Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Revisiting the culture–social structure duality debate through the lens of personal networks Cover

Revisiting the culture–social structure duality debate through the lens of personal networks

Open Access
|Jun 2025

References

  1. Abrutyn, S., & Turner, J. (2022). The first institutional spheres in human societies: Evolution and adaptations from foraging to the threshold of modernity. Routledge.
  2. Baldwin, J. R., Faulkner, S. L., Hecht, M. L., & Lindsley, S. L. (2006). Redefining culture: Perspectives across the disciplines. Routledge.
  3. Barnes, J. A. (1954). Class and committees in a Norwegian island parish. Human Relations, 7(1), 39–58.
  4. Bastani, S. (2007). Family comes first: Men’s and women’s personal networks in Tehran. Social Networks, 29(3), 357–374. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2007.01.004.
  5. Bateson, G. (1958). Naven: A survey of the problems suggested by a composite picture of the culture of a New Guinea tribe drawn from three points of view. Stanford University Press.
  6. Berry, J. W. (1969). On cross-cultural comparability. International Journal of Psychology, 4(2), 119–128.
  7. Bernard, H. R., & Killworth, P. D. (1973). On the social structure of an ocean-going research vessel and other important things. Social Science Research, 2, 145–184.
  8. Bidart, C., Degenne, A., & Grossetti, M. (2020). Living in networks: The dynamics of social relations. Structural analysis in the social sciences. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781108882392.
  9. Bird, D. W., Bird, R. B., Codding, B. F., & Zeanah, D. W. (2019). Variability in the organization and size of hunter-gatherer groups: Foragers do not live in small-scale societies. Journal of Human Evolution, 131, 96–108. doi: 10.1016/J.JHEVOL.2019.03.005.
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.
  11. Bourdieu, P. (2006). La distinción. Taurus.
  12. Boutyline, A., & Soter, L. K. (2021). Cultural schemas: What they are, how to find them, and what to do once you’ve caught one. American Sociological Review, 86(4), 728–758. doi: 10.1177/00031224211024525.
  13. Carlson, S. M., Koenig, M. A., & Harms, M. B. (2013). Theory of mind. WIREs Cognitive Science, 4(4), 391–402. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1232.
  14. Caulkins, D. D. (1999). Is Mary Douglas’s grid/group analysis useful for cross-cultural research? Cross-Cultural Research 33 (1): 108–128. doi: 10.1177/106939719903300107.
  15. Chao, G. T. (2000). Multilevel issues and culture: An integrative view. In Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 308–346). Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
  16. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120. doi: 10.1086/228943.
  17. de la Rúa, A. D. F. (2004). Los espacios sociales de la transnacionalidad. Una tipología de la integración relacional de los migrantes. Revista Redes, 57(Suppl. 1), 1. doi: 10.1157/13067416.
  18. Dimaggio, P. (1993). Nadel’s Paradox revisited: Relational and cultural aspects of organizational structures. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organization. Harvard Business School Press.
  19. Douglas, M. (1996). Natural symbols. Explorations in cosmology. Routledge.
  20. Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993). Co-evolution of neocortex size, group size and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(4): 681–735. http://www.bbsonline.org/documents/a/00/00/05/65/bbs000005.
  21. Dunbar, R. I. M. (1998). The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 6(5), 178–190. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1998)6:5<;178: AID-EVAN5>3.3.CO;2-P.
  22. Dunbar, R. I. M. (2018). The anatomy of friendship. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(1), 32–51. doi: 10.1016/J.TICS.2017.10.004.
  23. Eisenstadt, S. N. (1989). Introduction: Culture and social structure in recent sociological analysis. In H. Haferkamp (Eds.), Social structure and culture (p. 352). Walter de Gruyter.
  24. Elder, G. H. (1994). Time, human agency, and social change: Perspectives on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(1), 4–15. doi: 10.2307/2786971.
  25. Emirbayer, M., & Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. The American Journal of Sociology, 99(6), 1411–1454.
  26. Feld, S. L. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 1015–1035. doi: 10.1086/227352.
  27. Fernández-Peña, R., Molina, J. L., & Valero, O. (2020). Satisfaction with social support received from social relationships in cases of chronic pain: The influence of personal network characteristics in terms of structure, composition and functional content. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(8), 2706. doi: 10.3390/IJERPH17082706.
  28. Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2011). Toward a general theory of strategic action fields. Sociological Theory, 29(1), 1–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01385.x.
  29. Fontdevila, J., & White, H. C. (2010). Power from switching across netdoms through reflexive and indexical language. Redes: Revista Hispana Para El Análisis de Redes Sociales, 18, 327–349.
  30. Fortes, M., & Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (2015). African political systems. Routledge.
  31. Fox, S. A., Muller, M. N., González, N. T., Enigk, D. K., Machanda, Z. P., Otali, E., Wrangham, R., & Thompson, M. E. (2023). Weak, but not strong, ties support coalition formation among wild female chimpanzees. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 378(1868), 20210427. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0427.
  32. Freeman, L. C. (2004). The development of social network analysis. A study in the sociology of science. Empirical Press.
  33. Fuhse, J. A. (2009). The meaning structure of social networks. Sociological Theory, 27(1), 51–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.00338.x.
  34. Fuhse, J. (2021). Social networks of meaning and communication. Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780190275433.001.0001.
  35. Fuhse, J. A., & Gondal, N. (2024). Networks from culture: Mechanisms of tie-formation follow institutionalized rules in social fields. Social Networks, 77, 43–54. doi: 10.1016/J.SOCNET.2021.12.005.
  36. Gelfand, M. (2019). Rule makers, rule breakers: Tight and loose cultures and the secret signals that direct our lives. Scribner.
  37. Gelfand, M. J., Jackson, J. C., Pan, X., Nau, D., Pieper, D., Denison, E., Dagher, M., van Lange, P. A. M., Chiu, C. Y., & Wang, M. (2021). The relationship between cultural tightness–looseness and COVID-19 cases and deaths: a global analysis. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(3), e135–e144. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30301-6.
  38. Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. M., Lun, J., Lim, B. C., Duan, L., Almaliach, A., Ang, S., Arnadottir, J., Aycan, Z., Boehnke, K., Boski, P., Cabecinhas, R., Chan, D., Chhokar, J., D Amato, A., Ferrer, M., Fischlmayr, I. C., & Yamaguchi, S. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332(6033), 1100–1104. doi: 10.1126/science.1197754.
  39. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Univ of California Press.
  40. Giddens, A. (1984). Elements of the theory of structuration. In The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration (pp. 1–28). University of California Press. doi: 10.1007/BF01173303.
  41. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
  42. Graeber, D., & Wengrow, D. (2021). The dawn of everything: A new history of humanity. Penguin UK.
  43. Granovetter, M. (2018). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. In The sociology of economic life (pp. 22–45). Routledge.
  44. Hage, P. (1976). Structural balance and clustering in Bushmen kinship relations. Behavioral Science, 21, 36–76.
  45. Hill, R., & Dunbar, R. (2003). Social network size in humans. Human Nature, 14(1), 53–72. doi: 10.1007/s12110-003-1016-y.
  46. Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5). Sage.
  47. Hollstein, B. (2023). Personal network dynamics across the life course: A relationship-related structural approach. Advances in Life Course Research, 58, 100567. doi: 10.1016/J.ALCR.2023.100567.
  48. Inglehart, R. (2018). Cultural evolution: People’s motivations are changing, and reshaping the world. Cambridge University Press.
  49. Jackson, P. R. (1988). Personal networks, support mobilization, and unemployment. Psychological Medicine, 18, 397–404.
  50. Kahn, R. L., & Antonucci, T. C. (1980). Convoys over the life course: Attachment, roles, and social support. Life-Span Development and Behavior, 3, 253–286.
  51. Kilby, R. W. (1993). The study of human values. University Press of America. https://cataleg.uab.cat/iii/encore/record/C_Rb1314030_S The study of human values_Orightresult_U_X7?lang=cat.
  52. Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. Volume 47, Issue 1 of Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University.
  53. Lazega, E. (2016). Synchronization costs in the organizational society: Intermediary relational infrastructures in the dynamics of multilevel networks. In E. Lazega & T. Snijders (Eds.), Multilevel network analysis for the social sciences (pp. 47–77). Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-02904-7.
  54. Lazega, E., Jourda, M. T., & Mounier, L. (2013). Network lift from dual alters: Extended opportunity structures from a multilevel and structural perspective. European Sociological Review, 29(6), 1226–1238. doi: 10.1093/esr/jct002.
  55. Lee, R. B. (1972). ! Kung spatial organization: An ecological and historical perspective. Human Ecology, 1(2), 125–147.
  56. Lee, R. B., & DeVore, I. (1968). Man the hunter. Aldine Transaction.
  57. Levi-Strauss, C. (1995). Antropología estructural. Paidós.
  58. Lévi-Strauss, C. (2002). Les structures élémentaires de la parenté. De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110226089.
  59. Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge University Press.
  60. Lowie, R. H. (1920). Primitive society. Boni and Liveright.
  61. Mamadouh, V. (1999). Grid-group cultural theory: An introduction. GeoJournal, 47(3), 395–409. doi: 10.1023/A:1007024008646.
  62. Martin, J. L. (2009). Social structures. Princeton University Press.
  63. McCarty, C., Lubbers, M. J., Vacca, R., & Molina, J. L. (2019). Conducting personal network research: A practical guide. Guilford Publishers.
  64. McLean, P. (2016). Culture in networks. John Wiley & Sons.
  65. McLuhan, M., & Powers, B. R. (1989). The global village: Transformations in world life and media in the 21st century. Oxford University Press. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:109246321.
  66. Meguerditchian, A., Marie, D., Margiotoudi, K., Roth, M., Nazarian, B., Anton, J. L., & Claidière, N. (2021). Baboons (Papio anubis) living in larger social groups have bigger brains. Evolution and Human Behavior, 42(1), 30–34. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.06.010.
  67. Mitchell, C. J. (1969). Social networks in urban situations. Analyses of personal relationships in Central African towns. Manchester University Press.
  68. Mohr, J. W., & Duquenne, V. (1997). The duality of culture and practice: Poverty relief in New York City, 1888–1917. Theory and Society, 26(2/3), 305–356.
  69. Molina, J. L., Lubbers, M. J., Valenzuela‐García, H., & Gómez‐Mestres, S. (2017). Cooperation and competition in social anthropology. Anthropology Today, 33(1), 11–14.
  70. Molina, J. L., Ozaita, J., Tamarit, I., Sánchez, A., McCarty, C., & Bernard, H. R. (2022). Structural measures of personal networks predict migrants’ cultural backgrounds: An explanation from Grid/Group theory. PNAS Nexus, 1(4), pgac195. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac195.
  71. Murphy, W. P. (1980). Secret knowledge as property and power in Kpelle Society: Elders versus Youth. Africa, 50(2), 193–207. doi: 10.2307/1159011.
  72. Nadel, S. F. (1957). The theory of social structure. Cohen & West Ltd.
  73. Obradovich, N., Özak, Ö., Martín, I., Ortuño-Ortín, I., Awad, E., Cebrián, M., Cuevas, R., Desmet, K., Rahwan, I., & Cuevas, Á. (2022). Expanding the measurement of culture with a sample of two billion humans. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 19(190), 20220085. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0085.
  74. Patterson, O. (2014). Making sense of culture. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 1–30. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043123.
  75. Perrow, C. (1991). A society of organizations. Theory and Society, 20(6), 725–762.
  76. Perry, B. L., Pescosolido, B. A., & Borgatti, S. P. (2018). Egocentric network analysis: Foundations, methods, and models. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781316443255.
  77. Rayner, S., & Gross, J. L. (1985). Measuring culture: A paradigm for the analysis of social organization. Columbia University Press.
  78. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. The Free Press.
  79. Salpeteur, M., Patel, H., Balbo, A. L., Rubio-Campillo, X., Madella, M., Ajithprasad, P., & Reyes-García, V. (2015). When knowledge follows blood. Kin groups and the distribution of traditional ecological knowledge in a community of semi-nomadic pastoralists. Current Anthropology, 56(3), 471–483.
  80. Salpeteur, M., Patel, H. H., Molina, J. L., Balbo, A. L., Rubio-Campillo, X., Reyes-García, V., & Madella, M. (2016). Comigrants and friends: Informal networks and the transmission of traditional ecological knowledge among seminomadic pastoralists of Gujarat, India. Ecology and Society, 21(2), art20. doi: 10.5751/ES-08332-210220.
  81. Savage, M. (2015). Social class in the 21st century. Penguin UK.
  82. Schultz, J., & Breiger, R. L. (2010). The strength of weak culture. Poetics, 38(6), 610–624. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2010.09.002.
  83. Serino, M. (2021). Culture and networks in online social fields. Studying the duality of culture and structure in social media through Bourdieu’s theory and social network analysis. Italian Sociological Review, 11, 369–390. doi: 10.13136/isr.v11i4S.439.
  84. Silberbauer, G. B. (1961). Aspects of the Kinship System of the G/Wi Bushmen of the Central Kalahari. South African Journal of Science, 57(12), 353–359.
  85. Silberbauer, G. B. (1981). Hunter and habitat in the central Kalahari Desert. Cambridge University Press.
  86. Simmel, G. (1964). Conflict and the web of group-affiliations. Collier-Macmillan. http://cataleg.uab.cat/record=b1543636∼S1*cat.
  87. Small, M. L., & Adler, L. (2019). The role of space in the formation of social ties. Annual Review of Sociology, 45(1), 111–132. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022707.
  88. Snijders, T. A. B., van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. G. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32(1), 44–60.
  89. Spickard, J. V. (1989). A guide to Mary Douglas’s three versions of grid/group theory. Sociology of Religion, 50(2), 151–170. doi: 10.2307/3710986.
  90. Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273. doi: 10.2307/2095521.
  91. Taras, V., Rowney, J., & Steel, P. (2009). Half a century of measuring culture: Review of approaches, challenges, and limitations based on the analysis of 121 instruments for quantifying culture. Journal of International Management, 15(4), 357–373. doi: 10.1016/J.INTMAN.2008.08.005.
  92. Weiss, J., Lawton, L. E., & Fischer, C. S. (2022). Life course transitions and changes in network ties among younger and older adults. Advances in Life Course Research, 52, 100478. doi: 10.1016/J.ALCR.2022.100478.
  93. Wellman, B., & Berkowitz, S. D. (1988). Social structures: A network approach. Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/connections-2025-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2816-4245 | Journal ISSN: 0226-1766
Language: English
Page range: 25 - 38
Submitted on: Dec 10, 2024
Accepted on: Apr 30, 2025
Published on: Jun 19, 2025
Published by: International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 José Luis Molina, Christopher McCarty, Angel Sánchez, Miroslav Pulgar, published by International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.