Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assessment of the maturity of project management offices of government agencies of Kazakhstan: analysis, trends, and development prospects Cover

Assessment of the maturity of project management offices of government agencies of Kazakhstan: analysis, trends, and development prospects

Open Access
|Jul 2025

Figures & Tables

Current maturity level of project management offices in the central government agencies of Kazakhstan_

Central government agency codeGeneral description of the government agencyManagement controlBenefits managementFinancial managementStakeholder engagementRisk managementOrganizational governanceResource managementOverall organizational project management maturityAverage maturity level
CGA 11123122111.6
CGA 22332322322.4
CGA 32112111211.3
CGA 41123122121.7
CGA 51122112121.4
CGA 62221133111.8
CGA 73232221312.1
CGA 81233223322.3
CGA 91122321111.6
CGA 101112211111.2
CGA 111111111121.1
CGA 121122332312.0
CGA 132333222312.3
CGA 143344522313.0
CGA 151122111121.3
CGA 161111111111.0
CGA 173444522313.1

Current maturity level of project management offices in the ministries of Kazakhstan_

Ministry CodeGeneral description of the government agencyManagement controlBenefits managementFinancial managementStakeholder engagementRisk managementOrganizational governanceResource managementOverall organizational project management maturityAverage maturity level
Ministry 14435332213.0
Ministry 22332322322.4
Ministry 32112111211.3
Ministry 43343142312.7
Ministry 51122112111.3
Ministry 62221133111.8
Ministry 73435423313.1
Ministry 81233223312.2
Ministry 91122321111.6
Ministry 101112211111.2
Ministry 112435211232.6
Ministry 121122332312.0
Ministry 134433545333.8
Ministry 143344523323.2
Ministry 151122111111.2
Ministry 162342413312.6
Ministry 175445433113.3
Ministry 182333222312.3
Ministry 192333222312.3
Ministry 201122111111.2
Ministry 211122111121.3

Distribution of government agencies by maturity categories_

P3M3 LevelMaturity Score RangeCluster CategoryKey CharacteristicsNumber (Ministries)Number (CGA)Number (REA)
Level 1: Awareness of Process1.0–1.9Initial maturityBasic understanding of project management, but processes are applied inconsistently or reactively8103
Level 2: Repeatable Process2.0–2.9Transitional maturityStandardized processes exist, but they are not consistently applied or enforced across projects/agencies858
Level 3: Defined Process3.0–3.9Advanced maturityWell-documented, formalized project management frameworks that are consistently followed across projects529
Level 4: Managed Process*4.0–4.5Optimized maturityProject management processes are quantitatively measured and continuously improved000
Level 5: Optimizing Process*4.6–5.0Strategic maturityProject management is fully embedded in governance structures, driving continuous innovation000

Comparative characteristics of the competence of the manager and the chief of staff of the government agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan_

Competencies according to the national standardCompetencies according to the law
1Integration managementIntegration management
2Stakeholder engagementStakeholder engagement
3Content managementAbsent
4Resource managementResource management
5Managing deadlinesManaging deadlines
6Cost managementCost management
7Risk managementAbsent
8Quality managementAbsent
9Procurement managementProcurement management
10Communications managementCommunications management

Results of the project management office maturity t-test_

Indicatort-Statistics (Min vs CGA)p-Value (Min vs CGA)t-Statistics (Min vs REA)p-Value (Min vs REA)
General description of the government agency1.57660.12390.48480.6311
Management control1.86660.0701−1.11990.2696
Benefits management1.39920.171−1.79250.0809
Financial management1.60840.1165−0.65990.5132
Stakeholder engagement0.83770.408−1.75580.087
Risk management0.86750.3916−2.51310.0162
Organizational governance1.380.1764−2.3940.0217
Resource management0.6720.5062−1.46230.1517
Overall organizational project management maturity−0.10490.917−1.89520.0664

A self-assessment survey tool used for assessing the maturity of project management offices of a government agency_

IndicatorAnswer choices
1General description of the government agency
  • a) Management processes are usually not documented or absent; they can be managed according to individual management preferences

  • b) GA has key employees with specialized knowledge, thanks to which the authority is able to repeat past achievements. However, there may be an unclear distribution of responsibilities, uncertainty, and inconsistency in the objectives of the activity

  • c) Management and technical processes are documented, standardized, and integrated with other management processes of GA. The top management is involved in the management and actively supports it

  • d) The activities of GA are controlled using quantitative management methods. The authority sets quantitative goals in the field of quality and productivity

  • e) GA is mainly focused on optimizing processes that are managed using quantitative methods

2Management control
  • a) Projects are implemented and managed according to the individual preferences of the management

  • b) The GA staff understands the concept of project management; the authority has its own experts, experienced project managers working on key projects

  • c) GA has a centralized and documented approach to the project management lifecycle, which is applied to all projects by specially trained staff

  • d) Project management is a key change management tool in GA. The project focuses on improving the implementation process by measuring and analyzing performance

  • e) To achieve the goals of GA, a project approach is applied, which is generally accepted and considered optimal for implementing changes in the body

3Benefits management
  • a) GA is somewhat aware that the concept of economic benefits is different from the concept of project outputs

  • b) Economic benefits are a necessary element of the implementation of projects in GA

  • c) There is a permanent structure in GA to identify the economic benefits resulting from the project and monitor their implementation. This structure is managed centrally

  • d) Economic benefits management is integrated into the project management system. Much attention is paid to the effectiveness of GA, which is determined by the results of projects

  • e) Economic benefits management is integrated into the organizational approach to change management and is part of the organizational strategy

4Financial management
  • a) There is little or no financial management at the project level, reporting on project expenditures and monitoring them

  • b) The total cost of the project is not tracked, and there is no reporting on it

  • c) GA has centrally established standards for financial management of the project lifecycle

  • d) GA is able to effectively prioritize investment opportunities, taking into account the availability of financial resources

  • f) The financial control of an individual project is fully integrated into the financial control of GA

5Stakeholder engagement
  • a) Involvement of stakeholders and communication with them is rarely carried out

  • b) Some projects take into account the interests of stakeholders, but this is due more to the personal initiative of project managers than to the structural approach used in GA

  • c) GA uses a centralized and structured approach to involve stakeholders in the project and communicate with them. This approach is used in the implementation of all projects

  • d) Special methodologies are used to analyze and effectively involve stakeholders in the project. Quantitative methods serve as the basis for evaluating the achieved effectiveness

  • e) Communication with stakeholders is optimized due to extensive knowledge about them, which contributes to the achievement of project objectives. Actions are being taken to continuously improve the processes of involving stakeholders in the project and working with them

6Risk management
  • a) It is carried out minimally. The risks are documented, but there is no active management of them

  • b) It is used in projects, but there is variability in approaches to risk management, which leads to different levels of its effectiveness

  • c) It is based on a centralized process that is related to the organizational risk management policy and is applied continuously

  • d) It is effectively used and implemented in the GA management system

  • f) It is embedded in the organizational culture and underlies decision-making within the framework of projects. In GA, actions are being taken to continuously improve risk management processes

7Organizational governance
  • a) Informal project management is carried out, but there is no clear formal definition of roles in the project

  • b) From an organizational point of view, project management is beginning to take shape. Roles and responsibilities are fickle, as are lines of responsibility

  • c) Centralized organizational control applies to all projects

  • d) There are transparent decision-making processes within the project, which are implemented in organizational governance. Project management responsibilities are included in the role descriptions

  • f) The lines of responsibility are clearly traced to the level of senior management, and the responsibilities of employees are clearly defined

8Resource management
  • a) The need for effective resource management for the successful implementation of projects is formally recognized

  • b) The allocation of resources in GA is carried out according to the appropriate approach to their planning and management. However, there is a lack of consistency when using this approach

  • c) GA has a centrally established set of procedures and management processes for allocating, planning, and managing resources

  • d) Resource management is considered at the strategic level of GA

  • f) Resources are optimally allocated. Actions are being taken to continuously improve resource management processes

9Overall organizational project management maturity
  • a) GA recognizes the difference between a project and a day-to-day activity. Projects can be implemented informally, without specific standards, processes, and control systems

  • b) Each project is implemented using procedures that meet a certain standard

  • c) There are in-house project management processes that are centrally controlled

  • d) Data on the effectiveness of project management is documented and used to improve its quality, as well as to predict future results

  • f) Continuous improvement of project management processes, as well as proactive management of problems and technologies are carried out to measure the effectiveness of projects and optimize processes

Average Maturity Level of PMOs by Indicator and Agency Type (see Appendix 3 for detailed data)_

IndicatorMean (Ministries)Mean (CGA)Mean (REA)Standard deviation (Ministries)Standard deviation (CGA)Standard deviation (REA)Minimum (Ministries)Minimum (CGA)Minimum (REA)Maximum (Ministries)Maximum (CGA)Maximum (REA)
General description2.11.62.01.180.800.69111533
Management control2.41.72.81.240.991.15111445
Benefits management2.72.23.20.910.970.81112444
Financial management2.92.33.11.240.921.12111545
Stakeholder engagement2.42.13.21.361.341.27111555
Risk management2.01.82.81.000.660.91112435
Organizational governance2.11.72.81.040.690.83112534
Resource management2.11.92.50.940.990.83111334
Overall organizational project management maturity1.31.41.80.660.490.89111324
The average value for government agencies2.21.92.7---------

Variance analysis of maturity of project management offices_

IndicatorF-statisticsp-Value
General description of the government agency1.46790.2393
Management control4.25610.0191
Benefits management4.80850.0119
Financial management2.50510.0909
Stakeholder engagement3.29830.0444
Risk management6.49130.0029
Organizational governance7.46490.0014
Resource management2.18560.1221
Overall organizational project management maturity2.72630.0743

Current maturity level of project management offices in the regional executive agencies of Kazakhstan_

Regional executive agency codeGeneral description of the government agencyManagement controlBenefits managementFinancial managementStakeholder engagementRisk managementOrganizational governanceResource managementOverall organizational project management maturityAverage maturity level
REA 11123122111.6
REA 22332322322.4
REA 32334533223.0
REA 42444354443.8
REA 52342334122.7
REA 62221133111.8
REA 73235434323.2
REA 81233223312.2
REA 92445332323.1
REA 102534432223.0
REA 112322234222.4
REA 121122332312.0
REA 132443553333.6
REA 143344522313.0
REA 151122322211.8
REA 161242433212.4
REA 173444522313.1
REA 182333222312.3
REA 192433224332.9
REA 203244323333.0

A semi-structured focus group outline_

Question ThemeGuiding Questions
1Accuracy of self-assessment resultsDo you feel that the self-assessment results accurately reflect the current level of project management maturity in your agency?
  • Probes: Were there any indicators that felt over- or underestimated?

  • Which dimension seemed most accurate or most debatable?

2Factors explaining maturity differencesWhat factors, in your opinion, explain the differences in maturity levels between regional and central agencies?
  • Probes: Are they related to leadership, structure, resources, or something else?

  • Do regional agencies face different challenges than central?

3Barriers to advancing maturityWhat are the key internal or external barriers that hinder your agency’s ability to advance to a higher maturity level?
  • Probes: Is it about institutional resistance, lack of tools, or unclear roles?

  • Are there systemic or legal limitations?

4Enablers and success practicesCan you share any practices or decisions that helped strengthen project management in your agency?
Probes: Have specific methodologies, leadership, or collaboration contributed? What worked well?
5Recommendations for improvementWhat actions or support measures would help improve project management maturity in the public sector?
Probes: Should there be centralized standards, capacity-building programs, or digital tools? What is the most urgent step?
6Feedback on the assessment tool (optional)
  • Do you think the survey tool captured the reality of project management in your agency?

  • Were the questions clear and relevant?

  • Would you suggest any changes?

Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 1, 2025
Accepted on: Jun 9, 2025
Published on: Jul 22, 2025
Published by: University of Matej Bel in Banska Bystrica, Faculty of Economics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Anar Yessengeldina, Zhanar Baibussinova, Yerlan Kylbayev, published by University of Matej Bel in Banska Bystrica, Faculty of Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

AHEAD OF PRINT