R., & Leone, S.A. (2021). Team creativity during virtual meetings. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 8(1), 165–188.
- Reitman, W.R. (1964). Heuristic decision procedures, open constraints, and the structure of ill-defined problems. Human Judgments and Optimality, 282–315.
- Saito, Y., Sugimoto, M., Imura, S., Morine, Y., Ikemoto, T., Iwahashi, S., ... & Shimada, M. (2020). Intraoperative 3D hologram support with mixed reality techniques in liver surgery. Annals Of Surgery, 271(1), e4–e7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003552
- Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books. (Reprinted in 1995).
- Schroeder, R. (2008). Defining virtual worlds and virtual environments. Journal For Virtual Worlds Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.4101/jvwr.v1i1.294
- Shuguang, L.I.U., & Lin, B.A. (2020). Holographic Classroom Based on Digital Twin and Its Application Prospect. In 2020 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Electronics and Communication Engineering (ICECE) (pp. 122–126). IEEE.
- Sosik, J.J., Kahai, S.S., & Avolio, B.J. (1998). Transformational leadership and dimensions of creativity: Motivating idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1102_3
- Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295
- Sung, R.C., Ritchie, J.M., Robinson, G., Day, P.N., Corney, J.R., & Lim, T. (2009). Automated design process modelling and analysis using immersive virtual reality. Computer-Aided Design, 41(12), 1082–1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2009.09.006
- Suwa, M., Gero, J., & Purcell, T. (1998). Analysis of cognitive processes of a designer as the foundation for support tools. in J.S. Gero & F. Sudweeks (Eds), Proc. of Artificial Intelligence in Design‚ 98, (pp. 229–247). Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5121-4_12
- Suwa, M., Gero, J.S., & Purcell, T. (2000). Unexpected discoveries and s-inventions of design requirements: Important vehicles for a design process. Design Studies, 21(6), 539–567. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00034-4
- Takahashi, D. (2015). Second Life pioneer Philip Rosedale shows off virtual toy room in High Fidelity. Venture Beat. Retrieved from https://venturebeat.com/2015/10/28/virtual-world-pioneer-philip-rosedale-shows-off-virtual-toy-room-in-high-fidelity/
- Tao, X., Chen, X., Zeng, X., & Koehl, L. (2018). A customized garment collaborative design process by using virtual reality and sensory evaluation on garment fit. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 115, 683–695. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.10.023
- Thornhill-Miller, B., & Dupont, J.M. (2016). Virtual reality and the enhancement of creativity and innovation: Under recognized potential among converging technologies? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15(1), 102–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.15.1.102
- Toney, S., Light, J., & Urbaczewski, A. (2021). Fighting Zoom fatigue: Keeping the zoombies at bay. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 48(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04806
- Visser, W. (1994). Organisation of design activities: Opportunistic, with hierarchical episodes. Interacting with Computers, 6, 235–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0953-5438(94)90014-0
- Wiederhold, B.K. (2013). Avatars: changing behavior for better or for worse? CyberPsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 16, 319–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.1517
- Yee, N., & Bailenson, J. (2007). The Proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research, 33(3), 271–290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00299.x
- Ziegler, R., Diehl, M., & Zijlstra, G. (2000). Idea production in nominal and virtual groups: Does computer-mediated communication improve group brainstorming?. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430200032003