Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The voting of EU members for common consolidated corporate tax base and the tax benefits Cover

The voting of EU members for common consolidated corporate tax base and the tax benefits

Open Access
|Sep 2020

References

  1. Altshuler, R., & Grubert, H. (2010). Formula apportionment: Is it better than the current system and are there better alternatives? National Tax Journal, 63(4), 1145–1184.
  2. Aspinwall, M. (2002). Preferring Europe. Ideology and national preferences on European integration. European Union Politics, 3(1), 81–111.
  3. Bertelsen, S. H. (2017). CCTB/CCCTB positions and ongoing processes. Confederation of Danish Industry. Retrieved from https://www.eu-skatteret.dk/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/CCTB-CCCTB-positions-and-ondgoing-processes-in-countries-and-business.pdf (Accessed 24.03.2020)
  4. Bettendorf, L., Devereux, M., van der Horst, A., Loretz, S., & de Mooij, R. (2010). Corporate tax harmonization in the EU. Economic Policy, 25, 537–590.
  5. Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The Calculus of consent: Logical foundation of constitutional democracy. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
  6. Ceuppens, S. (2015). CCCTB: Analysis of the voting behaviour of members of the European Parliament. Universteit Gent. Retrieved from https://lib.ugent.be/fulltxt/RUG01/002/215/334/RUG01-002215334_2015_0001_AC.pdf (Accessed 31.05.2020)
  7. Cline, R., Neubig, T., Phillips, A., & Walsh, A. (2010). Study on the economic and budgetary impact of the introduction of a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base in the European Union. Retrieved from http://estaticos.expansionpro.orbyt.es/estaticas/descargas/2011/02/informeeyoung.pdf (Accessed 31.05.2020)
  8. Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs. (2017). Amendments 31 – 301. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECONAM-609575_EN.pdf (Accessed 24.03.2020)
  9. Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs. (2018). Report on the proposal for a Council directive on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) (COM(2016)0683 – C8-0471/2016 – 2016/0336(CNS)). Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0051_EN.html# (Accessed 24.03.2020)
  10. Committee on Legal Affairs. (2017). Amendments 16 – 45. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AM-604719_EN.pdf (Accessed 24.03.2020)
  11. Council of the European Union. (2016). Council directive on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/ (Accessed 24.03.2020)
  12. Council of the European Union. (2018). Common consolidated corporate tax base. Retrieved from http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/ccctb/ (Accessed 24.03.2020)
  13. De Lange, E., Hayes, B., & Hoekmark, G. (2018). The great EU corporate tax lie. Retrieved from https://euobserver.com/opinion/141092 (Accessed 24.03.2020)
  14. Devereux, M. P., & Loretz, S. (2008). The effects of EU formula apportionment on corporate tax revenues. Fiscal Studies, 29(1), 1–33.
  15. Eggert, W., & Schjelderup, G. (2003). Symmetric tax competition and formula apportionment. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 5(2), 439–446.
  16. European Commission. (2011). Questions and answers on the CCCTB. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-11-171_en.htm (Accessed 24.03.2020)
  17. European Commission. (2016a). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Building a fair, competitive and stable corporate tax system for the EU. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF (Accessed 24.03.2020).
  18. European Commission. (2016b). Impact assessment accompanying the document proposals for a Council Directive on a CCTB and CCCTB. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/sites/taxation/files/swd_2016_341_en.pdf (Accessed 31.05.2020)
  19. European Parliament. (2018a). Briefing: Common Corporate Tax Base (CCTB). Member's Research Service.
  20. European Parliament. (2018b). Briefing: Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB). European Parliamentary Research Service.
  21. European Parliament. (2018c). Parlemeter 2018 – Taking up the challenge: From (silent) support to actual vote. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/at-your-service/en/be-heard/eurobarometer/parlemeter-2018-taking-up-the-challenge (Accessed 31.05.2020)
  22. Faas, T. (2003). To defect or not to defect? National, institutional and party group pressures on MEPs and their consequences for party group. European Journal of Political Research, 42, 841–866.
  23. Fuest, C., Hemmelgarn, T., & Ramb, F. (2007). How would the introduction of an EU-wide formula apportionment affect the distribution and size of the corporate tax base? An analysis based on German multinationals. International Tax and Public Finance, 14(5), 605–626.
  24. Giger, N. (2009). Towards a modern gender gap in Europe? A comparative analysis of voting behavior in 12 countries. The Social Science Journal, 46, 474–492.
  25. Heinemann, F., Mohl, P., & Osterloh, S. (2009). Who's afraid of an EU tax and why? — revenue system preferences in the European Parliament. The Review of International Organizations, 4(1), 73–99.
  26. Hellerstein, W. (2019). The transformation of the state corporate income tax into market based levy. Journal of Taxation, 130(5), 4–20.
  27. Hellerstein, W., & McLure, C. (2004). The European Commission's report on company income taxation: What the EU can learn from the experience of the US States. International Tax and Public Finance, 11, 199–220.
  28. Hines, J. R. (2009). Income misatribution under formula apportionment. NBER Working Paper Series, 15185.
  29. Hix, S., & Noury, A. (2009). After enlargement: Voting patterns in the sixth European Parliaments. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 34(2), 159–174.
  30. Iwin-Garzyńska, J. (2012). Opodatkowanie kosztu długu przedsiębiorstwa a koncepcja wspólnej skonsolidowanej podstawy opodatkowania. Finanse w niestabilnym otoczeniu -dylematy i wyzwania, 89–97.
  31. Krchniva, K. (2014). Comparison of European, Canadian and U.S. Formula apportionment on real data. Procedia Economics and Finance, 12, 309–318.
  32. Kudła, J. (2013). Ekonomia Opodatkowania Międzynarodowego (pp. 323–331). Warszawa, Poland: Difin SA.
  33. Kutarba, M. (2011). Polska może stracić na wspólnej podstawie podatkowej. Retrieved from http://www.obserwatorfinansowy.pl/forma/debata/polskamoze-stracic-na-wspolnej-podstawie-podatkowej/ (Accessed 24.03.2020)
  34. Marceau, N., Mongrain, S., & Wilson, J. (2010). Why do most countries set high tax rates on capital? Journal of International Economics, 80, 249–259.
  35. Marks, G., & Wilson, C. J. (2002). Does left/right structure party positions on European integration? Comparative Political Studies, 35(8), 965–989.
  36. Mcelroy, G., & Benoit, K. (2011). Policy positioning in the European Parliament. European Union Politics, 13(1), 150–167.
  37. Nogueira, C. G., & Veiga, L. G. (2010). Economic determinants of citizens’ support for the Europe Union. Documentos de Trabalho Working Paper Series.
  38. Orłowski, W. M. (2008). Propozycja Wspólnej Skonsolidowanej Bazy CIT – wpływ na polską gospodarkę. Warszawa. Retrieved from http://www.pte.pl/pliki/2/1/w_orlowski_cit.pdf (Accessed 24.03.2020).
  39. Pethig, R., & Wagener, A. (2007). Profit tax competition and formula apportionment. International Tax and Public Finance, 14, 631–655.
  40. Roggeman, A., Verleyen, I., Van Cauwenberge, P., & Coppens, C. (2015). Did the economic impact of a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) affect the voting behaviour of the members of the European Parliament? De Economist, 163, 1–23.
  41. Selck, T. J. (2006). Preferences and procedures: European Union legislative decision-making. Dordrecht: Springer.
  42. Spengel, C., Ortmann-Babel, M., Zinn, B., & Matenaer, S. (2012). A common corporate tax base for Europe: An impact assessment of the draft Council directive on a CC(C)TB. Centre for European Economic Research, (12–039). Retrieved from http://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp12039.pdf (Accessed 31.05.2020)
  43. University of Portsmouth. (2013). Module 2: Understanding EU policy making. Retrieved from http://hum.port.ac.uk/europeanstudieshub/learning/module-2-understanding-eu-policy-making/ (Accessed 29.06.2020)
  44. Vella, M. (2018). Malta braces itself for MEPs’ vote on common corporate tax. Retrieved from https://www.maltatoday.com.mt/news/europe/85199/malta_taxation_corporate_ccctb_brussels_european_parliament#.XGHyeTNKiUk (Accessed 24.03.2020)
  45. VoteWatch Europe. (2018). Common consolidated corporate tax base. Retrieved from https://www.votewatch.eu/en/term8-common-consolidated-corporate-tax-base-draft-legislative-resolution-vote-commission-proposal-consult.html (Accessed 24.03.2020)
  46. Zodrow, G., & Mieszkowski, P. (1986). Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation, and the underprovision of public goods. Journal of Urban Economics, 19, 356–370.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ceej-2020-0005 | Journal eISSN: 2543-6821 | Journal ISSN: 2544-9001
Language: English
Page range: 56 - 71
Published on: Sep 9, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Wojciech Dąbroś, Janusz Kudła, published by Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.