Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Mode effect analysis in the case of daily passenger mobility survey Cover

Mode effect analysis in the case of daily passenger mobility survey

Open Access
|Jan 2021

References

  1. 1. Arnež, M., Belak, E., Bučar, N., Nemec, M., Rutar, K., Zupanc, L. (2018). Transition to WEB data collection in household surveys at SURS – what have we learned so far. Q2018 - European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics, Kraków, Poland, 26-29 June 2018.
  2. 2. Bayart, C., Bonnel, P. (2010). The mixing of survey modes: application to Lyon web and face-to-face household travel survey. 2th World Conference on Transportation Research, Lisbon, 11-15 July 2010.
  3. 3. Bayart, C., Bonnel, P. (2015). How to Combine Survey Media (Web, Telephone, Face-to-Face): Lyon and Rhône-alps Case Study. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 11, pp. 118-135.10.1016/j.trpro.2015.12.011
  4. 4. Berzelak, J. (2014). Mode effects in web surveys. Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty for social sciences, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana.
  5. 5. Bonnel, P., Bayart, C., Smith, B. (2015). Workshop Synthesis: Comparing and Combining Survey Modes. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 11, pp. 108-117.10.1016/j.trpro.2015.12.010
  6. 6. Bučar, N., Belak, E., Arnež, M., Rutar, K. (2018). Nonresponse in Web Surveys in Official Statistics. International Workshop on Household Survey Nonresponse, Budapest, Hungary, 22-24 August 2018.
  7. 7. Center for Transport Analytics (2019). The Danish National Travel Survey. Available at https://www.cta.man.dtu.dk/english/national-travel-survey [28 October 2020].
  8. 8. De Leeuw, E. (2018). Mixed-mode: Past, present, and future. Survey Research Methods, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 75-89.
  9. 9. Eurostat (2018), Eurostat Guidelines on Passenger Mobility Statistics. Eurostat, Luxembourg.
  10. 10. Hox, J., de Leeuw, E., Klausch, T. (2017). Mixed mode research: issues in design and analysis. In Total survey error in practice, Biemer, P. et al. (Eds.), Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 511–530.10.1002/9781119041702.ch23
  11. 11. Klausch, T. (2014). Informed design of mixed-mode surveys: evaluating mode effects on measurement and selection error. Ph.D. Dissertation, Utrecht University. Available at https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/300673 [26 November 2020].
  12. 12. Martin, P., Lynn, P. (2011). The Effects of Mixed Mode Survey Designs on Simple and Complex Analyses. ISER Working Paper Series, No. 2011-28, ISER, University of Essex, Colchester. Available at https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ese:iserwp:2011-28 [26 November 2020].
  13. 13. Škafar, A. (2018). Passenger mobility and road traffic. Final Report. SURS, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  14. 14. Škafar, A. (2019a). Methodological Explanation on Daily Passenger Mobility. SURS, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  15. 15. Škafar, A. (2019b). Standardno poročilo o kakovosti za raziskovanje Dnevna mobilnost potnikov (2017). Quality Report, SURS, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  16. 16. Statistics Netherlands (2016). Transport and mobility 2016. Statistics Netherlands, The Hague/Heerlen/Bonaire.
  17. 17. Transport Analysis (2019). The Swedish National Travel survey. Available at https://www.trafa.se/en/travel-survey/travel-survey [28 October 2020].
Language: English
Page range: 43 - 57
Submitted on: Oct 30, 2020
|
Accepted on: Nov 30, 2020
|
Published on: Jan 5, 2021
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Vasilij Centrih, Andrej Viršček, Andreja Smukavec, Nataša Bučar, Marta Arnež, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.