Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Optimization of Cross Diagonal Pixel Value Differencing and Modulus Function Steganography Using Edge Area Block Patterns Cover

Optimization of Cross Diagonal Pixel Value Differencing and Modulus Function Steganography Using Edge Area Block Patterns

Cybernetics and Information Technologies
Volume 22 (2022): Issue 2 (June 2022)
By: Supriadi Rustad,  Ignatius Moses Setiadi De Rosal,  Pulung Nurtantio Andono,  Abdul Syukur and  Purwanto  
Open Access
|Jun 2022

References

  1. 1. Darwis, D., A. Junaidi, D. A. Shofiana. Wamiliana: A New Digital Image Steganography Based on Center Embedded Pixel Positioning. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 21, 2021, No 2, pp. 89-104.10.2478/cait-2021-0021
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. 2. Cheddad, A., J. Condell, K. Curran, P. Mc Kevitt. Digital Image Steganography: Survey and Analysis of Current Methods. – Signal Processing, Elsevier, 2010.10.1016/j.sigpro.2009.08.010
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. 3. Hussain, M., A. W. A. Wahab, Y. I. B. Idris, A. T. S. Ho, K.-H. Jung. Image Steganography in Spatial Domain: A Survey. – Signal Process. Image Commun., Vol. 65, 2018, pp. 46-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.image.2018.03.01210.1016/j.image.2018.03.012
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. 4. Kadhim, I. J., P. Premaratne, P. J. Vial, B. Halloran. Comprehensive Survey of Image Steganography: Techniques, Evaluations, and Trends in Future Research. – Neurocomputing, Vol. 335, 2019, pp. 299-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.06.07510.1016/j.neucom.2018.06.075
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. 5. Rustad, S., D. R. I. M. Setiadi, A. Syukur, P. N. Andono. Inverted LSB Image Steganography Using Adaptive Pattern to Improve Imperceptibility. – J. King Saud Univ., Comput. Inf. Sci., 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.12.01710.1016/j.jksuci.2020.12.017
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. 6. Setiadi, D. R. I. M. Improved Payload Capacity in LSB Image Steganography Uses Dilated Hybrid Edge Detection. – J. King Saud Univ., Comput. Inf. Sci., 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.12.00710.1016/j.jksuci.2019.12.007
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. 7. Wang, Y., M. Tang, Z. Wang. High-Capacity Adaptive Steganography Based on LSB and Hamming Code. – Optik (Stuttg), Vol. 213, 2020, 164685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.16468510.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164685
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. 8. Pradhan, A., K. R. Sekhar, G. Swain. Adaptive PVD Steganography Using Horizontal, Vertical, and Diagonal Edges in Six-Pixel Blocks. – Secur. Commun. Networks., Vol. 2017, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/192461810.1155/2017/1924618
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. 9. Setiadi, D. R. I. M., J. Jumanto. An Enhanced LSB-Image Steganography Using the Hybrid Canny-Sobel Edge Detection. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 18, 2018, No 2, pp. 74-88.10.2478/cait-2018-0029
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. 10. Bai, J., C.-C. Chang, T.-S. Nguyen, C. Zhu, Y. Liu. A High Payload Steganographic Algorithm Based on Edge Detection. – Displays, Vol. 46, 2017, pp. 42-51.10.1016/j.displa.2016.12.004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. 11. Mukherjee, S., G. Sanyal. Edge Based Image Steganography with Variable Threshold. – Multimed. Tools Appl., Vol. 78, 2019, pp. 16363-16388.10.1007/s11042-018-6975-4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. 12. Nashat, D., L. Mamdouh. An Efficient Steganographic Technique for Hiding Data. – J. Egypt. Math. Soc., Vol. 27, 2019, 57.10.1186/s42787-019-0061-6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. 13. Sahu, A. K., G. Swain, E. S. Babu. Digital Image Steganography Using Bit Flipping. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 18, 2018, No 1, pp. 69-80.10.2478/cait-2018-0006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. 14. Muhammad, K., J. Ahmad, N. U. Rehman, Z. Jan, M. Sajjad. CISSKA-LSB: Color Image Steganography Using Stego Key-Directed Adaptive LSB Substitution Method. – Multimed. Tools Appl., Vol. 76, 2017, pp. 8597-8626.10.1007/s11042-016-3383-5
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. 15. Hameed, M. A., M. Hassaballah, S. Aly, A. I. Awad. An Adaptive Image Steganography Method Based on Histogram of Oriented Gradient and PVD-LSB Techniques. – IEEE Access., Vol. 7, 2019, pp. 185189-185204.10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2960254
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. 16. Pak, C., J. Kim, K. An, C. Kim, K. Kim, C. Pak. A Novel Color Image LSB Steganography Using Improved 1D Chaotic Map. Multimed. – Tools Appl., Vol. 79, 2020, pp. 1409-1425.10.1007/s11042-019-08103-0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. 17. Sharafi, J., Y. Khedmati, M. M. Shabani. Image Steganography Based on a New Hybrid Chaos Map and Discrete Transforms. – Optik, Vol. 226, 2021, 165492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.16549210.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165492
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. 18. Sari, C. A., G. Ardiansyah, D. R. I. M. Setiadi, E. H. Rachmawanto. An Improved Security and Message Capacity Using AES and Huffman Coding on Image Steganography. – TELKOMNIKA (Telecommunication Comput. Electron. Control), Vol. 17, 2018, pp. 2400-240910.12928/telkomnika.v17i5.9570
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. 19. Astuti, Y. P., D. R. I. M. Setiadi, E. H. Rachmawanto, C. A. Sari. Simple and Secure Image Steganography Using LSB and Triple XOR Operation on MSB. – In: Proc. of International Conference on Information and Communications Technology, ICOIACT’18, Yogyakarta, 2018.10.1109/ICOIACT.2018.8350661
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. 20. Setiadi, D. R. I. M. PSNR vs. SSIM: Imperceptibility Quality Assessment for Image Steganography. Multimed. – Tools Appl., Vol. 80, 2021, pp. 8423-8444.10.1007/s11042-020-10035-z
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. 21. Swain, G. Digital Image Steganography Using Eight-Directional PVD against RS Analysis and PDH Analysis. – Adv. Multimed., Vol. 2018, 2018.10.1155/2018/4847098
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. 22. Swain, G. Adaptive Pixel Value Differencing Steganography Using Both Vertical and Horizontal Edges. – Multimed. Tools Appl., Vol. 75, 2016, pp. 13541-13556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-2937-210.1007/s11042-015-2937-2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. 23. Abdel Hameed, M., S. Aly, M. Hassaballah. An Efficient Data Hiding Method Based on Adaptive Directional Pixel Value Differencing (ADPVD). – Multimed. Tools Appl., Vol. 77, 2018, pp. 14705-14723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-5056-410.1007/s11042-017-5056-4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. 24. Sahu, A. K., G. Swain. An Optimal Information Hiding Approach Based on Pixel Value Differencing and Modulus Function. – Wirel. Pers. Commun., Vol. 108, 2019, pp. 159-174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06393-z10.1007/s11277-019-06393-z
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. 25. Wu, D.-C., W.-H. Tsai. A Steganographic Method for Images by Pixel-Value Differencing. – Pattern Recognit. Lett., Vol. 24, 2003, pp. 1613-1626. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8655(02)00402-610.1016/S0167-8655(02)00402-6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. 26. Swain, G. Two New Steganography Techniques Based on Quotient Value Differencing with Addition-Subtraction Logic and PVD with Modulus Function. – Optik (Stuttg)., Vol. 180, 2019, pp. 807-823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.11.01510.1016/j.ijleo.2018.11.015
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. 27. Lin, W. B., T. H. Lai, C. L. Chou. Chi-Square-Based Steganalysis Method against Modified Pixel-Value Differencing Steganography. – Arab. J. Sci. Eng., Vol. 469. 2021, No 46, pp. 8525-8533. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13369-021-05554-210.1007/s13369-021-05554-2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. 28. Shen, S., L. Huang, Q. Tian. A Novel Data Hiding for Color Images Based on Pixel Value Difference and Modulus Function. – Multimed. Tools Appl., Vol. 74, 2015, pp. 707-728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-014-2016-010.1007/s11042-014-2016-0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. 29. Li, Z., Y. He. Steganography with Pixel-Value Differencing and Modulus Function Based on PSO. – J. Inf. Secur. Appl., Vol. 43, 2018, pp. 47-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2018.10.00610.1016/j.jisa.2018.10.006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. 30. Wang, Z., J. Zhang, X. Liao, Q. Wen. Data Embedding Based on Pixel Value Differencing and Modulus Function Using Indeterminate Equation. – J. China Univ. Posts Telecommun., Vol. 22, 2015, pp. 95-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1005-8885(15)60631-810.1016/S1005-8885(15)60631-8
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. 31. Jung, K. H. High-Capacity Data Hiding Scheme Based on Exploiting Modification Direction and Modulo Operation. – Adv. Sci. Lett., Vol. 22, 2016, pp. 2471-2474. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2016.780510.1166/asl.2016.7805
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. 32. Gaurav, K., U. Ghanekar. Image Steganography Based on Canny Edge Detection, Dilation Operator and Hybrid Coding. – J. Inf. Secur. Appl., Vol. 41, 2018, pp. 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2018.05.00110.1016/j.jisa.2018.05.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. 33. Chen, W.-J., C.-C. Chang, T. H. N. Le. High Payload Steganography Mechanism Using Hybrid Edge Detector. – Expert Syst. Appl., Vol. 37, 2010, pp. 3292-3301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.09.05010.1016/j.eswa.2009.09.050
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. 34. Al-Dmour, H., A. Al-Ani. A Steganography Embedding Method Based on Edge Identification and XOR Coding. – Expert Syst. Appl., Vol. 46, 2016, pp. 293-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.10.02410.1016/j.eswa.2015.10.024
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. 35. Ioannidou, A., S. T. Halkidis, G. Stephanides. A Novel Technique for Image Steganography Based on a High Payload Method and Edge Detection. – Expert Syst. Appl., Vol. 39, 2012, pp. 11517-11524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.10610.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.106
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. 36. Kumar, R., D. S. Kim, K. H. Jung. Enhanced AMBTC Based Data Hiding Method Using Hamming Distance and Pixel Value Differencing. – J. Inf. Secur. Appl., Vol. 47, 2019, pp. 94-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2019.04.00710.1016/j.jisa.2019.04.007
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. 37. Fridrich, J., M. Goljan, R. Du. Detecting LSB Steganography in Color and Gray-Scale Images. – IEEE Multimed., Vol. 8, 2001, pp. 22-28. https://doi.org/10.1109/93.95909710.1109/93.959097
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cait-2022-0022 | Journal eISSN: 1314-4081 | Journal ISSN: 1311-9702
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 145 - 159
Submitted on: Nov 23, 2021
Accepted on: Apr 18, 2022
Published on: Jun 23, 2022
Published by: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information and Communication Technologies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Pixel value differencing,
modulus function,
image steganography,
edge detection,
enhanced payload capacity
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Information technology

© 2022 Supriadi Rustad, Ignatius Moses Setiadi De Rosal, Pulung Nurtantio Andono, Abdul Syukur, Purwanto, published by Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information and Communication Technologies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 22 (2022): Issue 2 (June 2022)Next article