Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Technique to Precisely Design the Product in a House of Quality Considering Current Customers’ Requirements Cover

The Technique to Precisely Design the Product in a House of Quality Considering Current Customers’ Requirements

Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. Ali, A., Hafeez, Y., Hussain, S., Yang S., 2020. Role of Requirement Prioritization Technique to Improve the Quality of Highly-Configurable Systems. IEEE Access, 8, 27549-27573, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.297138210.1109/ACCESS.2020.2971382
  2. Chen, CH., Khoo, LP., Yan, W., 2003. Evaluation of multicultural factors from elicited customer requirements for new product development. Research In Engineering Design Theory Applications And Concurrent Engineering, 14(30), 119-130, DOI: 10.1007/s00163-003-0032-610.1007/s00163-003-0032-6
  3. Chen, LH. et al., 2009. Fuzzy linear programming models for new product design using QFD with FMEA, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33(2), 633-647, DOI: 10/1016/j.apm.2007.11.02910.1016/j.apm.2007.11.029
  4. Ertugrul, I. et al., 2016. Grey Relational Analysis Approach In Academic Performance Comparison Of University: A Case Study Of Turkish Universities, European Scientific Journal, 12, 128-139.
  5. Gazda, A., Pacana, A., Malindžák, D., 2013. Study on improving the quality of stretch film by Taguchi method, Przemysl Chemiczny, 92(6), 980-982.
  6. Hoła, A., Sawicki, M., Szóstak, M., 2018. Methodology of Classifying the Causes of Occupational Accidents Involving Construction Scaffolding Using Pareto-Lorenz Analysis, Appl. Sci., 8(1), 48, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app801004810.3390/app8010048
  7. Javed, S.A. et al., 2019. Systems Evaluation through New Grey Relational Analysis Approach: An Application on Thermal Conductivity—Petrophysical Parameters’ Relationships, Processes 7, 348, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr706034810.3390/pr7060348
  8. Lawlor, K. B., Hornyak, M., J., 2012. Smart Goals: How The Application Of Smart Goals Can Contribute To Achievement Of Student Learning Outcomes, Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 39, 259-267.
  9. Li, M. 2013. The method for product design selection with incomplete linguistic weight information based on quality function deployment in a fuzzy environment, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, DOI: 10.1155/2013/943218.10.1155/2013/943218
  10. Liu, AJ. et al., 2018. Novel Method for Perceiving Key Requirements of Customer Collaboration Low-Carbon Product Design, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(7), DOI: 10.3390/ijerph1507144610.3390/ijerph15071446606949829987252
  11. Pacana, A., Czerwińska, K., Bednarova L., 2018. Discrepancies analysis of casts of diesel engine piston, Metalurgija, 57, 4, 324-326.
  12. Pacana, A., Siwiec, D., Bednarova L., 2019. Analysis of the incompatibility of the product with fluorescent method, Metalurgija, 58, 3-4, 337-340.
  13. Pacana, A., Siwiec, D., Bednárová, L. 2020. Method of Choice: A Fluorescent Penetrant Taking into Account Sustainability Criteria, Sustainability, 12(14), 1-21, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su1214585410.3390/su12145854
  14. Rahim, A., Baksh, M., 2003. Application of quality function deployment (QFD) method for pultrusion machine design planning, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 103(6), 373-387.10.1108/02635570310479954
  15. Ulewicz, R., Siwiec, D., Pacana, A., Tutak, M., Brodny, J. 2021. Multi-Criteria Method for the Selection of Renewable Energy Sources in the Polish Industrial Sector, Energies, 14, 2386, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en1409238610.3390/en14092386
  16. Wang, F. et al., 2015. Capturing the key customer requirements for complex equipment design using Grey Relational Analysis, Journal of Grey System, 27, (3), 51-70.
  17. Wang, F., Li, H., Liu, AJ., Zhang, X., 2015. Hybrid customer requirements rating method for customer-oriented product design using QFD. Journal Of Systems Engineering And Electronics, 26(3), 533-543, DOI: 10.1109/JSEE.2015.0006110.1109/JSEE.2015.00061
  18. Wang, YM., Chin, KS., 2011. A linear goal programming approach to determining the relative importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment, Information Sciences, 181(24), 5523-5533, DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2011.08.01610.1016/j.ins.2011.08.016
  19. Winiarski, J. 2012. Ryzyko w projektach informatycznych – statystyczne narzędzia oceny, Contemporart Economy, Electronic Scientific Journal, 3(4), 35-42.
  20. Xie, et al., 2016. Determining the Importance Ratings of Customer Requirements of Automotive Clutch Based on Quality Function Deployment. International Conference on Mechanics Design, Manufacturing and Automation, 379-386.10.12783/dtetr/mdm2016/4932
Language: English
Page range: 9 - 16
Submitted on: May 10, 2021
|
Accepted on: Jun 17, 2021
|
Published on: Dec 17, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Dominika Siwiec, Andrzej Pacana, published by Quality and Production Managers Association
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.