Have a personal or library account? Click to login
(Re)coding TikTok: The Memetic Interactivity Codebook for content analysis Cover

(Re)coding TikTok: The Memetic Interactivity Codebook for content analysis

Open Access
|May 2025

References

  1. Abidin, C. and Kaye, DBV. 2021a. TikTok Syllabus: Teaching socio-cultural issues on TikTok. TikTok Cultures Research Network (TCRN), Social Media Pop Cultures Programme, Centre for Culture and Technology (CCAT). Accessed November 9. https://tiktokcultures.com/syllabus2021
  2. Abidin, C. and Kaye, DBV. 2021b. Audio memes, earworms, and templatability: The ‘aural turn’ of memes on TikTok. In Critical meme reader. Global mutations of the viral image, edited by Chloë Arkenbout, Jack Wilson, and Daniel de Zeeuw, 58-68. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.
  3. Alonso-López, N.; Sidorenko-Bautista, P. and Giacomelli, F. 2021. Beyond challenges and viral dance moves: TikTok as a vehicle for disinformation and fact-checking in Spain, Portugal, Brazil, and the USA. Anàlisi 64: 65-84. https://doi.org/10.5565/REV/ANALISI.3411
  4. Anderson, KE. 2020. Getting acquainted with social networks and apps: It is time to talk about TikTok. Library Hi Tech News 37 (4): 7-12. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2020-0001
  5. Avdeeff, MK. 2021. TikTok, Twitter, and platform-specific technocultural discourse in response to Taylor Swift’s LGBTQ+ Allyship in ‘You need to calm down’. Contemporary Music Review 40 (1): 78-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/07494467.2021.1945225
  6. Bandy, J. and Diakopoulos, N. 2020. #TulsaFlop: A Case study of algorithmically-influenced collective action on TikTok. arXiv Preprint:2012.07716. https://bit.ly/2ZOwtT6
  7. Berelson, B. 1952. Content analysis in Communications research. New York: Free Press.
  8. Bhandari, A. and Bimo, S. 2020. TikTok and the “algorithmized self”: A new model of online interaction. Paper presented at the AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research, Dublin, Ireland, October 26-31. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2020i0.11172
  9. Boffone, T. 2022. TikTok cultures in the United States. New York, USA: Routledge. part of normal app use in order to make them salient and therefore available for critical analysis.’ (Light et al. 2018, 882).
  10. Cervi, L.; Tejedor, S. and Marín-Lladó, C. 2021. TikTok and the new language of political communication: The case of Podemos. Culture, Language and Representation 26: 267-287. https://doi.org/10.6035/clr.5817
  11. Charmaz, K. 2009. Shifting the Grounds: Constructivist Grounded Theory Methods. In Developing Grounded Theory: The Second Generation, edited by Janice M. Morse, Phyllis Noerager Stern, Juliet Corbin, Barbara Bowers, Kathy Charmaz, Adele E. Clarke. 127–55. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
  12. Civila, S. and Jaramillo-Dent, D. 2022. #Mixedcouples on TikTok: Performative hybridization and identity in the face of discrimination. Social Media + Society: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221122464
  13. Divon, T. and Eriksson-Krutrök, M. 2024. Playful trauma: TikTok creators and the use of the platformed body in times of war. Social Media + Society: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241269281
  14. Evans, SK.; Pearce, KE.; Vitak, J. and Treem, JW. 2017. Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 22 (1): 35-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180
  15. Fowler, LR.; Schoen, L.; Smith, HS. and Morain, SR. 2021. Sex education on TikTok: A content analysis of themes. Health Promotion Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399211031536
  16. Gibbs, M.; Meese, J.; Arnold, M. and Carter, M. 2015. #Funerals and Instagram: Death, social media and platform vernacular. Information, Communication & Society 18 (3): 255-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.987152
  17. Graneheim, U.; Lindgren, B-M. and Lundman, B. 2017. Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Education Today 56: 29-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002
  18. Harper, P. 2020. Viral musicking: Aesthetics and iteration in online contagion. AoIR 2020: The 21th Annual Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2020i0.11228
  19. Hautea, S.; Parks, P.; Takahashi, B. and Zeng, J. 2021. Showing they care (or don’t): Affective publics and ambivalent climate activism on TikTok. Social Media + Society 7 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211012344
  20. Herrman, J. 2020. TikTok is shaping politics. But how? The New York Times, June 28.
  21. Jaramillo-Dent, D.; Alencar, A. and Asadchy, Y. 2022. #Migrantes on TikTok: Exploring Platformed Belongings. International Journal of Communication 16(22) 5578-5602. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/17435/3963
  22. Jaramillo-Dent, D. 2022. Algorithmic (in) visibility tactics among immigrant tiktokers. Mediální studia: 16 (02): 215-235.
  23. Kaye, DBV.; Chen, X. and Zeng, J. 2020. The co-evolution of two Chinese mobile short video apps: Parallel platformization of Douyin and TikTok. Mobile Media & Communication: 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2050157920952120
  24. Kaye, DBV. 2022. Please duet this: Collaborative music making in lockdown on TikTok. Networking Knowledge 15 (1): 59-77.
  25. Klug, D. 2020. ‘It took me almost 30 minutes to practice this’. Performance and production practices in dance challenge videos on TikTok. Paper presented at the NCA 106th Annual Convention – Communication at the Crossroads, Missouri, USA, November 19-22.
  26. Krippendorf, K. 2003. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. London: Sage.
  27. Leaver, T.; Highfield, T. and Abidin, C. 2020. Instagram. Visual social media cultures. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  28. Li, Y.; Guan, M.; Hammond, P. and Berrey, LE. 2021. Communicating COVID-19 information on TikTok: A content analysis of TikTok videos from official accounts featured in the COVID-19 information hub. Health Education Research 36 (3): 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyab010
  29. Light, B.; Burgess, J. and Duguay, S. 2018. The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society 20 (3): 881–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816675438
  30. Literat, I. 2021. ‘Teachers act like we’re robots’: TikTok as a window into youth experiences of online learning during COVID-19. Aera Open 7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858421995537
  31. Ma, Y. and Hu, Y. 2021. Business model innovation and experimentation in transforming economies: ByteDance and TikTok. Management and Organization Review 17 (2): 382-388. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2020.69
  32. Mayring, P. 2004. Qualitative content analysis. In A Companion to qualitative research, edited by Uwe Flick, Ernst von Kardoff, and Ines Steike, 266-269. London: Sage.
  33. McMillan, SJ. 2002. Exploring models of interactivity from multiple research traditions: Users, documents, and systems. In Handbook of new media. Social shaping and consequences of ICTs, edited by Leah A. Lievrouw, and Sonia Livingstone, 162-182. London, UK: Sage.
  34. McMillan, SJ. and Hwang, J-S. 2002. Measures of perceived interactivity: An exploration of communication, user control, and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity. Journal of Advertising 31 (3): 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673674
  35. McVeigh-Shultz, J. and Baym, NK. 2015. Thinking of you: Vernacular affordance in the context of the microsocial relationship app, Couple. Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604649
  36. Mendoza-Bruno, C. 2020. A content analysis of how healthcare workers use TikTok. Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communication 11 (2): 5-16. https://bit.ly/3D0i7NP
  37. Merga, MK. 2021. How can Booktok on TikTok inform readers’ advisory services for young people? Library & Information Science Research 43 (2): 101091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2021.101091
  38. Miles, MB.; Huberman, AM. and Saldana, J. 2019. Qualitative data analysis. A methods sourcebook. London, UK: Sage Publications.
  39. Miltsov, A. 2022. Researching TikTok: Themes, methods, and future directions. In The SAGE Handbook of social media research methods, edited by Anabel Quan-Haase and Luke Sloan. London: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529782943.n46
  40. Mina, AX. 2019. Memes to movements: How the world’s most viral media is changing social protest and power. Boston, USA: Beacon Press.
  41. Mosseri, A. 2021. Shedding more light on how Instagram works. Accessed October 10. https://bit.ly/3CLMR51
  42. Nagy, P. and Neff, G. 2015. Imagined affordance: Reconstructing a keyword for Communication theory. Social Media + Society. https://10.1177/2056305115603385
  43. Neuendorf, K. 2012. The content analysis guidebook. London: Sage.
  44. Qiyang, Z. and Heekyoung, J. 2019. Learning and sharing creative skills with short videos: A case study of user behavior in tiktok and bilibili. Paper presented at the International Association of Societies of Design Research Conference, Manchester, United Kingdom, September 2-5.
  45. Rafaeli, S. and Ariel, Y. 2007. Assessing interactivity in computer-mediated research. In The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology, edited by Adam N. Joinson, Katelyn Y.A. McKenna, Tom Postmes, and Ulf-Dietrich Reips, 71-89. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  46. Riffe, D.; Lacy, S. and Fico, F. 2014. Analyzing media messages. Using quantitative content analysis in research. New York: Routledge.
  47. Schellewald, A. 2021. Communicative forms on TikTok: Perspectives from digital ethnography. International Journal of Communication 15: 1437-1457. https://bit.ly/3bB0I1V
  48. Serafini, F. and Reid, S. 2019. Multimodal content analysis: Expanding analytical approaches to content analysis. Visual Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357219864133
  49. Shamayleh, G. and Arsel, Z. 2021. From blogs to platforms: Content landscape and affordances. In Routledge Handbook of digital consumption, edited by Rosa Llamas, and Russell Belk, pp. 1-27. New York, USA: Routledge.
  50. Shifman, L. 2013. Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 18 (3): 362-377. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12013
  51. Song, S.; Zhao, YC.; Yao, X.; Ba, Z. and Zhu, Q. 2021. Short video apps as a health information source: An investigation of affordances, user experience and users’ intention to continue the use of TikTok. Internet Research: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-10-2020-0593
  52. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  53. Sun, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, S. and Luo, J. 2020. Content-based Analysis of the Cultural Differences between TikTok and Douyin. Paper presented at the Proceedings - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Big Data 2020, Atlanta, USA, December 10-13. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData50022.2020.9378032
  54. Sundar, SS. and Kim, J 2005. Interactivity and persuasion: Influencing attitudes with information and involvement. Journal of Interactive Advertising 5 (2): 6-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2005.10722097
  55. Vizcaíno-Verdú, A. and Abidin, C. 2021. Music Challenge Memes on TikTok: Understanding In-Group Storytelling Videos. International Journal of Communication 16: 883-908. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/18141
  56. Vizcaíno-Verdú, A. and Abidin, C. 2023. TeachTok: Teachers of TikTok, micro-celebrification, and fun learning communities. Teaching and Teacher Education 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103978
  57. Vázquez-Herrero, J.; Negreira-Rey, M-C. and López-García, X. 2020. Let’s dance the news! How the news media are adapting to the logic of TikTok. Journalism 23 (8): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920969092
  58. Weil, E. 2019. What do teens learn online? The New York Times Magazine, November 13. https://nyti.ms/3CWqEkR
  59. Worb, J. 2020. How to use stitch: TikTok’s new editing feature. Later Blog, September 9, 2020. https://bit.ly/3m4ZD8f
  60. Yoon, K. and Zhu, Y. 2021. Social media affordances and transactive memory systems in virtual teams. Management Communication Quarterly 0 (0): 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189211032639
  61. Zeng, J. and Abidin, C. 2021. ‘#OkBoomer, time to meet the Zoomers’: Studying the memefication of intergenerational politics on TikTok. Information, Communication & Society: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1961007
  62. Zeng, J.; Schäfer, MS. and Allgaier, J. 2021. Reposting ‘till Albert Einstein is TikTok famous’: The Memetic Construction of Science on TikTok. International Journal of Communication 15: 3216-3247. https://bit.ly/3nTQ8J1
  63. Zhao, Y. 2020. Analysis of TikTok’s success based on its algorithm mechanism. Paper presented at the International Conference on Big Data and Social Sciences, Xi’an, China, August 14-16. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBDSS51270.2020.00012
  64. Zulli, D. and Zulli, DJ. 2020. Extending the internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform. New Media & Society: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820983603
Language: English
Page range: 63 - 81
Published on: May 20, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Arantxa Vizcaíno-Verdú, Daniela Jaramillo-Dent, published by Tallinn, Erfurt University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.