References
- Aldana, J. M. B. (2013). La armonización del Derecho, concepto y críticas en cuanto a su implementación. Revista e-mercatoria 12(2), 80–139.
- Alonso, S., and S. C. da Fonseca. (2012). Immigration, left and right. Party Politics 18(6), 865–884.
- Andreoni, J. (1988). Why free ride?: Strategies and learning in public goods experiments. Journal of public Economics 37(3), 291–304.
- Asplund, E. (2003). A Study of the Development of the Asylum Law and Policy of the European Union with Focus on the Role of Burden-Sharing and Temporary Protection. (2003).
- Bailliet, Cecilia. ‘The Tampa Case and its Impact on Burden Sharing at Sea.’ Human Rights Quarterly 25.3 (2003): 741–774.
- Betts, A. (2003). Public goods theory and the provision of refugee protection: The role of the joint-product model in burden-sharing theory. Journal of Refugee Studies 16(3), 274–296.
- Betz, H. (2001). Exclusionary Populism in Austria, Italy, and Switzerland. International Journal 56(3), 393–420.
- Biorcio, R. (1991). The Rebirth of Populism in France and Italy.
- Boodman, M. (1991). The myth of harmonization of laws. The American Journal of Comparative Law 39(4), 699–724.
- Bouteillet-Paquet, D. (2001). L’Europe et le droit d’asile. Editions L’Harmattan.
- Breuss, F., and Eller, M. (2004). The optimal decentralisation of government activity: normative recommendations for the European constitution. Constitutional Political Economy 15(1), 27–76.
- Brittan, L., and Miert, K. V. (1996). Towards an international framework of competition rules. International Business Law 24, 454.
- Bubb, R., Kremer M., and Levine D. I. (2011). The economics of international refugee law. The Journal of Legal Studies 40(2), 367–404.
- Buga, I. (2015). The Modification of Treaties by Subsequent Practice: The Implications of Practice Going Beyond the Limits of Treaty Interpretation. Diss. University Utrecht.
- Bureau, D., and Champsaur P. (1992). Fiscal federalism and European economic unification. The American Economic Review 88–92.
- Buxbaum, R. M., Hirsch A., and Hopt, K. eds. European business law: Legal and Economic analyses on integration and harmonization. Walter de Gruyter, 1991.
- Card, David. ‘The impact of the Mariel boatlift on the Miami labor market.’ ILR Review 43.2 (1990): 245–257.
- Choi, Seung-Whan, and Idean Salehyan. ‘No good deed goes unpunished: refugees, humanitarian aid, and terrorism.’ Conflict Management and Peace Science 30.1 (2013): 53–75.
- Commission on European Contract Law, (1994). https://www.jus.uio.no/lm/eu.principles.lando.commission/doc.html (on-line in November 2018)
- Committee of the UN, Committee against Torture, United States, CAT/C/USA/CO/2, 25 July 2006.
- Cortes, Kalena E. ‘Are refugees different from economic immigrants? Some empirical evidence on the heterogeneity of immigrant groups in the United States.’ Review of Economics and Statistics 86.2 (2004): 465–480;
- Cortes, Kalena E. ‘Are refugees different from economic immigrants? Some empirical evidence on the heterogeneity of immigrant groups in the United States.’ Review of Economics and Statistics 86.2 (2004): 465–480.
- Cremer, J., Estache A., and Seabright, P. (1994). The decentralization of public services: lessons from the theory of the firm. Vol. 1345. World Bank Publications.
- Day, Kate, and Paul White. ‘Decision making or circumstance: The UK as the location of asylum applications by Bosnian and Somali refugees.’ GeoJournal 56.1 (2002): 15–26.
- Des Places, S. B. (2003) Evolution of asylum legislation in the EU: insights from regulatory competition theory. No. 16. European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS), 2003.
- des Places, Ségolène Barbou, and Bruno Deffains. ‘Cooperation in the shadow of regulatory competition: the case of asylum legislation in Europe.’ International Review of Law and Economics 23.4 (2003): 345–364.
- Dixit, A. K. (1998). The making of economic policy: A transaction-cost politics perspective. MIT press.
- Doleys, T. J. (2012). Promoting competition policy abroad: European Union efforts in the developing world. The Antitrust Bulletin 57(2), 337–366.
- Dustmann, Christian. ‘Differences in the labor market behavior between temporary and permanent migrant women.’ Labour Economics 4.1 (1997): 29–46;
- Rivera-Batiz, Francisco L. ‘English language proficiency and the economic progress of immigrants.’ Economics Letters 34.3 (1990): 295–300.
- Ellickson, R. (1979). C. Public property rights: Vicarious intergovernmental rights and liabilities as a technique for correcting intergovernmental spillovers.
- Estache, A., ed. (1995). Decentralizing infrastructure: Advantages and limitations. The World Bank, 1995.
- Esty, D. C., and Geradin, D. (2001). Regulatory competition and economic integration: comparative perspectives. Oxford University Press.
- Esty, Daniel C., and Damien Geradin. Regulatory competition and economic integration: comparative perspectives. Oxford University Press, 2001.
- European Commission (2007) ‘Green Paper on the Future Common Asylum System’, COM (2007) 301 final, July 2010.
- European Commission, 2017, Relocation: Commission refers the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland to the Court of Justice http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-17-5002_en.htm (on-line in November 2018)
- European Court of Justice, Judgment in Joined Cases C-391/16, C-77/17 and C-78/17
- European Court on Human Rights Application nos. 3394/03, 55721/07, and also confirmed by the no. 27765/09
- European Union, The Founding Fathers of the EU https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/history_en (on-line in July 2019)
- Faure, M. (2001). ‘Regulatory Competition vs Harmonization in EU Environmental Law’ in Esty, Daniel C., and Damien Geradin. Regulatory competition and economic integration: comparative perspectives. Oxford University Press.
- Fernández-Huertas Moraga, Jesús, and Hillel Rapoport. ‘Tradable refugee-admission quotas and EU asylum policy.’ CESifo Economic Studies 61.3–4 (2015): 638–672.
- Fischer-Lescano, Andreas, Tillmann Löhr, and Timo Tohidipur. “Border controls at sea: Requirements under international human rights and refugee law.” International Journal of Refugee Law 21.2 (2009): 256–296.
- Frey, B. S. (1994). Direct democracy: politico-economic lessons from Swiss experience. The American Economic Review 84(2), 338–342.
- Frey, B., and Lau. L. J. (1968). Towards a mathematical model of government behaviour. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 28 (3–4), 355–380.
- Gareth, T. D. (2005). Subsidiarity as a Method of Policy Centralisation 14 (Int’l Law Forum of the Hebrew Univ. of Jerusalem, Research Paper 11-06, 2005), available at http://papers.ssm.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstractid-921454 (on-line in September 2018)
- Gilbert, Alan, and Khalid Koser. ‘Coming to the UK: what do asylum-seekers know about the UK before arrival?.’ Journal of ethnic and migration studies 32.7 (2006): 1209–1225.
- Hathaway, James C. The rights of refugees under international law. Cambridge University Press, 2005.
- Guy S. Goodwin-Gill, and Jane McAdam. ‘The Refugee in International Law.’ (2007): 2–11.
- Havinga, T., and Böcker, A. (1999). Country of asylum by decision making or by chance: Asylum-seekers in Belgium, the Netherlands and the UK. Journal of ethnic and migration studies 25(1), 43–61.
- Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American economic review 35(4), 519–530.
- Heinisch, R. (2008). Right-wing populism in Austria: A case for comparison. Problems of Post-Communism 55(3), 40–56.
- Henkin, L. (1995). International law: politics and values. Developments in International Law 18.
- Howard, M. M. (2010). The impact of the far right on citizenship policy in Europe: explaining continuity and change. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36(5), 735–751.
- Kay, J. A., and Vickers, J. S. (1990). Regulatory reform: An appraisal,[w:] G. Majone (ed.), Deregulation or Re-regulation.
- Koka, Enkelejda, and Denard Veshi. ‘Irregular Migration by Sea: Interception and Rescue Interventions in Light of International Law and the EU Sea Borders Regulation.’ European Journal of Migration and Law 21.1 (2019): 26–52.
- Kremer, M, Bubb, R. and Levine, D. (2011). The Economics of International Refugee Law. Journal of Legal Studies 40(2).
- Lauterpacht, Elihu, and Daniel Bethlehem. ‘The scope and content of the principle of non-refoulement: Opinion.’ Refugee protection in international law: UNHCR’s global consultations on international protection (2003).
- Lavenex, S. (2001). The Europeanization of refugee policies: Normative challenges and institutional legacies. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 39(5), 851–874.
- Leebron, D. W. (1995). Lying down with Procrustes: An analysis of harmonization claims. Center for Law and Economic Studies, Columbia University School of Law.
- Lenaerts, K., and van Ypersele, P. (1994). Le principe de subsidiarité et son contexte: étude de l’article 3B du Traité CE. Cahiers de droit européen 30(1), 3–85.
- Mammone, A. (2009). ‘The eternal return? Faux populism and contemporarization of neo-fascism across Britain, France and Italy.’ Journal of contemporary European studies 17(2), 171–192;
- Mattei, U. (1994). Efficiency in legal transplants: An essay in comparative law and economics. International Review of Law and Economics 14(1), 3–19.
- Milton, Daniel, Megan Spencer, and Michael Findley. ‘Radicalism of the hopeless: Refugee flows and transnational terrorism.’ International Interactions 39.5 (2013): 621–645.
- Moe, T. M. (1984). The new economics of organization. American journal of political science 739–777.
- Mogire, Edward. ‘Refugee realities: Refugee rights versus state security in Kenya and Tanzania.’ Transformation 26.1 (2009): 15–29.
- Monheim-Helstroffer, Jenny, and Marie Obidzinski. ‘Optimal discretion in asylum lawmaking.’ International Review of Law and Economics 30.1 (2010): 86–97.
- Neumayer, E. Bogus refugees? The determinants of asylum migration to Western Europe. International studies quarterly 49(3), 389–410.
- Neumayer, Eric. ‘Bogus refugees? The determinants of asylum migration to Western Europe.’ International studies quarterly 49.3 (2005): 389–410.
- Oates, W. E. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of economic literature 37(3), 1120–1149.
- Ogus, A. (1999). Competition between national legal systems: a contribution of economic analysis to comparative law. International & Comparative Law Quarterly 48(2), 405–418.
- Parisi, F., and Ribstein L. (1998). ‘Choice of law.’ The new Palgrave dictionary of economics and the law 1, 236–241.
- Pelkmans, J. (1990). Regulation and the single market: An economic perspective. The completion of the single market, Mohr: Tuebingen.
- Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Competitive Intelligence Review 1(1), 14–14.
- Portuese, A. (2010). The principle of subsidiarity as a principle of economic efficiency. Columbian Journal European Law 17, 231.
- Price, M. E. (2009). Rethinking asylum: History, purpose, and limits. Vol. 92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Randahl, D. A. V. I. D. ‘Refugees and Terrorism.’ PAX et Bellum Journal 3.1 (2016): 46–56.
- Reich, N. (1992). Competition between legal orders: A new paradigm of EC law. Common Market Law Review 29, 861.
- Revesz, R. L. (1992). Rehabilitating interstate competition: Rethinking the race-to-the-bottom rationale for federal environmental regulation. NYUL Review 67, 1210.
- Ribstein, L., and Kobayashi B. (2006). The economics of federalism. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.563.8018&rep=rep1&type=pdf (on-line in November 2018)
- Roberts, Anthea. ‘Righting wrongs or wronging rights? The United States and human rights post-September 11.’ European Journal of International Law 15.4 (2004): 721–749.
- Rose-Ackerman, S. (1993). Rethinking the progressive agenda. Simon and Schuster.
- Rosholm, Michael, and Rune Vejlin. ‘Reducing income transfers to refugee immigrants: Does start-help help you start?.’ Labour Economics 17.1 (2010): 258–275.
- Rotte, R., V., Zimmermann, K.F. (1996). Asylum migration and Policy coordination in Europe, Dicussion Papers, Munchener Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Beitrage, 96–11, July 1996.
- Ruiter, D. WP. (2005). Is transaction cost economics applicable to public governance?. European journal of law and economics 20(3), 287–303.
- Rydgren, J. (2003). Meso-level reasons for racism and xenophobia: Some converging and diverging effects of radical right populism in France and Sweden. European Journal of Social Theory 6(1), 45–68.
- Schmidt, H. (1991). Economic Analysis of the Allocation of Regulatory Competence in the European Communities in R.M. Buxbaum, G. Hertig, A. Hirsch and K.J. Hopt (eds.), European Bvsincss Law. Legal and Economic Anulyses on Infegralion and Harmonizalion (Berlin 1991)
- Siebert, H., and Koop J. M. Institutional competition versus centralization: quo vadis Europe?. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 9(1), 15–30.
- Smits, J. M. How to Predict the Differences in Uniformity between Different Areas of a Future European Private Law? An Evolutionary Approach. The Economics of Harmonizing European Law. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Snell, J. (2000). True proportionality and free movement of goods and services. European Business Law Review 11, 50.
- Snell, J., and Andenas, M. (1999). Exploring the Outer Limits-Restrictions on the Free Movement of Goods and Services. European Business Law Review 10, 252.
- Suriyakumaran, A. and Tamura J. (2015). Asylum provision: A review of economic theories. International Migration.
- Thielemann, E. (2018). Why Refugee Burden-Sharing Initiatives Fail: Public Goods, Free-Riding and Symbolic Solidarity in the EU. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 56(1), 63–82.
- Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of political economy 64(5), 416–424.
- UNHCR (1997) EXCOM Conclusion on Safeguarding Asylum No. 82 (XLVIII).
- UNHCR (2004) EXCOM General Conclusion No. 90 (LV), 2004.
- UNHCR (2007) Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-Refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol, 26 January.
- Van den Bergh, R. (1998). Subsidiarity as an economic demarcation principle and the emergence of European private law. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 5(2), 129–152.
- Van den Bergh, R. (2000). Towards an Institutional Legal Framework for Regulatory Competition in Europe. Kyklos 53(4), 435–466.
- Van den Bergh, R. The subsidiarity principle in European Community law: some insights from law and economics. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 1(4), 337–366.
- Van den Bergh, R., and Visscher L. (2006). The Principles of European Tort Law: The Right Path to Harmonisation? German Working Papers in Law and Economics 8.
- Van Kersbergen, K., and Van Waarden, F. (2001). Shifts in governance: Problems of legitimacy and accountability. Study for the Dutch Research Council (unpublished).
- Vihanto, M. (1992). Competition between local governments as a discovery procedure. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 411–436.
- Von Bogdandy, A. (2000). European Union as a Human Rights Organization-Human Rights and the Core of the European Union. The Common Market Law Review 37, 1307.
- Wagner, G. 2002. The economics of harmonisation: The case of contract law. ERA Forum. Vol. 3. No. 2. Springer-Verlag,.
- Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American journal of sociology 87(3), 548–577.
- Wittman, D. (1989). Why Democracies Produce Efficient Results, 97 J. Political Economics 1395, 1407–08.
- Woolcock, S. (1994). The single European market: centralization or competition among national rules?. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
- Zaun, N. (2018). States as Gatekeepers in EU Asylum Politics: Explaining the Non-adoption of a Refugee Quota System. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 56(1), 44–62.
- Zywicki, T. (2003). The Rise and Fall of Efficiency in the Common Law: A Supply-Side Explanation. Paul H. Rubin & Samuel.