References
- Araar, A., Duclos, J-Y., Audet, M., & Makdissi, P. (2009). Testing for pro-poorness of growth, with an application to Mexico. Review of Income and Wealth, 55(4), 853–881.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00357.x - Ashley, R. (2007). Growth may be good for the poor, but decline is disastrous: On the non-robustness of the Dollar – Kraay result. International Review of Economics and Finance, 17, 333–338.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2007.09.001 - Atkinson, A. B. (1987). On the measurement of poverty. Econometrica, 55(4), 749–764.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1911028 - Bibi, S., Duclos, J.-Y., & Verdier-Chouchane, A. (2012). Assessing absolute and relative pro-poor growth, with an application to selected African countries. Economics: The Open-Access Open-Assessment E-Journal, 6, 20–127.
https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-7 - Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2002). Growth is good for the poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 7(3), 195–225.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020139631000 - Duclos, J. Y. (2009). What is pro-poor? Social Choice and Welfare, 32(1), 37–58.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0308-x - Essama-Nssah, B., & Lambert, P. J. (2009). Measuring pro-poorness: A unifying approach with new results. Review of Income and Wealth, 55(3), 752–778.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00335.x - Foster, J. E., & Shorrocks, A. F. (1988). Poverty orderings. Econometrica, 56(1), 173–177.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1911846 - Grimm, M. (2007). Removing the anonymity axiom in assessing pro-poor growth. Journal of Economic Inequality, 5(2), 179–197.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-006-9038-4 - Grosse, M., Harttgen, K., & Klasen, S. (2008). Measuring pro-poor growth in nonincome dimensions. World Development, 36(3), 1021–1047.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.009 - Harmáček, J., Syrovátka, M., & Dušková L. (2017), Pro-poor growth in East Africa. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 64(C), 82–93.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2016.07.002 - Kakwani, N., Khandker, S., & Son, H. H. (2004). Pro-Poor Growth: Concepts and Measurement with Country Case Studies. Working paper; New York: United Nations Development Programme.
https://doi.org/10.30541/v42i4Ipp.417-444 - Kakwani, N., & Pernia, E. M. (2000). What is pro-poor growth? Asian Development Review, 18(1), 1–16.
- Kakwani, N., & Son H. (2004). Pro-poor growth: concepts and measurement with country case studies. The Pakistan Development Review, 42(4), 417–444.
https://doi.org/10.30541/v42i4Ipp.417-444 - Kakwani, N., & Son, H. H. (2008). Poverty equivalent growth rate Review of Income and Wealth, 54(4), 643–655.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2008.00293.x - Kakwani, N., & Subbarao, K. (1990). Rural poverty and its alleviation in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 25(13), A2–A16.
- Klasen, S. (2008). Economic growth and poverty reduction: Measurement issues using income and non-income indicators. World Development, 36(3), 420–445.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.03.008 - Kośny, M., & Yalonetzky, G. (2015). Relative income change and pro-poor growth. Economia Politica, 32(3), 311–327.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-015-0017-8 - Kraay, A. (2006). When is growth pro-poor? Evidence from a panel of countries. Journal of Development Economics, 80(1), 198–227.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.02.004 - Layard, R., Mayraz, G., & Nickell, S. (2010). Does relative income matter? Are the critics right? In E. Diener, D. Kahneman, J. Lelliewell (Eds.), International Differences in Well-Being (pp. 139–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732739.003.0006 - Lo Bue, M., & Palmisano, F. (2019). The individual poverty incidence of growth. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 82(6), 1295–1321.
https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12362 - Lopez, H. (2006). Did Growth Become Less Pro-Poor in the 1990s? Washington, DC: World Bank.
https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3931 - Moyes, P. (1999). Stochastic dominance and the Lorenz curve., In J. Silber (Ed.), Handbook on Income Inequality Measurement. Boston: Kluwer, 199–225.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4413-1_7 - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007). DAC Guidelines and Reference Series Promoting Pro-Poor Growth: Policy Guidance for Donors. Paris: OECD.
- Panek, T. (2011). Poverty, Social Exclusion and Inequality. Theory and Measurement Practice. Warsaw: Warsaw School of Economics Press [in Polish].
- Panek, T., Zwierzchowski, J. (2021). Economic Growth, Poverty, Inequality, and Social Transfers in the European Union, Warsaw: SGH Publishing House.
- Pen, J. (1971). Income Distribution. New York: Praeger.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2230231 - Ravallion, M. (1994). Poverty Comparisons. Chur: Harwood Academic.
- Ravallion, M., & Chen, S. (2003). Measuring pro-poor growth. Economics Letters, 78(1), 93–99.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(02)00205-7 - Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2009). Absolute and relative poverty: The case of Mexico, 1992–2004. El Trimestre Economico, 76(301), 67–100.
- Son, H. H. (2004), A note on pro-poor growth. Economics Letters, 82(3), 307–314.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2003.08.003 - Son, H. H., & Kakwani, N. (2008). Global estimates of pro-poor growth. World Development, 36(6), 1048–1066.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.002 - Subramanian, S. (2004). Indicators on Inequality and Poverty. Helsinki: World Institute for Development Economics Research, United Nations University.
- Tebaldi, E., & Kim, J (2015). Is income growth in the United States pro-poor? A state-level analysis. Eastern Economic Journal, 41(2), 251–272.
https://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2014.14 - Zeman, K., & Shamsuddin, S. (2017). Linear and non-linear relationships between growth, inequality, and poverty in a panel of Latin America and the Caribbean countries: A new evidence of pro-poor growth. Social Indicators Research, 41(2), 251–272.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1581-9 - Zheng, B., (1997). Aggregate poverty measures. Journal of Economic Surveys, 11(2), 123–162.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00028