References
- Alavi, M., Kayworth, T.R., & Leidner, D.E. (2006). An empirical examination of the influence of organizational culture on knowledge management practices. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(3), 191–224.
- Boswell, C. (2009). The political uses of expert knowledge: Immigration policy and social research. Cambridge University Press.
- Bourdieu, P. (1971). Une interpretation de la théorie de la religion selon Max Weber. Archives européennes de sociologie, 12(1), 3–21.
- Bressers, D., van Twist, M.J.W., van der Steen, M.A., & Schulz, J.M. (2018). The contested autonomy of policy advisory bodies: the tradeoff between autonomy and control of policy advisory bodies in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and Sweden. In E. Ongaro & S. Van Thiel (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe (pp. 1189–1211). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Bristow, D., Carter, L., & Martin S. (2015). Using evidence to improve policy and practice: the UK What Works Centres. Contemporary Social Science, 10(2), 126–137.
- Cash, D., Clark, W., Alcock, F., Dickson, N., Eckley, N., & Jäger, J. (2003). Salience, credibility, legitimacy and boundaries: linking research, assessment and decision making. KSG Working Paper Series. Harvard University.
- Cobarzan, B. (2008). Special advisors to the minister in Romania: carriers of political and administrative roles. In B. Connaughton, G. Sootla, & G. Peters (Eds.), Politico-Administrative Relations at the Centre: Actors, Structures and Processes Supporting the Core Executive (pp. 293–307). Bratislava: NISPAcee Press.
- Colebatch, H.K. (2017). Policy, learning and regime change: Western concepts and CEE experience. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 11(2), 2–10.
- Colebatch, H.K. (2010) Giving accounts of policy work. In H.K. Colebatch, R. Hoppe, & M. Noordegraaf (Eds.), Working for Policy (pp. 31–43). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
- Craft, J., & Howlett, M. (2013). The dual dynamics of policy advisory systems: the impact of externalization and politicization on policy advice. Policy and Society, 32(3), 187–197.
- Craft, J., & Wilder, M. (2017). Catching a second wave: context and compatibility in advisory system dynamics. Policy Studies Journal, 45(1), 215–239.
- Crowley, K., & Head, B. (2017). Expert advisory councils in the policy system. In M. Brans, I. Geva-May, & M. Howlett (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Comparative Policy Analysis (pp. 181–198). NY and London: Routledge.
- Dimitrova, A. L. (2010). The new member states of the EU in the aftermath of enlargement: Do new European rules remain empty shells? Journal of European Public Policy, 17(1), 137-148.
- European Commission (2012). Position of the Commission Services on the Development of Partnership Agreement and Programs in Slovakia for the Period 2014 – 2020. Retrieved from http://www.nsrr.sk/sk/programoveobdobie-2014---2020/pozicny-dokument-europskej-komisie-kpartnerskej-dohode-a-programom-sr-na-roky-2014---2020/ (accessed 10 January 2018).
- Falkner, G., & Treib, O. (2008). Three worlds of compliance or four? The EU-15 compared to new member states. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(2), 293–313.
- Filko, M., Kiss, Š., & Ódor, Ľ. (2016). Najlepší z možných svetov: Hodnota za peniaze v slovenskej verejnej politike [The Best of Possible Worlds: Value for Money in Slovak Public Policy]. Bratislava: Ministerstvo financií SR.
- Gajduschek, G. (2007). Socialist and post-socialist civil service in Hungary. In A. Jakab, P. Takács, A.F. Tatham (Eds.), The Transformation of the Hungarian Legal Order 1985–2005: Transition to the Rule of Law and Accession to the European Union (pp. 123–126). Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
- Government Office of the Slovak Republic (2014). Civil Service in 2013. Report from the Survey among Civil Service. Bratislava: Government Office of the Slovak Republic.
- Grzymala-Busse, A. (2010). The best laid plans: the impact of informal rules on formal institutions in transitional regimes. Studies in Comparative International Development, 45(3), 311–333.
- Gunnell, J.G. (1982). The technocratic image and the theory of technocracy. Technology and Culture, 23(3), 392–416.
- Habermas, J. (1990). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Halligan, J. (1995). Policy advice and the public service. In B.G. Peters, & D.J. Savoie (Eds.), Governance in a changing environment (pp. 138–172). Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
- Hood, C., & Jackson, M. W. (1991). Administrative argument. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
- Howlett, M. (2013). Policy work, policy advisory systems and politicization. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 7(1), 4–7.
- Jasanoff, S. (1990). The Fifth Branch. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Jørgensen, T. B., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values: an inventory. Administration & Society, 39(3), 354–381.
- Keris, M. (2008). Ministerial advisors in Estonia: role perceptions as multifunctionalism. In B. Connaughton, G. Sootla, & G. Peters (Eds.), Politico-Administrative Relations at the Centre: Actors, Structures and Processes Supporting the Core Executive (pp. 206–224). Bratislava: NISPAcee Press.
- Majcherkiewicz, T. (2008). Between the pool of spoils and shallow professionalism: recruitment, composition and functioning of the political cabinets of prime ministers and ministers in Poland 1997–2006. In B. Connaughton, G. Sootla, & G. Peters (Eds.), Politico-Administrative Relations at the Centre: Actors, Structures and Processes Supporting the Core Executive (pp. 268–292). Bratislava: NISPAcee Press.
- Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process. Connecticut: Yale University Press.
- Mannheim, K. (1936[1997]). The sociological problem of the ‘intelligentsia’. In: Ideology and utopia: collected works of Karl Mannheim (pp. 136–145). Vol. 1. New York: Routledge.
- Martin, D. (1969). The dissolution of the monasteries. In D. Martin (Ed.), Anarchy and Culture: The Problem of the Contemporary University. London: Taylor & Francis.
- Martin, J., & Siehl, C. (1983). Organizational culture and counterculture: an uneasy symbiosis. Organizational dynamics, 12(2), 52–64.
- Meuser, M., & Nagel, U. (2005). ExpertInneninterviews – vielfach erprobt, wenig bedacht. Ein Beitrag zur qualitativen Methodendiskussion. In A. Bogner, B. Littig, & W. Menz (Eds.), Das Experteninterview – Theorie, Methoden, Anwendung (pp. 71–93). 2nd ed. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
- Meyer-Sahling, J-H., & Veen, T. (2012). Governing the post-communist state: government alternation and senior civil service politicisation in Central and Eastern Europe. East European Politics, 28(1), 4–22.
- Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
- Múčka, F. (2014, 24 November). Keď naši hipsteri robia policy [When our hipsters conduct policy]. Týždeň. Retrieved from https://www.tyzden.sk/nazory/24097/ked-nasi-hipsteri-robia-policy/ (accessed 16 February 2018).
- OECD (2014). Slovak Republic. Developing a Sustainable Strategic Framework for Public Administration Reform. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/slovak-republic-developinga-sustainable-strategic-framework-for-public-administrationreform_9789264212640-en (accessed 16 February 2018).
- OECD (2017). Policy Advisory Systems: Supporting Good Governance and Sound Public Decision Making. Paris: OECD.
- Perry, J.L., & Hondeghem, A. (2008). Building theory and empirical evidence about public service motivation. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 3–12.
- Perry, J.L., Hondeghem, A., & Wise, L.R. (2010). Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: twenty years of research and an agenda for the future. Public administration review, 70(5), 681–690.
- Peters, B.G. (2001). The Politics of Bureaucracy. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Peters, G., & Barker, A. (1993). Advising West European Governments: Inquiries, Expertise and Public Policy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Randma-Liiv, T., & Drechsler, W. (2017). Three decades, four phases: public administration development in central and Eastern Europe, 1989–2017. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(6-7), 595–605.
- Raudla, R. (2012). Pitfalls of contracting for policy advice: preparing performance budgeting reform in Estonia. Governance, 26(4), 605–629.
- Rose, R.A. (1988). Organizations as multiple cultures: a rules theory analysis. Human Relations, 41(2), 139–170.
- Schäfer, H. (2004). Priests, prophets or sorcerers? on intellectual elites and politics in modernizing Latin America. In I. Lawford (Ed.), The Role of the Educated Class in Africa: Between African Renaissance and Globalisation Critique (pp. 193–219). Rehburg: Loccum.
- Schmitt-Egner, P. (2015). Gemeinwohl: Konzeptionelle Grundlinien zur Legitimität und Zielsetzung von Politik im 21. Jahrhundert. Nomos.
- Sedláček, V., & Veselý, A. (2016). Policy Analysis Outsourcing. In A. Veselý, M. Nekola, & E. Hejzlarová (Eds.), Policy Analysis in the Czech Republic (pp. 203–214). Bristol: Policy Press University of Bristol.
- Staroňová, K. (2014). L’institutionnalisation des études d’impact en Europe centrale et orientale” (Institutionalization of the Regulatory Impact Assessment in CEE countries). Revue Francaise D’Administration Publique, 149(1), 123–143.
- Staroňová, K., & Gajduschek, G. (2017). Politicization beyond the meritsystem façade: the intricate relationship between formal and informal institutions in the senior civil service systems in Central and Eastern Europe. XXI IRSPM Annual Conference, 19–21 April 2017, Budapest, Hungary.
- Staroňová, K., & Rybář, M. (2018). Ministerial or party roots of civil service patronage? Evidence from a parliamentary democracy. 68th Political Studies Association Annual International Conference, 26–28 March 2018, Cardiff, UK.
- Sundell, A. (2014). Are formal civil service examinations the most meritocratic way to recruit civil servants? Not in all countries. Public Administration, 92(2), 440–457.
- Van den Berg, C. (2017). Dynamics in the Dutch policy advisory system: externalization, politicization and the legacy of pillarization. Policy Sciences, 50(1), 63–84.
- Van Maanen, J., & Barley, S. (1985). Fragments of a theory. In P.J. Frost, L.F. Moore, M.R.E. Louis, C.C. Lundberg, & J.E. Martin (Eds.), Organizational Culture (pp. 31–55). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Vandenabeele, W., & Van de Walle, S. (2008). International Differences in public service motivation: comparing regions across the world. In J.L. Perry, & A. Hondeghem (Eds.), Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service (pp. 223–244). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Van de Haar, E. (2015). CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis: Dutch (economic) policy-making. Contemporary Social Science, 10(2), 182–190.
- Veit, S., Hustedt, T., & Bach, T. (2017). Dynamics of change in internal policy advisory systems: the hybridization of advisory capacities in Germany. Policy Sciences, 50(1), 50–63.
- Veselý, A. (2013). Externalization of policy advice: theory, methodology and evidence. Policy and Society, 32(3), 199–209.
- Wallace, W. (1996). Truth and power, monks and technocrats: theory and practice in international relations. Review of International Studies, 22(3), 301–321.
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Yanow, D. (1996) How Does a Policy Mean? Interpreting Policy and Organizational Actions. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.