Type of play and similar taxonomies_ Literature review
| Study | Category | Taxonomy |
|---|---|---|
| Throsby (1990) | Repertoire classification | Written before 1900 (“classic”) |
| Abbé-Decarroux (1994) | Repertoire classification | “Classic” play (written before 1900) |
| Urrutiaguer (2002) | Repertoire classification | “Classics”: author died before 1900 |
| Corning and Levy (2002) | Genre | Comedy |
| Willis and Snowball (2009) | Genre | Classic |
| Production type | Comedy | |
| Grisolía and Willis (2011, 2012) | Repertoire classification/type of a play | Comedy |
| Grisolía and Willis (2016) | Type of play | Drama |
| Context | Written before 1900 | |
| Type of production | Modern | |
| Wiśniewska and Czajkowski (2017) | Entertainment |
Quality dimensions from two projects
| Quality dimension | Description |
|---|---|
| Relevance (A/E) | It had something to say about today’s world/the world in which we live |
| Captivation (A/E) | It was absorbing and held my attention |
| Originality (A/E) | It was ground-breaking |
| Distinctiveness (A/E) | It was different from things I have experienced before |
| Excellence – global (A/E)* | It was amongst the best of its type [in the world]*. |
| Excellence – local (A/E)* | It was amongst the best of its type [in Australia]* |
| Risk (A/E) | The artists/curators really challenged themselves with this |
| Rigor (A/E) | It seemed well thought through and put together |
| Presentation (E) | It was well produced and presented |
| Challenge (E) | It was thought-provoking |
| Enthusiasm (E) | I would come to something like this again |
| Local impact (E) | It is important that it is happening here |
| Concept (E) | It was an interesting idea |