Has Economic Growth in Balkan Countries Been Pro-Poor in the 2012–2017 period?
By:
References
- Araar, A., Duclos, J-Y., Audet, M., & Makdissi, P. (2009). Testing for pro-poorness of growth, with an application to Mexico.
Review of Income and Wealth , 55(4), 853–881. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00357.x - Ashley, R. (2007). Growth may be good for the poor, but decline is disastrous: On the non-robustness of the Dollar – Kraay result.
International Review of Economics and Finance , 17, 333–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2007.09.001 - Atkinson, A. B. (1987). On the measurement of poverty.
Econometrica , 55(4), 749–764. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911028 - Bibi, S., Duclos, J.-Y., & Verdier-Chouchane, A. (2012).
Assessing absolute andrelative pro-poor growth, with anapplication toselected African countries. Economics: The Open-Access Open-Assessment E-Journal , 6, 20–127. https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-7 - Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2002). Growth is good for the poor.
Journal of Economic Growth , 7(3), 195–225. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020139631000 - Duclos, J. Y. (2009). What is pro-poor?
Social Choice and Welfare , 32(1), 37–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0308-x - Essama-Nssah, B., & Lambert, P. J. (2009). Measuring pro-poorness: A unifying approach with new results.
Review of Income and Wealth , 55(3), 752–778. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00335.x - Foster, J. E., & Shorrocks, A. F. (1988). Poverty orderings.
Econometrica , 56(1), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911846 - Grimm, M. (2007). Removing the anonymity axiom in assessing pro-poor growth.
Journal of Economic Inequality , 5(2), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-006-9038-4 - Grosse, M., Harttgen, K., & Klasen, S. (2008). Measuring pro-poor growth in nonincome dimensions.
World Development , 36(3), 1021–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.009 - Harmáček, J., Syrovátka, M., & Dušková L. (2017), Pro-poor growth in East Africa.
The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance , 64(C), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2016.07.002 - Kakwani, N., Khandker, S., & Son, H. H. (2004).
Pro-Poor Growth: Concepts and Measurement with Country Case Studies . Working paper; New York: United Nations Development Programme. https://doi.org/10.30541/v42i4Ipp.417-444 - Kakwani, N., & Pernia, E. M. (2000). What is pro-poor growth?
Asian Development Review , 18(1), 1–16. - Kakwani, N., & Son H. (2004). Pro-poor growth: concepts and measurement with country case studies.
The Pakistan Development Review , 42(4), 417–444. https://doi.org/10.30541/v42i4Ipp.417-444 - Kakwani, N., & Son, H. H. (2008). Poverty equivalent growth rate
Review of Income and Wealth , 54(4), 643–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2008.00293.x - Kakwani, N., & Subbarao, K. (1990). Rural poverty and its alleviation in India.
Economic and Political Weekly , 25(13), A2–A16. - Klasen, S. (2008). Economic growth and poverty reduction: Measurement issues using income and non-income indicators.
World Development , 36(3), 420–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.03.008 - Kośny, M., & Yalonetzky, G. (2015). Relative income change and pro-poor growth.
Economia Politica , 32(3), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-015-0017-8 - Kraay, A. (2006). When is growth pro-poor? Evidence from a panel of countries.
Journal of Development Economics , 80(1), 198–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.02.004 - Layard, R., Mayraz, G., & Nickell, S. (2010). Does relative income matter? Are the critics right? In E. Diener, D. Kahneman, J. Lelliewell (Eds.),
International Differences in Well-Being (pp. 139–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732739.003.0006 - Lo Bue, M., & Palmisano, F. (2019). The individual poverty incidence of growth.
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics , 82(6), 1295–1321. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12362 - Lopez, H. (2006).
Did Growth Become Less Pro-Poor in the 1990s? Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3931 - Moyes, P. (1999). Stochastic dominance and the Lorenz curve., In J. Silber (Ed.),
Handbook on Income Inequality Measurement. Boston: Kluwer, 199–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4413-1_7 - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007).
DAC Guidelines and Reference Series Promoting Pro-Poor Growth: Policy Guidance for Donors . Paris: OECD. - Panek, T. (2011).
Poverty, Social Exclusion and Inequality. Theory and Measurement Practice. Warsaw: Warsaw School of Economics Press [in Polish]. - Panek, T., Zwierzchowski, J. (2021).
Economic Growth, Poverty, Inequality, and Social Transfers in the European Union , Warsaw: SGH Publishing House. - Pen, J. (1971).
Income Distribution. New York: Praeger. https://doi.org/10.2307/2230231 - Ravallion, M. (1994).
Poverty Comparisons . Chur: Harwood Academic. - Ravallion, M., & Chen, S. (2003). Measuring pro-poor growth.
Economics Letters , 78(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(02)00205-7 - Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2009). Absolute and relative poverty: The case of Mexico, 1992–2004.
El Trimestre Economico , 76(301), 67–100. - Son, H. H. (2004), A note on pro-poor growth.
Economics Letters , 82(3), 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2003.08.003 - Son, H. H., & Kakwani, N. (2008). Global estimates of pro-poor growth.
World Development , 36(6), 1048–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.002 - Subramanian, S. (2004).
Indicators on Inequality and Poverty. Helsinki: World Institute for Development Economics Research, United Nations University. - Tebaldi, E., & Kim, J (2015). Is income growth in the United States pro-poor? A state-level analysis.
Eastern Economic Journal , 41(2), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2014.14 - Zeman, K., & Shamsuddin, S. (2017). Linear and non-linear relationships between growth, inequality, and poverty in a panel of Latin America and the Caribbean countries: A new evidence of pro-poor growth.
Social Indicators Research , 41(2), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1581-9 - Zheng, B., (1997). Aggregate poverty measures.
Journal of Economic Surveys , 11(2), 123–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00028
Language: English
Page range: 76 - 92
Published on: May 20, 2022
Published by: Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2022 Jan Zwierzchowski, Tomasz Panek, published by Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.