Detailed Analysis of GRR Study Results and their Visualization

Mikulová, Pavlína; Plura, Jiří

doi:10.2478/cqpi-2019-0065

Abstract

The paper presents the possibilities of analyzing the measurement system repeatability and reproducibility (GRR) analysis results in more detail and their visualization. Based on real data, the influence of appraisers’ behavior on GRR analysis results is evaluated. The measured data obtained in the GRR study by three operators are analyzed in more detail for cases involving only two operators. Comparison of the behavior of individual operators is performed using Gaussian curves, which allow to evaluate graphically the repeatability of individual operators and the reproducibility of measurement system. This approach makes possible to visualize the GRR analysis results with regard to behavior of individual operators. Obtained results make possible to improve the interpretation of GRR analysis results and are useful for measurement system improvement.

References

Burdick, R.K., Borror, C.M., Montgomery, D.C., 2003. A review of methods for measurement systems capability analysis, Journal of Quality Technology, 35, 342–354. DOI: 10.1080/00224065.2003.1198023210.1080/00224065.2003.11980232
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
García, A.C., Río, A.G., 2013. Number of distinct data categories and gage repeatability and reproducibility, A double (but single) requirement. Measurement, 46 (8), 2514–2518, DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2013.04.06510.1016/j.measurement.2013.04.065
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Klaput, P., Plura, J., 2011. The importance of graphical tools for measurement systems analysis, Proceedings of QMOD Conference on Quality and Service Sciences 2011, Pamplona: Universidad Navarra, 1010-1028.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mikulová, P., Plura, J., 2018. Comparison of approaches to gauge repeatability and reproducibility analysis, 12^th International Conference Quality Production Improvement QPI 2018, Zaborze, 183-189.10.1051/matecconf/201818303015
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Montgomery, D.C., 2009. Introduction to statistical quality control. 6th ed. Hoboken, N. J.: Wiley, New Jersey.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MSA Work Group, 2010. Measurement System Analysis, Reference Manual, fourth ed. Chrysler Group LLC.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Plura, J., 2001. Quality Planning and Continuous Quality Improvement (In Czech), first ed. Computer Press, Prague, 244 pp., ISBN 80-7226-543-1.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Plura, J., Klaput P., 2011. The possibilities of confidence improvement of measurement systems analyses results, 21^th International Conference on metallurgy and Materials - METAL, Brno, Czech republic.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wheeler, D. J., 2006. EMP III: Evaluating the Measurement Process & Using Imperfect Data, Third ed. SPC Press, Knoxville, Tennessee.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Detailed Analysis of GRR Study Results and their Visualization

Abstract

Paradigm

My account