Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Impact of Turbulence Models of Wind Pressure on two Buildings with Atypical Cross-Sections Cover

Impact of Turbulence Models of Wind Pressure on two Buildings with Atypical Cross-Sections

Civil and Environmental Engineering
Volume 17 (2021): Issue 2 (December 2021)
By:
Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. [1] STATHOPOULOS, T.: Computational wind engineering: past achievements and future challenges. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 67–68, 1997, pp. 509–532, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00097-4.10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00097-4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] BAKER, C. J.: Wind engineering - past, present and future. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 95, 2007, pp. 843–870, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2007.01.011.10.1016/j.jweia.2007.01.011
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] BLOCKEN, B.: 50 years of computational wind engineering: past, present and future. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 129, 2014, pp. 69–102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2014.03.008.10.1016/j.jweia.2014.03.008
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] BLOCKEN, B.: Computational Fluid Dynamics for urban physics: Importance, scales, possibilities, limitations and ten tips and tricks towards accurate and reliable simulations. Building and Environment, Vol. 91, 2015, pp. 219–245, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.015.10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.015
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] MOK, W. K. – CHOW, W. K.: Verification and validation in modeling fire by computational fluid dynamics. International Journal on Architectural Science, Vol. 5, Iss. 3, 2004, pp. 58–67, https://www.bse.polyu.edu.hk/researchCentre/Fire_Engineering/summary_of_output/journal/IJAS/V5/p.58-67.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] CHARNEY, J. G.: The use of the primitive equations of motion in numerical prediction. Tellus, Vol. 7, 1955, pp. 22–26, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1955.tb01138.x.10.1111/j.2153-3490.1955.tb01138.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] SMAGORINSKY, J.: On the numerical integration of the primitive equations of motion for baroclinic flow in a closed region. Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 86, Iss. 12, 1958, pp. 457–466, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1958)086<0457:OTNIOT>2.0.CO;2.10.1175/1520-0493(1958)086<0457:OTNIOT>2.0.CO;2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] MURAKAMI, S. – MOCHIDA, A.: Past, present and future of CWE. The view from 1999. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Wind Engineering, Copenhagen, 1999, pp. 91–104.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] MURAKAMI, S.: Overview of turbulence models applied in CWE–1997. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 74–76, 1998, pp. 1–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00004-X.10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00004-X
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] RICHARDS, P. J. – HOXEY, R. P.: Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engineering models using the k-ε turbulence model. Computational Wind Engineering 1, Elsevier, 1993, pp. 145–153, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-81688-7.50018-8.10.1016/B978-0-444-81688-7.50018-8
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] BLOCKEN, B. – STATHOPOULOS, T – CARMELIET, J.: CFD simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: wall function problems. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 41, Iss. 2, 2007, pp. 238–252, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.08.019.10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.08.019
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] FRANKE, J. – HELLSTEN, A. – SCHLÜNZEN, H. – CARISSIMO, B.: Best practice guideline for the CFD simulation of flows in the urban environment. COST Office, 2007.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] YANG, Y. – GU, M. – CHEN, S. – JIN, X.: New inflow boundary conditions for modelling the neutral equilibrium atmospheric boundary layer in computational wind engineering. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 97, Iss. 2, 2009, pp. 88–95, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2008.12.001.10.1016/j.jweia.2008.12.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] MURAKAMI, S. – MOCHIDA, A.: Three-dimensional numerical simulation of turbulent flow around buildings using the k−ε turbulence model. Building and Environment, Vol. 24, Iss. 1, 1989, pp. 51–64, https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1323(89)90016-4.10.1016/0360-1323(89)90016-4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] MURAKAMI, S. – MOCHIDA, A. – HAYASHI, Y. – SAKAMOTO, S.: Numerical study on velocity-pressure field and wind forces for bluff bodies by κ-ϵ, ASM and LES. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 44, Iss. 1–3, 1992, pp. 2841–2852, https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(92)90079-P.10.1016/0167-6105(92)90079-P
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] MURAKAMI, S.: Comparison of various turbulence models applied to a bluff body. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 46–47, 1993, pp. 21–36, https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(93)90112-2.10.1016/0167-6105(93)90112-2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] JONES, W. P. – LAUNDER, B. E.: The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 15, Iss. 2, 1972, pp. 301–314, https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(72)90076-2.10.1016/0017-9310(72)90076-2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] SHIH, T. – LIOU, W. W. – SHABBIR, A. – YANG, Z. – ZHU, J.: A new k-ϵ eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows. Computers & Fluids, Vol. 24, Iss. 3, 1995, pp. 227–238, https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7930(94)00032-T.10.1016/0045-7930(94)00032-T
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] WILCOX, D. C.: Turbulence modeling for CFD. Vol. 2, 1998, pp. 103–217 La Canada, CA: DCW industries.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] MENTER, F. R.: Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal, Vol. 32, Iss. 8, 1994, pp. 1598–1605, https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149.10.2514/3.12149
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] HUBOVÁ, O – LOBOTKA, P.: The Multipurpose New Wind Tunnel STU. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Vol. 10, Iss. 1, 2014, pp. 1–9, https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2014-0001.10.2478/cee-2014-0001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] STN EN 1991-1-4, Eurocode 1: Actions on structures. Part 1-4: General actions. Wind actions, Slovak Office of Standards, Metrology and Testing, 2007.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] CERMAK, J. E. et al.: Wind Tunnel Studies of Buildings and Structures: ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice, 1999, Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] MEDVECKÁ, S – IVÁNKOVÁ, O. – MACÁK, M. – MICHALCOVÁ, V.: Determination of Pressure Coefficient for a High-rise Building with Atypical Ground Plan. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Vol. 14, Iss. 2, 2018, pp. 138–145, https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2018-0018.10.2478/cee-2018-0018
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] TOMINAGA, Y. – MOCHIDA, A. – YOSHIE, R. – KATAOKA, H. – NOZU, T. – YOSHIKAWA, M. – SHIRASAWA, T.: AIJ guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedestrian wind environment around buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 96, Iss. 10 - 11, 2008, pp. 1749–1761, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.058.10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.058
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] VAN HOOFF, T. – BLOCKEN, B.: Coupled urban wind flow and indoor natural ventilation modelling on a high-resolution grid: a case study for the Amsterdam ArenA stadium. Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol. 25, Iss. 1, 2010, pp. 51–65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.07.008.10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.07.008
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide, ANSYS, Inc., 275 Technology Drive Canonsburg, PA 15317, November 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] CHANG, J. C. – HANNA, S. R.: Air quality model performance evaluation. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, Vol. 87, 2004, pp. 167–196, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-003-0070-710.1007/s00703-003-0070-7
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2021-0044 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6512 | Journal ISSN: 1336-5835
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 409 - 419
Published on: Dec 9, 2021
Published by: University of Žilina
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Atypical cross-section,
External pressure coefficient,
Wind tunnel,
Computational fluid dynamics
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Economic theory, systems and structures,
Business management,
Industries,
Environmental management

© 2021 Michal Franek, Marek Macák, Oľga Hubová, Oľga Ivánková, published by University of Žilina
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 17 (2021): Issue 2 (December 2021)Next article