Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Being bound in a fieldsite: Cross-cultural methodological notes on doing digital ethnography on TikTok Cover

Being bound in a fieldsite: Cross-cultural methodological notes on doing digital ethnography on TikTok

By: Crystal Abidin and  Jin Lee  
Open Access
|Aug 2025

References

  1. Abidin, C. 2017. ‘Just Asian’? Inscribing East Asian mixed race in Australia. In F. Fozdar & K. McGavin (Eds.), Mixed race identities in Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands (pp. 84–100). Routledge.
  2. Abidin, C. 2021a. Mapping internet celebrity on TikTok: Exploring attention economies and visibility labours. Cultural Science Journal, 12(1), 77–103. https://doi.org/10.5334/csci.140
  3. Abidin, C. 2021b. From “networked publics” to “refracted publics”: A companion framework for researching “below the radar” studies. Social Media + Society, 7(1), 2056305120984458. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120984458
  4. Abidin, C. 2024. The virtual human industry in Greater China: A stocktake of news discourse [Conference presentation]. AoIR2024: The 25th Annual Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers, Sheffield, UK. http://spir.aoir.org
  5. Abidin, C. and Kaye, D. B. V. 2021. Audio memes, earworms, and templatability: The ‘aural turn’ of memes on TikTok. In C. Arkenbout, J. Wilson and D. de Zeeuw (Eds.), Critical meme reader: Global mutations of the viral image (pp. 58–68). Institute of Network Cultures.
  6. Abidin, C. and Lee, J. 2023. K-pop TikTok: TikTok’s expansion into South Korea, TikTok Stage, and platformed glocalization. Media International Australia, 188(1), 86–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X231186445
  7. Abidin, C. and Robinson, N. 2023. A retrospect on young people and COVID-19 discourse on TikTok. TikTok Cultures Research Network (TCRN), Centre for Culture and Technology (CCAT), Curtin University. https://tiktokcultures.com/covid-19-report
  8. Abidin, C. and De Seta, G. 2020. Private messages from the field: Confessions on digital ethnography and its discomforts. Journal of Digital Social Research, 2(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v2i1.35
  9. Al-Khouri, C.; Lowrey, T. and Long, C. 2023. TikTok to be banned from Australian government devices. ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-04/tiktok-ban-australian-government-devices/102183478
  10. Aswad, J. 2020. K-pop fans take over #WhiteLivesMatter hashtag to drown out racist posts. Variety. https://variety.com/2020/music/news/k-pop-whitelivesmatter-hashtag-drown-out-racist-1234624126
  11. Australian Sports Commission. 2025. Australians are redefining the way they play. Ausport.gov.au. https://www.ausport.gov.au/media-centre/news/australians-are-redefining-the-way-they-play
  12. Barnes, D. 2024. Indigenous knowledge and creativities online: TikTok as a relational tool within the Indigenous art process. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 20(2), 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/11771801241246731
  13. BBC News. 2020. Australia fires: Firefighters dance on TikTok to ‘raise spirits’. https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-australia-51276906
  14. Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.
  15. Bukamal, H. 2022. Deconstructing insider–outsider researcher positionality. British Journal of Special Education, 49(3), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12426
  16. Burrell, J. 2009. The field site as a network: A strategy for locating ethnographic research. Field Methods, 21(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X08329699
  17. Cannizzo, F.; Mauri, C. and Osbaldiston, N. 2019. Moral barriers between work/life balance policy and practice in academia. Journal of Cultural Economy, 12(4), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2019.1574860
  18. Carlson, B. and Kennedy, T. 2021. Us Mob online: The perils of identifying as Indigenous on social media. Genealogy, 5(2), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy5020052
  19. Chakravarti, A. 2021. A year since TikTok ban, Indian TikTokers narrate how their lives were impacted. India Today. https://www.indiatoday.in/technology/features/story/a-year-since-tiktok-ban-indian-tiktokers-narrate-how-their-lives-were-impacted-1823024-2021-07-02
  20. Cho, Y.-H. 2012. Internet and ethnographic approach in audience studies: Theorizing internet ethnography. Media, Gender & Culture, 21, 101–134. http://www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE01835950
  21. de Seta, G. 2020. Three lies of digital ethnography. Journal of Digital Social Research, 2(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v2i1.36
  22. Dwyer, S. C. and Buckle, J. L. 2009. The space between: On being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800105
  23. Fichman, P. and Amidu, G. 2024. The roles of collapsing contexts and TikTok’s features in reciprocal trolling. Information, Communication & Society, 28(8), 1442–1462. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2391820
  24. Gentry, B. A. 2022. TikTok’s ‘Republicansona’ trend as cross-party cross-dressing: Legible normativity, (in)dividual representation and performing subversive ambiguity. Convergence, 29(6), 1465–1485. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221113469
  25. Gray, J. 2021. The geopolitics of ‘platforms’: The TikTok challenge. Internet Policy Review. https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/geopolitics-platforms-tiktok-challenge
  26. Haldrup, M.; Koefoed, L. and Simonsen, K. 2006. Practical Orientalism: Bodies, everyday life and the construction of otherness. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 88(2), 173–184. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3878386
  27. Hammond-Errey, M. 2024. Byte-sized diplomacy: Should Australia ban TikTok? The Interpreter. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/byte-sized-diplomacy-should-australia-bantiktok
  28. Hannerz, U. 2003. Being there... and there... and there! Reflections on multi-site ethnography. Ethnography, 4(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/14661381030042003
  29. Hutchinson, J. 2015. From fringe to formalisation: An experiment in fostering interactive public service media. Media International Australia, 155(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1515500103
  30. Hutchinson, J. 2017. Cultural intermediaries: Audience participation in media organisations. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66287-9
  31. Judge, S. 2020. Australian bushfire TikToks are going viral for all the wrong reasons. BuzzFeed. https://www.buzzfeed.com/sohanjudge/australian-bushfire-tiktoks
  32. Kennedy, M. 2020. ‘If the rise of the TikTok dance and e-girl aesthetic has taught us anything, it’s that teenage girls rule the internet right now’: TikTok celebrity, girls and the Coronavirus crisis. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(6), 1069–1076. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549420945341
  33. Kim, K. and Moon, S.-I. 2021. When algorithmic transparency failed: Controversies over algorithm-driven content curation in the South Korean digital environment. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(6), 847–862. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764221992827
  34. King-O’Riain, R. C. 2020. “They were having so much fun, so genuinely...”: K-Pop fan online affect and corroborated authenticity. New Media & Society, 23(12), 3537–3553. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820941194
  35. Kowal, E. 2017. Descent, classification and Indigeneity in Australia. In F. Fozdar & K. McGavin (Eds.), Mixed race identities in Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands (pp. 17–32). Routledge.
  36. Kwak, K. T.; Lee, S. Y. and Lee, S. W. 2021. News and user characteristics used by personalized algorithms: The case of Korea’s news aggregators, Naver News and Kakao News. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 171, 120940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120940
  37. Kwon, Y. 2021. 신곡 챌린지로 틱톡 점령한 K…2년 만에 영상 3배 증가 [K-pop dominates TikTok with ‘new song challenges’: Videos triple in two years]. JoongAng Ilbo. https://www.joongang.co.kr/article/25022567#home
  38. Lee, A. and Fulloon, S. 2024. Have these older Australians found the key to a longer, healthier life? Experts think so. SBS News. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/small-business-secrets/article/have-these-older-australians-found-the-key-to-a-longer-life-experts-think-so/f81kzugow
  39. Lipson, S. M.; Stewart, S. and Griffiths, S. 2020. Athleisure: A qualitative investigation of a multi-billion-dollar clothing trend. Body Image, 32, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.10.009
  40. Maddox, J. 2024. Using Creator Studies insights to optimize participant recruitment on TikTok. The Communication Review, 28(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2024.2370124
  41. Mayer, M. 2019. China’s authoritarian internet and digital orientalism. In D. Felder (Ed.), Redesigning organizations: Concepts for the connected society (pp. 177–192). Springer Nature.
  42. McQueeney, K. and Lavelle, K. M. 2017. Emotional labor in critical ethnographic work: In the field and behind the desk. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 46(1), 81–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241615602318
  43. Morley, D. and Robins, K. (Eds.). 1995. Spaces of identity: Global media, electronic landscapes and cultural boundaries. Routledge.
  44. Park, C. 2018. 얼굴천재 차은우, 틱톡 대흥민국 참석 [‘Face genius’ Cha Eun-woo attends TikTok’s ‘Daehungmin-guk’ event]. Maeil Economy. https://www.mk.co.kr/news/culture/view/2018/12/760566
  45. Perkins, M. (Ed.). 2007. Visibility different: Face, place and race in Australia. Peter Lang.
  46. Pohlhaus, G. 2002. Knowing communities: An investigation of Harding’s standpoint epistemology. Social Epistemology, 16(3), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269172022000025633
  47. Postill, J. and Pink, S. 2016. Digital ethnography and the politics of visibility. In S. Pink, H. Horst, J. Postill, L. Hjorth, T. Lewis and J. Tacchi (Eds.), Digital ethnography: Principles and practices (pp. 85–97). SAGE.
  48. Reddy, S. 2019. Analysis: How does North Korea use social media? BBC Monitoring. https://monitoring.bbc.co.uk/product/c200xiwn
  49. Rettberg, J. W. 2020. Situated data analysis: A new method for analysing encoded power relationships in social media platforms and apps. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0495-3
  50. Rockquemore, K. A. and Laszloffy, T. A. 2005. Raising biracial children. AltaMira Press.
  51. Said, E. W. 1978. Orientalism. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  52. Schellewald, A. 2024. Discussing the role of TikTok sharing practices in everyday social life. International Journal of Communication, 18, 18. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/20993/4476
  53. Schock, B.; Kuraner, S. E.; Westphal, M. and Bonanno, G. A. 2025. How “algospeak” is changing online discourse on suicide and self-harm: A pilot study. Traumatology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/trm0000581
  54. Shim, D. and Noh, K. W. 2012. Youtube and Girls’ Generation fandom. Journal of the Korean Contents Association, 12(1), 125–137. http://www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE01780542
  55. Steen, E.; Yurechko, K. and Klug, D. 2023. You can (not) say what you want: Using algospeak to contest and evade algorithmic content moderation on TikTok. Social Media + Society, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231194586
  56. Sommers, J. 2021. Nearly half of Americans fear TikTok would give their data to the Chinese government. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/nearly-half-of-americans-fear-tiktok-would-give-china-data-2021-7
  57. Song, J. J. 2006. The Korean language: Structure, use and context. Routledge.
  58. Tang, E. 2021, December 22. A cultural history of the ‘Naur’ meme. BuzzFeed News. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/estelletang/naur-meme-origin
  59. Tidy, J. 2021, April 21. TikTok loophole sees users post pornographic and violent videos. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-56821882
  60. TikDragons. 2020, August 11). How does the TikTok algorithm work? Medium. https://medium.com/tikdragons/how-does-the-tiktok-algorithm-work-aac10057e41a
  61. Thompson, N. 2020. The rank hypocrisy of a TikTok ban. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/trump-tiktok-ban-hypocrisy/
  62. van der Nagel, E.; Hutchinson, J.; Abidin, C. and Kaye, B. 2023. Black summer on TikTok and ABC news: Shaping cultural identity during an Australian bushfire crisis. Convergence, 29(4), 962–979. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231178005
  63. Verma, T. 2021. Cultural cringe: How caste and class affect the idea of culture in social media. Feminist Media Studies, 21(1), 159–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1864879
  64. Vukovich, D. 2012. China and orientalism: Western knowledge production and the P.R.C. Routledge.
  65. Whiteman, N. 2012. Undoing ethics: Rethinking practice in online research. Springer.
  66. Wilson, C. 2020. Bushfires: TikTok users share safety information amid Australian crisis. BuzzFeed. https://www.buzzfeed.com/cameronwilson/bushfires-tiktok-australia-safety-information-world
  67. Yoo, J. 2021. SNS 타고 커버댄스·챌린지 폭주, 음악 유통 혁명 [Revolution in the music circulation: Cover dance and challenges through SNS]. JoongAng Ilbo. https://www.joongang.co.kr/article/24118184#home
  68. Zeng, J. and Kaye, D. B. V. 2022. From content moderation to visibility moderation: A case study of platform governance on TikTok. Policy & Internet, 14(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.287
  69. Zurovac, E.; Boccia Artieri, G. and Donato, V. 2024. Tales of visibility in TikTok: The algorithmic imaginary and digital skills in young users. In D. Radovanović (Ed.), Digital literacy and inclusion (pp. 113–126). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30808-6_8
Language: English
Page range: 82 - 98
Published on: Aug 12, 2025
Published by: Tallinn, Erfurt University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Crystal Abidin, Jin Lee, published by Tallinn, Erfurt University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.