References
- Acheson, N. (2010). Welfare state reform, compacts and restructuring relations between the state and the voluntary sector: Reflections on Northern Ireland’s experience. Voluntary Sector Review, 1(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080510X511238
- Alcock, P. (2016). From partnership to the Big Society: The third sector policy regime in the UK. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 7(2), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2015-0022
- Ansell, C., Doberstein, C., Henderson, H., Siddiki, S., & ‘t Hart, P. (2020). Understanding inclusion in collaborative governance: A mixed methods approach. Policy and Society, 39(4), 570–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1785726
- Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
- Ansell, C., & Gash, A. L. (2018). Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux030
- Ansell, C., & Miura, S. (2020). Can the power of platforms be harnessed for governance? Public Administration, 98(1), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12636
- Arvidson, M., Johansson, H., Johansson, S., & Nordfeldt, M. (2018). Local civil society regimes: Liberal, corporatist and social democratic civil society regimes in Swedish metropolitan cities. Voluntary Sector Review, 9(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080518X15199961331635
- Batory, A., & Svensson, S. (2019). The fuzzy concept of collaborative governance: A systematic review of the state of the art. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 13(2), 28-39. https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2019-0008
- Blatt, F., & Schlaufer, C. (2021). The influence of civil society on Ukrainian anti-corruption policy after the Maidan. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 15(1), 15-13. https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2021-0001
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Brock, K. L. (2020). Government and non-profit collaboration in times of deliverology, policy innovation laboratories and hubs, and new public governance. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31(2), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00145-0
- Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods, Oxford University Press.
- Butcher, J., Casey, J., & Dalton, B. (2012). An Australian national compact – Something old, something new? Nonprofit Policy Forum, 3(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.1515/2154-3348.1038
- Campomori, F., & Ambrosini, M. (2020). Multilevel governance in trouble: The implementation of asylum seekers’ reception in Italy as a battleground. Comparative Migration Studies, 8(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-020-00178-1
- Carboni, J. L., Siddiki, S., Koski, C., & Sadiq, A.-A. (2017). Using network analysis to identify key actors in collaborative governance processes. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 8(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2017-0012
- Casey, J., Dalton, B., Melville, R., & Onyx, J. (2010). Strengthening government–nonprofit relations: International experiences with compacts. Voluntary Sector Review, 1(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080510X497019
- Coule, T. M., & Bennett, E. (2018). State–voluntary relations in contemporary welfare systems: New politics or voluntary action as usual? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(4_suppl), 139S–158S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018755507
- Craig, G., Taylor, M., Carlton, N., Garbutt, R., Kimberlee, R., Lepine, E., & Syed, A. (2005). The paradox of compacts: Monitoring the impact of compacts. London: Home Office.
- Davies, J. S. (2007). The limits of partnership: An exit-action strategy for local democratic inclusion. Political Studies, 55(4), 779–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00677.x
- Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00355.x
- Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2011). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
- Futrell, R. (2003). Technical adversarialism and participatory collaboration in the US chemical weapons disposal program. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 28(4), 451–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243903252762
- Fyfe, N. R. (2005). Making space for “neo-communitarianism”? The third sector, state and civil society in the UK. Antipode, 37(3), 536–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00510.x
- Gash, A. (2016). Collaborative Governance. Handbook on Theories of Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK.
- Gustafsson, K., & Johansson, J. (2018). A worthy reception? Ambivalences in social work with refugees and migrants in Sweden. Advances in Social Work, 18(3), 983–1004. https://doi.org/10.18060/21656
- Hansen, C. (2019). Solidarity in diversity: Activism as a pathway of migrant emplacement in Malmö, Malmö University, Sweden.
- Johansson, H., & Johansson, M. (2012). From a ‘liberal’ to a ‘social democratic’ welfare state: The translation of the English compact into a Swedish context. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 3(2), 6. https://doi.org/10.1515/2154-3348.1057
- Johansson, H., Kassman, A., & Scaramuzzino, R. (2011). Staten och det civila samhällets organisationer i ett föränderligt välfärdssamhälle: Perspektiv på en överenskommelse: andra tematiska studien, juni 2011. Överenskommelsen, Sweden.
- Johansson, M. (2011). I dialogens namn-idén om en överenskommelse mellan regeringen och ideella organisationer, Linneaus University. Sweden.
- Jönsson, A., Scaramuzzino, R. (2016). Samverkan mellan stat, region och civilsamhäller för nyanländas etablering. En utvärdering av projektet NAD i Skåne. Lund Socialhögskolan, Sweden.
- Karlsson, M., & Vamstad, J. (2020). New deeds for new needs: Civil society action against poverty in Sweden. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31(5), 1025–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-9964-3
- Klockmo, C., & Bostedt, G. (2015). Med målet att skapa samverkan mellan idéburen och offentlig sektor: det första steget. Kommunförbundet Västernorrland, Sweden.
- Laforest, R., & Orsini, M. (2005). Evidence-based engagement in the voluntary sector: Lessons from Canada. Social Policy & Administration, 39(5), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00451.x
- Malmöandan. (2017). Överenskommelse för samverkan mellan idéburen sektor i Malmö och Malmö stad. För ökad demokrati, delaktighet och jämlikhet i Malmö. Malmöandan, Sweden.
- Malmöandan. (2020). Överenskommelsen Malmöandan. Samarbetsplan ideburen sektor och Malmöstad. Malmöandan, Sweden.
- Malmöandan. (n.d.). Samarbetsplan - idéburen sektor och Malmö stad 2018–2022.
- Nemec, J., Svidroňová, M., & Kovács, É. (2019). Welfare Co-Production: Hungarian and Slovak Reality. Journal of Public Administration and Policy, (12)2, 195-215. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2019-0019
- Morison, J. (2000). The government-voluntary sector compacts: Governance, governmentality, and civil society. Journal of Law and Society, 27(1), 98–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00148
- Nordfeldt, M. (2012). Förväntningar och spridning: en sammanfattande studie av den nationella överenskommelsens tre första år: del tre i uppföljningen av Överenskommelsen mellan regeringen, idéburna organisationer inom det sociala området och Sveriges kommuner och landsting. Överenskommelsen, Sweden.
- Purdy, J. M. (2012). A framework for assessing power in collaborative governance processes. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02525.x
- Reuter, M. (2012). Överenskommelsen som spegel och arena. Betraktelser över ett avtal i tiden. i Civilsamhället i samhällskontraktet: En antologi om vad som står på spel, 217–244. European Civil Society Press, Stockholm.
- Reuter, M., Wijkström, F., & von Essen, J. (2012). Policy tools or mirrors of politics. Government-voluntary sector compacts in the post-welfare state age. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 3(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1515/2154-3348.1062
- Sjöberg, K. (2018). Ankomst Malmö: röster om flyktningmottagandet hösten 2015. Malmö stad, Sweden.
- Smith, S. R. (2012). Government-voluntary sector compacts reconsidered. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/2154-3348.1064
- Stigendal, M., & Östergren, P. O. (Eds.). (2013). Malmös väg mot en hållbar framtid. Hälsa, välfärd och rättvisa (3rd ed.). Kommissonen för ett socialt hållbart Malmö, Sweden.
- Waardenburg, M. (2020). Understanding the microfoundations of government–civil society relations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32, 548–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00221-w
- Weber, E. P. (2003). Bringing society back in: Grassroots ecosystem management, accountability, and sustainable communities. MIT Press, Cambridge.
- Wijkström, F. (2000). Changing focus or changing role? The Swedish nonprofit sector in the 1990s. German Policy Studies/Politikfeldanalyse, 1(2), 161–188.
- Wijkström, F. (2007). The role of civil society. The case of Sweden in international comparison, 2004(19).
- von Essen, J. (2019). The shifting meanings of popular engagement in Swedish society. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00089-5
- Zimmeck, M. (2010). The compact 10 years on: Government’s approach to partnership with the voluntary and community sector in England. Voluntary Sector Review, 1(1), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080510X497082
- Åberg, P. (2015). Myths and traditions as constraints or resources? Path dependency and decoupling strategies among civil society organizations. Journal of Civil Society, 11(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2015.1009695