Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Advocacy Coalitions in Transport Policy: A Case of Rail Sector in Croatia Cover

Advocacy Coalitions in Transport Policy: A Case of Rail Sector in Croatia

By: Željko Poljak  
Open Access
|Aug 2018

References

  1. Araral, E. et al. (Eds.) (2012). Routledge Handbook of Public Policy. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203097571
  2. Button, K. (2006). Transportation and Infrastructure. In B. G. Peters, & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of Public Policy (pp. 323-338). London: SAGE Publications.10.4135/9781848608054.n20
  3. Cairney, P. (2015). Paul A. Sabatier, ‘An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein’. In E. Page et al. (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of the Classics of Public Policy and Administration (pp. 484-497). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199646135.013.24
  4. Colebatch, H. (2006). Policy, Models, and the Construction of Governing. In H. Colebatch (Ed.), The Work of Policy. An International Survey (pp. 3-19). Lanham: Lexington Books.
  5. Compston, H. (2004). Introduction: The Nature of Public Policy in Britain, France and Germany. In H. Compston (Ed.), Handbook of Public Policy in Europe. Britain, France and Germany (pp. 1-13). New York: Palgrave Macmillian.10.1057/9780230522756_1
  6. Dundović, Č., & Plazibat, V. (2011). Lučka i prometna infrastruktura Republike Hrvatske. Pomorstvo, 25(1), 209-222.
  7. Elliott, C., & Schlaepfer, R. (2001). The advocacy coalition framework: application to the policy process for the development of forest certification in Sweden. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(4), 642-661.10.1080/13501760110064438
  8. Green, M., & Houlihan, B. (2004). Advocacy coalitions and elite sport policy change in Canada and the United Kingdom. International review for the sociology of sport, 39(4), 387-403.10.1177/1012690204049066
  9. Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2009). Implementing Public Policy. London: SAGE Publications.
  10. Ilić, M. (2000). Željeznički putnički promet Središnje Hrvatske. Hrvatski geografski glasnik, 62(1), 67-79.
  11. Jang, S., Weible, C. M., & Park, K. (2016). Policy processes in South Korea through the lens of the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 9(3), 274-290.10.1080/17516234.2016.1201877
  12. Jenkins-Smith, H., & Sabatier, P. A. (1994). Evaluating the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Journal of Public Policy, 14(2), 175-203.10.1017/S0143814X00007431
  13. Kasapović, M. (2008). Political science in Croatia 1962–2007. European Political Science, 7(2), 237-246.10.1057/eps.2008.3
  14. Kekez, A. (2016). Javno upravljanje u Hrvatskoj: politički prioritet i implementacijski neuspjeh. Političke analize, 7(26), 45-49.
  15. Kekez, A. (2018). Public service reforms and clientelism: explaining variation of service delivery modes in Croatian social policy. Policy and Society, 1-19.10.1080/14494035.2018.1436505
  16. Kettl, D. F. (1997). The global revolution in public management: Driving themes, missing links. Journal of Policy Analysis and management, 16(3), 446-462.10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199722)16:3<446::AID-PAM5>3.0.CO;2-H
  17. Koprić, I. (2011). Contemporary Croatian Public Administration on the Reform Waves. Godišnjak Akademije pravnih znanosti Hrvatske, II(1), 1-40.
  18. Lajh, D., & Petak, Z. (Eds.), (2015). EU Public Policies Seen from a National Perspective: Slovenia and Croatia in the European Union. Ljubljana: Faculty of Social Sciences.
  19. Nohrstedt, D. (2015). Paradigms and Unintended Consequences: New Public Management Reform and Emergency Planning in Swedish Local Government. In J. Hogan & M. Howlett (Eds.), Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice (pp. 141-164). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137434043_8
  20. Osborne, S. P. (Ed.) (2010). The new public governance: Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203861684
  21. Padjen, J. (2003). Prometna politika u Hrvatskoj. Zagreb: MasMedia.
  22. Petak, Z. (2006). Policy in a transitional context: Performing decentralization in Croatia. In H. K. Colebatch (Ed.), The Work of Policy. An International Survey (pp. 83-106). Lanham: Lexington Books.
  23. Petak, Z. (2007). Javne politike: razvoj discipline u Hrvatskoj i svijetu. In M. Kasapović (Ed.), Izlazak iz množine? (pp. 187-215). Zagreb: Fakultet političkih znanosti.
  24. Petak, Z. (2012). Politics of decentralization policy: Explaining the limited success of the Croatian case after 2001. Politička misao, 48(5), 72-84.
  25. Peters, B. G., & Zittoun, P. (Eds.) (2016). Contemporary Approaches to Public Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-50494-4
  26. Petek, A. (2012). Što su hrvatske javne politike? Političke analize, 3(11), 37-45.
  27. Petek, A., & Petković, K. (Eds.) (2014). Pojmovnik javnih politika. Zagreb: Fakultet političkih znanosti.
  28. Petek, A. (2016). Politološka ekspertiza za javne politike. Suvremene teme, 8(1), 7-23.
  29. Petek, A. (2017). Croatian Decision Agenda: An Analysis of the Acts Published in the National Gazette Since 1990. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu, 67(5), 815-841.
  30. Petković, K. (2014). Javne politike u povijesti časopisa Politička misao od 1964. do 2013: kako izgledamo u ogledalu poddiscipline? Politička Misao, 51(1), 11-38.
  31. Pierce, J. J., Peterson, H. L., Jones, M. D., et al. (2017). There and Back Again: A Tale of the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Policy Studies Journal, 45(S1), 13-46.10.1111/psj.12197
  32. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public Management Reform: A comparative analysis-new public management, governance, and the Neo-Weberian state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  33. Poljak, Ž. (2017). Zagovaračke koalicije u procesu stvaranja javnih politika. Političke analize, 7(29), 52-57.
  34. Rul, M. (2016). Uspon i pad sindikalnog pokreta u HŽ-u 1990-ih godina. Radnička prava. Accessible via: http://radnickaprava.org/tekstovi/clanci/mirna-rul-uspon-i-pad-sindikalnog-pokreta-u-hz-u-1990-ih-godina (accessed 17 January 2017).
  35. Sabatier, P. A. (1986). TopDown and BottomUp Approaches to Implementation Research: a Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), 2148.10.1017/S0143814X00003846
  36. Sabatier, P. A. (1987). Knowledge, Policy-Oriented Learning, and Policy Change: An Advocacy Coalition Framework. Science Communication, 8: 649-692.10.1177/0164025987008004005
  37. Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2/3), 129-168.10.1007/BF00136406
  38. Sabatier, P. A. (1998). The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 98-130.10.1080/13501768880000051
  39. Sabatier, P. A. (2007). The Need for Better Theories. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 3-20). Boulder: Westview Press.10.4324/9780367274689-1
  40. Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (2007). The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Innovations and Clarifications. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed) Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 189–222). Boulder: Westview Press.10.4324/9780367274689-7
  41. Saldaña, J. (2009). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
  42. Stefičar, S. (2008). Željeznica je mrtva! Živjela željeznica! Zagreb and Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
  43. Sućeska, A. (2015). Podijeli pa vladaj – kako je rastrojen HŽ. Rad - novine o radnim pravima i suradnji 3. Accessible via: http://radnickaprava.org/rad/RAD_drugi_broj.pdf (accessed 17 January 2017).
  44. Širinić, D. (2016). Political priorities in Croatia 1990-2016: comparison of media and political agendas. In A. Musa (Ed.), 11. Forum za javnu upravu (pp. 21-35). Zagreb: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Institut za javnu upravu.
  45. Thomas, D. R. (2006). A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237-246.10.1177/1098214005283748
  46. Vedriš, M. (2015). Croatian Transport Policy in the EU Context. In D. Lajh, & Z. Petak (Eds.), EU Public Policies Seen from a National Perspective: Slovenia and Croatia in the European Union (pp. 193-206). Ljubljana: Faculty of Social Sciences.
  47. Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (2006). A Guide to the Advocacy Coalition Framework. In F. Fischer, G. J. Miller, & M. S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods (pp. 123-136). Boca Raton, London and New York: CRC Press.10.1201/9781420017007.pt3
  48. Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A., & McQueen, K. (2009). Themes and Variations: Taking Stock of the Advocacy Coalition Framework. The Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 121–140.10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00299.x
  49. Weible, C. M., & Nohrstedt, D. (2013). The advocacy coalition framework: Coalitions, learning and policy change. In E. Araral, et al. (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Public Policy (pp. 125-137). London and New York: Routledge.
  50. Weible, C. M. & Jenkins-Smith, H. (2016). The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Approach for the Comparative Analysis of Contentious Policy Issues. In G. Peters, & P. Zittoun (Eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Public Policy (pp. 15-29). London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-50494-4_2
  51. Đurić, Z. (2016). Accessible via: http://www.forum.tm/vijesti/jedini-smosindikat-koji-je-strajkao-za-vrijeme-rata-4381 (accessed 12 February 2017).
  52. Forgač, I. (2016). Accessible via: http://www.forum.tm/vijesti/ivanforgac-radnicki-pokret-treba-politicko-krilo-4243 (accessed 12 February 2017).
  53. Interview 1 (2017). Anonymous semi-structured interview with two highly-positioned officials from Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure in Croatia.
  54. Interview 2 (2017). Anonymous semi-structured interview with highlypositioned employee in state-owned rail company HŽ Passenger Transport.
  55. Maršić, Z. (2016a). Accessible via: http://radnickaprava.org/tekstovi/intervjui/zoran-marsic-u-hz-u-imamo-vise-menadzerskih-setova-negosto-juventus-ima-postava (accessed 12 February 2017).
  56. Maršić, Z. (2016b). Accessible via: http://radnickaprava.org/tekstovi/intervjui/zoran-marsic-zeljeznica-vise-nije-od-strateskog-interesa-zadrzavu (accessed 12 February 2017).
  57. Mindum, K. (2016). Accessible via: http://www.forum.tm/vijesti/zeljeznicu-guta-vec-daljina-neznanje-i-arogancija-kumovali-surastakanju-hz-3563 (accessed 12 February 2017).
  58. Pavletić, Z. (2016). Accessible via: http://radnickaprava.org/tekstovi/intervjui/zlatko-pavletic-strajkali-smo-za-zeljeznicu (accessed 12 February 2017).
  59. AIN (Agency for Investigation of Air, Sea and Rail Traffic Accidents) (2016). Godišnji program rada i razvoja Agencije za 2017.
  60. ASŽ (Croatian Railway Safety Agency) (2016). Godišnji program rada i razvoja Agencije za 2017.
  61. MPPI (Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure) (2014). Strategija prometnog razvoja Republike Hrvatske za razdoblje od 2014. do 2030. godine.
  62. HAKOM (Croatian Regulatory Authority for Network Industries) (2016). Godišnji program rada za 2017.
  63. Croatian Parliament (2012). Konačni prijedlog zakona o dopuni Zakona o podjeli trgovačkog društva HŽ - Hrvatske željeznice d.o.o., hitni postupak, prvo i drugo čitanje, P.Z. br. 84. Fonogram rasprave.
  64. HŽ Cargo (2016). Godišnje konsolidirano poslovno izvješće o stanju društava za 2015. godinu.
  65. HŽ Infrastructure (2016). Godišnje izvješće 2015.
  66. HŽ PP (HŽ Passenger Transport) (2016). Izvješće o stanju društva i-xii 2015.
  67. World Bank (2005). Railway Reform in the Western Balkans. Transport Unit, Infrastructure Department: Europe and Central Asia Region.
Language: English
Page range: 41 - 56
Submitted on: Nov 13, 2017
Accepted on: Mar 9, 2018
Published on: Aug 6, 2018
Published by: University of Matej Bel in Banska Bystrica, Faculty of Economics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2018 Željko Poljak, published by University of Matej Bel in Banska Bystrica, Faculty of Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.