References
- WYKEHAM FARRANCE ENGINEERING LTD OPERATORS MANUAL.: Bromhead Ring Shear Apparatus (Slough, England Engineering Ltd, Slough, England, 1988.).
- ANAYI, J.T. - BOYCE, J.R, and RODGER, C.D.F.: Comparison of Alternative Methods of Measuring the Residual Strength of a Clay. Transportation Research Record 1192, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC,1988, pp.16-26.
- ANDERSON, W.F. – HAMMOUD, F.: Effect of Testing Procedure in Ring Shear Tests. Geotech. Test. J., ASTM, Vol. 11, Iss. 3, 1988, pp. 204-207 ASTM Standard D 6467-99.
- STARK, T.D. – VETTEL, J.J.: Bromhead Ring Shear Test Procedure. Geotech. Test. J., ASTM, Vol. 15, Iss. 1, 1992, pp. 24-32.
- KAKOU, B.G. - SHIMIZU, H. NISHIMURA, S. – MATSUMUTO, Y.: Residual shear strength of landslide soils by presheared flush testing for stability quantification. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 7, Bundle A – 2002.
- MEEHAN, L.C. – BRANDON, T. – DUNCAN, J.M.: Measuring Drained Residual Strengths in the Bromhead Ring Shear, Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol.30, Iss. 6, 2007.
- UESUGI, M. – KISHIDA, H.: Frictional resistance at yield between dry sand and mild steel. Soils Found, 1986.
- ZHANG, G. – LIANG, D. - ZHANG, J.-M.: Image analysis measurement of soil particle movement during a soil–structure interface test. Comput. Geotech, Vol. 33, Iss. (4-5), 2006, pp. 248–259.
- FELIGHA, M. – HAMMOUD, F. – BELACHIA, M. – NOUAOURIA, M.S.: Experimental investigation of frictional behavior between cohesive soils and solid materials using direct shear apparatus. J Geotech Geol Eng, Vol.34, Iss. 2, 2015, pp. 567–578.
- MARTINEZ, A. – FROST, J.D.: The influence of surface roughness form on the strength of sand-structure interface. Geotechnique letters, Vol. 7, Iss. 1, 2016, pp. 1-8.
- TEJINDER, T. – DEEPAK, M., PRIYANKA, S. – SHASHWAT, K. – KALA, V. U.: Interface behavior between soil and different surface textures. Geotechnical Characterization and Modelling, Vo. 85, 2020, pp.353–364.
- DEJONG, J.T. – FROST, D. – CARGILL.E.: Effect of surface texturing on CPT friction sleeve measurements. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, Vol.127. Iss. 2, 2001, pp. 158–168.
- TAN, W.H. – LEE, C.Y. – SIVADASS, T.: Behaviour of clay-steel interfaces. Int Conf Construct Build Technol, 2008, 2: pp. 11-20.
- TSUBAKIHARA, Y. - KISHIDA, H.: Frictional behaviour between normally consolidated clay and steel by two direct shear type apparatuses. Soils Found, Vol. 33, Iss. 2, 1993, pp. 1–13.
- MITCHELL, J.K. - VILLET, W.C.: Reinforcement of Earth Slopes and Embankments; NCHRP Report; Transportation Research Board: Washington, DC, USA, 1987.
- SUBBA RAO, K.S. – ALLAM, M.M. – ROBINSON, R.G.: Interfacial friction between sands and solid surfaces. Proc. Instn Civil Engrs – Geotech. Engng, Vol.131, Iss. 2, 1998, pp.75–82, doi: org/10.1680/igeng.1998.30112.
- DIETZ, M. – LINGS, M.: Postpeak strength of interfaces in a stress-dilatancy framework. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Engng, Vol.132, Iss. 11, 2006, pp. 1474–1484.
- IRSYAM, M. – HRYCIW, R.D.: Friction and passive resistance in soil reinforced by plane ribbed inclusions. Géotechnique, Vol. 41, Iss. 4, 1991, pp. 485–498, doi: org/10.1680/geot.1991.41.4.485.
- FROST, J.D. – DEJONG, J.T.: In situ assessment of the role of surface roughness on interface response. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Engng, Vol. 131, Iss. 4, 2005, pp. 498–511.
- HEBELER, G.L. - MARTINEZ, A. – FROST, and J.D.: Shear: Zone evolution of granular soils in contact with conventional and textured CPT friction sleeves. KSCE J. Civil Engng, Vol. 20, Iss. 4, 2015, pp. 1267–1282.