Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Interactive AI is Smarter! The Role of AI Interactivity on Information Quality and Credibility in Times of Conflict Cover

Interactive AI is Smarter! The Role of AI Interactivity on Information Quality and Credibility in Times of Conflict

Open Access
|Jun 2025

References

  1. Arikan, E., Altinigne, N., Kuzgun, E., & Okan, M. (2023). May robots be held responsible for service failure and recovery? The role of robot service provider agents’ human-likeness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 70, 103175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103175
  2. Aron, A., & Westbay, L. (1996). Dimensions of the prototype of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.535
  3. Ashfaq, M., Yun, J., Yu, S. B., & Loureiro, S. M. C. I. (2020). Chatbot: Modeling the determinants of users’ satisfaction and continuance intention of AI-powered service agents. Telematics and Informatics, 54, 101473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101473
  4. Barbul, M., Bojescu I., & Niculescu, M. (2024). Exploring generational differences in attitudes toward human-like robots. Analele Universității din Oradea. Seria Științe Economice TOM XXXIII, 2, 295-306.
  5. Beer, J. M., Prakash, A., Mitzner, T. L., & Rogers, W. A. (2011). Understanding robot acceptance. Human Factors and Aging Laboratory, School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Technical Report HFA-TR-1103.
  6. Breazeal, C. (2002). Designing Sociable Robots. MIT Press.
  7. Burton, J. (2023). Algorithmic extremism? The securitization of artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact on radicalism, polarization and political violence. Technology in Society, 75, 102262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102262
  8. Carey, J. (1989). Interactive media. In E. Barnouw (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Communications (pp. 328–330). Oxford University Press.
  9. Chan, T., Chan, I. C. C., Lam, L. W., & Law, R. (2025). Riding on uncertainty: Leveraging human agents and service robots during service delivery. Journal of Service Research, 23(4), 456-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.104000
  10. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
  11. De Ruyter, B., Saini, P., Markopoulos, P., & Van Breemen, A. (2005). Assessing the effects of building social intelligence in a robotic interface for the home. Interacting with Computers, 17(5), 522–541.
  12. Ding, Y., & Najaf, M. (2024). Interactivity, Humanness, and Trust: A Psychological Approach to AI Chatbot Adoption in E-Commerce. BMC Psychology, 12, 595. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02083-z
  13. Fehr, B., & Russell, J. A. (1991). The concept of love viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.3.425
  14. Fong, T. W., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, I. K. (2003). A Survey of Socially Interactive Robots: Concepts, Design, and Applications. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3–4), 142–166.
  15. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90.
  16. Gomes, S., Lopes, J. M. & Nogueira, E. (2025). Anthropomorphism in artificial intelligence: a game-changer for brand marketing. Future Business Journal, 11(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00423-y
  17. Gong, T. (2025). Bridging the gap: Exploring the nexus of service robot personalization, customer identification, and citizenship behaviours. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 82, 104105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104105
  18. Gu, C., Zhang, Y., & Zeng, L. (2024). Exploring the mechanism of sustained consumer trust in AI chatbots after service failures: A perspective based on attribution and CASA theories. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03879-5
  19. Gursoy, D., Chi, O. H., Lu, L., & Nunkoo, R. (2019). Consumer’s acceptance of artificially intelligent (AI) device use in service delivery. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 157-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.008
  20. He, Y., Yang, L., & Tang, Y. (2025). Preference for assistance from service robots or human staff: The impact of social exclusion experience. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 125, 102-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.104018
  21. Heerink, N., Kröse, B. J. A., Wielinga, B. J., & Evers, V. (2008). Enjoyment, continuous usage and actual use of a conversational robot by elderly people. In Proceedings of the Third ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 113–120).
  22. Hegel, F., Muhl, C., Wrede, B., Hielscher-Fastabend, M., & Sagerer, G. (2009). Understanding social robots. In 2009 Second International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (pp. 169–174).
  23. Horakova, J., Uusitalo, U., Munnukka, J., & Jokinen, O. (2022). Does the digitalization of retailing disrupt consumers’ attachment to retail places?. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 67, 102958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102958
  24. Hsieh, S. H., & Lee, C. T. (2021). Hey Alexa: Examining the effect of perceived socialness in usage intentions of AI assistant-enabled smart speaker. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 15(2), 267–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-11-2019-0179
  25. Jacucci, G., Spagnolli, A., Freeman, J., & Gamberini, L. (2014). Symbiotic interaction: A critical definition and comparison to other human-computer paradigms. In G. Jacucci, L. Gamberini, J. Freeman, & A. Spagnolli (Eds.), Symbiotic Interaction: Third International Workshop, Symbiotic 2014, Helsinki, Finland, October 30–31, 2014, Proceedings (pp. 3–20). Springer International Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13500-7_1
  26. Johnson, D. O., Cuijpers, R. H., Juola, J. F., Torta, E., Simonov, M., Frisiello, A., Bazzani, M., Yan, W., Weber, C., Wermter, S., Meins, N., Oberzaucher, J., Panek, P., Edelmayer, G., Mayer, P., & Beck, C. (2014). Socially assistive robots: a comprehensive approach to extending independent living. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6, 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0217-8
  27. Ki (Chloe), C. W., Cho, E. & Lee, J. E. (2020). Can an intelligent personal assistant (IPA) be your friend? Para-friendship development mechanism between IPAs and their users. Computers in Human Behaviour, 111, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106412
  28. Kim, J., Kang, S. & Bae, J., (2022). Human likeness and attachment effect on the perceived interactivity of AI speakers. Journal of Business Research, 144, 797–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.047
  29. Kim, S., & Baek, T. H. (2018). Examining the antecedents and consequences of mobile app Engagement. Telematics and Informatics, 35, 148-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.10.008
  30. Kwak, S. S., Kim, Y., Kim, E., Shin, C., & Cho, K. (2013). What makes people empathize with an emotional robot? The impact of agency and physical embodiment on human empathy for a robot. In 2013 IEEE RO-MAN: The 22nd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 180–185). IEEE.
  31. Lee, S., & Oh, H. (2025). Service task compatibility for human staff vs. service robots: Roles of product type and brand level. Journal of Business Research, 124, 342-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103952
  32. Lessiter, J., Freeman, J., Miotto, A., & Ferrari, E. (2014). Ghosts in the machines: Towards a taxonomy of human-computer interaction. In G. Jacucci, L. Gamberini, J. Freeman, & A. Spagnolli (Eds.), Symbiotic interaction: Third international workshop, Symbiotic 2014, Helsinki, Finland, October 30–31, 2014, Proceedings (pp. 21–31). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13500-7_2
  33. Liu, X. S., & Hancock, J. (2024). Social robots are good for me, but better for other people: The presumed allo-enhancement effect of social robot perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2(2), 100079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100079
  34. Liu, Y., & Shrum, L. J. (2002). What is interactivity and is it always such a good thing? Implications of definition, person, and situation for the influence of interactivity on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673685
  35. Lu, L., Cai, R., & Gursoy, D. (2019). Developing and validating a service robot integration willingness scale. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 80, 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.01.005
  36. Lu, L., Zhang, P., & Zhang, T. (2021). Leveraging “human-likeness” of robotic service at restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94, Article 102823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102823
  37. Martelaro, N., Nneji, V. C., Ju, W., & Hinds, P. (2016). Tell me more: Designing HRI to encourage more trust, disclosure, and companionship. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 181–188). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451750
  38. Massey, B. L., & Levy, M. R. (1999). Interactivity, online journalism, and English language web newspapers in Asia. Journal of Mass Communication Quarterly, 76(1), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909907600110
  39. McMillan, S. J. (2005). The researchers and the concept: Moving beyond a blind examination of interactivity. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5(2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2005.10722096
  40. Mende, M., Scott, M. L., van Doorn, J., Grewal, D., & Shanks, I. (2019). Service robots rising: How humanoid robots influence service experiences and elicit compensatory consumer responses. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(4), 535–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243718822827
  41. Messer, U. (2025). How do people react to political bias in generative artificial intelligence (AI)?. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 3, 100108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100108
  42. Nomura, T., & Kanda, T. (2016). Rapport-expectation with a robot scale. International Journal of Social Robotics, 8(1), 21–30.
  43. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251430
  44. Pelau, C., Volkmann, C., Barbul, M., & Bojescu, I. (2023). The role of attachment in improving consumer-ai interactions. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 17(1), 1075-1084. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2023-0097
  45. Pelau, C., Barbul, M., Bojescu, I., & Niculescu, M. (2025). AI, How Much Shall I Tell You? Exchange and Communal Consumer–AI Relationships and the Willingness to Disclose Personal Information. Behavioral Sciences, 15(3), 386. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030386
  46. Pentina, I., Xie, T., Hancock, T., & Bailey, A. A. (2023). Consumer–machine relationships in the age of artificial intelligence: Systematic literature review and research directions. Psychology & Marketing, 40(8), 1593–1614. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21853
  47. Riegger, A.-S., Klein, J. F., Merfeld, K., & Henkel, S. (2021). Technology-enabled personalization in retail stores: Understanding drivers and barriers. Journal of Business Research, 123, 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.039
  48. Roca, J. C., Chiu, C. M., & Martinez, F. J. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(8), 683-696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003
  49. Săniuță, A., Zbuchea, A., & Hrib, B. (2022). Innovation in the Book Market Retail. Preferences among Romanian Readers. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 10(2), 179-209. https://doi.org/10.2478/mdke-2022-0013
  50. Song, S. Y., & Kim, Y.-K. (2020). Factors influencing consumers’ intention to adopt fashion robot advisors: Psychological network analysis. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 40(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X20941261
  51. Teo, T. S. H., Srivastava, S. C., & Jiang, L. (2008). Trust and Electronic Government Success: An Empirical Study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 99–132. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222250303
  52. Thomson, M., Macinnis, D.J. & Park, C.W. (2005). The ties that bind: Measuring the strength of consumers’ emotional attachments to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1501_10
  53. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  54. Vidu, C., Zbuchea, A., Mocanu, R., & Pinzaru E. (2020). Artificial intelligence and the ethical use of knowledge. In Strategica. Preparing for Tomorrow, Today (pp. 773-784). Tritonic.
Language: English
Page range: 10 - 22
Submitted on: Apr 18, 2025
Accepted on: May 20, 2025
Published on: Jun 28, 2025
Published by: National University of Political Studies and Public Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Miruna Niculescu, Irina Bojescu, Maria Barbul, Corina Pelau, published by National University of Political Studies and Public Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.