Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Implementation of Credit Risk Scorecard Using Ontology Design Patterns and BCBS 239 Cover

The Implementation of Credit Risk Scorecard Using Ontology Design Patterns and BCBS 239

Open Access
|Jun 2020

References

  1. 1. BCBS (n.d.). The Basel Committee – Overview. Retrieved September 2019. https://www.bis.org/bcbs/index.htm
  2. 2. BCBS (n.d.). Principles for Effective Risk Data Aggregation and Risk Reporting. Retrieved September 2019. https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs239.pdf
  3. 3. Prorokowski, L., H. Prorokowski. Solutions for Risk Data Compliance under BCBS 239. – Journal of Investment Compliance, 2 November 2015, pp. 66-77.10.1108/JOIC-01-2015-0015
  4. 4. Chandrasekaran, B., J. Josephson, R. Benjamins. What Are Ontologies, and Why Do We Need Them? – Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, IEEE, Vol. 14, 1999, pp. 20-26.10.1109/5254.747902
  5. 5. Gruber, T. A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications. – Knowledge Acquisition, 1993, pp. 199-220. DOI:10.1006/knac.1993.1008.10.1006/knac.1993.1008
  6. 6. Cruz, I., H. Xiao, AdvisLab. The Role of Ontologies in Data Integration. – Jounal of Engineering Intelligent Systems, Vol. 13, 2005, No 4, pp. 1-18.
  7. 7. Gagnon, M. Ontology-Based Integration of Data Sources. – In: Proc. of 10th International Conference on Information Fusion, Quebec, Canada, 2007, pp. 1-8.10.1109/ICIF.2007.4408086
  8. 8. Subirats, L., R. Gil, R. García. Personalization of Ontologies Visualization: Use Case of Diabetes. – In: G. Alor-Hernández, J. Sánchez-Cervantes, A. Rodríguez-González, R. Valencia-García, Eds. Current Trends in Semantic Web Technologies: Theory and Practice, Vol. 815, 2019, pp. 3-24.10.1007/978-3-030-06149-4_1
  9. 9. Dwivedi, S., A. Kumar. Development of University Ontology for aSPOCMS. – Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, Vol. 5, August 2013, No 3, pp. 213-221.10.4304/jetwi.5.3.213-221
  10. 10. Forbes, D., P. Wongthongtham, J. Singh, S. Thompson. Ontology Supported Assistive Communications in Healthcare. – Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 34, 2014, pp. 297-322.10.17705/1CAIS.03414
  11. 11. The Gene Ontology Consortium. The Gene Ontology Resource: 20 Years and Still GOing Strong. – In: Nucleic Acids Res., 2018. DOI:10.1093/nar/gky1055.10.1093/nar/gky1055632394530395331
  12. 12. Yan, H., F. Zhang, B. Liu. Granular Computing Based Ontology Learning Model and Its Applications. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 16, 2016, No 4, pp. 29-44.
  13. 13. Kontopoulos, E., G. Martinopoulos, D. Lazarou, N. Bassiliades. An Ontology-Based Decision Support Tool for Optimizing Domestic Solar Hot Water System Selection. – Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 112, 2016, No 5, pp. 4636-4646.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.088
  14. 14. Monnin, P., C. Jonquet, J. Legrand, A. Napoli. PGxO: A Very Lite Ontology to Reconcile Pharmacogenomic Knowledge Units. – PeerJ Preprints 5:e3140v1., 2017. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3140v110.7287/peerj.preprints.3140v1
  15. 15. Brüggemann, S. Rule Mining for Automatic Ontology Based Data Cleaning. – In: Y. Zhang, G. Yu, E. Bertino, U. Xu, Eds. APWeb 2008. 4976, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 2008, pp. 522-527. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78849-2_5210.1007/978-3-540-78849-2_52
  16. 16. Buranarach, M., T. Supnithi, Y. Thein, T. Ruangrajitpakorn, T. Rattanasawad, K. Wongpatikaseree, A. O. Lim, Y. Tan, A. Assawamakin. OAM: An Ontology Application Management Framework for Simplifying Ontology-Based Semantic Web Application Development. – International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Vol. 26, 2016, No 1, pp. 115-145.10.1142/S0218194016500066
  17. 17. Eine, B., M. Jurisch, W. Quint. Ontology-Based Big Data Management. – Systems, Vol. 5, 2017, No 45.10.3390/systems5030045
  18. 18. Michael, A., R. Kothandaraman, K. Kaliyan. Providing Ontology-Based Access Control for Cloud Data by Exploiting. – International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, Vol. 12, 2019, No 3, pp. 280-291. DOI:10.22266/ijies2019.0630.27.10.22266/ijies2019.0630.27
  19. 19. EDM Council. The Financial Industry Business Ontology (FIBO). 2008. Retrieved Sptember 2019. https://spec.edmcouncil.org/fibo/index.html
  20. 20. Wisnosky, D. The FIBO Leadership Team. FIBO™ Build, Test, Deploy and Maintain Methodology. 30 September 2017. Retrieved 30 September 2019, from EDM Council. https://spec.edmcouncil.org/fibo/doc/20170930_FIBO_BTDM.pdf
  21. 21. Abdelghany, A. S., N. R. Darwish, H. A. Hefni. An Agile Methodology for Ontology Development. – International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, Vol. 12, 2019, No 2, pp. 170-181. DOI:10.22266/ijies2019.0430.17.10.22266/ijies2019.0430.17
  22. 22. Axelsson, J., E. Papatheocharous, J. Nyfjord, M. Törngren. Notes on Agile and Safety-Critical Development. – ASM SIGSOFT Software Engeneering, Vol. 41, March 2016, No 2, pp. 23-26.10.1145/2894784.2894796
  23. 23. The Gene Ontology Consortium (n.d.). Gene Ontology Resource. Retrieved September 2019. http://geneontology.org/
  24. 24. Fox, M., J. Chionglo, F. Fadel (n.d.). TOVE Project. Retrieved September 2019. http://www.eil.utoronto.ca/projects/tove-project/
  25. 25. Bennett, M. Providing Conceptual Disambiguation for Terms in Reusable Ontologies: A Case Study from FIBO. – In: 6th International Workshop on Ontologies and Conceptual Modeling (Onto.Com), 2205. Cape Town, South Africa, 2018.
  26. 26. Zaino, J. Banking on FIBO: Financial Institutions Turn to Semantic Standard. 2016. Retrieved September 2019. https://www.dataversity.net/banking-fibo-financial-institutions-turn-standard-value-compliance/
  27. 27. ElHassouni, J., A. ElQadi, M. Bazzi, M. ElHaziti. Modeling with Ontologies Design Patterns: Credit Scorecard as a Case Study. – Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vol. 17, January 2020, No 1, pp. 429-439. DOI:10.11591/ijeecs.v17.i1.10.11591/ijeecs.v17.i1
  28. 28. Gangemi, A., V. Presutti. Ontology Design Patterns. – In: S. Staab, R. Studer, Eds. Handbook on Ontologies. International Handbooks on Information Systems. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 2009, pp. 221-243.10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_10
  29. 29. Ferrario, R. Who Cares about Axiomatization? Representation, Invariance, and Formal Ontologies, Epistemologia. – Epistemologia, Vol. 2, 2006, pp. 323-342. http://www.cnr.it/prodotto/i/69465
  30. 30. Suppose, P. Heuristics and the Axiomatic Method. – Models and Methods in the Philosophy of Science. – Selected Essays, Vol. 226, pp. 55-65. Preprint. – In: Synthese Library. Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2300-8_510.1007/978-94-017-2300-8_5
  31. 31. Krötzsch, M., F. Simancik, I. Horrocks. A Description Logic Primer. ArxIV; Preprint: 2012. arXiv CoRR abs/1201.4089.
  32. 32. Sarker, M., A. Krisnadhi, P. Hitzler. OWLAx: A Protégé Plugin to Support Ontology Axiomatization through Diagramming. – In: T. Kawamura, H. Paulheim, Eds. Proceedings of the ISWC 2016 Posters & Demonstrations Track Co-Located with 15th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC’16), Kobe, Japan, 2016.
  33. 33. PovedaVillalón, M. (n.d.). OOPS! (OntOlogy Pitfall Scanner!). Retrieved September 2019. http://oops.linkeddata.es
  34. 34. PovedaVillalón, M. Ontology Evaluation: A Pitfall-Based Approach to Ontology Diagnosis. Phd Thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, 2016.
  35. 35. Parsia, B., N. Matentzoglu, R. Gonçalves, B. Glimm, A. Steigmiller. The OWL Reasoner Evaluation (ORE) 2015 Competition. – Automated Reasoning, 2015. DOI:10.1007/s10817-017-9406-8.10.1007/s10817-017-9406-8604426530069067
  36. 36. Glimm, B., I. Horrocks, B. Motik, G. Stoilos, Z. Wang. HermiT: An OWL 2 Reasoner. – Automated Reasoning, 2014, pp. 1-25. DOI:10.1007/s10817-014-9305-1.10.1007/s10817-014-9305-1
  37. 37. Horridge, M., S. Bechhofer. The OWL API: A Java API for OWL. – Semantic Web Journal, Vol. 2, 2011, No 1, pp. 11-21.10.3233/SW-2011-0025
  38. 38. Blomqvist, E., A. SeilSepour, V. Presutti. Ontology Testing – Methodology and Tool. – In: K. E. Management, Ed. Proc. of 18th International Conference EKAW 2012, Galway, Irland. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, October 2012, pp. 216-226.10.1007/978-3-642-33876-2_20
  39. 39. The Apache Software Foundation. Apache Jena – ARQ – A SPARQL Processor for Jena. 2017, Retrieved September 2019. http://jena.apache.org/documentation/query
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cait-2020-0019 | Journal eISSN: 1314-4081 | Journal ISSN: 1311-9702
Language: English
Page range: 93 - 104
Submitted on: Feb 10, 2020
Accepted on: Mar 20, 2020
Published on: Jun 12, 2020
Published by: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information and Communication Technologies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Jalil Elhassouni, Abderrahim El qadi, Yasser El madani El alami, Mohamed El haziti, published by Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information and Communication Technologies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.