Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assesing efficiency of targeting in social services in Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina Cover

Assesing efficiency of targeting in social services in Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina

Open Access
|Jun 2020

References

  1. 1. Ahmed, A. U., Bouis, H. E. (2002). Weighing what’s practical: Proxy Means Tests for targeting food subsidies in Egypt. Food Policy, Vol. 27, No. 5-6, pp. 519-540.10.1016/S0306-9192(02)00064-7
  2. 2. Bakhshoodeh, M. (2013). Proxy Means Tests for Targeting Subsidies Scheme in Iran. Iranian Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 25-46.
  3. 3. Baulch, B. (2002). Poverty monitoring and targeting using ROC curves: Examples from Vietnam. Working Paper No. 161, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
  4. 4. Castañeda, T. (2005). Targeting social spending to the poor with proxy means testing: Colombia’s SISBEN System. Social Protection Discussion Paper Series No. 0529. Washington DC: The World Bank.
  5. 5. Cheli, B., Lemmi, A. (1995). A Totally Fuzzy and Relative Approach to the Multidimensional Analysis of Poverty. Economic Notes, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 115-134.
  6. 6. Coady, D., Parker, S. (2009). Targeting social transfers to the poor in Mexico, IMF Working Paper WP/09/60.10.5089/9781451872071.001
  7. 7. Coady, D., Skoufias, E. (2004). On the targeting and redistributive efficiencies of alternative transfer instruments, Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 11-27.10.1111/j.0034-6586.2004.00109.x
  8. 8. Delalić, A., Somun Kapetanović, R., Resić. E. (2017). New multidimensional approaches to poverty measurement in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Croatian Review of Economic, Business and Social Statistics, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 1-15.10.1515/crebss-2017-0001
  9. 9. European Commission, (2016). Minimum income schemes in Europe: A study of national policies. Brussels: European Commission
  10. 10. Glewwe, P., Kanaan, O. (1989). Targeting assistance to the poor: A multivariate approach using household survey data. Policy, Planning and Research Working Paper No. 225. Washington DC: The World Bank.
  11. 11. Grosh, M. (1994). Administering targeted social programs in Latin America: From platitudes to practice. World Bank Regional and Sectoral Studies, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank.10.1596/0-8213-2620-1
  12. 12. Grosh, M. (1994). Administering Targeted Social Programs in Latin America: From Platitudes to Practice. Washington DC: The World Bank.10.1596/0-8213-2620-1
  13. 13. Grosh, M., Baker, J. (1995). Proxy Means Tests for targeting social programs: Simulations and speculations. Living Standards Measurement Survey Working Paper No. 118. Washington DC: The World Bank.10.1596/0-8213-3313-5
  14. 14. Grosh, M., Glinskaya, E. (1997). Proxy means testing and social assistance in Armenia. Draft Report. Washington DC: The World Bank.
  15. 15. Grosh, M., J. Baker (1995). Proxy Means Tests for Targeting Social Programs: Simulations and Speculation. Working Paper No. 118. Living Standards Measurement Study, The World Bank.10.1596/0-8213-3313-5
  16. 16. Hou, X. (2008). Challenges of Targeting the Bottom Ten Per cent: Evidence from Pakistan. Mimeo (Draft). Washington DC: World Bank
  17. 17. Houssou, N. (2010). Operational poverty targeting by proxy means tests, models and policy simulations for Malawi. Ph.D. Dissertation, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences in the Tropics and Subtropics University of Hohenheim.
  18. 18. Houssou, N., Zeller, M., Alcaraz, V., Schwarze, S., Johannsen, J. (2007). Proxy means tests for targeting the poorest households applications to Uganda. Paper Prepared for Presentation at the 106th Seminar of the EAAE, Pro-poor Development in Low Income Countries: Food, Agriculture, Trade, and Environment, 25-27 October 2007, Montpellier, France.
  19. 19. IBHI Project. (2013). Non-contributory Cash Benefits for Social Protection in B&H – What Works and What Does Not (II): Targeting of non-contributory cash transfers - Theory and evidence from selected countries, June 2013.
  20. 20. Johannsen, J. (2006). Operational poverty targeting in Peru – Proxy means testing with non-income indicators. International Poverty Centre Working Paper No. 30, United Nations Development Programme International Poverty Centre.
  21. 21. Kidd, S. Wylde. E. (2011). Targeting the Poorest: an assessment of the proxy means test methodology. Australian Agency for International Development, Canbera, Australia.
  22. 22. Narayan, A., Yoshida, N. (2005). Proxy means test for targeting welfare benefits in Sri Lanka, South Asia Poverty Reduction and Economic Management, World Bank, Washington D. C., Report No. SASPR-7.
  23. 23. Ravallion, M. (1998) Poverty Comparisons. Harwood Academic Publishers, Chur.
  24. 24. Schreiner, M. (2006). A simple poverty scorecard for India. Microfinance Risk Management, Center for Social development, Washington University in Saint Louis, USA.
  25. 25. Sharif, I. A. (2009). Building a targeting system for Bangladesh based on proxy means testing. Discussion Paper, No. 0914, The World Bank.
  26. 26. World Bank, (2007). Economics and Governance of Nongovernmental Organizations in Bangladesh, World Bank Country Study. UPL: Dhaka
  27. 27. World Bank, (2005). Targeting Resources for the Poor in Bangladesh, World Bank: Dhaka.
  28. 28. World Bank, (2008a). Guidance for Responses to the Rising Food and Fuel Prices, Human Development Sector, Washington DC: World Bank
  29. 29. World Bank, (2008b). Bangladesh Poverty Assessment: Creating Opportunities and Bridging the East West Divide, Washington DC: World Bank
  30. 30. Zeller, M., Alcaraz, V. G. (2005). Developing and testing poverty assessment tools: Results from accuracy tests in Uganda. IRIS Center, University of Maryland, College Park.
  31. 31. Zeller, M., Houssou, N., Alcaraz, V. G., Johansen, J., Schwarze, S. (2006). Developing poverty assessment tool based on principal component analysis: Results from Bangladesh, Kazakhstan, Uganda, and Peru. Paper Presented at the 26th International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) Conference, Gold Coast, Australia, 12–19 August 2006.
Language: English
Page range: 56 - 74
Submitted on: Jan 6, 2020
|
Accepted on: May 12, 2020
|
Published on: Jun 8, 2020
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2020 Adela Delalić, Ademir Abdić, Muamer Halilbašić, Lamija Šćeta, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.