Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The European Union Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism as a Green Tax Policy Instrument Cover

The European Union Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism as a Green Tax Policy Instrument

Open Access
|Mar 2025

References

  1. Aldeia, S., & Lopes, J. (2022). The legal research method applied: the case study of the factoring contract’s modalities. Paper presented at the 21st European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies (ECRM), Aveiro, Portugal.
  2. Aldeia, S. C. R. (2023). Environmentally friendly tax measures in the Portuguese jurisdiction. Enforcement of the polluter pays tax principle. International Journal of Law and Management, 65(6), 511–522. doi:10.1108/ijlma-02-2023-0018
  3. Alston, P. (2023). The Right to a Healthy Environment: Beyond Twentieth Century Conceptions of Rights. Ajil Unbound, 117, 167–172. doi:10.1017/aju.2023.30
  4. Ambec, S., & Yang, Y. T. (2024). Climate policy with electricity trade. Resource and Energy Economics, 76, 26. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2023.101422
  5. Bellora, C., & Fontagné, L. (2023). EU in search of a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. Energy Economics, 123, 16. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106673
  6. Berliner, D., & Prakash, A. (2012). From norms to programs: The United Nations Global Compact and global governance. Regulation & Governance, 6(2), 149–166. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01130.x
  7. Berliner, D., & Prakash, A. (2014). The United Nations Global Compact: An Institutionalist Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(2), 217–223. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2217-5
  8. Borodin, A., Zaitsev, V., Mamedov, Z. F., Panaedova, G., & Kulikov, A. (2022). Mechanisms for Tax Regulation of CO2-Equivalent Emissions. Energies, 15(19), 15. doi:10.3390/en15197111
  9. Boute, A. (2024). Accounting for Carbon Pricing in Third Countries Under the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. World Trade Review, 21. doi:10.1017/s1474745624000107
  10. Brauch, M. D., Arnold, J., Klonsky, E., & Everard, F. (2021). Event Highlights: Carbon Border Adjustments in the EU, the U.S., and Beyond. Paper presented at the The Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI), Columbia Law School and Columbia Climate School at Columbia University.
  11. Brown, J. A., Clark, C., & Buono, A. F. (2018). The United Nations Global Compact: Engaging Implicit and Explicit CSR for Global Governance. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(4), 721–734. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3382-5
  12. Buissing, T. N. (2022). EU Air Transport and the EU’s Environmental Agenda Struggle: A Leap of Faith or Can a CBAM Level the Playing Field? Air & Space Law, 47(6), 24. doi: 10.54648/aila2022035
  13. Cathala, C. (2022). Net Operating Loss Policies In Poland - A Tool For Tax Neutrality and a Firm’s Antifragility. Financial Internet Quarterly, 18(3), 68–79. doi:10.2478/fiqf-2022-0020
  14. Chacha, K. A. G., Castro, J. G. A., Tamara, D. V., Araujo, N. F., Castro, J. G. A., & Tamara, D. V. (2018). Legal and Socio-Legal Research Methodology Introduction. Bogota: Editorial Bonaventuriana.
  15. Chacha, K. A. G., Ramos, E. L. H., & Sanchez, S. I. L. (2021). El proyecto de investigación: la metodología de la investigación científica o jurídica [The Research Project: Scientific or Legal Research Methodology.] Revista Conrado, 17(81), 163–168.
  16. Chen, S.-C. J. (2019). Neutrality as Tax Justice: The Case of Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base under the EU law. European Studies - The Review of European Law, Economics and Politics, 5.
  17. Chen, X. (2023). Transboundary Carbon Regulation: A View From China. World Economy and International Relations, 67(4), 75–80. doi:10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-4-75-80
  18. Cima, E. (2022). The right to a healthy environment: Reconceptualizing human rights in the face of climate change. Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law, 31(1), 38–49. doi:10.1111/reel.12430
  19. Clora, F., Yu, W. S., & Corong, E. (2023). Alternative Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanisms in the European Union and International Responses: Aggregate and Within-Coalition results. Energy Policy, 174, 14. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113454
  20. Durán, G. M. (2023). Securing Compatibility of Carbon Border Adjustments with the Multilateral Climate And Trade Regimes. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 72(1), 73–103. doi:10.1017/s0020589322000501
  21. Regulation (EU) 2023/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023, establishing a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). Official Journal of the European Union L130/52 (2023).
  22. Fochmann, M., Kiesewetter, D., & Sadrieh, A. (2012). Investment Behavior and the Biased Perception of Limited Loss Deduction in Income Taxation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 81(1), 230–242. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.10.014
  23. Gehring, M. W. (2023). European Union Trade Measures and Highest Priority Challenge Related to Climate Change in EU-Americas Relations. Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 50(3), 339–362. doi:10.54648/leie2023015
  24. Gergondet, E. (2021). The European Union’s Proposed Carbon-Border Adjustment and Its Impact on Trade With Africa. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 16(11–12), 564–571. doi:10.54648/GTCJ2021071
  25. Guo, Y. M., & Li, X. (2023). The Impact of Greater VAT Tax Neutrality on Total Factor Productivity: Evidence From China’s VAT Credit Refund Reform in 2018. Economic Analysis and Policy, 78, 922–936. doi:10.1016/j.eap.2023.04.026
  26. Hancock, L., & Wollersheim, L. (2021). EU Carbon Diplomacy: Assessing Hydrogen Security And Policy Impact In Australia And Germany. Energies, 14(23), 8103. doi:10.3390/en14238103
  27. Hartley, T. (2010). The Foundations of European Union Law (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  28. Hilson, C. (2024). Emissions Intensity: Do We Need a CBAM For Oil and Gas Imports? Journal of World Energy Law & Business, 17(2), 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwad036
  29. Ismer, R., & Haussner, M. (2016). Inclusion of Consumption into the EU ETS: The Legal Basis Under European Union Law. Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law, 25(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12131
  30. Jakob, M. (2023). The Political Economy Of Carbon Border Adjustment In The EU. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 39(1), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grac044
  31. Klotz, S., Probst, S. L., & Hulliger, O. (2022). The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism – A Tax in Disguise? European Taxation, 2022(8), 350–353. https://doi.org/10.59403/139fdjw
  32. Kourula, A. (2013). The United Nations Global Compact: Achievements, Trends and Challenges. Business & Society, 52(1), 170–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650312459922
  33. Ladly, S. D. (2012). Border Carbon Adjustments, WTO-Law and the Principle of Common But Differentiated Responsibilities. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 12(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-011-9153-y
  34. Leonelli, G. C. (2022a). Carbon Border Measures, Environmental Effectiveness and WTO Law Compatibility: Is There a Way Forward for the Steel and Aluminium Climate Club? World Trade Review, 21(5), 619–632. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474745622000209
  35. Leonelli, G. C. (2022b). Practical Obstacles and Structural Legal Constraints in the Adoption of ‘Defensive’ Policies: Comparing the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism and the US Proposal for a Border Carbon Adjustment. Legal Studies, 42(4), 696–714. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2022.20
  36. Lestan, F., Kabiraj, S., & George, B. (2023). Preliminary Impact Assessment of Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on Russian Economy. FIIB Business Review, April 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145221143033
  37. Lopez, R. E., Cubillos, P. G., & Figueroa, E. (2020). The Tax Paradox and Weak Tax Neutrality. Southern Economic Journal, 86(3), 1150–1169. https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12398
  38. Machado, J. C. F. (2022). Tributos e ambiente: a extrafiscalidade como indutora de práticas sustentáveis [Taxes and the Environment: The Extrafiscality as an Inducer of Sustainable Practices]. Novos Cadernos Naea, 25(3), 351–365.
  39. Magacho, G., Espagne, E., & Godin, A. (2023). Impacts of the CBAM on EU Trade Partners: Consequences For Developing Countries. Climate Policy, 24(2), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2200758
  40. Mohdali, R., Isa, K., & Yusoff, S. H. (2014). The Impact of Threat of Punishment on Tax Compliance and Non-Compliance Attitudes in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.079
  41. Motta, F., Freitas, L. B., & Freitas, G. B. R. (2021). Atuação Estatal por Indução: Tributação Extrafiscal Como Instrumento de Efetivação das Políticas Públicas [State Action by Induction: Extra-Taxation as an Instrument to Implement Public Policies]. A&C -Revista De Direito Administrativo & Constitucional, 21(83), 137–160. https://doi.org/10.21056/aec.v21i83.1352
  42. Niemann, R. (2004). Tax Rate Uncertainty, Investment Decisions, and Tax Neutrality. International Tax and Public Finance, 11(3), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:Itax.0000021971.56588.34
  43. Niemann, R., & Sureth, C. (2004). Tax Neutrality Under Irreversibility and Risk Aversion. Economics Letters, 84(1), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2003.12.010
  44. Niemann, R., & Sureth, C. (2013). Sooner or Later? Paradoxical Investment Effects of Capital Gains Taxation under Simultaneous Investment and Abandonment Flexibility. European Accounting Review, 22(2), 367–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2012.682781
  45. Perdana, S., & Vielle, M. (2023). Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism in the Transition to Net-Zero Emissions: Collective Implementation and Distributional Impacts. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 25(3), 299–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-023-00361-5
  46. Perdana, S., Vielle, M., & Oliveira, T. D. (2024). The EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Implications on Brazilian Energy Intensive Industries. Climate Policy, 24(2), 260–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2277405
  47. Pereira, P. R. (2010). Princípios Do Direito Fiscal Internacional: Do Paradigma Clássico Ao Direito Fiscal Europeu [Principles of International Tax Law: From the Classical Paradigm to European Tax Law]. Coimbra: Almedina.
  48. Pereira, P. R. (2015). Em Torno dos Princípios do Direito Fiscal Internacional [Around the Principles of International Tax Law]. In J. R. Catarino & V. B. Guimarães (Eds.), Lições de Fiscalidade (Vol. II). Guimarães: Almedina.
  49. Pirlot, A. (2022). Carbon Border Adjustment Measures: A Straightforward Multi-Purpose Climate Change Instrument? Journal of Environmental Law, 34(1), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqab028
  50. Pomerleau, S. (2023, June 9). What is in the Prove It Act introduced by Senator Coons and Senator Cramer? Niskanen Center. https://www.niskanencenter.org/what-is-in-the-prove-it-act-introduced-by-senator-coons-and-senator-cramer/
  51. Portuese, A., Gough, O., & Tanega, J. (2017). The Principle of Legal Certainty as a Principle of Economic Efficiency. European Journal of Law and Economics, 44(1), 131–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-014-9435-2
  52. Pozzetti, V. C., Souza, V. R. D., & Araújo, C. J. (2018). A possibilidade de implantação dos ICMS - Ecológicos no Estado do Amazonas [The possibility of implementing ICMS - Ecológicos in the State of Amazonas]. Revista Percurso, 3(26), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7430015
  53. Raitio, J. (2003). The Principle of Legal Certainty in EC Law. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  54. Salviejo, C. (2003). Le principe de securite juridique en droit communautaire [The principle of legal certainty in Community law]. [Doctoral dissertation, Universite de Montpellier]. Theses.fr.
  55. Sarfo, N. A. (2023, June 22). The Bipartisan Road to a U.S. Carbon Border Tax. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/taxnotes/2023/06/22/the-bipartisan-road-to-a-us-carbon-border-tax/
  56. Schwarze, J. (1992). European Administrative Law. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
  57. Selicato, G. (2022). The EU Proposal for a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: An Advanced Tool to Combat ‘Carbon Leakage’, a New EU Own Resource Of ‘Moral Suasion’ for Third Countries? Review of European and Comparative Law, 50(3), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.13920
  58. Shum, R. Y. (2024). Decarbonizing Contending Industries: Policy Design and the EU’s CBAM. Climate Policy, 24(2), 274–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2194275
  59. Skrodzka, V. (2017). Tax Neutrality at Leasing or Rural Farms. Ekonomia I Prawo - Economics and Law, 16(3), 343–353. https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2017.024
  60. Smith, T. K. (2023). U.S. Carbon Border Adjustment Proposals and World Trade Organization Compliance. American Action Forum. https://www.americanactionforum.org/insight/u-s-carbon-border-adjustment-proposals-and-world-trade-organization-compliance/
  61. Stockdale, J. (2009). Glass: A Small Part of the Climate Change Problem, a Large Part of the Solution. Boletin De La Sociedad Espanola De Ceramica Y Vidrio, 48(2), 53–58.
  62. Vanistendael, F. (2020). The Functioning of Fundamental Freedoms and Tax Neutrality in the Internal Market. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
  63. Weingertner, P. (2009, Oct 20–23). Economic Instruments in Water Management: Application of the Polluter Pays Principle - Examples in the Rhine Basin. [Conference presentation]. 4th International Yellow River Forum, Yellow River Conservancy Commiss, Zhengzhou, China.
  64. Wettestad, J. (2024). The EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Shaped and Saved by Shifting Multi-Level Reinforcement? Review of Policy Research, January 2024, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12597
  65. Wolff, G. (2024). Systemic Rivalry of China and the West in Climate Policy. Economists Voice, 20(2), 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1515/ev-2023-0048
  66. Yang, F., Zou, C. X., & Li, C. T. (2023). The Impact of Carbon Tariffs on China’s Agricultural Trade. Agriculture-Basel, 13(5), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13051013
  67. Zhang, Z. X. (2010). The US Proposed Carbon Tariffs and China’s Responses. Energy Policy, 38(5), 2168–2170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.026
  68. Zhong, J. R., & Pies, I. (2024). The Fairness Controversy over CBAM and its Policy Implications. Climate Change Economics, 15(01), 22. https://doi.org/10.1142/s201000782350029x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ceej-2025-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2543-6821 | Journal ISSN: 2544-9001
Language: English
Page range: 85 - 101
Published on: Mar 27, 2025
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year

© 2025 Susana Cristina Rodrigues Aldeia, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.