Have a personal or library account? Click to login
How do You Feel in Virtual Environments? The Role of Emotions and Openness Trait Over Creative Performance Cover

How do You Feel in Virtual Environments? The Role of Emotions and Openness Trait Over Creative Performance

Open Access
|Aug 2021

References

  1. Agnoli, S., Franchin, L., Rubaltelli, E., & Corazza, G.E. (2015). An eye-tracking analysis of irrelevance processing as moderator of openness and creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 27(2), 125–132.10.1080/10400419.2015.1030304
  2. Agnoli, S., Pittarello, A., Hysenbelli, D., & Rubaltelli, E. (2015). “Give, but give until it hurts”: The modulatory role of trait emotional intelligence on the motivation to help. PloS one, 10(6), e0130704.10.1371/journal.pone.0130704
  3. Ashby, F.G., Isen, A.M., & Turken, A.U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106, 529–550.10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.529
  4. Baas, M., De Dreu, C.K., & Nijstad, B.A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus?. Psychological bulletin, 134(6), 779.10.1037/a0012815
  5. Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Richard, P., Burkhardt, J.M., Frantz, B., & Lubart, T. (2020). The expression of users’ creative potential in virtual and real environments: An exploratory study. Creativity Research Journal, 32(1), 55-65.10.1080/10400419.2020.1712162
  6. Chirico, A., & Gaggioli, A. (2019). When virtual feels real: comparing emotional responses and presence in virtual and natural environments. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(3), 220-226.10.1089/cyber.2018.0393
  7. Chirico, A., Yaden, D.B., Riva, G., & Gaggioli, A. (2016). The potential of virtual reality for the investigation of awe. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1766.10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01766
  8. Corazza, G.E. (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 258–267.10.1080/10400419.2016.1195627
  9. Corazza, G.E., & Agnoli, S. (2020). Personality: Openness. In M. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity, 3rd Edition. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.23691-2
  10. Corazza, G.E., & Lubart. T., (2021). Intelligence and Creativity: Mapping Constructs on the Space-Time Continuum. Journal of Intelligence, 9: 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence901000110.3390/jintelligence9010001
  11. Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological assessment, 4(1), 5.10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5
  12. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior research methods, 39(2), 175-191.10.3758/BF03193146
  13. Felnhofer, A., Kothgassner, O.D., Schmidt, M., Heinzle, A.K., Beutl, L., Hlavacs, H., & Kryspin-Exner, I. (2015). Is virtual reality emotionally arousing? Investigating five emotion inducing virtual park scenarios. International journal of human-computer studies, 82, 48–56.10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.05.004
  14. Feist, G.J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
  15. Forgas, J.P. (2000). Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition. Paris: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Goritz A.S., & Moser K. (2003). Mood and flexibility in categorization: A conceptual replication. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 97(1), 107–119.10.2466/pms.2003.97.1.107
  17. Guegan, J., Buisine, S., Mantelet, F., Maranzana, N., & Segonds, F. (2016). Avatar-mediated creativity: When embodying inventors makes engineers more creative. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.02410.1016/j.chb.2016.03.024
  18. Guegan, J., Nelson, J., & Lubart, T. (2017). The relationship between contextual cues in virtual environments and creative processes. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(3), 202–206.10.1089/cyber.2016.0503
  19. Isen A.M., Daubman K.A., & Nowicki G.P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122–1131.10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1122
  20. Jauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A.C. (2014). The road to creative achievement: a latent variable model of ability and personality predictors. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 95–105.10.1002/per.1941
  21. Kalantari, S., Rounds, J.D., Kan, J., Tripathi, V., & Cruz-Garza, J.G. (2021). Comparing physiological responses during cognitive tests in virtual environments vs. in identical real-world environments. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–14.10.1038/s41598-021-89297-y
  22. Mastria, S., Agnoli, S., & Corazza, G.E. (2019). How does emotion influence the creativity evaluation of exogenous alternative ideas?. PloS one, 14(7), e0219298.10.1371/journal.pone.0219298
  23. Michinov, N., Jamet, E., Métayer, N., & Le Hénaff, B. (2015). The eyes of creativity: Impact of social comparison and individual creativity on performance and attention to others’ ideas during electronic brainstorming. Computers in Human Behavior, 42, 57–67.10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.037
  24. Pena, J., Hancock, J., & Merola, N. (2009). The priming effects of avatars in virtual settings. Communication Research, 36, 838–856.10.1177/0093650209346802
  25. Ragan, E.D., Bowman, D.A., & Huber, K.J. (2012). Supporting cognitive processing with spatial information presentations in virtual environments. Virtual Reality, 16(4), 301–314.10.1007/s10055-012-0211-8
  26. Riva, G., Mantovani, F., Capideville, C.S., Preziosa, A., Morganti, F., Villani, D., ... & Alcañiz, M. (2007). Affective interactions using virtual reality: the link between presence and emotions. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 10(1), 45–56.10.1089/cpb.2006.9993
  27. Shin, D. (2018). Empathy and embodied experience in virtual environment: To what extent can virtual reality stimulate empathy and embodied experience?. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 64–73.10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.012
  28. Silvia, P.J., Winterstein, B.P., Willse, J.T., Barona, C.M., Cram, J.T., Hess, K.I., Martinez, J.L., & Richard, C.A. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthtetics Creativity and the Arts, 2, 68–85.10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.68
  29. Thornhill-Miller, B., & Dupont, J.-M. (2016). Virtual reality and the enhancement of creativity and innovation: Under recognized potential among converging technologies? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15(1), 102–121.10.1891/1945-8959.15.1.102
  30. Vergara, D., Lorenzo, M., & Rubio, M.P. (2017). Virtual environments in materials science and engineering: the students’ opinion. In Materials Science and Engineering: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1465–1483). IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-5225-1798-6.ch059
  31. Verhaeghen P., Joormann J., & Khan R. (2005). Why we sing the blues: The relation between self- reflective rumination, mood, and creativity. Emotion, 5, 226–232.10.1037/1528-3542.5.2.226
  32. Watson, D., & Clark, L.A. (1999). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule—Expanded form. University of Iowa: Psychology Publications.
  33. Wilson, R.C., Guilford, J.P., & Christensen, P.R. (1953). The measurement of individual differences in originality. Psychological Bulletin, 50(5), 362.10.1037/h0060857
Language: English
Page range: 148 - 164
Submitted on: May 31, 2021
|
Accepted on: Jul 2, 2021
|
Published on: Aug 30, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Sergio Agnoli, Sofia Zenari, Serena Mastria, Giovanni Emanuele Corazza, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.