Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Boundaries of management performance measures (MPMs) disclosed in primary financial statements prepared in accordance with new standard planned to supersede IAS 1 Cover

Boundaries of management performance measures (MPMs) disclosed in primary financial statements prepared in accordance with new standard planned to supersede IAS 1

Central European Economic Journal
Volume 11 (2024): Issue 58 (January 2024)
By:
Open Access
|Jan 2024

References

  1. Alexander, D., & Archer, S. (2003). On economic reality, representational faithfulness and the “true and fair override.” Accounting and Business Research, 33(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2003.9729628
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Aljughaiman, A. A., Nguyen, T. H., Trinh, V. Q., & Du, A. (2023). The Covid-19 outbreak, corporate financial distress and earnings management. International Review of Financial Analysis, 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102675
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Ayu, M., Lindrianasari Gamayuni, R. R., & Urbański, M. (2020). The impact of environmental and social costs disclosure on financial performance mediating by earning management. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2020.21.2.06
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Bahrl, M., St-Pierre, J., & Sakka, O. (2016). Performance measurement and management for manufacturing SMEs: A financial-statement-based system. Measuring Business Excellence, 21(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-06-2015-0034
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Berliner, C., & Brimson, J. A. (1988). Cost management for today's advanced manufacturing: The CAM-I conceptual design. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Białek-Jaworska, A., & Dec, K. (2019). Pożyczki od jednostek powiązanych a wygładzanie zysków przez polskie przedsiębiorstwa prywatne. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, 102(158). https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.2499
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Boselie, P., Dietz, G., & Boon, C. (2005). Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research. Human Resource Management Journal, 15(3), 67–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2005.tb00154.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Brignall, S., Fitzgerald, L., Johnston, R., & Silvestro, R. (1991). Performance measurement in service businesses. Management Accounting, 69(10), 34–36.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Burchell, S., Clubb, C., & Hopwood, A. G. (1985). Accounting in its social context: Towards a history of value added in the United Kingdom. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 10(4), 381–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(85)90002-9
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Chandler, A., Jr. (1977). The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. Harvard University Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Chapman, C. S., Hopwood A. G., & Shields M. D. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of Management Accounting Research. Elsevier.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Chen, W., Harding, N., & He, W. (2021). Non-professional investors' judgments of reliability of fair value estimates – the impact of investor mood. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 33(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.2308/BRIA-19-035
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, Ch. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Cooper, R., & Kaplan, R. (1988). Measure cost right: Make the right decisions. Harvard Business Review, 66(5), 106–111.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Cutler, D. M., Poterba, J. M., & Summers, L. H. (1989). What moves the stock prices? Journal of Portfolio Management, 15, 4–12.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Deloitte. (2020, September 30). Deloitte comment letter on general presentation and disclosures. https://bit.ly/Deloitte-2020c
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. EFRAG. Primary financial statements. Targeted outreach activities. Corporates (2022, September). https://bit.ly/EFRAG-2022-09
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. EFRAG IASB Joint Online Roundtable. What are the implications of recent IASB decisions on primary financial statements? (2022, November 15). https://www.efrag.org/News/Meeting-502/PROGRAMMEEFRAG-IASB-online-roundtable---What-are-the-implications-of-the-recent-IASB-decisions-on-Primary-Financial-Statements-15-November-2022
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. FASB IASB Joint Educational Meeting. (2022, September). https://bit.ly/FASB-IASB-09-2022
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Gomoi, B. C., & Pantea, M. F. (2016). The impact of signaling theory and agency theory on the financial reporting. Lucrări Ştiinţifice Management Agricol, 18(2), 199–202. https://lsma.ro/index.php/lsma/article/view/860
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Harrison, P. D., & Harrell, A. (1993). Impact of “adverse selection” on managers' project evaluation decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 635–643.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Hartmann, B., Marton, J., & Söderström, R. (2018). The improbability of fraud in accounting for derivatives: A case study on the boundaries of financial reporting compliance. European Accounting Review, 27(5), 845–873. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2018.1494022
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Holthausen, R. W. (1990). Accounting method choice: Opportunistic behavior, efficient contracting, and information perspectives. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 12(1–3), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(90)90047-8
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. IFRS Accounting. Accounting Standards Advisory Forum Meeting. Staff paper. (2023, July). https://bit.ly/IFRS-07-2023
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. IFRS Foundation. IFRS completes technical work on two new IFRS Accounting Standards. (2023, July 26). https://www.ifrs.org/news-and-events/news/2023/07/iasb-completes-technical-work-ontwo-new-ifrs-accounting-standards/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. IFRS Foundation. IFRS standards exposure draft ED/2019/7: General presentation and disclosures. (2019, December). https://cdn.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/project/primary-financial-statements/exposure-draft/ed-general-presentation-disclosures.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. IFRS Foundation. Primary financial statements. (2023). https://www.ifrs.org/projects/work-plan/primary-financial-statements/#current-stage
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Jassim, A., Dexter, C. R., & Sidhu, A. (1988). Agency theory: Implications for financial management. Managerial Finance, 14(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb013600
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Kadous, K., Koonce, L., & Thayler, J. M. (2012). Do financial statements users judge relevance based on properties of reliability? The Accounting Review, 87(4), 1335–1356. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50157
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. https://hbr.org/1992/01/the-balanced-scorecard-measures-that-drive-performance-2 (Original work published in 1992).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Kennerly, M., & Neely, A. (2003). Measuring performance in a changing business environment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570310458465
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Khan, S., Khan, H., & Khan, F. (2019). Firms audit committee and external auditor influence on accounting conservatism and firm's performance. International Journal of Management, Accounting & Economics, 6(1), 22–47.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Knoeber, Ch. R., & McKee Jr., A. J. (1991). Accounting choice: The role of monitoring cost. Managerial and Decision Economics, 12(5), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090120503
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Lambert, R., Leuz, Ch., & Verrecchia, R. E. (2007). Accounting information, disclosure, and the cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 45(2), 385–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00238.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Liang, J., Yang, S., & Xia, Y. (2023). The role of financial slack on the relationship between demand uncertainty and operational efficiency. International Journal of Production Economics, 262, 108931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108931
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Lynch, R. L., & Cross, K. F. (1991). Measure-Up: The essential guide to measuring business performance. Mandarin.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Macintosh, N., Shearer, T., Thorton, D. B., & Welker, M. (2000). Accounting as simulacrum and hyperreality: Perspectives on income and capital. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 25, 13–50. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361-3682(99)00010-0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Macintosh, N. B. (2009). Accounting and the truth of earnings reports: Philosophical considerations. European Accounting Review, 18(1), 141–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180802327073
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Marilen, P., Flavia, B., & Lucia, N. M. (2013). The institutional investors' behaviour under the impact of the global financial crisis. Annals of the “Constantin Brâncuşi” University of Târgu Jiu, 1, 285–292. http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2013-01/39_Pirtea%20Marilen,%20Barna%20Flavia.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Maruszewska, E. W., Niesiobędzka, M., & Kołodziej, S. (2023). Why is it so hard to provide a faithful representation? The impact of indirectly evoked incentives on the accounting policy decision and the accountant's subsequent post-decision distortion. Meditari Accountancy Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-11-2021-1505
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Mavropulo, O., Rapp, M. S., & Udoieva, I. A. (2021). Value-based management control systems and the dynamics of working capital: Empirical evidence. Management Accounting Research, 52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2021.100740
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Micheli, P., & Mari, L. (2014). The theory and practice of performance measurement. Management Accounting Research, 25(2), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.005
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Morris, R. B. (1987). Signalling, agency theory and accounting policy choice. Accounting and Business Research, 18(69), 47–56. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:154914982
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. Neely, A. (Ed.) (2002). Business performance measurement. Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Neely, A., Mills, J., Platts, K., Richards. H., Gregory, M., Bourne, M., & Kennerly, M. (2000). Performance measurement system design: Developing and testing a process-based approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(10), 1119–1145. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570010343708
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. Palas, R., Solomon, D., Gafni, D., & Baum, I. (2023). Does wedge size matter? Financial reporting quality and effective regulation of dual-class firms. Finance Research Letters, 54, 103774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103774
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. Ross, S. A. (1973). The economic theory of agency: The principal's problem. Decision Making under Uncertainty, 63(2), 134–139.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. Taticchi, P., Tonelli, F., & Cagnazzo, L. (2009). A decomposition and hierarchical approach for business performance measurement and management. Measuring Business Excellence, 13(4), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040911006783
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. Van der Hauwaert, E., Hoozée, S., Maussen, S., & Bruggeman, W. (2022). The impact of enabling performance measurement on managers' autonomous work motivation and performance. Management Accounting Research, 55 100780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2021.100780
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ceej-2024-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2543-6821 | Journal ISSN: 2544-9001
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 16
Published on: Jan 5, 2024
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year
Keywords:
management performance measures,
MPM,
performance measurement,
IAS 1,
IFRS 18,
signalling theory,
agency theory
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Economic theory, systems and structures,
Microeconomics,
Macroeconomics,
Economic policy

© 2024 Ewa Wanda Maruszewska, Maciej Andrzej Tuszkiewicz, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 11 (2024): Issue 58 (January 2024)Next article