Deep Learning-Driven Workload Prediction and Optimization for Load Balancing in Cloud Computing Environment

Karimunnisa, Syed; Pachipala, Yellamma

doi:10.2478/cait-2024-0023

Abstract

Cloud computing revolutionizes as a technology that succeeds in serving large-scale user demands. Workload prediction and scheduling tend to be factors dictating cloud performance. Forecasting the future workload in due to avoid unfair resource allocation, emerges to be a crucial inspecting feature for enhanced performance. The aforementioned issues of interest are addressed in our work by soliciting a Deep Learning driven Max-out prediction model, which efficiently forecasts the future workload by providing a balanced approach for enhanced scheduling with the Tasmanian Devil-Bald Eagle Search (TDBES) optimization algorithm. The results obtained proved that the TDBES scored efficacy in makespan with 16.75%, migration cost with 14.78%, and a migration efficiency rate of 9.36% over other existing techniques like DBOA, WACO, and MPSO, with additional error analysis of prediction performance using RMSE, MAP, and MAE, among which our contributed approach overrides traditional methods with least error.

References

Ebadifard, F., S. M. Babamir. Autonomic Task Scheduling Algorithm for Dynamic Workloads through a Load Balancing Technique for the Cloud-Computing Environment. – Cluster Computing, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s10586-020-03177-0.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Devi, K. L., S. Valli. Multi‐Objective Heuristics Algorithm for Dynamic Resource Scheduling in the Cloud Computing Environment. – The Journal of Supercomputing, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s11227-020-03606-2.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaur, G., A. Bala. Prediction-Based Task Scheduling Approach for Food Plain Application in Cloud Environment. – Computing, Vol. 103, 2021, pp. 895-916. DOI: 10.1007/s00607-021-00936-8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaur, G., A. Bala. OPSA: An Optimized Prediction-Based Scheduling Approach for Scientific Applications in Cloud Environment. – Cluster Computing, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s10586-021-03232-4.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Li, H., Y. Zhao, S. Fang. CSL‐Driven and Energy‐Efcient Resource Scheduling in the Cloud Data Center. – The Journal of Supercomputing. DOI: 10.1007/s11227-019-03036-9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Karimunnisa, S., Y. Pachipala. Task Classification and Scheduling Using Enhanced Coot Optimization in Cloud Computing. – International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 2023. DOI: 10.22266/ijies2023.1031.43.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peng, Z., J. Lin, D. Cui, Q. Li, J. He. A Multi-Objective Trade-Off Framework for Cloud Resource Scheduling Based on the Deep Q-Network Algorithm. – Cluster Computing, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s10586-019-03042-9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shishira, S. R., A. Kandasamy. A Novel Feature Extraction Model for Large‐ Scale Workload Prediction in Cloud Environment. – SN Computer Science, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s42979-021-00730-5.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tarafdar, A., M. Debnath, S. Khatua, R. K. Das. Energy and Makespan Aware Scheduling of Deadline Sensitive Tasks in the Cloud Environment. – Journal of Grid Computing, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s10723-021-09548-0.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pachipala, Y., D. B. Dasari, V. V. R. M. Rao, P. Bethapudi, T. Srinivasarao. Workload Prioritization and Optimal Task Scheduling in Cloud: Introduction to Hybrid Optimization Algorithm. – Wireless Networks, 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s11276-024-03793-3.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nabi, S., M. Ahmed. OG‐RADL: Overall Performance‐Based Resource‐Aware Dynamic Load‐Balancer for Deadline Constrained Cloud Tasks. – The Journal of Supercomputing, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s11227-020-03544-z.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Singh, H., A. Bhasin, P. R. Kaveri. QRAS: Efficient Resource Allocation for Task Scheduling in Cloud Computing. – SN Appl. Sci., Vol. 3, 2021, 474. DOI: 10.1007/s42452-021-04489-5.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Leka, H. L., Z. Fengli, A. T. Kenea, N. W. Hundera, T. G. Tohye, A. T. Tegene. PSO-Based Ensemble Meta-Learning Approach for Cloud Virtual Machine Resource Usage Prediction. – Symmetry, Vol. 15, 2023.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Karimunnisa, S., Y. Pachipala. An AHP Based Task Scheduling and Optimal Resource Allocation in Cloud Computing. – International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 2023. DOI: 10.14569/ijacsa.2023.0140317.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Menon, S. M., P. Rajarajeswari. A Hybrid Machine Learning Approach for Drug Repositioning. – International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, Vol. 20, 2020, Issue 12, pp. 217-223.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Umbarkar, A. J., P. D. Sheth. Crossover Operators in Genetic Algorithms: A Review. – ICTACT Journal on Soft Computing, Vol. 6, October 2015, Issue 1. DOI: 10.21917/ijsc.2015.0150.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dickson, M. C., A. S. Bosman, K. M. Malan. Hybridised Loss Functions for Improved Neural Network Generalisation. – arXiv:2204.12244v1 [cs.LG] 26 April 2022.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ramadan, A., S. Kamel, M. H. Hassan, T. Khurshid, C. Rahmann. An Improved Bald Eagle Search Algorithm for Parameter Estimation of Different Photovoltaic Models. – Processes 2021, Vol. 9, 1127. DOI: 10.3390/pr9071127.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ilankumaran, A., S. J. Narayanan. An Energy-Aware QoS Load Balance Scheduling Using Hybrid GAACO Algorithm for Cloud. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 23, 2023, No 1, pp. 161-177.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Srivastava, V., K. Dwivedi, A. K. Singh. Cryptocurrency Price Prediction Using Enhanced PSO with Extreme Gradient Boosting Algorithm. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 23, 2023, No 2, pp. 170-187.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Guliashki, V., L. Kirilov, A. Nuzi. Optimization Models and Strategy Approaches Dealing with Economic Crises, Natural Disasters, and Pandemics – an Overview. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 23, 2023, No 4, pp. 3-25.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Matoussi, W., T. Hamrouni. A New Temporal Locality-Based Workload Prediction Approach for SaaS Services in a Cloud Environment. – Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.04.008.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Meyer, V. D., F. Kirchoff, M. L. Da Silva, C. A. F. De Rose. ML-Driven Classification Scheme for Dynamic Interference-Aware Resource Scheduling in Cloud Infrastructures. – Journal of Systems Architecture, Vol. 116, 2021.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Grzegorowski, M., E. Zdravevski, A. Janusz, P. Lameski, C. Apanowicz, D. Slezak. Cost Optimization for Big Data Workloads Based on Dynamic Scheduling and Cluster-Size Tuning. – Big Data Research, Vol. 25, 2021.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cao, M., Y. Li, X. Wen, Y. Zhao, J. Zhu. Energy-Aware Intelligent Scheduling for Deadline-Constrained Workflows in Sustainable Cloud Computing. – Egyptian Informatics Journal, Vol. 24, 2023, Issue 2.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bi, J., S. Li, H. Yuan, M. C. Zhou. Integrated Deep Learning Method for Workload and Resource Prediction in Cloud Systems. – Neurocomputing, Vol. 424, 2021, No 1.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kumar, J., A. K. Singh, R. Buyya. Self-Directed Learning Based Workload Forecasting Model for Cloud Resource Management. – Information Sciences, Vol. 543, 2021.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ji, K., F. Zhang, C. Chi, P. Song, B. Zhou, A. Marahatta, Z. Liu. A Joint Energy Efficiency Optimization Scheme Based on Marginal Cost and Workload Prediction in Data Centers. – Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, Vol. 32, 2021.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Xiao, Z., B. Wang, X. Li, J. Du. Workload-Driven Coordination between Virtual Machine Allocation and Task Scheduling. – Advances in Parallel and Distributed Computing for Neural Computing, Neural Computing and Applications, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-019-04022-1.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chandrashekar, C., P. Krishnadoss, V. K. Poornachary, B. Ananthakrishnan, K. Rangasamy. HWACOA Scheduler: Hybrid Weighted Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm for Task Scheduling in Cloud Computing. – Applied Sciences, Vol. 13, 2023, No 6, p. 3433. DOI: 10.3390/app13063433.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sharma, N., S. Beniwal, P. Garg. Ant Colony Based Optimization Model for QoS-Based Task Scheduling in Cloud Computing Environment. – SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4237751.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chaudhary, S., V. K. Sharma, R. N. Thakur, A. Rathi, P. Kumar, S. Sharma. Modified Particle Swarm Optimization Based on Aging Leaders and Challengers Model for Task Scheduling in Cloud Computing. – Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Vol. 2023, 2023, No 1. DOI: 10.1155/2023/3916735.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hosseinzadeh, M., et al. Improved Butterfly Optimization Algorithm for Data Placement and Scheduling in Edge Computing Environments. – Journal of Grid Computing, Vol. 19, March 2021, No 2, DOI: 10.1007/s10723-021-09556-0.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mangalampalli, S., S. K. Swain, V. K. Mangalampalli. Multi Objective Task Scheduling in Cloud Computing Using Cat Swarm Optimization Algorithm. – Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Vol. 47, September 2021, No 2, pp. 1821-1830. DOI: 10.1007/s13369-021-06076-7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peta, J,. S. Koppu. An IoT-Based Framework and Ensemble Optimized Deep Maxout Network Model for Breast Cancer Classification. – Electronics, Vol. 11, 2022, 4137. DOI: 10.3390/electronics11244137.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dickson, M. C., A. S. Bosman, K. M. Malan. Hybridised Loss Functions for Improved Neural Network Generalisation. – arXiv:2204.12244v1 [cs.LG] 26 April 2022.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dehghani, M., T. P. Hubalovsky, P. Trojovsky. Tasmanian Devil Optimization: A New Bio-Inspired Optimization Algorithm for Solving Optimization Algorithm. – Digital Object Identifier, Vol. 10, 2022. DOI: 10.1109/Access.2022.3151641.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Alsattar, H. A., A. A. Zaidan, B. B. Zaidan. Novelmeta-Heuristic Bald Eagle Search Optimization Algorithm. – Artificial Intelligence Review, Vol. 53, 2020, No 6. DOI: 10.1007/s10462-019-09732-5.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ramadan, A., S. Kamel, M. H. Hassan, T. Khurshid, C. Rahmann. An Improved Bald Eagle Search Algorithm for Parameter Estimation of Different Photovoltaic Models. – Processes, Vol. 9, 2021, 1127. DOI: 10.3390/pr9071127.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yang, X., J. Liu, Y. Liu, P. Xu, L. Yu, L. Zhu, H. Chen, W. Deng. A Novel Adaptive Sparrow Search Algorithm Based on Chaotic Mapping and T-Distribution Mutation. – Appl. Sci., Vol. 11, 2021, 11192. DOI: 10.3390/app112311192.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Umbarkar, A. J., P. D. Sheth. Crossover Operators in Genetic Algorithms: A Review. – ICTACT Journal on Soft Computing, Vol. 6, 2015, Issue 1. DOI: 10.21917/ijsc.2015.0150.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
https://research.google/tools/datasets/google-cluster-workload-traces-2019/
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Deep Learning-Driven Workload Prediction and Optimization for Load Balancing in Cloud Computing Environment

Abstract

Paradigm

My account