Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Association, Overlap, and Inhibition: A Study of Implicit Theories of Creativity Cover

Association, Overlap, and Inhibition: A Study of Implicit Theories of Creativity

Open Access
|Jan 2021

References

  1. Abdulla, A. M. & Cramond, B. (2017). After six decades of systematic study of creativity: What do teachers need to know about what it is and how it is measured? Roeper Review, 39(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2016.124739810.1080/02783193.2016.1247398
  2. Altheide, D. L. (1987). Ethnographic content analysis. Qualitative Sociology, 10(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0098826910.1007/BF00988269
  3. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4612-5533-8
  4. Amabile, T. M. (1990). Within you, without you: Towards a social psychology of creativity, and beyond. In M.A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity. Sage.
  5. Chan, D. W., & Chan, L-K. (1999). Implicit theories of creativity: Teachers’ perception of student characteristics in Hong Kong. Creativity Research Journal, 12(3), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1203_310.1207/s15326934crj1203_3
  6. Cohen, L. M. (2011). Adaptation, adaptiveness, and creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (2nd. ed.). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
  7. Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches. Sage Publications.
  8. Cropley, A. (2016). The myths of Heavensent creativity: Toward a perhaps less democratic but more down-to-earth understanding. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.119561410.1080/10400419.2016.1195614
  9. Dane, E. (2010). Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: A cognitive entrenchment perspective. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 579–603. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.4.zok57910.5465/amr.35.4.zok579
  10. Educational Testing Service (2016). The TOEFL ITP assessment series: Test taker handbook.
  11. Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., & Walumbwa, F. (2005). “Can you see the real me?” A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 343–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.00310.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.003
  12. Glaveanu, V. P. (2011). Is the lightbulb still on? Social representations of creativity in Western context. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 21(1), 53–72.
  13. Gruber, H. E. (1993). Creativity in the moral domain: Ought implies can implies create. Creativity Research Journal, 6(1–2), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1040041930953446210.1080/10400419309534462
  14. Kapur, R. L., Subramanyam, S., & Shah A. (1997). Creativity in Indian science. Psychology and Developing Societies, 9(2), 161–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/09713336970090020210.1177/097133369700900202
  15. Karwowski, M. (2010). Are creative students really welcome in the classrooms? Implicit theories of “good” and “creative” student’ personality among polish teachers. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1233–1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.17910.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.179
  16. Kharkhurin, A. V. (2014). Creativity.4in1: Four-criterion construct of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(3), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.92942410.1080/10400419.2014.929424
  17. Kokotsaki, D. (2011). Student teachers’ conceptions of creativity in the secondary music classroom. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(2), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2011.04.00110.1016/j.tsc.2011.04.001
  18. Layperson., & (n.d.) In Oxford Online Dictionary. https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/layperson
  19. Martin, L., & Wilson, N. (2017). Defining creativity with discovery. Creativity Research Journal, 29(4), 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.137654310.1080/10400419.2017.1376543
  20. McLaren, R. B. (1993). The dark side of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 6(1–2), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/1040041930953447210.1080/10400419309534472
  21. Merriam, S. G. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  22. Morais, M. F., & Azevedo, I. (2011). What is a creative teacher and what is a creative pupil? Perceptions of teachers. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 330–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.04210.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.042
  23. Paletz, S. B. F., & Kaiping Peng. (2008). Implicit theories of creativity across cultures: Novelty and appropriateness in two product domains. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(3), 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/002202210831511210.1177/0022022108315112
  24. Pizzingrilli, P., & Antonietti, A. (2010). Implicit theories of creativity in schoolchildren: An exploratory study. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4732–4736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.75910.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.759
  25. Romo, M., & Alfonso, V. (2003). Implicit theories of Spanish painters. Creativity Research Journal, 15(4), 409–415. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1504_810.1207/S15326934CRJ1504_8
  26. Runco, M. A. (1984). Teachers’ judgments of creativity and social validation of divergent thinking tests. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 711–717. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1984.59.3.71110.2466/pms.1984.59.3.711
  27. Runco, M. A. (1993). Creative Morality: Intentional and unconventional. Creativity Research Journal, 6(1–2), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1040041930953446310.1080/10400419309534463
  28. Runco, M. A. (2011). Implicit theories. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 644–646). Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-375038-9.00119-9
  29. Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice (2nd ed.). Elsevier Academic Press.
  30. Runco, M. A., & Bahleda, M. D. (1986). Implicit theories of artistic, scientific, and everyday creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20(2), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1986.tb00423.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.1986.tb00423.x
  31. Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.65009210.1080/10400419.2012.650092
  32. Runco, M. A., & Johnson, D.J. (2002). Parents’ and teachers’ implicit theories of children’s creativity: A cross-cultural perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3–4), 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1434_1210.1207/S15326934CRJ1434_12
  33. Runco, M. A., Johnson, D. J., & Bear, P. K. (1993). Parents’ and teachers’ implicit theories of children’s creativity. Child Study Journal, 23, 91–113.
  34. Sen, R. S., & Sharma N. (2011). Through multiple lenses: Implicit theories of creativity among Indian children and adults. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(2), 273–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01431.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01431.x
  35. Simonton, D. K. (2016). Defining creativity: Don’t we also need to define what is not creative? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 52(1), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.13710.1002/jocb.137
  36. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.60710.1037/0022-3514.49.3.607
  37. Sternberg, R. J. (2017). ACCEL: A new model for identifying the gifted. Roeper Review, 39(3), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2017.131865810.1080/02783193.2017.1318658
  38. Taylor, M. (2013). The Oxford Handbook of the Development of Imagination. Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195395761.001.0001
  39. Wickes, K. N. S., & Ward, T. B. (2006). Measuring gifted adolescents’ implicit theories of creativity. Roeper Review, 28(3), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/0278319060955435210.1080/02783190609554352
  40. Williams, R., Runco, M. A., & Berlow, E. (2016). Mapping the themes, impact, and cohesion of creativity research over the last 25 years. Creativity Research Journal, 28(4), 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.123035810.1080/10400419.2016.1230358
Language: English
Page range: 251 - 283
Submitted on: Mar 10, 2020
|
Accepted on: Dec 13, 2020
|
Published on: Jan 26, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Ahmed M. Abdulla Alabbasi, Sarah E. Sumners, Sue Hyeon Paek, Mark A. Runco, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.