Analysis Procedure of Inspection Errors Based on MSA Attribute Study Data Set for the Improvement Purposes: Part 2 – Results and Discussion

Krzysztof Knop

doi:10.2478/cqpi-2020-0018

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Analysis Procedure of Inspection Errors Based on MSA Attribute Study Data Set for the Improvement Purposes: Part 2 – Results and Discussion

Conference Quality Production Improvement – CQPI

Volume 2 (2020): Issue 1 (October 2020)

By: Krzysztof Knop

Open Access

|Oct 2020

Abstract

In the first article in this series, the research methodology concerning the analysis of inspection errors based on MSA attribute study data set for the improvement purposes was presented. In the final article in the series, applying the methodology in practice step by step was presented. Instructions for correct performance of the analysis, in compliance with the author’s procedure, were determined. Both advantages and disadvantages of the developed approach were underlined.

References

Armstrong M., 2017. How to be an Even Better Manager: A Complete A-Z of Proven Techniques and Essential Skills. 10th Edition, New York, USA: Kogan Page.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Blikle A. J., 2018. The doctrine of quality. Edition II turquoise. The thing about turquoise self-organization [in Polish], Onepress.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Borkowski S., Knop K., 2013. Visual Control as a Key Factor in a Production Process of a Company from Automotive Branch, Production Engineering Archives, 1, 1, pp. 25-28.10.30657/pea.2013.01.08
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chandler S., Richardson S., 2012. 100 Ways to Motivate Others: How Great Leaders Can Produce Insane Results Without Driving People Crazy. 3rd Edition, Pomtpon Plains, NJ, USA: The Career Press, Inc..
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dostál J., 2014. Theory of Problem Solving, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, pp. 1-8, DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.970.10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.970
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fisher A., Grei S., Funke J., 2012. The Process of Solving Complex Problems, Journal of Problem Solving, 4, 1, 19-42. DOI: 10.7771/1932-6246.1118.10.7771/1932-6246.1118
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Grissinger M., 2003. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Can Help Guide Error-Prevention Efforts, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 28, 1, p. 8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jagusiak-Kocik M., 2014. Ensuring Continuous Improvement Processes Through Standardization in the Automotive Company, Production Engineering Archives, 2, 1, pp. 12-15.10.30657/pea.2014.02.04
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Knop K., Mielczarek K., 2018. Using 5W-1H and 4M Methods to Analyse and Solve the Problem with the Visual Inspection Process - Case Study, MATEC Web of Conferences, 183.10.1051/matecconf/201818303006
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Knop K., Ulewicz R., 2018. Analysis of the Possibility of Using the Kamishibai Audit in the Area of Quality Inspection Process Implementation, Organization & Management: Scientific Quarterly, 3, 43, pp. 31-49.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liker J.K., 2004. The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer, 1 edition, McGraw-Hill Education, New York.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mielczarek K., Knop K., 2016. Significance of Factor Describing Visual Control in the Second Management Principle of Toyota in the Automotive Supply Industry, Production Engineering Archives, 13, 4, pp. 16-19.10.30657/pea.2016.13.04
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA), AIAG, Reference Manual, 4th Edition Chrysler, Ford, General Motors, 2010.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Okes D., 2019. Root Cause Analysis, Second Edition: The Core of Problem Solving and Corrective Action, 2 edition, ASQ Quality Press; Milwaukee (WI).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Puvanasvaran A.P., Megat M.H.M.A., Tang S.H., Muhamad M.R, Hamouda A.M.S., 2008. A Review of Problem Solving Capabilities in Lean Process Management, American Journal of Applied Sciences, 5, 5, pp. 504-511. DOI: 10.3844/ajassp. 2008.504.511.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Robitaille D., 2004. Root Cause Analysis: Basic Tools and Techniques, First Edition Edition, Paton Professional, Chico (CA).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sharma K.D., Srivastava S., 2018. Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) Implementation: A Literature Review, Journal of Advance Research in Aeronautics and Space Science, 5, 1&2, pp. 1-17.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stanek K., Czech P., Barcik J., 2011. Methodology of World Class Manufacturing (WCM) in the factory of Fiat Auto Poland SA [in Polish], Silesian University of Technology Scientific Papers, Series: Transport, 71, pp. 65-72.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cqpi-2020-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2657-8603

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 162 - 171

Submitted on: Jun 20, 2020

Accepted on: Aug 22, 2020

Published on: Oct 27, 2020

Published by: Quality and Production Managers Association

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

Keywords:

Related subjects:

Business and economics,

Business management,

Business management, other,

Engineering,

Introductions and overviews,

Engineering, other,

Mechanical engineering,

Production technology,

Social sciences,

Sociology,

Sociology of science, technology, and environment

© 2020 Krzysztof Knop, published by Quality and Production Managers Association
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 2 (2020): Issue 1 (October 2020)