Voting and MCDM: the pedagogy of the Saari triangle
References
- Arrow, K. J. (1951) Social Choice and Individual Values. Yale University Press (2nd ed., 1963).
- Baum, S. D. (2020) Social choice ethics in artificial intelligence. AI & Soc 35, 165–176.10.1007/s00146-017-0760-1
- Brandt, F., Conitzer, V., Endriss, U., Lang, J. and Procaccia, A. D., eds. (2016) Handbook of Computational Social Choice. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.10.1017/CBO9781107446984.002
- Brams, S. J. and Fishburn, P. C. (2002) Voting Procedures. In: K. J. Arrow, A. K. Sen and K. Suzumura, eds., Handbooks in Economics 19: Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 1. Elsevier B.V.10.1016/S1574-0110(02)80008-X
- Eggers, A. C. (2021) A diagram for analyzing ordinal voting systems. Soc Choice Welf 56, 143–171.10.1007/s00355-020-01274-y
- Endriss, U. (2018) Judgement aggregation with rationality and feasibility constraints. In: AAMAS ’18: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC.
- Gerasimou, G. (2018) Indecisiveness, Undesirability and Overload Revealed Through Rational Choice Deferral. The Economic Journal, 128, 2450–2479.10.1111/ecoj.12500
- Gorban, A. N., Makarov, V. A. and Tyukin I.Y. (2020) High-Dimensional Brain in a High-Dimensional World: Blessing of Dimensionality. Entropy 22, 82.10.3390/e22010082751651833285855
- Hansson, S. O. and Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2017) Preferences. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [Accessed: 2021, May 09]. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/preferences/
- List, C. (2013) Social choice theory. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [Accessed: 2021, May 09]. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/social-choice/
- Nurmi, H. and Meskanen, T. (2000) Voting Paradoxes and MCDM. Group Decision and Negotiation, 9, 297-313.10.1023/A:1008618017659
- Pacuit, E. (2011) Voting methods. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [Accessed: 2021, May 09]. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/voting-methods/
- Pini, M. S., Rossi, F., Venable, K. B. and Walsh, T. (2001) Incompleteness and incomparability in preference aggregation: Complexity results. Artificial Intelligence 175, 1272–1289.10.1016/j.artint.2010.11.009
- Rabinowicz, W. (2012) Value relations revisited. Economics & Philosophy 28, 133-164.10.1017/S0266267112000144
- Romney, M., Tan, Y. and Tang, M. (2016) Three-Candidate Elections Using Saari Triangles. Wolfram Demonstrations Project. [Accessed: 2021, May 09]. Available from: https://demonstrations.wolfram.com/ThreeCandidateElectionsUsingSaariTriangles/
- Saari, D.G. (1992) Millions of election outcomes from a single profile. Soc Choice Welfare 9, 277–306.10.1007/BF00182572
- Saari, D.G. (1994) Geometry of Voting. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
- Saari, D. G. (1999) Explaining All Three-Alternative Voting Outcomes. Journal of Economic Theory, 87, 2, 313-355.10.1006/jeth.1999.2541
- Saari, D. G. (2008) Complexity and the geometry of voting. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 48, 9-10, 1335-1356.10.1016/j.mcm.2008.05.033
- Saari, D. G. (2019) Arrow, and unexpected consequences of his theorem. Public Choice 179, 133–144.10.1007/s11127-018-0531-7
- Saari, D. G. (2021) Notes on Social Choice Theory. [Accessed: 2021, May 09] Available from: https://www.cse.wustl.edu/˜cytron/fdiv/PDFs/saariNotes.pdf
- Saari, D. G. and Barney S. (2003) Consequences of reversing preferences. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 25, 17-31.10.1007/BF02984858
- Saari, D. G. and Tataru, M. M. (1999) The likelihood of dubious election outcomes. Economic Theory 13: 345-363.10.1007/s001990050258
- Schoop, M. and Kilgour, D.M., eds. (2017) Group Decision and Negotiation. A Socio-Technical Perspective. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference, GDN 2017 Stuttgart, Germany, August 14–18, 2017. Springer, Cham.10.1007/978-3-319-63546-0
- Vehko, T., Ruotsalainen, S. and Hyppönen, H., eds. (2019) E-health and e-welfare of Finland. Checkpoint 2018. National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland.
- Zahid, M. A. (2012) A New Framework for Elections. Shaker Publishing, Maastricht.
Language: English
Page range: 401 - 412
Submitted on: Sep 1, 2020
Accepted on: Mar 1, 2021
Published on: Jun 27, 2022
Published by: Systems Research Institute Polish Academy of Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2022 Jaakko Hakula, published by Systems Research Institute Polish Academy of Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.