On the Effect of Reciprocal Dyadic Relations on the Share of Lexical Practices
References
- Albert, E. M. (1986). Culture patterning of speech behavior in Burundi. In Gumperz J. and Hymes D. (Eds) Directions in Sociolinguistics : The Ethnography of communication (pp. 72–105). Oxford : Basil Blackwell.
- Androutsopoulos, J. K. (2000). Extending the concept of the (socio)linguistic variable to slang. In K. Tamas (Ed.), Mi a szleng? (pp. 109–140). Debrecen: Kossuth Lajos University Press.
- Aral, S., Muchnik, L., & Sundararajan, A. (2009). Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. PNAS, 106 (51), 21545–21549.
- Aral, S., & Walker D. (2014). Tie strength, embeddedness, and social influence: A Large-scale networked experiment. Management Science, 60(6), 1352–1370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1936
- Bauer, L., & Bauer W. (2000). Nova Zelandia est ominis divisa in partes tres. New Zealand English Journal, 14, 7–17.
- Beeching, K. (2012). Sociolinguistic aspects of lexical variation in French. In T. Pooley & D. Lagorgette (Eds.), On linguistic change in French: Socio-historical approaches (Le changement linguistique en français) (pp. 37–54). Savoie: Presses Universitaires de Savoie.
- Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in society, 13, 145–204.
- Bell, A. (2001). Back in style: Reworking audience design. In P. Eckert & J. R. Rickford (Eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation (pp. 139–169). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P. D., & Sailer, L. (1980). Informant accuracy in social network data, IV: Comparison of clique-level structure in behavorial and cognitive data. Social Networks, 2, 191–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(79)90014-5
- Blom, J. P., & Gumperz, J. J. (1986). Social meaning in linguistic structures: Code-switching in Norway. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 407–434). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- Borgatti, S. P. (2002). Netdraw network visualization. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
- Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (1997). Network analysis of 2-mode data. Social Networks, 19, 243–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(96)00301-2
- Everett, M. G., & Borgatti, S. P., (2014). Networks containing negative ties. Social Networks, 38, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2014.03.005
- Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. (2002). UCINET 6 for windows: Software for social network analysis. Massachusetts: Analytic Technologies.
- Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2018). Analyzing social network. London: SAGE.
- Brint, S. (2001). Gemeinschaft revisited: A critique and reconstruction of the community concept. Sociological Theory 19(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00125
- Britain, D. (2013). Space, diffusion and mobility. In J. K. Chambers & N. Schilling (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (2nd ed., pp. 472–500). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
- Burt, R. S. (1992), Structural holes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94, S95–S120. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2780243
- Coleman, J., Katz, E., & Menzel, H. (1957). The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry 20(4), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.2307/2785979
- Carrington, P. J., & Scott, J. (2011). The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. London: SAGE.
- Cooper, R. L. (1980). Sociolinguistic survey: The state of the art. Applied Linguistics 1, 113–128.
- Dekker, D., Krackhard, D., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2007). Sensitivity of MRQAP tests to collinearity and autocorrelation conditions. Psychometrika 2, 563–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-007-9016-1
- Dodsworth, R. & Benton, R. A. (2020). Language variation and change in social networks: A bipartite approach. New York and London: Routledge.
- Eckert, P. (1988). Adolescent social structure and the spread of linguistic change. Language in Society 17(2), 183–207. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500012756
- Edwards, J. (2009). Language and identity. UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Elias, N. (1991). La société des individus. Paris: Fayard.
- Elias, N. (1995). The symbol theory. London: SAGE.
- Ervin-Tripp, S. (1986). On sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co-occurrence. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 214–250). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- Fagyal, Z., Swarup, S., & Escobar, A. M. (2010). Centers and peripheries: Network roles in language change. Lingua 120(8), 2061–2079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.02.001
- Fasold, R. W. (2013). Variation and Syntactic Theory. In J. K. Chambers & N. Schilling (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (2nd ed., pp. 185–202). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
- Feagin, C. (2013). Entering the Community : Fieldwork. In J. K. Chambers & N. Schilling (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (2nd ed., pp. 19–37). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
- Fought, C. (2013). Ethnicity. In J. K. Chambers & N. Schilling (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (2nd ed., pp. 388–407). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
- Gasiorek, J. (2016). The “Dark side” of CAT: Nonaccommodation. In H. Giles (Ed.), Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts (pp. 85–104). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Gauchat, L. (1905). L’unité phonétique dans le patois d’une commune. Halle: Max Niemeyer.
- Giles, H. & St. Clair, R. (1979). Language and social psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review 25(2), 161–176. http://hdl.handle.net/10694/347
- Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78(6), 1360–1380. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2776392
- Gravetter, F., & Wallnau, L. (2014). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, California: Wads.
- Greco, L. (2014). Les recherches linguistiques sur le genre: un état de l’art. Langage et Société 148, 11–29. https://doi.org/10.3917/ls.148.0011
- Greenwald, H. J., & O’Connell, S. M. (1970). Comparison of dichotomous and Likert formats. Psychological Reports 27(2), 481–482.
- Gumperz, J. J. (1989). Sociolinguistique interactionnelle: une approche interprétative. La Réunion: l’Harmattan.
- Guy, G. R. (1988). Language and social class. In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey (pp. 37–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Harary, F., Norman, R. Z., & Cartwright, D. (1965). Structural models: An introduction to the theory of directed Graphs. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
- Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 21, 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1946.9917275
- Hernández-Campoy, J. M. (2016). Sociolinguistic styles. UK: Wiley Blackwell.
- Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. (1996). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 653–660. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2118218
- Holland, P. W., & Leinhard, S. (1971). Transitivity in structural models of small groups. Comparative Group Studies, 2, 107–124.
- Hubert, L., & Schultz, J. (1976). Quadratic assignment as a general data analysis strategy. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 29(2), 190–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1976.tb00714.x
- Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Hymes, D. (1986). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 35–71). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- Jellab, A. (2013). Cohérences et tensions dans la socialisation universitaire des étudiants: les enseignements d’une recherche qualitative. L’Homme & la Société 187, 227–250.
- Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2020). Dyadic data analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
- Kiesling, F. S. (2013). Constructing identity. In J. K. Chambers & N. Schilling (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (2nd ed., pp. 448–467). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
- Kirkham, S., & Moore, E. (2013). Adolescence. In J. K. Chambers & N. Schilling (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (2nd ed, pp. 277–297). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
- Kossinets, G., & Watts, D. J. (2009). Origins of homophily in an evolving social network. American Journal of Sociology, 115(2), 405–450. https://doi.org/10.1086/599247
- Kovacs, B., & Kleinbaum, A. M. (2019). Language-style similarity and social networks. Pschological Science, 31(2), 202–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619894557
- Krackhardt, D. (1987). Cognitive social structure. Social Networks, 9(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(87)90009-8
- Krackhardt, D. (1988). Predicting with networks: Nonparametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data. Social Networks, 10, 359–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(88)90004-4
- Kroch, A. (1989). Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1(3), 199–244. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000168
- Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Labov, W. (1976). Sociolinguistique. Paris: Les éditions de minuit.
- Le Page, R. B. (1968). Problems of description in multilingual communities. Transactions of the Philological Society, 67, 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.1968.tb01134.x
- Lev, M. (2014). Social dimensions of language change. In C. Bowern & B. Evans (Eds.), Handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 484–502). New York: Routledge.
- Lev-Ari, S. (2017). Talking to fewer people leads to having more malleable linguistic representations. PLOS One, 12(8), e0183593. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183593
- Lev-Ari, S. (2018). Social network size can influence linguistic malleability and propagation of linguistic change. Cognition, 176, 31–39.
- Liben-Nowell, D., Novak, J., Kumar, R., Raghavan, P., & Tomkins, A. (2005). Geographic routing in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(33), 11623–11628. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503018102
- Lippi-Green, R. L. (1989). Social network integration and language change in progress in a rural alpine village. Language in Society, 18(2), 213–234.
- Lodewijk, H. F. M. (2008). The norm of reciprocity. International Encyclopedia of the Social Science 2, 107–108.
- Lodge, R. A. (2004). A sociolinguistic history of Parisian French. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Loewenstein, J., & Ocasio, W. C. (2005). Vocabularies of organizing: How language links culture, cognition, and action in organizations. McCombs Working Paper OSSM-03-05, University of Texas at Austin, Austin.
- Luce, R. D., & Perry, A. D. (1949). A method of matrix analysis of group structure. Psychometrika, 14, 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289146
- Lusher, D., Koskinen, J., & Robins, G. (2013). Exponential random graph models for social networks: Theory, methods, and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Macauly, R. (2013). Discourse variation. In J. K. Chambers & N. Schilling (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (2nd ed., pp. 222–236). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
- Martin, N., Chevrot, J.-P., & Barbu, S. (2010). Stylistic variations in the social network of a 10-year-old child: Pragmatic adjustments or automatic alignment? Journal of Sociolinguistics, 14(5), 678–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2010.00459.x
- McFarland, D. A., Moody, J., Diehl, D., Smith, J. A., & Thomas, R. J. (2014). Network ecology and adolescent social structure. American Sociological Association 79(6), 1088–1121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414554001
- McPherson, M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1987). Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. American Sociological Review 52, 370–379.
- McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
- Merton, R. K. (1949). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
- Meyerhoff, M., & Strycharz, A. (2013). Communities of practice. In J. K. Chambers & N. Schilling (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (2nd ed., pp. 428–447). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
- Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (1992). Social network and social class: Toward an integrated sociolinguistic model. Language in Society, 21(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500015013
- Milroy, L. (1987). Language and social networks (2nd ed.). New York: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
- Milroy, L., & Llamas, C. (2013). Social networks. In J. K. Chambers & N. Schilling (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (2nd ed., pp. 409–427). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
- Mitchell-Kernan, C. (1986). Signifying and marking: Two Afro-American speech acts. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 161–179). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- Nardy, A., Chevrot, J.-P., & Barbu, S. (2014). Socioliguistic convergence and social interactions within group of preschoolers: A longitudinal study. Language, Variation and Change, 26, 273–301.
- Noble, B., & Fernandez, R. (2015). Centre stage: How social network position shapes linguistic coordination. Proceedings of CMCL, 2015, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W15-1104
- Paolillo, J. (1999). The virtual speech community: Social network and language variation on IRC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00109.x
- Pescosolido, B. A., & Rubin, B. A. (2000). The web of group affiliations revisited: Social life, postmodernism, and sociology. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 52–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657289
- Poupart, J. (2011). Tradition de Chicago et interactionnisme: des méthodes qualitatives à la sociologie de la déviance. Recherches qualitatives, 30(1), 178–199. https://doi.org/10.7202/1085485
- Preston, D. R. (2013). Language with an attitude. In J. K. Chambers & N. Schilling (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (2nd ed., pp. 157–182). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
- Queen, R. (2013). Gender, sex, sexuality and sexual identities. In J. K. Chambers & N. Schilling (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (2nd ed., pp. 368–387). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
- Silverstein, M. (1975). Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In B.G Blount (Ed.), Language, Culture, and Society: A Book of readings (pp. 187–221). IL: Waveland.
- Rapoport, A. (1953). Spread of Information through a population with sociostructural bias: Assumption of transitivity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 15, 523–533.
- Safranková, J. M., & Sikyr, M. (2016). The study of university students’ motivation. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 4(4), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.52950/TE.2016.4.4.004
- Saint-Charles, J., & Mongeau, P. (2018). Social influence and discourse similarity networks in workgroups. Social Networks, 52, 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.09.001
- Santa Ana, O., & Parodi, C. (1998). Modeling the speech community: Configuration and variable types in the Mexican Spanish setting. Language in Society, 27(1), 23–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500019710
- Scholand, A. J., Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). Assessing group interaction with social language network analysis. In S. K. Chai, J. J. Salerno, & P. L. Mabry (Eds.), Advances in social computing (pp. 248–255). Berlin: Springer.
- Sharma, D., & Dodsworth, R. (2020). Language variation and social networks. Annual Review of Linguistics, 6, 341–361.
- Shoemark, P., Kirby, J., & Goldwater, S. (2018). Inducing lexicon of sociolinguistic variable from code-mixed text. Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop W-NUT: The 4th Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text, 1–6.
- Simmel, G. (1964). Conflict & The web of group-affiliations. New York: The Free Press.
- Simmel, G. (1999). Sociologie: études sur les formes de la socialisation (traduction). Paris: PUF.
- Srivastava, S. B., & Goldberg, A. (2017). Language as a window into culture. California Management Review, 60(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125617731781
- Starks, D., & McRobbie-Utasi, Z. (2001). Collecting sociolinguistic data: Some typical and some not so typical approaches. New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 16(1), 79–92.
- Sterponi, L., & Bhattacharya, U. (2012). Dans les traces de Hymes et au-delà: les études de la socialisation langagière. Langage et société, 139(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.3917/ls.139.0067
- Tagliamonte, S. A., D’Arcy, A., & Louro Rodriguez, C. (2016). Outliers, impact, and rationalization in linguistic change. Language, 92, 824–849. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0074
- Tasselli, S., Zappa, P., & Lomi, A. (2020). Bridging Cultural Holes in Organizations: The Dynamic Structure of Social Networks and Organizational Vocabularies Within and Across Subunits. Organization Science, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1352
- Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects of representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70013-X.
- Vaquero Luis, M., & Cebrian, M. (2018). The weakness of weak ties in the classroom. arXiv, [en ligne] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1201.1589v1.pdf (consulté le 30.03.2020).
- von Hipple, E. (1994). Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40(2), 429–439.
- Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (2018). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Wolfson, N. (1976). Speech events and natural speech: Some implications for sociolinguistic methodology. Language in Society, 5(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500007028
- Yu, W. (2016). A study of catchwords from the perspective of speech community. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(4), 804–809. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0604.18
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/connections-2022-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2816-4245 | Journal ISSN: 0226-1766
Language: English
Page range: 26 - 49
Published on: Mar 10, 2023
Published by: International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2023 Guillaume P. Fernandez, published by International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.