Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Technology Roadmaps, Innovation Journeys, and Nanoworld: A Spatio-temporal Consolidation of the EC Nanotechnology Policy Cover

Technology Roadmaps, Innovation Journeys, and Nanoworld: A Spatio-temporal Consolidation of the EC Nanotechnology Policy

By: Pavel Kotlík  
Open Access
|Feb 2019

References

  1. Amato, I. (1999). Nanotechnology – Shaping the World Atom by Atom. National Science and Technology Council, Washington: Interagency Working Group on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology.
  2. Åm, Heidrun. (2013). ‘Don’t make nanotechnology sexy, ensure its benefits, and be neutral’: Studying the logics of new intermediary institutions in ambiguous governance contexts. Science and Public Policy. vol. 40 (4), 466–478.10.1093/scipol/sct054
  3. Barker, D. and Smith, D.J.H. (1995). Technology Foresight Using Roadmaps. Long Range Planning, 28(2), 21–28.10.1016/0024-6301(95)98586-H
  4. Berker, T., and Throndsen, W. (2017). Planning story lines in smart grid road maps (2010–2014): three types of maps for coordinated time travel, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 19(2), 214–228.10.1080/1523908X.2016.1207159
  5. Brown, N., and Michael, M. (2003). A Sociology of Expectations: Retrospecting Prospects and Prospecting Retrospects. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(1), 3–18.10.1080/0953732032000046024
  6. Cameron, L. (1999). Operationalizing Metaphor for Applied Linguistic Research. In L. Cameron and G. Low (Eds.), Researching and Applying Metaphor (pp. 3–28), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524704.004
  7. Campbell, J. (1949). The Hero with a Thousand Faces. 3rd ed. Novato, Calif: New World Library.
  8. Ceccarelli, L. (2013). On the Frontier of Science: An American Rhetoric of Exploration and Exploitation (Michigan State UP, 2013).10.14321/j.ctt7zt5wp
  9. Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230000612
  10. Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230319899
  11. Chilton, P.A. and Ilyin, M. (1993). Metaphor in Political Discourse: The Case of the ‘Common European House’. Discourse and Society, 4(1), 7–31.10.1177/0957926593004001002
  12. Chilton, P. A. and Schäffner, C. (2002). Politics as Text and Talk. Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.4
  13. Chilton, P. A. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. Psychology Press.10.4324/9780203561218
  14. Crichton, M. (2003). Prey. New York: HarperCollins.
  15. Edgerton, D. (2006). The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History since 1900. New York: Oxford University Press.
  16. ETC Group. (2005). Special Report – NanoGeoPolitics: ETC Group Surveys the Political Landscape NanoGeoPolitics. ETC Group Special Report – Communiqué, July/August 2005, No. 89.
  17. EuroBarometer. (2010). Biotechnology Report. Special Eurobarometer 341 / Wave 73.1 – TNS Opinion & Social. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_341_en.pdf (August 2016).
  18. European Commission. (1995). Green Paper on Innovation. Commission of the European Communities. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  19. European Commission. (2004). Communication from the Commission – Towards a European strategy for nanotechnology. Directorate-General for Research Communication Unit. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. URL: https://cordis.europa.eu/pub/nanotechnology/docs/nano_com_en_new.pdf (August 2016).
  20. European Commission. (2005). Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies: An Action Plan for Europe 2005–2009. Community Research and Development Information Service. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  21. European Commission. (2006). Exploring the Nano-World: Leading EU Research in Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies. Community Research and Development Information Service. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  22. European Commission. (2010a). Communicating Nanotechology: Why, to Whom, Saying What and How? Directorate-General for Research Communication Unit. URL: https://cordis.europa.eu/pub/nanotechnology/docs/communicating-nanotechnology_en.pdf (August 2016).
  23. European Commission. (2010b). Europe 2020: Commission proposes new economic strategy. Directorate-General for Research Communication Unit. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/president/news/documents/pdf/20100303_1_en.pdf (August 2016).
  24. European Commission. (2010c). A Rationale For Action: Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative – Innovation Union (Accompanying Document). Innovation Union: Transforming Europe through Research and Innovation. COM(2010) 546.
  25. European Commission. (2011). Regulation of The European Parliament and of the Council: Establishing Horizon 2020 – The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014–2020). Directorate-General for Research Communication Unit. COM(2011) 809 final.
  26. European Commission (2017). Synergy Grants: Criteria. ERC Executive Agency. URL: https://erc.europa.eu/funding/synergy-grants (October 2017).
  27. Feynman, R. P. (1959). There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom. A Reprint of the Talk (February 1960), Engineering and Science (23), 22–36.
  28. Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge and The Discourse on Language. Pantheon Books: New York.
  29. Gilad, S. (2010). It Runs in the Family: Meta-Regulation and Its Siblings. Regulation and Governance, (4), 485–506.10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01090.x
  30. Gottweis, H. (1998). Governing Molecules: The Discursive Politics of Genetic Engineering in Europe and the United States. MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3334.001.0001
  31. Greimas, A. J. (1966). Éléments pour une théorie de l’interprétation du récit mythique, Communications, 8(8), 28–59.10.3406/comm.1966.1114
  32. Greimas, A. J. (1983). Structural Semantics: An Attempt at a Method. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  33. Greimas, A. J. (1987). On meaning: selected writings in semiotic theory; translation by Paul J. Perron and Frank H. Collins; foreword by Frederic Jameson; introduction by Paul J. Perron.
  34. Greimas, A. J. and Courtés, J. (1982). Semiotics and Language: An Analytical Dictionary. Translation by Crist, L., Patte, D. et al. Bloomington: Indiana University Press (French edn 1979. Dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du langage. Paris: Hachette).
  35. Jasanoff, S. (2005). Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400837311
  36. Korzybski, A. (1933). Chapter IV: On Structure. In Schuchardt Read, C. (Ed.), Science and Sanity: An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics (1996).
  37. Kostoff, R. N., and R. R. Schaller. (2001). Science and Technology Roadmaps. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(2), 132–43.10.1109/17.922473
  38. Kwiat, J. (2008). From Aristotle to Gabriel: A summary of the narratology literature for story technologies. Technical Report, KMI-08-01. Milton Keynes: Knowledge Media Institute, Open University.
  39. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University Of Chicago Press.
  40. Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Ortony, A. (ed.) Metaphor and Thought (pp. 202–251), Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
  41. Lente van, H., & Rip, A. (1998). Expectations in Technological Developments: an Example of Prospective Structures to be Filled in by Agency. In: Disco C., Meulen van der B.J.R. (editors). In N. C. Disco, & B. van der Meulen (Eds.), Getting New Technologies Together. Studies in Making Sociotechnical Order (pp. 203–231). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  42. Lente van, H. (2000). Forceful futures: from promise to requirement. In Brown, N., Rappert, B., and Webster, A. (Eds.), Contested futures: A sociology of prospective Techno-science (pp. 43–63), Routledge.
  43. McDowall, W. (2012). Technology roadmaps for transition management: The case of hydrogen energy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(3), 530–542.10.1016/j.techfore.2011.10.002
  44. McGee, M. C. (1980). The ‘ideograph’: A Link between Rhetoric and Ideology. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 66(1), 1–16.10.1080/00335638009383499
  45. Merton, R. K. (1948). The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy. The Antioch Review, (8)2, 193–210.10.2307/4609267
  46. Mordini, E. (2007). The Narrative Dimension of Nanotechnology: Fabula and Story. Nanotechnology Perceptions, (3), 15–24.
  47. Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and Political Discourse. Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230504516
  48. Nordmann, A. (2007). Design Choices in the Nanoworld: A Space Odyssey. In Marian Deblonde, Lieve Goorden, et al. (Eds.), Nano Researchers Facing Choices (pp. 13–30), The Dialogue Series Vol. 10, Antwerp: Universitair Centrum Sint-Ignatius Antwerpen.
  49. Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. J. P. and Probert, D. R. (2004). Technology roadmapping – A Planning Framework for Evolution and Revolution. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71 (1–2), 5–26.10.1016/S0040-1625(03)00072-6
  50. Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. J. P., and Probert, D. R. (2009). Visualising strategy: A classification of graphical road map forms. International Journal of Technology Management, 47(4), 286–305.10.1504/IJTM.2009.024431
  51. Rip, A. (2006). Folk Theories of Nanotechnologists. Science as Culture, 15(4), 349–65.10.1080/09505430601022676
  52. Rip, A. (2012). The context of innovation journeys. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(2), 158–170.10.1111/j.1467-8691.2012.00640.x
  53. Schön, D. (1993). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem setting in social policy. In: A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 137–163). Cambridge University Press (1st ed.1979).10.1017/CBO9781139173865.011
  54. Schummer, J. (2004). Societal and ethical implications of nanotechnology: meanings, interest groups, and social dynamics. Techné, 8(2), 56–87.10.5840/techne2004825
  55. Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816802.015
  56. Stokes, E. (2013). Demand for command: Responding to technological risks and scientific uncertainties. Medical Law Review, 21(1), 11–38.10.1093/medlaw/fws042
  57. Suganami, H. (1996). On the Causes of War. Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198273387.001.0001
  58. Verbong, G. P. J., and Geels, F. W. (2010). Exploring sustainability transitions in the electricity sector with socio-technical pathways. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(8), 1214–1221.10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.008
  59. Wikberg, K. (2007). The role of corpus linguistics in metaphor research. In: Johanneson, N. L.; Minugh, D. (Ed.). Selected Papers from the 2006 and 2007 Stockholm Metaphor Festivals. Stockholm: Department of English, Stockholm University.
  60. CORDIS. (2000a). Nano: the new buzzword in science and technology. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2000-11-14, Record control number (RCN):15831
  61. CORDIS. (2002a). Busquin chairs nanotechnology information day. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2002-06-14, Record control number (RCN):18546
  62. CORDIS. (2002b). Expert group hails nanotechnology as cornerstone in increasing competitiveness. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2002-03-13, Record control number (RCN):18111
  63. CORDIS. (2003a). First large scale release of nanotechnology product into the environment provokes concern. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2003-10-31, Record control number (RCN):21137
  64. CORDIS. (2003b). EIB loan to help Europe stay at the forefront of nanoelectrical research. Community Research and Development Information Service, European Investment Bank (EIB), Date 2003-11-17, Record control number (RCN):21208
  65. CORDIS. (2003c). Nanotechnology: opportunity or threat? Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2003-06-12, Record control number (RCN):20401
  66. CORDIS. (2003d). Europe announces more nano creations. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2003-08-14, Record control number (RCN):20725
  67. CORDIS. (2003e). Experts examine the barriers to public acceptance of nanotechnologies. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2003-12-11, Record control number (RCN):21330
  68. CORDIS. (2004a). Revamped CORDIS service on nanotechnology reflects huge importance of the very small. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2004-11-29, Record control number (RCN):22995
  69. CORDIS. (2004b). Health is wealth, and must be given priority to achieve the Lisbon process, says ERS. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2004-10-20, Record control number (RCN):22799
  70. CORDIS. (2004c). Renewed calls for assessment of nanotechnology risks. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2004-07-12, Record control number (RCN):22314
  71. CORDIS. (2004d). European Construction Technology Platform to outline vision for 2030. Community Research and Development Information Service, European Construction Technology Platform (ECTP), Date 2004-10-19, Record control number (RCN):22792
  72. CORDIS. (2004e). France provides 210 million euro for nanotechnologies. Community Research and Development Information Service, French Research Ministry, Date 2004-12-20, Record control number (RCN):23100
  73. CORDIS. (2005a). Key Technologies for Europe reports recommend six pillars for a research strategy ‘Beyond Lisbon’. Community Research and Development Information Service, Conference ‘Key Technologies for Europe’, Date 2005-10-21, Record control number (RCN):24650
  74. CORDIS. (2005b). New report identifies ten key nanotechnologies for the developing world, Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2005-04-12, Record control number (RCN):23659
  75. CORDIS. (2005c). New report identifies ten key nanotechnologies for the developing world. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2005-04-12, Record control number (RCN):23659
  76. CORDIS. (2005d). Ireland builds new nanotechnology research centre, Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2005-02-14, Record control number (RCN):23359
  77. CORDIS. (2005e). FP6 project to keep EU at forefront of nanoelectronics. The NanoCMOS consortium, Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2005-06-28, Record control number (RCN):24055
  78. CORDIS. (2005f). EU funded project develops a roadmap for nanotechnology applications. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2005-10-11, Record control number (RCN):24582
  79. CORDIS. (2005g). Technology Platform emphasises interdisciplinarity in roadmap for sustainable chemistry research. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2005-11-28, Record control number (RCN):24840
  80. CORDIS. (2005h). China the notable exception in growing ‘nano-divide’. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2005-11-07, Record control number (RCN):24720
  81. CORDIS. (2005i). No Knowledge, No Future, Says Potocnik. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2005-02-03, Record control number (RCN):23304
  82. CORDIS. (2006a). New CORDIS focus supplements published. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2006-05-24, Record control number (RCN):25710
  83. CORDIS. (2006b). Potocnik vows to defend ERC budget. Community Research and Development Information Service. Based on a speech by Janez Potocnik (SPEECH/06/257), Date 2006-04-26, Record control number (RCN):25556
  84. CORDIS. (2006c). Nano ‘switch’ bridges biological and nano-worlds. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2006-04-25, Record control number (RCN):25551
  85. CORDIS. (2006d). Raising awareness of nano-bio-technology and its ethical issues. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2006-04-10, Record control number (RCN):25487
  86. CORDIS. (2006e). Communication and risk assessment: keys to unleashing nano-potential. Community Research and Development Information Service, CORDIS News attendance at European Forum on Nanosciences, Date 2006-10-20, Record control number (RCN):26531
  87. CORDIS. (2006f). EU project gives insight into future of nanotechnology. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2006-07-05, Record control number (RCN):25949
  88. CORDIS. (2006g). Commissioner reassures industry on JTIs. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2006-12-07, Record control number (RCN):26774
  89. CORDIS. (2007a). European Commission launches proposals for first Joint Technology Initiatives. Community Research and Development Information Service, Based on CORDIS News attendance at European Commission press conference and press release (IP/07/668), Date 2007-05-16, Record control number (RCN):27685
  90. CORDIS. (2007b). Commission launches consultation on responsible nano research. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2007-07-20, Record control number (RCN):28083
  91. CORDIS. (2007c). Nanotechnology and the environment: beauty rather than beast? Community Research and Development Information Service,
  92. CORDIS News interview with David Rickerby, Date 2007-05-22 Record control number (RCN):27711
  93. CORDIS. (2007d). Clean skies JTI takes off at Paris air show. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2007-06-21, Record control number (RCN):27893
  94. CORDIS. (2007e). Commission takes stock of nano progress. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2007-09-14, Record control number (RCN):28341
  95. CORDIS. (2007f). Nanotechnology: we’ve invested in research, where are the applications? Community Research and Development Information Service, CORDIS News attendance at EuroNanoForum, Date 2007-06-20, Record control number (RCN):27882
  96. CORDIS. (2007g). Trust and communication: keys to public acceptance of nanotechnology. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2007-06-21, Record control number (RCN):27892
  97. CORDIS. (2008). Towards a European Observatory on Nanotechnologies. Community Research and Development Information Service, Institute of Nanotechnology, UK, Date 2008-05-08, Record control number (RCN):29419
  98. CORDIS. (2009a). New EU project to spearhead development of organic nano-materials in electronics. Community Research and Development Information Service, CORDIS News attendance at the public launch of the ONE-P project, Date 2009-03-05, Record control number (RCN):30537
  99. CORDIS. (2009b). Commission underlines importance of supporting development of key technologies. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2009-10-01, Record control number (RCN):31310
  100. CORDIS. (2012). Prion busting molecules. LUPAS project, Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2012-06-15, Record control number (RCN):34730
  101. CORDIS. (2013a). Final Report Summary – NANOFUTURES: A cross-ETP Coordination Initiative on nanotechnology. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2013-01-18, Record control number (RCN):54223
  102. CORDIS. (2013b). ERC-funded project tackles quantum biology. Community Research and Development Information Service, University of Ulm, Date 2013-01-21, Record control number (RCN):35456
  103. CORDIS. (2013c). Calls for proposals for ‘Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies (LEIT)’. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2013-12-18, Record control number (RCN):36340
  104. CORDIS. (2014). NANOFORCE sheds some light on nanoparticle toxicity. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2014-02-13, Record control number (RCN):36448
  105. CORDIS. (2015). European Technology Platform for Nanomedicine and the ENATRANS consortium launch second edition of the Nanomedicine Award. Community Research and Development Information Service, Date 2015-08-04, Record control number (RCN):127554
Language: English
Page range: 34 - 49
Submitted on: Jan 23, 2017
Accepted on: May 24, 2018
Published on: Feb 1, 2019
Published by: University of Matej Bel in Banska Bystrica, Faculty of Economics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Pavel Kotlík, published by University of Matej Bel in Banska Bystrica, Faculty of Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.