References
- 1. Murai, Y, D. Whitney. Serial Dependence Revealed in History-Dependent Perceptual Templates. – Curr Biol., Vol. 31, 2021, No 14, pp. 3185-3191.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.05.006.831910734087105
- 2. Bialek, W. Physical Limits to Sensation and Perception. – Annual Review of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Vol. 16, 1987, pp. 455-478.10.1146/annurev.bb.16.060187.002323
- 3. Faisal, A. A., L. P. Selen, D. M. Wolpert. Noise in the Nervous System. Nature Reviews. – Neuroscience, Vol. 9, 2008, No 4, pp. 292-303.10.1038/nrn2258
- 4. Sternad, D. It’s Not (Only) the Mean That Matters: Variability, Noise and Exploration in Skill Learning. – Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci., Vol. 20, 2018, pp. 183-195. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.01.004.605154530035207
- 5. Pelli, D. G., B. Farell. Why Use Noise? – Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision, Vol. 16, 1999, No 3, pp. 647-653.10.1364/JOSAA.16.000647
- 6. Hu, X., Y. Qin, X. Ying et al. Temporal Characteristics of Visual Processing in Amblyopia. – Front Neurosci., Vol. 15, 2021, 673491. Published 3 Jun 2021. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.673491.821108834149348
- 7. Mc Anany, J. J., J. C. Park, G. A. Fishman, R. A. Hyde. Contrast Sensitivity and Equivalent Intrinsic Noise in X-Linked Retinoschisis. – Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol., Vol. 11, 2022, No 3,7. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.11.3.7.891456735258559
- 8. Liu, R., M. Kwon. Increased Equivalent Input Noise in Glaucomatous Central Vision: Is It due to Undersampling of Retinal Ganglion Cells? – Invest Ophthalmol Vis. Sci., Vol. 61, 2020, No 8, 10. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.61.8.10.742573432645132
- 9. Braham Chaouche, A., D. Silvestre, A. Trognon, A. Arleo, R. Allard. Age-Related Decline in Motion Contrast Sensitivity due to Lower Absorption Rate of Cones and Calculation Efficiency. – Sci. Rep., Vol. 10, 2020, No 1, 16521. Published 5 October 2020. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73322-7.753641533020552
- 10. Manning, C., M. S. Tibber, S. C. Dakin. Visual Integration of Direction and Orientation Information in Autistic Children. – ADLI, Vol. 2, 2017, pp. 1-16. DOI: 10.1177/2396941517694626.
- 11. Bocheva, N., I. Hristov, S. Stefanov, T. Totev, S. N. Staykova, M. S. Mihaylova. How the External Visual Noise Affects Motion Direction Discrimination in Autism Spectrum Disorder. – Behav Sci (Basel), Vol. 12, 2022, No 4, 113. Published 18 April 2022. DOI: 10.3390/bs12040113.903171035447685
- 12. Solomon, J. A., D. G. Pelli. The Visual Filter Mediating Letter Identification. – Nature, Vol. 36, 1994, No 9 (6479), pp. 395-397. https://doi.org/10.1038/369395a010.1038/369395a0
- 13. Ridder, W. H. 3rd. A Comparison of Contrast Sensitivity and Sweep Visual Evoked Potential (sVEP) Acuity Estimates in Normal Humans. – Doc. Ophthalmol., Vol. 139, 2019, No 3, pp. 207-219. DOI: 10.1007/s10633-019-09712-8.31414313
- 14. Vera-Diaz, F. A., P. J. Bex, A. Ferreira, A. Kosovicheva. Binocular Temporal Visual Processing in Myopia. – J. of Vis., Vol. 18, 2018, No 11, 17. DOI: 10.1167/18.11.17.620555930372727
- 15. Wang, H., G. E. Legge. Comparing the Minimum Spatial-Frequency Content for Recognizing Chinese and Alphabet Characters. – J. of Vis., Vol. 18, 2018, No 1, 1. DOI: 10.1167/18.1.1.574964829297056
- 16. Hussain, Z., P. J. Bennett. Perceptual Learning of Detection of Textures in Noise. – J. of Vis., Vol. 20, 2020, No 7, 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.7.22.742495632692831
- 17. Lindborg, A., T. S. Andersen. Bayesian Binding and Fusion Models Explain Illusion and Enhancement Effects in Audiovisual Speech Perception. – PloS One., Vol. 16, 2021, No 2, e0246986. Published 19 February 2021. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246986.789537233606815
- 18. Ohnishi, M, K. Oda. Unresolvable Pixels Contribute to Character Legibility: Another Reason Why High-Resolution Images Appear Clearer. – Iperception, Vol. 11, 2020, No 6, 2041669520981102. Published 26 December 2020. DOI: 10.1177/2041669520981102.776832433489075
- 19. Eckstein, M. P., A. J. Ahumada. Classification Images: A Tool to Analyze Visual Strategies. – J. of Vis., Vol. 2, 2002, No 1, 1x. https://doi.org/10.1167/2.1.i10.1167/2.1.i
- 20. Levi, D. M., S. A. Klein. Noise Provides Some New Signals about the Spatial Vision of Amblyopes. – Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 23, 2003, pp. 2522-2526.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-07-02522.2003
- 21. Allard, R., J. Faubert. Double Dissociation between First- and Second-Order Processing. – Vis. Res., Vol. 47, 2007, pp. 1129-1141. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.01.010.17363024
- 22. Allard, R., J. Faubert. First- and Second-Order Motion Mechanisms are Distinct at Low but Common at High Temporal Frequencies. – J. of Vis., Vol. 8, 2008, pp. 1-17. DOI: 10.1167/8.2.12.18318638
- 23. Drewes, J., W. Zhu, D. Melcher. The Optimal Spatial Noise for Continuous Flash Suppression Masking is Pink. – Sci. Rep., Vol. 10, 2020, 6943. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63888-710.1038/s41598-020-63888-7718169632332984
- 24. Han, S., D. Alais. Strength of Continuous Flash Suppression is Optimal when Target and Masker Modulation Rates are Matched. – J. of Vis., Vol. 18, 2018, No 3, 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/18.3.3.29677318
- 25. Di Mattina, C., C. L. Baker. Modeling Second-Order Boundary Perception: A Machine Learning Approach. – PloS Comput Biol., Vol. 15, 2019, No 3, e1006829. Published 18 March 2019. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006829.643856930883556
- 26. Ahumada, A. J. Classification Image Weights and Internal Noise Level Estimation. – J. of Vis., Vol. 2, 2002, No 1, pp. 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1167/2.1.810.1167/2.1.812678600
- 27. Gold, J., A. Sekuler, P. Bennett. Characterizing Perceptual Learning with External Noise. – Cognitive Science, Vol. 28, 2004, pp. 167-207.10.1207/s15516709cog2802_3
- 28. Jeon, S. T., Z. L. Lu, B. A. Dosher. Characterizing Perceptual Performance at Multiple Discrimination Precisions in External Noise. – Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optica Publishing Group, Vol. 26, 2009, pp. B43-B58. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.26.000B4310.1364/JOSAA.26.000B43282944619884915
- 29. Taylor, C. P., P. J. Bennett, A. B. Sekuler. Evidence for Adjustable Bandwidth Orientation Channels. – Front. Psychol., Vol. 5, 2014, No 578. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00578.405401424971069
- 30. Gold, J. M. Information Processing Correlates of a Size-Contrast Illusion. – Front. Psychol., Vol. 5, 2014, No 142. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00142.392854024600430
- 31. Treviño, M., B. Dela Torre-Valdovinos, E. Manjarrez. Noise Improves Visual Motion Discrimination via a Stochastic Resonance-Like Phenomenon. – Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 10, 2016, 572. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.0057210.3389/fnhum.2016.00572512010927932960
- 32. Benuci, A. Motor-Related Signals Support Localization Invariance for Stable Visual Perception. – PloS Computational Biology, Vol. 18, 2022, No 3, e1009928. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.100992810.1371/journal.pcbi.1009928894759035286305
- 33. Söderlund, G., J. Åsberg Johnels, B. Rothén, E. Torstensson-Hultberg, A. Magnusson, L. Fälth. Sensory White Noise Improves Reading Skills and Memory Recall in Children with Reading Disability. – Brain and Behavior, Vol. 11, 2021, No 7, e02114. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.211410.1002/brb3.2114832303234096202
- 34. Park, W. J., K. B. Schauder, R. Zhang, L. Bennetto, D. Tadin. High Internal Noise and Poor External Noise Filtering Characterize Perception in Autism Spectrum Disorder. – Scientific Reports, Vol. 7, 2017, No 1, 17584.10.1038/s41598-017-17676-5573055529242499
- 35. Gao, X., E. A. Stine-Morrow, S. R. Noh, R. T. Eskew. Visual Noise Disrupts Conceptual Integration in Reading. – Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Vol. 18, 2011, No 1, pp. 83-88.10.3758/s13423-010-0014-421327368
- 36. Wang, Zh., A. Bovik, H. Sheikh, E. Simoncelli. Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity. – IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 13, April 2004, No 4, pp. 600-612. DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2003.819861.
- 37. Simoncelli, E. P., B. A. Olshausen. Natural Image Statistics and Neural Representation. – Annual Review of Neuroscience, Vol. 24, 2001, pp. 1193-1216. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.119310.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.119311520932
- 38. Krause, M. R., C. C. Pack. Contextual Modulation and Stimulus Selectivity in Extrastriate Cortex. – Vision Research, Vol. 104, 2014, pp. 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2014.10.00610.1016/j.visres.2014.10.00625449337
- 39. Shtereva, K., M. Stefanova, N. Bocheva, B. Hadjiyska, T. Totev, M. Mihaylova. Grapheme-Level Errors in Reading Words and Pseudo-Words by Children and Adolescent with Autism Spectrum Disorder. – In: Proc. of International Conference Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, Albena, 2020, pp. 221-232. ISBN 978-954-9458-28-2.
- 40. Boyat, A., B. Joshi. A Review Paper: Noise Models in Digital Image Processing. – ArXiv, abs/1505.03489, 2015.
- 41. Suryanarayana, S., B. Deekshatulu, K. Lal Kishore, R. Kumar. Estimation and Removal of Gaussian Noise in Digital Images. – International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Vol. 5, 2012, pp. 23-33.
- 42. Boncelet, Ch. Image Noise Models. – In Bovik, A. C. Handbook of Image and Video Processing, 2005.
- 43. Goodman, J. Some Fundamental Properties of Speckle. – Journal of the Optical Society of America, Vol. 66, 1976, pp. 1145-1150.10.1364/JOSA.66.001145