Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Principle of Distinction in Cyber Warfare Cover
Open Access
|Jun 2024

References

  1. Buchan, R., in Tsagourias, N., 2022. ‚Ukrainian ‘IT Army‘: A Cyber Levée en Masse or Civilians Directly Participating in Hostilities?‘. https://www.ejiltalk.org/ukranian-it-army-a-cyber-levee-en-masse-or-civilians-directly-participating-in-hostilities/ (26. 2. 2024).
  2. Connell, M., in Vogler, S., 2016. Russia’s Approach to Cyber Warfare, CNA’s Occasional Paper series, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1019062.pdf (28. 2. 2024).
  3. Department of Defense, 2021. Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/URLs_Cited/OT2021/21A477/21A477-1.pdf (28. 2. 2024).
  4. Dinstein, Y., in Willy, D. A., 2020. Oslo Manual on Select Topics of the Law of Armed Conflict: Rules and Commentary. Springer.
  5. Doffman, Z., 2019. Israel Responds to Cyber Attack with an Air Strike on Cyber Attackers in World First. Forbes, 6. maj, https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2019/05/06/israeli-military-strikes-and-destroys-hamas-cyber-hq-in-world-first/?sh=50d4edacafb5 (26. 2. 2024).
  6. Döge, J., 2010. Cyber Warfare Challenges for the Applicability of the Traditional Laws of War Regime. Archiv des Völkerrechts, 48(4), str. 486–501.
  7. Droege, C., 2012. Get off my Cloud: cyber warfare, international humanitarian law, and the protection of civilians. International Review of the Red Cross, 94(886), str. 533–578.
  8. Geiß, R., in Lahmann, H., 2012. Cyber Warfare: Applying the Principle of Distinction in an Interconnected Space. Israel Law Review, 45(3), str. 381–399.
  9. Generalna skupščina Združenih narodov, (2015). The United Nations Group of Governmental Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security, Report 2015 (A/70/174). Z dne 22. julija 2015.
  10. Generalna skupščina Združenih narodov, (2021). OEWG Final Substantive Report (A/AC.290/2021/CRP.2). Z dne 10. marca 2021.
  11. Goodman, R., in Jinks, D. P., 2010. The ICRC Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities Under International Humanitarian Law: An Introduction to the Forum, New York University International Law and Politics, 42, str. 637–640.
  12. Harrison Dinniss, H., 2013. Participants in Conflict: Cyber warriors, patriotic hackers and the laws of war. V: D. Saxon, ur. International Humanitarian Law and the Changing Technology of War, str. 251–278. Leiden: Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  13. Hathaway, O. idr., 2011. The Law of Cyber-Attack. California Law Review, 100, str. 817–886.
  14. Henckaerts, J., in Doswald-Beck, L., 2009. Customary International Humanitarian Law, Vol. 1 – Rules. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Human Rights Watch, 2003. International Humanitarian Law Issues in a Potential War in Iraq. Human Rights Watch Briefing Paper. Washington DC.
  16. ICRC, 2013. Cyberwarfare and international humanitarian law: the ICRC‘s position, https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/2013/130621-cyberwarfare-q-and-a-eng.pdf (28. 2. 2024).
  17. ICRC, 2020. Avoiding Civilian Harm from Military Cyber Operations During Armed Conflicts: ICRC Expert Meeting, 21–22 January 2020, Geneva, https://shop.icrc.org/avoiding-civilian-harm-from-military-cyber-operations-during-armed-conflicts-icrc-expert--meeting-21-22-january-2020-geneva-pdf-en (27. 2. 2024).
  18. ICRC, 2021. Commentary on the Third Geneva Convention: Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  19. ICRC, 2022. Digitalizing the Red Cross, Red Crescent and Red Crystal Emblems: Benefits, Risks, and Possible Solutions. ICRC, Ženeva.
  20. ICRC, 2023. Preventing and minimizing digital threats to people affected by armed conflict, Draft Elements of Resolution, November 2023. ICRC, Ženeva.
  21. International Court of Justice (ICJ), 1996. Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (Advisory Opinion). I.C.J. Reports, 226.
  22. International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY), 1995. The Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadić, IT-94-1-AR72 (Appeals Chamber, Decision).
  23. International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY), 2000. Final Report to the Prosecutor by the Committee Established to Review the NATO Bombing Campaign Against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. International Legal Materials, 39(5), str. 1257–1283.
  24. Matheson, C., 2019. From Munitions to Malware: A Comparative Analysis of Civilian Targetability in Cyber Conflict. Journal of Law & Cyber Warfare, 7(2), str. 29–66.
  25. Mavropoulou, E., 2015. Targeting in the Cyber Domain: Legal Challenges Arising from the Application of the Principle of Distinction to Cyber Attacks. Journal of Law & Cyber Warfare, 4(2), str. 23–93.
  26. Melzer, N., 2009. Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law. International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Ženeva.
  27. Microsoft, 2022. Microsoft Digital Defense Report 2022. https://www.microsoft.com/en--us/security/business/microsoft-digital-defense-report-2022 (27. 2. 2024).
  28. Nash, K. S., Castellanos, S., in Janofsky, A., 2018. One Year After NotPetya Cyberattack, Firms Wrestle with Recovery Costs. The Wall Street Journal, https://www.wsj.com/articles/one-year-after-notpetya-companies-still-wrestle-with-financial-impacts-1530095906 (27. 2. 2024).
  29. Padmanabhan, V. M., 2013. Cyber Warriors in the Jus in Bello. International law studies, 288(89), str. 288–308.
  30. Pascucci, C., 2017. Distinction and Proportionality in Cyber War: Virtual Problems with a Real Solution. Minnesota Journal of International Law, 26(1), str. 419–460.
  31. Protokol o prepovedih ali omejitvah uporabe zažigalnih orožij, Uradni list Socialistične Federativne Republike Jugoslavije, Mednarodne pogodbe, št. 3/82.
  32. Sancin, V., Švarc, D., in Ambrož, M., 2009. Mednarodno pravo oboroženih spopadov. Ljubljana: Poveljstvo za doktrino, razvoj, izobraževanje in usposabljanje.
  33. Schmitt, M. N., 2015. The Law of Cyber Targeting. Naval War College Review, 68(2), Article 3, str. 1–20.
  34. Schmitt, M. N., 2017. Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations, 2. izd. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  35. Second International Peace Conference, The Hague, 1907. Hague Convention (IV) Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land and Its Annex: Regulations Concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land. International Conferences (Haag), z dne 18. oktobra 1907.
  36. Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, 2009. Agreement on Cooperation in Ensuring International Information Security. Jekaterinburg, 16. junija.
  37. Šarf, P., 2017. Legality of Low-Intensity Cyber Operations Under International Law. Sodobni vojaški izzivi, 19(3), str. 81–93.
  38. Štrucl, D., 2022. Russian Aggression on Ukraine: Cyber Operations and the Influence of Cyberspace on Modern Warfare. Sodobni vojaški izzivi, 24(2), str. 103–123.
  39. Thurau, J., 2022. Germany‘s Critical Infrastructure Is Poorly Protected. DW, https://www.dw.com/en/germanys-critical-infrastructure-is-poorly-protected/a-63505983 (26. 2. 2024).
  40. Turns, D., 2012. Cyber Warfare and the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 17, str. 279–297.
  41. Ur. l. SFRJ, 1978. Dopolnilni protokol k ženevskim konvencijam z dne 12. avgusta 1949 o zaščiti žrtev mednarodnih oboroženih spopadov, z dne 8. junija 1977 (DP-I), mednarodne pogodbe, št. 16/78.
  42. van Benthem, T. J., 2023. Privatized Frontlines: Private-Sector Contributions in Armed Conflict. 15th International Conference on Cyber Conflict: Meeting Reality (CyCon), Talin, Estonija, str 55–69. DOI: 10.23919/CyCon58705.2023.10182177.
  43. Wallace, D. A., in Reeves, S., 2013. The Law of Armed Conflict‘s ‚Wicked‘ Problem: Levée En Masse in Cyber Warfare. International Law Studies, 89, str. 646–668.
  44. Združeno kraljestvo, 2020. Response to Chair’s Initial ‘Pre-draft’ of the Report of the OEWG on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security, April 2020.
  45. Ženevska konvencija o ravnanju z vojnimi ujetniki, z dne 12. avgusta 1949. (1950). Ur.l. Prezidijuma LS FLRJ, št. 6/50.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cmc-2024-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2463-9575 | Journal ISSN: 2232-2825
Language: English, Slovenian
Page range: 21 - 35
Published on: Jun 26, 2024
Published by: General Staff of the Slovenian Armed Forces
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Urban Praprotnik, published by General Staff of the Slovenian Armed Forces
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.