Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effect of the inferior alveolar nerve block injection versus maxillary infiltration with two local anesthetic agents on cardiovascular parameters: A randomized comparative double-blind clinical trial Cover

Effect of the inferior alveolar nerve block injection versus maxillary infiltration with two local anesthetic agents on cardiovascular parameters: A randomized comparative double-blind clinical trial

Open Access
|May 2023

References

  1. Torres-Lagares D, Serrera-Figallo MÁ, Machuca-Portillo G, Corcuera-Flores JR, Machuca-Portillo C, Castillo-Oyagüe R, et al. Cardiovascular effect of dental anesthesia with articaine (40 mg with epinefrine 0.5 mg% and 40 mg with epinefrine 1 mg%) versus mepivacaine (30 mg and 20 mg with epinefrine 1 mg%) in medically compromised cardiac patients: A cross-over, randomized, single blinded study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17(4):655-60.
  2. Sharifi R, Nazari H, Bolourchi P, Khazaei S, Parirokh M. The most painful site of maxillary anterior infiltrations. Dent Res J. 2016;13(6):539-43.
  3. Troullos ES, Goldstein DS, Hargreaves KM, Dionne RA. Plasma epinephrine levels and cardiovascular response to high administered doses of epinephrine in local anesthesia. Anesth Progr. 1987;34(1):10-3.
  4. Abu-Mostafa N, Al-Showaikhat F, Al-Shubbar F, Al-Zawad K, Al-Zawad F. Hemodynamic changes following injection of local anesthetics with different concentrations of epinephrine during simple tooth extraction: A prospective randomized clinical trial. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015;7(4):471-6.
  5. Scarparo HC, Maia RN, de Gois SR, Costa FW, Ribeiro TR, Soares EC. Effects of mepivacaine 2% with epinephrine in the cardiovascular activity of patients undergoing third molar surgery: a prospective clinical study. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(1):9-12.
  6. Becker DE, Reed KL. Local anesthetics: review of pharmacological considerations. Anesth Prog. 2012;59(2):90-102.
  7. Saxena P, Gupta SK, Newaskar V, Chandra A. Advances in dental local anesthesia techniques and devices: An update. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2013;4(1):19-4.
  8. de Morais HH, de Santana Santos T, da Costa Araújo FA, de Freitas Xavier RL, Vajgel A, de Holanda Vasconcellos RJ. Hemodynamic changes comparing 2% lidocaine and 4% articaine with epinephrine 1: 100,000 in lower third molar surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(4):1204-11.
  9. Balasubramaniyan N, Rayapati DK, Puttiah RH, Tavane P, Singh SE, Rangan V, Kalakunta PR. Evaluation of anxiety induced cardiovascular response in known hypertensive patients undergoing exodontia-a prospective study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(8):123-7.
  10. Managutti A, Prakasam M, Puthanakar N, Menat S, Shah D, Patel H. Comparative analysis of local anesthesia with 2 different concentrations of adrenaline: a randomized and single blind study. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(3):24-7.
  11. Meechan JG, Cole B, Welbury RR. Anaesthesia: The influence of two different dental local anaesthetic solutions on the haemo-dynamic responses of children undergoing restorative dentistry: a randomised, single-blind, split-mouth study. Br Dent J. 2001;190(9):502-4.
  12. Sanadhya YK, Sanadhya S, Jalihal S, Nagarajappa R, Ramesh G, Tak M. Hemodynamic, ventilator, and ECG changes in pediatric patients undergoing extraction. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2013;31(1):10-6.
  13. Raja DC, Kapoor A, Sinha A, Kashyap S, Khanna R, Kumar S, Garg N, Tewari S, Goel P. Heart rate manipulation in dilated cardiomyopathy: assessing the role of ivabradine. Indian Heart J. 2018;70(2):246-51.
  14. Ezmek B, Arslan A, Delilbasi C, Sencift K. Comparison of hemodynamic effects of lidocaine, prilocaine and mepivacaine solutions without vasoconstrictor in hypertensive patients. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010;18(4):354-9.
  15. Lequeux B, Uzan C, Rehman MB. Does resting heart rate measured by the physician reflect the patient’s true resting heart rate? White-coat heart rate. Indian Heart J. 2018;70(1):93-8.
  16. Fu Y, Liu J. System design for wearable blood oxygen saturation and pulse measurement device. Procedia Manuf. 2015;3:1187-94.
  17. Santos CF, Modena KC, Giglio FP, Sakai VT, Calvo AM, Colombini BL. Epinephrine concentration (1: 100,000 or 1: 200,000) does not affect the clinical efficacy of 4% articaine for lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(12):2445-52.
  18. Murillo‐Benítez M, Martín‐González J, Jiménez‐Sánchez MC, Cabanillas‐Balsera D, Velasco‐Ortega E, Segura‐Egea JJ. Association between dental anxiety and intraoperative pain during root canal treatment: a cross‐sectional study. Int Endod J. 2020;53(4):447-54.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cipms-2023-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2300-6676 | Journal ISSN: 2084-980X
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 7
Submitted on: Jan 5, 2021
|
Accepted on: Aug 10, 2021
|
Published on: May 1, 2023
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Roohollah Sharifi, Zahra Lami, Feridoun Sabzi, Hamid Reza Mozaffari, Mohammad Moslem Imani, Amin Golshah, Hedaiat Moradpoor, Mohsen Safaei, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.