Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Men Think they Know More about Networks Cover

Men Think they Know More about Networks

By: Zachary P. NealORCID  
Open Access
|Aug 2023

References

  1. Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. A. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 15(3), 241. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0086006.
  2. Hussénius, A. (2020). Trouble the gap: Gendered inequities in stem education. Gender and Education, 32(5), 573–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2020.1775168.
  3. Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.139.
  4. Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121.
  5. Kwiek, M., & Roszka, W. (2021). Gender-based homophily in research: A large-scale study of man-woman collaboration. Journal of Informetrics, 15(3), 101171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101171.
  6. Mullangi, S., & Jagsi, R. (2019). Imposter syndrome: Treat the cause, not the symptom. Journal of the American Medical Association, 322(5), 403–404. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.9788.
  7. Porter, T., Elnakouri, A., Meyers, E. A., Shibayama, T., Jayawickreme, E., & Grossmann, I. (2022). Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(9), 524–536. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00081-9.
  8. Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2022). Gender differences in self-estimated intelligence: Exploring the male hubris, female humility problem. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 812483. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.812483.
  9. Silver, R. (2022). Imposter syndrome-Am I a fraud? BDJ Team, 9(7), 14–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41407-022-0990-z.
  10. Spelke, E. S. (2005). Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science?: A critical review. American Psychologist, 60(9), 950. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.9.950.
  11. Wang, Y. S., Lee, C. J., West, J. D., Bergstrom, C. T., & Erosheva, E. A. (2023). Gender-based homophily in collaborations across a heterogeneous scholarly landscape. PLOS One, 18(4), e0283106. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283106.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/connections-2022-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2816-4245 | Journal ISSN: 0226-1766
Language: English
Page range: 50 - 54
Published on: Aug 29, 2023
Published by: International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Zachary P. Neal, published by International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.