References
- A
izerman , M. A.and Malishevski , A. V. (1981) General theory of best variants choice. Some aspects. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-26, 1030-1040. - F
elsenthal , D. S.and Nurmi H. (2017) Monotonicity Failures Afficting Procedures for Electing a Single Candidate. Springer, Cham, Switzerland. - F
elsenthal , D. S.and Nurmi , H. (2018) Voting Procedures for Electing a Single Candidate. Springer, Cham, Switzerland. - F
elsenthal , D. S.and Nurmi H. (2019) Voting Procedures Under a Restricted Domain. Springer, Cham, Switzerland. - F
ishburn , P. C. (1974) Paradoxes of voting. American Political Review 68, 537-546. - F
ishburn , P. C. (1977) Condorcet social choice functions. Journal of Applied Mathematics 33, 469-489. - F
ishburn , P. C. (1982) Monotonicity paradoxes in the theory of elections. Discrete Applied Mathematics 4, 119-134. - F
ishburn , P. C.and Brams , S. J. (1983) Paradoxes of preferential voting. Mathematics Magazine 56, 207-214. - G
azeta Wyborcza , http://wyborcza.pl/7,113768,20925157,konkurs-wieniawskiego-2016-wewnetrzna-wojna-jurorow.htmldisableRedirects=true November 29, 2018 (Wieniawski competition, war of jurors) (in Polish). - G
ibbard , A. (1974) A Pareto-consistent libertarian claim. Journal of Economic Theory 7 388-410. - J
anuszkiewicz , M.and Chorościak , E. (2016) Konkurs skrzypcowy im. Wieniawskiego w Poznaniu (Wieniawski Violin Competition in Poznań). Ruch Muzyczny. 50-55 (in Polish). - K
ontek , K.and Sosnowska , H. (2020) Specific Tastes or Cliques of Jurors? How to Reduce the Level of Manipulation in Group Decisions? Group Decision and Negotiation, 29, 1057-1084. - L
ouis , P., Nunez , M.and Xefteris , D. (2023) Trimming extreme reports in preference aggregation. Games and Economic Behavior 137, 116-151. - M
oulin , H. (1988) Condorcet’s principle implies the No-Show paradox. Journal of Economic Theory 45, 533-64. - N
urmi , H. (1987) Comparing Voting Systems. Reidel, Dordrecht. - N
urmi , H. (2004) A comparison of some distance-based choice rules in ranking environments. Theory and Decision 57, 5-24. - R
amsza , M.and Sosnowska , H. (2020) Trials of characterizations of anti-manipulation method. Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXXV, 21-37. - S
aari , D. G.and Barney , S. (2003) Consequences of reversing preferences. Mathematical Intelligencer 25, 17-31. - S
atherwaitte , M. A. (1975) Strategy-proofness and Arrow’s condition: existence and correspondence for voting procedures and social welfare functions. Journal of Economic Theory 10, 187-217. - S
en , A. K.(1970) Collective Choice and Social Welfare . Holden-Day, San Francisco. - S
osnowska , H.and Zawiślak , P. (2019) Differences of voting of jurors in classical music competitions. Analysis using MCDM and network theory. Multiple Criteria Decision Making 14, 100-114. - W
oodall , D. R. (1994) Properties of preferential election rules. Voting Matters 3, 8-15. - Y
oung , H. P. (1974) An axiomatization of Borda’s rule. Journal of Economic Theory 9. 43-52. - Y
oung , H. P. (1975) Social choice scoring functions. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 28, 824-838.